Categories
Health

Leighton Meester on Single Parents, the Myth of the Work-Life Balance, and Getting Equal Pay


To say Leighton Meester is excited for her new show, Single Parents, is an understatement. Not only is the cast and crew “super funny and super nice,” but she gets to wear jeans and sneakers on set—a big departure from the regular two-hour fittings she did on Gossip Girl years ago.

But most important, the ABC comedy is about a subject matter she knows well these days: the challenges of parenthood. The show is about single parents specifically, yes, but Meester—who has a three-year-old daughter, Arlo Day, with husband Adam Brody—still finds ways to relate. “Angie is a paralegal and a mom and has very little time to do anything,” Meester says. “We use comedy on the show to explore co-parenting and being single parents. I can only imagine it is the hardest job in the world, because being a parent is the hardest job in the world.”

That said, she knows every parent’s experience is different. “Nobody can tell you what parenthood is going to be like,” she says. “You think you know, and then it’s just so hard. I feel so, so lucky that I have help and a husband. I feel stable, but there are so many people who don’t have that. In a really tender way, Single Parents explores how parenting is an emotional roller coaster.”

Here, Meester opens up her own experience, how she’s seen Hollywood change since her time on Gossip Girl, and more.

PHOTO: Mitch Haaseth

Meester on ‘Single Parents’

On Single Parents, Taran Killam’s character is the type of dad who makes Play-Doh from scratch. What kind of parent are you in real life?

Leighton Meester: I have so much respect for people who do that, but no. People don’t get paid to raise their children; if they did, they’d be making a lot of money doing all the secretarial work, grocery shopping, cleaning, cooking…even just listening. For me, being home is amazing and being at work is amazing. But I don’t think there’s a balance. I’m lucky I can breathe between each project and appreciate both.

You bring up an interesting point—the trope of how women balance it all. Men rarely get asked that.

LM: I’ve never heard a man get asked that question. I’ve been in interviews with male co-workers who are fathers, and I get asked that question and they don’t. I was doing the pilot of a show and, harmlessly, once a day someone would say, “Who’s taking care of your kid?” I asked my husband, “Do people ever ask you that on set?” He said, “No. No one’s ever asked me one time who’s taking care of my kid.” It’s not offensive; I completely understand the instinct, because it is typical that moms do the majority of the child-raising and housework. Even though men are working the same amount, if not at times less. [Laughs] And women are making less! Parenting is more than a full-time job. You don’t get a day off. But my paid work is getting hair and makeup done, being creative, talking to adults, sitting down to drink coffee instead of chasing somebody…it’s like a vacation.

So what do you say then when people ask how you balance it all?

LM: I don’t think there is a balance. That term is not real. We still aren’t forgiving enough of mothers, of working mothers, which is the majority of the population. I think as a society, particularly in the United States, we need to realize that mothers need to work. We don’t have an option most of the time, because one parent working isn’t enough. Most people can’t afford to stay home, but you have to pay a lot to put your kid in daycare. I consider myself so lucky in every way in life, and playing this role definitely enlightened me.

How method did you get for this role? Did you ever say to your husband, “Go take a vacation for three days so I can be alone with our daughter?” [Laughs]

LM: I would never say that, are you crazy? [Laughs] No, we both try to work when the other one isn’t working as much as we can. Inevitably you end up with your kid alone, and it’s hard to do anything beside watch your kid. You can’t shower, you can’t eat, you can’t clean. You don’t go to the bathroom alone. You go to the bathroom with a person looking at you. Every time.

You’ve been in this business for a long time. How has Hollywood changed?

LM: The last couple years everything has boiled over. It took us the entire existence of humanity for people to sort of, kind of, say women demand respect and dignity and equality in every way. We’re still not there, but we’re seeing more women who aren’t in their twenties just have scenes talking about other men. We see women who have flaws that aren’t just superficial or quirky or cute. They have deep flaws, like any other male character that leads a show. I think [television today] reflects society a lot more. It’s important to use that to send a message. It starts with casting, with the writers’ room, with the people working on a show, and what you put out there.

The Hollywood Reporter reported a few months ago that your cast is all getting paid the same. Is that correct?

LM: We’re all getting paid the same. It helps that a lot of us have the same agent, but of course it’s a good thing. They were like, “It’s only fair.” I don’t know if that would have been the case three years ago, five years ago. It isn’t unheard of now to talk about what you’re making with the other women you’re working with. And men! A couple years ago I was working with Adam Pally, who I love, on Making History on FOX. Right off the bat he was like, “How much are you making? I’m making this much.” It’s the same thing with this cast. It’s about being transparent.

Your first TV role was Law & Order. What do you remember about that?

LM: Law & Order is everyone’s first role! Every single person I’ve met from New York was on that show. That was a fun experience, because it was the first time I was ever on a set. I played a girl whose mother was battered, and I had a friend who died, and she was in an exorcism I think. [Laughs] It’s been a while since I’ve watched it. The truth is, if I’m being totally honest, a set by and large—at least for dramatic situations—isn’t really built for kids. But on Single Parents, we have a lot of kids and I’m amazed with them. They’re more professional than I am! I’m making stupid jokes, and they’re like, “Get to work.” [Laughs] On top of that, they go to school between scenes while I, like, take a nap in my trailer. They work hard, but as long as you have the right environment it’s OK.

BuzzFoto Celebrity Sightings In New York - February 06, 2012

PHOTO: Pablo Tomatis

Meester on the set of ‘Gossip Girl’

We can’t end this interview without talking about Gossip Girl. Do you look forward to the day when your daughter can watch it?

LM: Oh, I don’t know. I don’t know how to answer that. I meet young women now who are watching it for the first time, and I’m like, “Whoa.” It still speaks to a lot of people, so I’m proud of it. It was, in many ways, my college and a first job. It was my twenties, from 20 to 26. It was so much of my growth. I was working five days a week—15-, 16-hour days, every day. Many days I didn’t see the sun because we were in a studio from 5 A.M. to 8 P.M. or 9 P.M. But I was in New York, which is the best place to live when you’re 20, 21. And the clothes obviously were amazing. I will say, because of that experience, I’m looking forward to wearing jeans and sneakers at work. It’s definitely more Angie’s speed [on Single Parents]. It’s way more comfortable. On Gossip Girl, we’d do two-hour fittings every week. We’d be wearing ball gowns, but there was a blizzard outside and we’d have to pretend there wasn’t and wear uncomfortable shoes. [Laughs] But still, so beautiful.

If Gossip Girl came on TV, or you stumbled upon it on Netflix, would you stop and watch?

LM: To be honest, I didn’t watch it to begin with because I was making it. I just didn’t have the time. Now, I’m just like, “I don’t have time to watch an hour show.” It’s hard to keep up with a show that’s an hour. I’m better at bite-size pieces. Maybe when I get more free time some day. I don’t know when it will come, but it will come someday.

Single Parents airs Wednesdays on ABC.



Source link

Categories
Health

This Open Letter Demanding Equal Pay in Hollywood Has More Than 3,000 Signatures


The wage gap in Hollywood has been an especially hot topic in recent months, with high-profile stars like Claire Foy and Ellen Pompeo revealing that they hadn’t received equal pay to their male counterparts—and demanding change. Now, there’s a budding movement—one carrying the support of many high-profile actors and directors—to address the wage gap between the men and women who work behind the scenes.

More than 3,000 Hollywood figures have signed an open letter that denounces “egregious” wage inequalities between men and women holding jobs in production, such as script supervisors, production coordinators, and art department coordinators. Many familiar names have put their signatures on the letter so far, including A Wrinkle in Time director Ava DuVernay, This Is Us actress Chrissy Metz, and Book Club actress Jane Fonda.

The letter was written after a recent study by Working Ideal for IATSE Local 871 (a union with members who “keep Hollywood running”) revealed that women in crew or production positions receive significantly less pay than men in similar positions.

According to the study, women in craft roles are “paid hundreds or even thousands of dollars per week less than counterparts in comparable male-dominated crafts, even though California’s Fair Pay Act generally requires equal pay for men and women performing substantially similar work and federal law bars gender discrimination in pay.” The findings have the support of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Women in Film organization, according to the Los Angeles Times.

“It is time for real change. It is no longer acceptable for employees in traditionally female-dominated classifications – like Art Department Coordinators and Assistant Production Coordinators – to be stuck with low wages that oftentimes make it difficult to make ends meet, especially in expensive cities like Los Angeles,” the letter reads. “Nor is it acceptable that – despite the recent changes in state law aimed at closing the wage gap – women (and men) employed in other historically female crafts earn significantly less than their predominantly male counterparts, such as 2nd Second Assistant Directors, while performing substantially similar work.”

The numbers back up these claims: According to the study, women working in positions like a script supervisors earned a weekly rate of of $2,573 in 2016, while men in an equivalent first assistant director position earned $4,465. (The two positions have different responsibilities but are on roughly the same level in the industry.)

The letter references the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements as catalysts to extend equal pay from marquee names to every member of a film’s set.

“In the current age of #MeToo and the launching of Time’s Up we have seen that some production companies have moved to correct gender-based wage inequality for actors working on the same projects, but there has not been any similar effort made to address wage gaps for those working behind the scenes,” the letter continues. “With your help we can demonstrate that this issue has the support of our fellow industry members and the viewing audience at large.”

Related Stories:

180 Female Ad Execs Launch Time’s Up Advertising to Combat Industry Harassment

#MeToo Founder Tarana Burke Just Laid Out the Movement’s Next Steps

The Model Alliance’s New Program Aims to Hold the Fashion Industry Accountable in the Age of #MeToo





Source link

Categories
Health

Why Americans Need to Pay Attention to Ireland's Historic Abortion Referendum


Three years ago this week, I cried with joy as I sat in my New York apartment and watched the country I grew up in make joyous, beautiful, progressive history with a national referendum that ultimately allowed us to become the first country in the world to grant into law gay marriage.

On Friday, May 25, I will again be frantically refreshing news pages as I await the result of another historic referendum—which means a country’s entire electorate are invited to vote—this time on whether to repeal the Eighth Amendment. Or for those of you unaccustomed to the Irish constitution, whether abortion will be legalized.

Abortion has been illegal in Ireland since 1861 but, in 1983, the Eighth Amendment was voted into the Irish Constitution, stating that the life of a pregnant woman is equal to that of an unborn child, and outlaws abortion for every woman.

Indeed, Ireland has had a troubling history of oppressing women, insofar as the country has had to reckon with the fact that up until as recent as the mid 1990s thousands of unmarried pregnant women were placed into servitude in what was known as the Magdelene Laundries—essentially confinement asylums run by Roman Catholic nuns for girls or young women who had become pregnant outside marriage or whose families could not or would not support them and had to be hidden away.

In many other ways, though, Ireland has changed a lot since 1983. In just a few decades, it’s gone from an often-insular society with institutions controlled by the Catholic Church to a multicultural society of socially progressives. To Americans, it might sound like we’re slow to adopt cultural norms you’re accustomed to, but progress has been made: In 1985 the Irish government approved the sale of contraceptives, divorce became legal in 1995 following another referendum, and Ireland is now the European hub of some of the largest and most innovative tech companies in the world, including Google an Facebook. Our current political leader, Prime Minister Leo Varadkar, is the gay son of Indian immigrants!

I want to stress that you don’t have to agree with abortion to hope for an affirmative outcome. You just have to agree that Irish women should be afforded a legal—and safe—choice.

On Friday, if the vote gets a majority Yes, Ireland will likely enact legislation that will allow for legal abortions up to 12 weeks into a pregnancy (for context, most states in the US allows abortion up to the 20th week). After that time period, abortions will only be carried out on the grounds of a serious mental or physical health risk to the mother, or a fatal fetal condition. A No vote means that Ireland’s abortion laws, which are some of the most restrictive in the developed world, would remain in place.

This referendum is deeply divisive in Ireland and for the Irish diaspora around the world, many of which are traveling long distances to be able to cast their vote. And, right now, the polls are too close to call.

Having lived outside Ireland for the past eight years, I’m not eligible to vote but given the opportunity I would certainly vote a resounding YES to repeal the 8th.

Because abortion is illegal—full stop—thousands of women have had to seek them out in unsafe and illegal ways. According to the UK Department of Health data, nine women make the journey from Ireland to the UK to have an abortion every day. They bleed on the way home on Ryanair flights from London where they’ve had to travel to get legal terminations; they wait in anxious hope for the illegal “abortion pills” they’ve surreptitiously ordered online to make it through the postal system without getting caught because if they do, they can face up to 14 years in jail; they cry in airports with their husbands and partners when they’ve been told they have a terminal pregnancy but under Irish law they have to carry the baby to term. In Ireland, a sexual assault survivor could potentially face more jail time for terminating a pregnancy than her rapist.

As I explain this referendum to curious friends and colleagues here in the US, I want to stress that you don’t have to agree with abortion to hope for an affirmative outcome, you just have to agree that Irish women should be afforded a legal—and safe—choice.

I urge Glamour readers to pay attention to the outcome of tomorrow’s vote. While women’s reproductive rights—an area Glamour has long been committed to covering—are in a precarious place in the US right now, the fact is, for many women in many states, access to safe and legal abortions exist. I hope you’ll join me in agreeing that right should be afforded to the women across the Atlantic, too.

Samantha Barry is Glamour’s Editor-in-Chief



Source link

Categories
Health

Claire Foy Is Reportedly Getting $275,000 in Back Pay for ‘The Crown’


It appears that Claire Foy is going to be properly paid for her role as Queen Elizabeth II on The Crown, after all.

Earlier this year it was revealed that Foy, despite being the show’s lead, was paid significantly less money than her male costar, Matt Smith, who plays the queen’s husband, Prince Philip. At the time the actress told Entertainment Weekly, “I’m surprised because I’m at the center of it, and anything that I’m at the center of like that is very, very odd, and feels very, very out of ordinary. But I’m not [surprised about the interest in the story] in the sense that it was a female-led drama. I’m not surprised that people saw [the story] and went, ‘Oh, that’s a bit odd.’ But I know that Matt feels the same that I do, that it’s odd to find yourself at the center [of a story] that you didn’t particularly ask for.”

Just last week Smith finally addressed the controversy. “I believe that we all should be paid equally and fairly,” he said. “Claire is one of my best friends. I support her completely.” (Producers said Smith was initially paid more because he was more well-known when the show began filming.)

Producers Suzanne Mackie and Andy Harries had pledged that going forward the gender pay discrepancy would be fixed. “Going forward, no one gets paid more than the queen,” Mackie said. But since Foy will no longer be playing the part going forward, it didn’t really help her much. Until today, that is. Foy is now set to reportedly receive around $275,000 in back pay to close the wage gap.

In a statement to the Daily Mail, Left Bank Productions (the company behind The Crown) said: “As the producers of The Crown, we are responsible for budgets and salaries. The actors are not aware of who gets what and cannot be held personally responsible for the pay of their colleagues. We are absolutely united with the fight for fair pay, free of gender bias and for a rebalancing of the industry’s treatment of women in front of the camera and behind the scenes.”

Long may she reign—and be paid fairly.



Source link

Categories
Health

Evan Rachel Wood Says She'll Receive Equal Pay for 'Westworld' Season 3


Despite being one of the main characters and arguably the most recognizable face of Westworld, Evan Rachel Wood said she was not paid the same as her male colleagues for the first two seasons. That’s coming to an end, though: The actress just confirmed that she’ll receive equal pay in the third season of the hit HBO show. (Season two is set to premiere on April 22.)

“I think I’m just now to the point where I’m getting paid the same as my male co-stars,” Wood said in a recent interview with TheWrap. Specifically, her salary will now be the same as costars Anthony Hopkins and Ed Harris, who play Dr. Ford and The Man in Black, respectively. “I was just told that, you know, ‘Hey you’re, you’re getting equal pay.’ And I was like,” she said, miming a gasp. “And I almost got emotional. I was like, ‘I have never been paid the same as my male counterparts … Never, never.’”

The change was not for lack of effort on the part of the star. Wood has been a vocal supporter of the Time’s Up and #MeToo movements, but felt her status did not compare to that of the two legendary actors. “I’m always fighting for [equal pay],” Wood added. “And I have turned down projects [because of it]. Westworld, it’s like, I get it a little more,” she said laughing. “It’s like, ‘Well, you’re Anthony Hopkins or Ed Harris.’ But I think now we’re all doing equal amounts of work and really hard work.”

Earlier this month, HBO pledged to address the gender pay disparity and close the gap. “We’ve proactively gone through all of our shows—in fact, we just finished our process where we went through and made sure that there were no inappropriate disparities in pay; and where there were, if we found any, we corrected it going forward,” HBO executive Casey Bloys said in a recent interview.

“There is a lot of stuff that goes on behind the scenes. There is a lot of trying to make things equal and trying to make things fair. I don’t know, there is a lot of stuff,” Wood added, potentially referencing the recent changes at the company. “But this is the first time that somebody made a point of being like, ‘Hey you’re getting this. And you deserve it.’ And that was nice.”

Related: Evan Rachel Wood Speaks Out About Being Sexually Assaulted Twice



Source link

Categories
Health

Rose McGowan Is Selling Her House to Pay for Her Fight Against Harvey Weinstein


Earlier this month, Rose McGowan attended the Television Critics Association’s press tour in Pasadena, California, where she told reporters that she was planning to sell her house in order to pay for the legal bills she’s accumulated from “fighting off the monsters.” On Friday, the actress and activist, who has publicly accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault, listed her home near Nichols Canyon in the Hollywood Hills for $1.9 million.

McGowan has said she reached a $100,000 settlement in 1997 with Weinstein about the alleged rape—and was then promptly blacklisted from Hollywood. But the legal bills McGowan has referred more recently to aren’t due to a broken NDA from the settlement: “I never signed an NDA, actually,” McGowan said at the TCA. “That was a mistake the press made, and actually a mistake that I made for a long time. [I was misinformed] by a lawyer that I had signed one, when in fact it turned out I hadn’t. I thought I remember refusing that. I think NDAs, as we’re finding out, can be broken.”

“It’s really scary,” McGowan said in January about her (unspecified) legal battles. “I’m having to sell my house right now to pay legal bills fighting off the monsters.”

McGowan’s house, which she purchased in 2011 for $1.39 million, is being sold by Tracy Tutor Maltas from Bravo’s Million Dollar Listing: Los Angeles.

The actress’ account of her experience with Weinstein and her work as an activist will appear in both her memoir, Brave, and her new E! docu-series Citizen Rose. The book will be available on January 30, the same day as the show’s premiere.

Related Stories:
Rose McGowan Opens the Women’s Convention by Calling Out Sexual Harassment in Hollywood
These Are the Women Who Have Accused Harvey Weinstein of Sexual Harassment or Assault
Meryl Streep Is Trying to Fix Hollywood’s Sexism Problem





Source link