Categories
Health

I Feel Bad Wasn't Written for a Woman of Color. Then Sarayu Blue Auditioned.


Sarayu Blue was debating a career change—or, at very least, a pivot—when the actress landed the part of Emet on I Feel Bad, NBC’s new comedy from Amy Poehler. “I wasn’t like, ‘Oh, I quit,'” she explains. “It was more of a really deep frustration with the industry and feeling like there was a cap on what, as a woman of color, I was going to be allowed to do.”

That’s not to say Blue isn’t proud of her résumé so far. She is! She’s had great experiences with roles on just about every hit procedural and sitcom you can name (NCIS: Los Angeles, Grey’s Anatomy, The Big Bang Theory) as well as a memorable part in this year’s Blockers. But after more than a decade auditioning for what she jokes are “four-line doctor roles,” Blue started to feel discouraged. She questioned her long-term plan. She thought, “I gotta figure something out to be able to not be broke at 85.”

Acting is like being in a dysfunctional relationship, she explains. Right when you’re ready to call it, you get just enough to keep going.

“In my experience, if it wasn’t written specifically for a woman of color…a lead role wasn’t going my way.”

“I turned to my husband and said, ‘I think I’ve got about one more pilot season in me,'” Blue remembers. “And he looked at me with heartbreak. I mean, he was so sad that’s where I was. It really broke his heart.” She tears up remembering this story, because, “it just makes it mean so much more now.”

That “it” is playing Emet, a mother/daughter/wife/coworker who’s just trying to keep it all together. When Blue saw the role, she knew she wanted it. Bad. She remembers shaking as she left the audition, thinking, Oh my God, I think I nailed it. After that came a studio test, then a network test, and a read with Paul Adelstein, who plays Emet’s husband David. Still, Blue knew well enough by now that roles can come and go at anytime, for any reason. It’s the nature of the business.

Another factor she considered: Emet wasn’t written specifically for an Indian woman. “I was the only woman of color testing for it,” she says. “It was one of those experiences where you go, ‘Oh, it’s either going to go that way or this way.'” In other words, she wasn’t really in competition with anyone for the part—she was auditioning for “the concept of me doing the role.”

PHOTO: Getty Images

PHOTO: Getty Images

PHOTO: Getty Images

But it worked: Blue got the part, and it had ripple effects for the rest of the show’s casting. “It brings this cultural specificity,” she explains. “You have to get Indian parents, you have to get biracial children.”

Blue compares this to a Cinderella story: Colorblind casting is still so unheard of in the industry that it’s a fairytale. A fantasy.

“There have been plenty of times I read for the leads of pilots, and I’ve called up my manager and said, ‘I’m not going to get this. You still want me to go in?'” Blue says. “Not to be cynical. I’m happy to go in; I love auditioning. But I had the awareness at that point that it was like, ‘They’re not going to do that.'”

“I’ve heard a lot of people when I got [I Feel Bad] say, ‘Where did she come from? We didn’t know you could do this!'”

When I ask her to elaborate, she says, “In my experience, if it wasn’t written specifically for a woman of color—and even more specifically, Indian—a lead role wasn’t going my way. It just wasn’t on the table. It wasn’t an option. There are plenty of lead roles that I think lots of women of color are fantastic for, but more often than not they’re creating that work for themselves. That’s what I’ve seen.”

She’s also seen people of color or other marginalized communities being limited to those aforementioned four-line doctor roles. “When you watch any story, there are characters that are fleshed out and there are functional characters. There’s nothing wrong with either,” she says. “But if you keep putting [people of color] in those roles, audiences aren’t going to know what those actors can do. I’ve heard a lot of people when I got [I Feel Bad] say, ‘Where did she come from? We didn’t know you could do this!'”

But that’s the point: She can do this. She has been doing this. She just finally has a platform to show it.

“The thing about the show that’s so special is how honest it is. None of us feel like we’re enough or doing enough or that we’re allowed to just take a break. We’re all just trying to get by,” Blue says. “I wanted to let Emet be the flawed human she is. Because I think that’s how we all feel, like treading water and trying to keep afloat. That, to me, is very human.”

I Feel Bad airs Thursdays on NBC.



Source link

Categories
Health

This Meteorologist Had a Powerful Response to a Complaint That Her Natural Hair Wasn't 'Normal'


It’s 2018 and for some reason people are still taking it upon themselves to tell women of color how to wear their hair. The latest case? WBBJ TV meteorologist and multimedia journalist Corallys Ortiz was criticized by a viewer for wearing her hair natural on air. As first reported by The Jackson Sun, a viewer called in and requested that Ortiz wear her hair “more normal,” followed by an alleged racial slur. As frustrating and downright unacceptable as this situation was, Ortiz rose above the comments and took the time to write a powerful response on her Facebook page.

Along with her Facebook post, Ortiz recorded a video where she played back the voicemail from the woman. “Please don’t wear your hair like that anymore. It just doesn’t look good at all. Please don’t. Change it back to something more normal,” the caller says, followed by what sounds like inaudible slurs.

“When I heard her say I should wear my hair ‘normal’, I just rolled my eyes. But what I didn’t expect was to hear a racial slur at the end of the message,” the meteorologist, who is based in Jackson, Tennessee, tells Glamour. “In this decade we are still being criticized for the hair that naturally grows out of our head. That’s how conditioned this society has been to white beauty standards. The viewer actually had called a total of three times [to complain]. It really bothered her that much.”

Ortiz is of Caribbean descent and explained why she decided to wear her hair natural on air that day. “These past few days I’ve been giving my hair a bit of a break from this heat and humidity and not having to straighten it so often,” she wrote on Facebook. “This is only my second round wearing it [natural] the 10 months I’ve been in Tennessee.”

The comment is especially loaded because, for years, natural hair has been deemed as “unprofessional” and has a big impact on how women of color are viewed in the workplace. There’s been extra pressure placed on us to conform to more “palatable” ideals.

“What many people may not know is that being in the TV industry there is a ‘standard’ in which people are made to have their hair worn,” Ortiz wrote on Facebook. “The issue with this is that it always targets and pressures women of color to present their hair in ways that are unnatural just for the sake of having their hair look ‘professional.’ For years on end women of color have always been told their hair wasn’t professional or ‘neat’ enough for the workplace, and for years women of color would have to adhere to ‘white beauty standards’ in order to get ahead. Slowly but surely over the years, those standards have been changing in this field and we see more and more women of color being able to present themselves with their natural hair on TV.”

That’s why, criticism be damned, Ortiz says she’s going to continue to wear her hair natural on air. “I wear my hair straight 90 percent of the time, so when I wear it curly how does that even impact the way I do my job? It doesn’t,” she says. “Also, I think representation matters. I’ve had viewers tell me they appreciate me being myself because they see how their daughters, who have the same hair type as me, feel more confident. That’s so important.”

As Ortiz mentioned, she joins a growing number of on-air reporters who have recently made the decision to wear their hair natural. “I wear my hair in several ways on air, but I feel the freest when it’s in a natural style,” says Kimberly Shine, a TV reporter and anchor from Indiana. “Until recently, I’d always been scared or discouraged from any other style than straight.”

For so many women of color, wearing their natural hair on air means so much more than a hairstyle, it’s setting the precedent and paving the way for other journalists in the making. “In this business, wearing natural styles forces diversity—and conversation,” says Shine. “But more than that, it shows black youth and black aspiring journalists that ‘we’ matter. Representation is extremely important. Of course, everyone’s hair is different, but it can still be professional. Our hair is unique and nothing we should be afraid of showcasing.”

Even still, Shine says it’s not just commenters committing these microaggressions. Managers, too, have long been part of the problem: “I was once told I couldn’t wear a braided/rod-curl style on air. That was years ago, and I was younger then, so I did what I was told.” Since then, she says she’s grown more confident in herself and the work she does—thanks partially, in fact, to social media. “It was a big help,” Shine says. “I started following some journalism ladies who wear their hair natural on air, and that encouraged me even more.”

These days, Shine says it’s mostly getting better in the newsroom. Management, coworkers, and viewers have all been supportive of her—but that isn’t the case everywhere. “Unfortunately, it sometimes all depends on the TV market where you work,” she says. “I feel like you have more leniency in smaller cities, than in the larger ones. But regardless, no one can deny good work. If your work is strong, it’s all about finding a natural hairstyle that compliments you.”

And thankfully, on a larger scale, women like CNN commentator Angela Rye are using their positions at national news outlets to champion both natural hair and protective styles. “I thought wearing my hair on CNN in cornrows wasn’t a big deal. I didn’t think twice about it,” Rye shared in the October issue of Glamour. “But a number of black women responded, saying, ‘Oh my God, thank you so much for doing this. Now I know I can do this in a professional setting.’ A lot of people are just starting to accept that how black women wear their hair is a form of self-expression.”

Doing so shouldn’t have to be “brave,” and yet, as Senait Gebregiorgis, multimedia journalist and fill-in anchor at Fox Illinois News, points out, that’s exactly what it’s taken for women of color to get to this point. “I can write a novel sharing my journey and what it took for me to have the courage to wear my hair the way it is on television. I remember thinking why try to look or be like everyone else when I can be myself?” she tells Glamour. “As reporters, our duties include being a watchdog; telling the stories viewers care about and serving our community. But oftentimes we forget one of the best ways to accomplish that is to be relatable and represent who we serve; whether that’s keeping your name [instead of a stage name] or wearing the hair god blessed you with.”

The freedom that comes with it allows these women to do their job uninhibited by the pressures of societal beauty ideals. “The day I decided to ditch my flatiron, I felt like a weight lifted off of my shoulders,” says Amina Smith, an on-air host at Stadium Sports Network. “I could just be myself on-air, not what the industry wanted me to be.”

At the end of the day, Gebregiorgis says it best: “My hair is a part of my identity. So what do you do with what you were given? You rock it.”

Related Stories:
Sanaa Lathan: ‘Natural Hair Is Beautiful, but It Should Be a Choice’
Khloé Kardashian Shouldn’t Have to ‘Block Out’ Racist Remarks About True
A Banana Republic Employee Says She Was Told Her Box Braids Looked Too ‘Urban’





Source link

Categories
Health

Why Wasn't *The Bachelorette*'s Lincoln Adim Mentioned During Men Tell All? Chris Harrison Explains


The “Men Tell All” special is one of the most anticipated episodes during each The Bachelorette season. After all, the drama comes easy when you put every eliminated contestant in the same room to hash over the season’s gripes before everyone goes on their merry, sponsored Instagram-posting way. This year was a little different, though, because by the time Chris Harrison teased next week’s finale, the biggest controversy surrounding Becca Kufrin’s season was completely unmentioned.

ICYMI, the news out of this season wasn’t Colton’s virginity or Jordan’s Zoolander soundbites; it was the report that contestant Lincoln Adim was convicted of assault. No one expected Adim to be in attendance at Men Tell All—he wasn’t invited—but it was notable that nobody addressed him or the case during the taping of the show. So, we sat down with Chris Harrison and asked him to explain.Read on.

Lincoln’s name never once came up tonight. Considering this was a big story that prompted Warner Bros. to release a statement, why was it avoided at the taping?

Chris Harrison: First of all, Lincoln was not invited and not welcome here. What he did was illegal and against the law, so that is a very easy call. There was no chance he was coming here tonight, no chance I wanted to talk to him or hear his side, because there is no side. What he did was commit a crime. That’s a very easy answer. As far as dealing with it, we wanted [Men Tell All] to remain about Becca, about the guys, and about this journey. And going there…this wasn’t the time or place. There really isn’t much to explain about Lincoln other than he lied, he deceived, he committed a crime, he’s not here, and he’s removed from the show and the franchise.

Warner Bros. said they were looking into how he slipped through the cracks because they do extensive background checks. We haven’t heard anything since. How can the show prevent this from happening again?

Chris: I’ll leave that to the lawyers and Warner Bros., but I will just say it’s very easy for people to go on social media and say it was very easy to discover. [Well,] that’s because you knew what you were looking for. We also know what we’re looking for, and it’s not as simple as everybody thinks it is to find that. It was a bizarre set of circumstances that allowed that to happen, on top of someone [Lincoln] who decided to lie and deceive.

PHOTO: Paul Hebert

Obviously, Blake and Garrett were not at Men Tell All, but when you sit down with Garrett on After the Final Rose, will you bring up his history of liking bigoted memes on Instagram?

Chris: Possibly. Another thing I want to say is that people need to stop putting Lincoln and Garrett in the same sentence. That’s something that kind of pisses me off. What Garrett did is something you disagree with. That is different than what Lincoln did. Lincoln broke the law. That is a very, very different thing than liking something you don’t agree with on Instagram.

I have no problem with you disagreeing with what Garrett did. I have no problem if it makes you angry, if it makes you sick to your stomach, but just remember it’s something you disagree with. It that wasn’t something that’s against the law, which is what Lincoln did. Just don’t put them in the same sentence. But if Garrett made you sick, that’s fine too. Will we talk about it? Probably. Maybe. I don’t know. It really depends on the situation in the moment. The finale [after show] is live, so a lot of what I’m doing is going on feels, like it was tonight. If it feels like the right time, then we’ll do it.

Sspeaking of the finale, what’s in store?

Chris: Becca’s goodbye [to the runner-up is] easily the most gut-wrenching tearful moment that I have been through. It literally brings her to her knees. You have to watch. Trust me. The exit that you’re going to see is probably in the top five of [most dramatic Bachelor franchise moments ever]. We haven’t even really teased it that much because you don’t have to. When you have the goods and you know what’s coming…just watch. It’s stunning.

So are you saying that the man she says goodbye to is probably going to be the next Bachelor?

Chris: Could be. People are always riding on that wave of enthusiasm. [But then again] everyone’s high on Joe the Grocery Store guy right now. He’s in the mix; great guy. We’ve never had a guy from Buffalo [Jason], very articulate…unlike Joe who doesn’t speak. [Laughs] So, Jason’s in the mix. Obviously number two [Garrett or Blake] might be in the mix. Number one might be in the mix if [he and Becca are] not still together [by then]…you never know. And obviously, you gotta watch Paradise because look who came out of Paradise. Wait and see…



Source link

Categories
Health

Claire Foy Says She Actually Wasn't Paid Back for Making Less Than Matt Smith on 'The Crown'


It turns out that Claire Foy may not be getting her due after all. In an interview with Al Arabiya English published Thursday (July 26), the actress said that she has not received the back pay supposedly promised to her for the gap between her and costar Matt Smith’s paychecks. “That was what was reported that I was back-paid. I’ve never mentioned anything about it and neither have the producers. The fact that that is ‘fact’ is—not quite correct,” she told Al Arabiya English.

To recap: In April the Daily Mail reported that Foy would reportedly receive £200,000 (around $260,000) in back pay for her lead role as Queen Elizabeth II. This news came about a month after producers Suzanne Mackie and Andy Harries confirmed that Smith, who played Prince Philip, was getting a higher paycheck than the woman who portrayed the queen.

“Going forward, no one gets paid more than the queen,” Mackie said at the time. Meanwhile, Left Bank Pictures, one of the production companies behind The Crown, apologized to both stars, while declining to mention whether anything would be done to retroactively address the gap.

Shortly after, Foy addressed the controversy: “I’m surprised because I’m at the center of it, and anything that I’m at the center of like that is very, very odd, and feels very, very out of ordinary,” Foy told Entertainment Weekly in March. “But I’m not [surprised about the interest in the story] in the sense that it was a female-led drama. I’m not surprised that people saw [the story] and went, ‘Oh, that’s a bit odd.’ But I know that Matt feels the same that I do, that it’s odd to find yourself at the center [of a story] that you didn’t particularly ask for.”

In the article published Thursday, Foy elaborated on those thoughts: “Yes, it’s Netflix, but it’s a British production company. It happened at the same time as it was coming out with a lot of other people that there was a lot of pay inequality across the board—in the music industry, in journalism, in every industry,” she told Al Arabiya English. “It’s across the board that it became part of a bigger conversation, which is an odd place to find yourself in.”

“I realized early on that me being quiet about it or me not thinking about it in any way, and not associating myself with it, would be harmful to me and also lots of other people,” she continued. “It’s taught me a lot, and I’m still learning about it. I have not come out the other side and know exactly what I’m talking about. I’m still learning as much as anybody else is.”

Glamour has reached out to Foy’s representative, Netflix, Left Bank Pictures, and Sony Pictures for comment, and will update this story accordingly.

Related Stories:

Claire Foy Just Spoke Out About Being Paid Less Than Co-Star Matt Smith on The Crown



Source link

Categories
Health

Duchess Camilla Says Even the Royal Family Wasn't Sure How the Royal Wedding Would Go


Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s royal wedding went off without a hitch last Saturday—much the relief of the royal family, who, like the rest of the world, was anticipating more drama to unfold in light of the Thomas Markle controversy. (More on that in a second.) During an interview with British radio station Channel 5 on Wednesday morning, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, spoke about her stepson Prince Harry’s “uplifting” wedding, and hinted that the palace was as shocked as the rest of us by all of the pre-wedding tumult that came courtesy of Markle’s immediate family.

“It was such a lovely day. Just everything went right,” Duchess Camilla said in her interview, according to the Daily Mail‘s royal correspondent Rebecca English. “We all wondered whatever would happen next and then everything went right. The only thing is that we are all losing our voices now.” She added, “It’s nice to have something that is uplifting rather than depressing. Everything was just perfect, including the weather, which couldn’t have been better. It was a beautiful day.”

Last week Thomas Markle revealed at the last minute he wouldn’t be attending the royal wedding in light of a report alleging paparazzi photos taken of him were staged. Later, though, he changed his mind, and then changed it again. TMZ echoed Duchess Camilla’s interview with a report that the royal family had been completely “blindsided” by Thomas Markle’s decision. The palace also released a statement about the matter: “This is a deeply personal moment for Ms. Markle in the days before her wedding She and Prince Harry ask again for understanding and respect to be extended to Mr. Markle in this difficult situation.” Meghan Markle ultimately released a statement herself, confirming that her father wasn’t attending her wedding.

In the end, of course, the royal wedding ran as smoothly as possible and was a joyous affair for all involved. And on Tuesday (May 22), lost voices or not, the newlyweds reconvened with the royal family for Prince Charles’ 70th Birthday Patronage Celebration at the Buckingham Palace Gardens, where Meghan shared a laugh with her new parents-in-law as Harry paid tribute to his dad with a sweet speech (and expertly avoided a bee attack).





Source link

Categories
Health

Rihanna's Answer to Why She Wasn't Invited to the Royal Wedding Is Honestly Perfection


Rihanna, queen of pop, makeup, lingerie, and Catholicism-inspired fashion, pops up pretty much wherever the latest action is. One place she won’t be, however, is the royal wedding—which, as you might of heard, is happening this coming Saturday, May 19.

The invite list to the royal wedding is kept to an intimate 600 people, not including the 2,640 normals (such as myself, in a better world) who will be spectacle-ing on the grounds of Windsor Castle. That’s fine and all, but when you’re an institution as extensive as the British monarchy and surrounding aristocracy, those seats get filled up pretty quickly.

Apparently, Rihanna is clued into this, and, humbly, didn’t really think she’d be invited. Sure, Rihanna and Prince Harry might have met in 2016 at a Barbados National HIV/AIDS Commission event, but Rihanna didn’t think that alone warranted an invite to the royal wedding.

PHOTO: Chris Jackson – Pool/Getty Images

Prince Harry Visits The Caribbean - Day 11

PHOTO: Chris Jackson – Pool/Getty Images

Fast-forward to 2018, and a reporter asked her if she was going to the big bash. Apparently Rihanna is too busy being fabulous—and also literally busy!—to know the royal wedding is coming up: “So is it really coming up? Like, soon or something?” she said.

“Yeah, in a week,” the reporter replied.

“Oh shoot!” she responded. “See, I need to stay on the Internet more.”

The reporter then promptly asked, “So you weren’t invited?”

She, being humble, was like, “Why would you even think I’m invited?”

The reporter might or might not have been caught off-guard and responded, “I don’t know. You met [Prince Harry].”

And then, Rihanna said jokingly, “OK, you met me. You think you’re coming to my wedding?”

The reporter then said, “Maybe!” and Rihanna asks if she’s invited to hers. “I mean, you’ll get the invite,” she responds.

“Oh, girl,” Rihanna replied, before flipping her gorgeous hair.

Watch the instant classic here:

Simply iconic.

Related Stories:

Bad Gals, Get Psyched: Rihanna’s Lingerie Line Is Here

Rihanna Showed Up to the 2018 Met Gala Dressed Like an Actual Pope

Rihanna Wore a Denim Skirt as a Top, and Honestly It’s Kind of Genius





Source link