Categories
Health

Jennifer Lopez Just Gave an Incredibly Emotional Speech Supporting Time's Up


Jennifer Lopez isn’t going to be attending the Golden Globes—and for a very good reason. She’s on the ground in Puerto Rico, working on relief efforts in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria (she’s already donated $1 million to relief efforts as well). There’s plenty of work ahead for the recovering nation, as more than three months after the storm, just over half the island had power as of December 30. J.Lo landed on the island Sunday afternoon with A-Rod to do what she could for the situation, and in a speech during a press conference, also spoke up about Time’s Up, tying its desire for equality to a critique of the U.S. government for not doing enough to help Puerto Rico recover.

“We are humbled and proud to be a part of this effort,” she says in a clip posted to her Instagram. Both she and A-Rod are wearing black. “You know, today is the Golden Globes in Los Angeles, and a lot of the women, with #TimesUp, are standing up for equality, to be treated equally, and for sexual harassment. I stand here in black doing the same from far away. It’s the same with here in Puerto Rico, we want to be treated equally.”

The audience claps as she finishes her statement, clearly emotional.

At the Golden Globes tonight, the Time’s Up movement—launched on January 1 with more than 300 powerful women in Hollywood backing it—is set to reshape, if even for one night, how the red carpet looks and is reported on. Women and men allied with the movement are dressing in all back, and red carpet reporting is (supposed to) be focusing less on what designers women are wearing and more on the need for Time’s Up. Additionally, eight actresses with ties to Time’s Up are bringing some truly incredible activists with them for the evening. Here’s to hoping that this marks the beginning of a shift not just on the red carpet, but in Hollywood culture.

J.Lo and A-Rod’s relief trip to Puerto Rico will certainly bring about some good. Props to her for speaking out about the situation and continuing to shed light on the humanitarian crisis.

Related Stories:
Jennifer Lopez Is Donating $1 Million to Help Puerto Rico Hurricane Victims
8 Time’s Up Actresses Are Bringing Incredible Activists With Them to the Golden Globes
The Political Accessory Everyone Will Wear at Sunday’s Golden Globes



Source link

Categories
Health

8 Time's Up Actresses Are Bringing Incredible Activists With Them to the Golden Globes


The Golden Globes, broadcasting on Sunday night (January 7), will be making a huge statement on the red carpet: After months of sexual misconduct allegations that have shaken the industry and toppled its most powerful men, actresses and actors will be wearing black as a way to make a statement about the events. The questions they’re asked on the red carpet—usually something about what designer they’re wearing—are rumored to be switching up to questions about the stars’ actual work. But those aren’t the only statements being made: According to a press release, eight Golden Globes attendees, including Meryl Streep, Emma Stone, and Amy Poehler, will be bringing gender and racial activists with them to the event “in a show of support for victims of sexual harassment and assault.” And we’re talking some truly incredible women.

“Our goal in attending the Golden Globes is to shift the focus back to survivors and on systemic, lasting solutions,” the activists said in a collective statement. “Each of us will be highlighting legislative, community-level and interpersonal solutions that contribute to ending violence against women in all our communities. It is our hope that in doing so, we will also help to broaden conversations about the connection to power, privilege and other systemic inequalities.”

The statement continues, “Many of us identify as survivors of sexual harassment, assault and violence ourselves and we believe we are nearing a tipping point in transforming the culture of violence in the countries where we live and work. It’s a moment to transform both the written and unwritten rules that devalue the lives and experiences of women. We believe that people of all genders and ages should live free of violence against us. And, we believe that women of color, and women who have faced generations of exclusion—Indigenous, Black, Brown and Asian women, farmworkers and domestic workers, disabled women, undocumented and queer and trans women—should be at the center of our solutions. This moment in time calls for us to use the power of our collective voices to find solutions that leave no woman behind.”

Read on to find out who’s bringing whom, as well as about the powerful work each of the activists has done in her field.

Michelle Williams is bringing Tarana Burke.
Tarana Burke is perhaps best known for starting the #MeToo movement an entire decade ago. It began as a way to help sexual assault survivors in underprivileged communities who didn’t have access to care, like counseling or crisis centers, following an assault. “It wasn’t built to be a viral campaign or a hashtag that is here today and forgotten tomorrow,” Burke told Ebony. “It was a catchphrase to be used from survivor to survivor to let folks know that they were not alone and that a movement for radical healing was happening and possible.” Burke is also a co-founder of the youth organization Just Be, Inc., which focuses on the holistic well-being of girls of color.

Emma Watson is bringing Marai Larasi.
Marai Larasi is the executive director of Imkaan in the UK, which is a prominent Black-feminist network that includes specialist women’s organizations and community groups focusing on ending violence against Black and “minority ethnic” women and girls. In addition to her work as co-chair of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, the country’s biggest network of related organizations, she actively contributes to books and related literature and has been named one of the 100 most influential LGBT people of the year on the World Pride Power List in 2013.

Susan Sarandon is bringing Rosa Clemente.
Rosa Clemente is a leading scholar on Afro-Latinx identity (known for her groundbreaking, discussion-catalyzing 2001 article “Who Is Black?“) and is the founder of Know Thy Self Productions, which produces community activism tours and consults on hip-hop feminism, media justice, and the right of Puerto Rico to be an independent nation. She also founded PR (Puerto Rico On The Map) after Hurricane Maria, an “independent, unapologetic” media collective centered on Afro-Latinx issues. Clemente also made history as the first Afro-Latina woman to run for VP of the U.S. in 2008 on the Green Party ticket.

Meryl Streep is bringing Ai-jen Poo.
Ai-gen Poo has been a leader in organizing female immigrant workers for more than 20 years, leads the National Domestic Workers Alliance as its director, and also co-directs the Caring Across Generations campaign. She’s also a 2014 MacArthur fellow and has been listed as one of Fortune‘s 50 World’s Greatest Leaders.

Laura Dern is bringing Mónica Ramírez.
Mónica Ramírez is the founder of Alianza Nacional de Campesinas, the organization that wrote a stirring and powerful letter of solidarity to women in Hollywood in November. The daughter and granddaughter of migrant farmworkers, she now serves female farmworkers, Latina, and immigrant women as an attorney and advocate. Ramírez has also founded art activism projects and a legal initiative for immigrant women at the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Shailene Woodley is bringing Calina Lawrence.
Calina Lawrence is an Indigenous activist who draws on her passion of singing and music to lead her work advocating for Native Treaty Rights, the Mni Wiconi (Water is Life) movement led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, and the “#NoLNG253” movement, led by the Puyallup Tribe. Other focuses of her activism include mass incarceration, police brutality, gentrification, climate injustice, foster youth, the misrepresentation of Native Americans in education and the media, and many other topics.

Emma Stone is bringing Billie Jean King.
Emma Stone and Billie Jean King have developed something of an offscreen friendship following Stone’s portrayal of the tennis legend in Battle of the Sexes. Beyond her incredible career in tennis, King founded the Women’s Tennis Association, the Billie Jean King Leadership Initiative, and the Women’s Sports foundation. King also co-founded World TeamTennis.

Amy Poehler is bringing Saru Jayaraman.
Saru Jayaraman founded Restaurant Opportunities Centers United after 9/11 with displaced World Trade Center workers. Today, the organization is the leader of the One Fair Wage campaign, which is working to eliminate lower wages for tipped workers, like bartenders and servers in the food industry. In her work with ROC, Jayaraman also carries out activist efforts for workplace justice campaigns for those in the industry, launches cooperative restaurants, and conducts research and policy work.

Related Stories:
The Political Accessory Everyone Will Wear at Sunday’s Golden Globes
300 Powerful Hollywood Women Just Launched a Massive Antiharassment Action Plan
Time’s Up Empowers American Women—Now It’s Our Duty to Empower Others Around the World





Source link

Categories
Health

Amber Tamblyn, Uzo Aduba, and Tessa Thompson on Time's Up and Why Wearing Black at the Golden Globes Matters


As 2017 entered its final weeks and think piece after think piece laid bare the tectonic shift happening Hollywood—and many other industries—post-Harvey Weinstein, the attention of many turned to the first week of January, which marks the start of awards season, kicked off by Sunday’s Golden Globes.

What would Hollywood’s most flashbulb-saturated season be like this year? And more importantly, how would the industry step up? By mid-December, reports circulated that actresses would wear black on the Golden Globes red carpet, in solidarity with women who had come forward about harassment allegations. But would that be it?

This week, we got our answer with Time’s Up, an ambitious and thoughtful initiative piloted by 300 powerful women in Hollywood with the goal to end “systemic inequality and injustice in the workplace”—whether that workplace is Hollywood or the agriculture industry. Since its official launch on January 1, many of the women who helped develop the initiative—from Eva Longoria and Shonda Rimes to America Ferrera and Reese Witherspoon—have spoken up about the importance of using moments like the Golden Globes as an opportunity to show solidarity, whether by wearing black or speaking out about harassment on the red carpet.

But how will the award season overall be shaped by this issue? And is wearing black enough? We spoke on the phone with some of the founding members of Time’s Up—Amber Tamblyn, Tessa Thompson, and Uzo Aduba—about what wearing black means to them this Sunday, as well as the change they each want to see in their industry, on the Friday before the Golden Globes.

To hear Tamblyn tell it, after Sunday might, we’ll all feel differently about award shows—and in a good way. “This can effect real change and this can shift something. This is going to be the first time in my entire life that I’ve ever been excited to watch a red carpet.”

GLAMOUR: One of the words that comes up in talking about Time’s Up is ‘community.’ Is that something you all feel has been lacking in Hollywood and the entertainment industry before this?

AMBER TAMBLYN: I’ve known Tessa from way back in the day, but Uzo I’ve never known, and I would say 90 percent of the women that are part of the movement I’ve never met before. So we were definitely brought together through a goal of wanting it to feel like a better community that represents all women—not just white women, which is often what most communities represent. For us in this movement, Time’s Up, it was very important to make sure that LGBTQ women are being represented, women of color, women with disabilities, so that it felt more like what a real community would feel like. In this larger conversation of talking the talk—of saying we want parity, of saying we want equality, of saying we want better representation—we therefore then also have to walk the walk, which is why Time’s Up is made up of so many types of women across industry lines. We really want this to be a representative community that looks like the world that we live in.

GLAMOUR: So this has been a way for you guys to make contact with each other in ways you haven’t before?

UZO ADUBA: Absolutely. I think that’s what’s really exciting about Time’s Up is the connectedness of this community; that this opportunity has brought so many women from across not just our industry. We’re seeing the alignment and the solidarity that exists between every industry be it this farmer’s union, nurses, teachers, people in entertainment, lawyers.

AT: The black dress is just one gesture; there’s going to be a lot going on. Our hope is that we can take something like our bodies, which have been used as objects, as specific types of ornaments, throughout history—certainly in fashion—and suddenly be able to say, in a singular moment, that we don’t belong to anybody anymore. The choice that we’re making about our futures, and the futures of the other women that we stand next to, is that we don’t tolerate abuse anymore. We just don’t tolerate it. We’re not asking for permission to change things, we’re just changing them and everybody has to come along with us.

GLAMOUR: The wearing black thing did get some initial blowback, with some people saying that instead of wearing black you could skip the carpet completely, for example. I do think the initiative itself, once it was unveiled on January 1, quieted some of those voices because Time’s Up feels bigger than wearing black.

AT: I think it’s really important to support anybody in whatever gesture they want to make that moves us toward change—however small, however big, however radical, however non-radical, no matter what. What people are doing collectively to change the narrative and to change the way women are treated and the power dynamic is important. None of it should be dismissed and all of it is powerful.

“The black dress is just one gesture. Our
hope is that we can take
something like our bodies, which have
been used as objects, as specific
types of ornaments, and suddenly be
able to say, in a singular moment, that
we don’t belong to anybody anymore.”
—Amber Tamblyn

TESSA THOMPSON: I know one of the critiques, for example, was, Why don’t you boycott it? Well, the truth is we’re not making any specific demands to the H.F.P.A. (the organization that votes on the awards). To me, it makes sense to boycott an organization if they’re not complying with something that you’re asking for. We’re making wider demands to the industry, to all industries, and to create a culture in Hollywood that is safe for all people, not just women, right? And I think then in the spirit of that it makes sense to actually engage, to lean in, to use this moment both on the red carpet and on the stage to amplify this idea of real change. That, to me, is why this moment at the Globes is indeed really powerful and has the capability to reach all kinds of people. It’s a time to take the microphone that you’ve been given and to use it in a new and exciting way.

GLAMOUR: Is the plan also to extend this and other activations like this through award season?

UA: Right now, we have our focus on the Golden Globes: the action of showing up, taking the carpet, and having the opportunity, as Tessa said, to use our voices … I think we’re just taking it day by day and step by step.

TT: The SAG awards announced that they would have all female presenters this year and there’s been direct involvement with some women from Time’s Up with SAG not just about that but as a union to take that power and to figure out how SAG is a part of making all people under their union safe. That’s a conversation that will go well into awards season with them and beyond it. I think everyone feels really excited by this and the truth is the work will continue—the work of Time’s Up, the bigger initiatives that are happening around gender parity, around 50/50 by 2020, that work continues.

AT: To piggyback on that, this isn’t a moment this is a movement. It’s not here to be here for just a minute of anyone’s time, it’s going to be the new reality, as Tessa just said. This is the way things are going to be from now on.

GLAMOUR: Well good, I’m glad. I often cover events and later realize that the majority of people only know what they see on TV—like people who watch the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show and then think that every fashion show is an hour long and includes musical guests, which is not true. Similarly, most people at home never go to a red carpet—they don’t go to the Oscars, they don’t go to the Golden Globes—so what they see on TV just looks like a fun party. The award season just looks like a fun party. But for you, what is the red carpet really like?

AT: I wouldn’t call it a burden, but at some point I do feel like everything falls on women to look a certain way and represent something that may not necessarily belong to them—an attitude, a look, a certain weight—on red carpets. So while it looks like a big party, it’s also like a lot of work for women and we’ve had to carry that for a very, very long time. The Golden Globes red carpet is the biggest red carpet in the United States. It’s over a mile long, and it takes hours to go down it. Often, you’re not really being asked substantive questions—it’s only about what you’re wearing and maybe it’s about the thing you’re promoting but there’s nothing else that you’re really talking about. This is why we believe that Sunday will effect a lot of change with regards to that, shifting the narrative towards making sure that when we are talking, that talk is translating to direct action, that we’re not just sharing non-substantive stories to answer a non-substantive question. That we’re actually engaging in real conversation, even at something as superfluous as an awards show.

UO: I think that’s been the artists responsibility since the beginning of time, hasn’t it? When you think of the Galileos and the artists of various eras of history, you know they were the first people to be silenced. The first people to be shut down are the artists because their art speaks to the community, they speak to the world. Now that we’re living in this modern era and this is the age of television, the age of red carpets, I think the stage has changed but the intentions of the artist hasn’t. I think artists traditionally have always had a voice and this weekend isn’t necessarily exceptional in that way. I think what’s exceptional is that so many have found a way to come together to unite in a singular voice, and that’s powerful.

AT: I’d be remiss, too, if I didn’t speak to one other factor, which is sort of the elephant in the room. A lot of this movement is happening because of the incredibly brave women who came forward and told their stories publicly. This would not have been possible without them. Those people include Rose McGowan, Ashley Judd, Lupita Nyong’o, Olivia Munn, Annabella [Sciorra], Mira Sorvino. These women put their necks on the line, put their livelihood out on the line, to create massive change and it’s not lost on me that the award show we’re choosing to do this at is an award show that really was sort of funded and fully supported by Harvey Weinstein. We’re taking that back, taking it away from him, and saying that this doesn’t belong to you anymore—that we are protective of these women and we support them. We stand next to them, no harm will come to them, and their livelihood means everything to us. It’s really important that this message gets across because all of these women are a part of the movement as well and we all will stand with each other. We know what it cost them to come forward. So for me, part of the real joy of participating in the wearing of black, I ask myself, Why am I wearing black? For me, it has so much to do with sending a direct message to the Hollywood Foreign Press and to the Golden Globes, saying we know who this award show used to belong to and it doesn’t belong to him anymore. We’re taking over the narrative of our bodies and our rights and our livelihood.

GLAMOUR: I’m clapping for you from here in my small office.

TT: I know it’s more detailed than this, but I’m also like, is this just the funeral for the patriarchy?

“It’s not lost on me that the award show we’re choosing to do this at
is an award show that really was sort of funded and fully supported by
Harvey Weinstein. We’re taking that back, taking it away from him, and
saying that this doesn’t belong to you anymore.” —Amber Tamblyn

GLAMOUR: The question is what we get to wear next year when it’s the matriarchy. Like just whatever? I’m ready. Circling back to what Uzo said about artists, I know that one of the main points that Time’s Up really addresses is inequality broadly, which we all acknowledge is one of the major areas from which harassment stems. Harassment is about power. And I know that there’s this other narrative at work here, which is that women are far less visible than men in terms of overall award show kudos—at the Golden Globes, for example, there’s been a lot of buzz about the lack of female directing nominees this year, and in general. Have you guys talked about this in your conversations also?

AT: Oh absolutely. Not only are there no women in directing categories, there’s also almost zero women of color and certainly no Latina women. The disparity is so deep and so obvious when you look at it, so why are huge amounts of women being left out of the creative conversation, constantly? So yes, it’s a big conversation for us.

TT: One of the things that’s so exciting to me is to talk about that, to use this cultural moment as an opportunity to talk about inequality and real, true, inclusivity—I hate the “d” word, “diversity.” I have [been talking] with Stacy Smith at [USC] Annenberg about how we make inclusivity contractual. How do we either collectively bargain to have true inclusivity—not just in front of the lens but in terms of crew—and how do you make that something that is actually contractual. How do you speak to SAG, for example, and say, okay, how do we incentivize real inclusivity on a set, both in front of a camera and behind it? I just feel a real, tremendous amount of gratitude to the women that have made this real time possible.

GLAMOUR: Listening to you all talk, I really do believe—and I keep thinking back to an interview I did with Gretchen Carlson—that all of these issues are industry-agnostic: trying to find ways to incentivize people to put women in leadership positions and/or to make sure that there’s equality and show that there’s a meaningful result. That it isn’t just because it’s the right thing to do, that you can show meaningful results, both in terms of healthier workplaces and more successful companies.

AT: And by the way, it’s statistically proven that when you have more women in positions of power in the workplace, sexual assault and violence and abuse goes down. There’s statistics behind that, so it’s more than just representation. And putting women in all positions—at top levels or even lower levels—are ways to balance it out so that our bodies are not always at stake.

UO: I think another thing that’s important is that solidarity extends beyond just women to people of color; gender representation … I know, that working on Orange [is the New Black], for example, you see Laverne [Cox] out front, and that changes the minds of people to see someone who is trans. When you see more people like that represented in various outlets—not just entertainment, but as one of your nurses, as one of your teachers, as one of your lawyers. It changes the way in which you encounter that person and engage with that person and imagine that person in your mind.

“Time’s Up didn’t exist until Time’s Up existed—until a group of women
got in a room and made it exist. I think,
oftentimes, we’re in the space of
waiting for someone to come in
and save [something]. Start it.
Do it, and others will follow. You
might be the one you’ve been
looking for.” —Uzo Aduba

GLAMOUR: So here is a logistical question. Other than donating to Time’s Up, what’s the clearest action that you would want our readers to take, or people watching the awards to take? Is it just conversation, or are there other tactical things you think they should undertake?

AT: I would say, look at the communities around you and see what’s missing. What is the action that’s missing? What is the conversation that’s missing? What is the role that you can take as leadership in order to change the way things are?

UO: I would agree with that. Time’s Up didn’t exist until Time’s Up existed—until a group of women got in a room and made it exist. I think, oftentimes, we’re in the space of waiting for someone to come in and save [something]. Start it. Do it, and others will follow. You might be the one you’ve been looking for. I think Amber is right, looking within your own community, being interested in changing the world around you, in fact, changes the world. And stepping up to do that can make all the difference. I would also say that … I think we live in a time of action through social media, and that has been a great tool for raising awareness, but I think we’ve now turned the page to a new chapter where action is needed. It’s not enough to tweet, re-tweet, post, share—we’re living in a time of the doing.

TT: In the last couple of weeks, to Uzo’s point … I’ve never had so many apps and ways of communicating as I do now because of this Time’s Up movement, and now I’m like, Oh, my phone has a point. Literally for the first time in my adult life, I’m using apps, I’m using technology, I’m using social media in a way that I understand how it’s vital, how it connects us. I marvel at people who started movements that were part of real change back before we had access to each other in the way that we do now. And now we have so much at our disposal! And because of all of the work that we’re doing, I’m like, I see the point of this now. My phone feels powerful in my hands in a new way.

GLAMOUR: Some folks who don’t work in my industry have said to me, “With Weinstein and all the things that have happened, I just don’t think award season can be fun. There’s no room for fun here.” And it’s been interesting talking to you guys—the word I kept coming back to in my mind was ‘joy,’ which something I often think about, making room for joy. Despite the fact that all of the topics we’re addressing here are obviously very heavy, all of you seem to be in very good spirits. And there seems to be this real sense of community, which I know is something you’ve talked about. Can you talk about this sense of delight or the possibility for delight in this moment?

AT: To complement what Tessa just said about understanding what [her] phone is for, that now it serves a purpose: After Sunday, you’ll all be feeling that same way about an awards show. Like, Oh, this actually serves a purpose now. This doesn’t have to be one level, this can be multiple levels. This can effect real change and this can shift something. To that end, I think … Look, this is going to be the first time in my entire life that I’ve ever been excited to watch a red carpet.

“After Sunday, you’ll all be feeling
[differently] about an awards show.
Like, Oh, this actually serves a
purpose now. Look, this is
going to be the first time in my
entire life that I’ve ever been excited
to watch a red carpet.” —Amber Tamblyn

TT: I’m embarrassed because I like to watch! I really like dresses and stuff, so I don’t mind it. I sometimes find the red carpet terrifying or boring—and I occasionally find it fun. If you’ve made a project and you’re really excited and you’ve made good friends in the process, it does feel silly and stupid to parade around, but there’s sort of joy in that…I think this really has been a unification in terms of a lot of people that either, like in the case of Amber and I, have known each other for years but haven’t had the chance to really talk or be in each other’s company in so long, or new people that have never met, or people that have always admired each other from afar or shared one dance at an event and then never spoke again. Now there’s the time to really feel a real connection to those people and get to know them in a new way, and celebrate. I think there’s so much room for celebration in this. And with the promise of change—real change, lasting change—so ripe, how can we not want to celebrate?

UO: Absolutely. A word you used, Laurel, was ‘joy,’ and like, I latched onto that word. I was talking to my best friend on New Year’s Day, and she said, “How do you feel?” And I said, “I feel joyful.” I have felt happy, but I don’t know when last I felt joyful. And it’s because of this. The real truth is, I work on a show with incredible women and I love those girls. And I’ve known them now for six years. But outside of that group, meeting another wise group of women? That hasn’t happened for me since I was running track in college, to be honest with you. And to know that this community has always existed, we just never knew how to necessarily tap into it, collectively. So often a lot of us are the only [women] there, on the job. So you don’t get to have the 10 other girls that you love around you all the time. And to be around women that are excited to have a lasting effect on the world—or try to, at least, put our best hat in the ring—and who are interested in who we are as a country and what we stand for is really exciting for me. And I think that joy will show on Sunday because everyone is excited. It doesn’t feel like a dark, dingy basement. Or at least that’s not my experience. My experience feels like, these are women that are coming together to try and change something. And change always feels good.

This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.

MORE GOLDEN GLOBES:



Source link

Categories
Health

Time's Up Pin Is the Accessory Everyone Will Be Wearing at the Golden Globes


On Monday, more than 300 women in the entertainment industry, including actresses, producers, agents and lawyers, came together to announce a new sexual harassment action plan known as Time’s Up, with a goal to end the imbalance of gender power across all industries.

In an open letter about the initiative, the women not only announced a legal defense fund and push for new legislation as part of this initiative, but also confirmed reports that many actors and actresses planned to wear all black to this Sunday’s Golden Globes in solidarity with survivors of sexual harassment. And it looks like this protest will be even more visible on the red carpet than previously thought: According to the Hollywood Reporter, participants will also be wearing a specially-designed pin meant to draw further attention to the cause.

Whereas last awards season, many attendees pinned blue ACLU ribbons to their red carpet looks, you can expect to see many black and white pins that read “Time’s Up” this time around. They were designed by famed costume designer Arianne Phillips and commissioned by Reese Witherspoon, one of the initiative’s lead backers and a 2018 Golden Globe nominee, according to the Hollywood Reporter. “Reese asked me to come to the actor’s group [at a planning session for Time’s Up], and told me they were going to be wearing black and would I consider creating a pin for the nominees and male presenters,” Phillips told the publication. “We were up against the holidays, but I said I could do it, and the first person I called was my partner-in-crime [L.A. jewelry designer] Michael Schmidt.”

Booth Moore, Hollywood Reporter‘s Style and Fashion News Director, posted a photo of the pins on Instagram.

Phillips and Schmidt somehow managed to quickly turn around a design and produce 500 pins just in time for the Golden Globes. “I met so many great women, and it was such an honor to be called to action,” Phillips added.

In the New York Times piece announcing Time’s Up, Eva Longoria said of the red carpet blackout: “For years, we’ve sold these awards shows as women, with our gowns and colors and our beautiful faces and our glamour. This time the industry can’t expect us to go up and twirl around. That’s not what this moment is about.”

While Phillips is asking her fellow designers to donate to the Time’s Up legal defense fund, you can too by simply visiting their GoFundMe page here.

More:

300 Powerful Hollywood Women Just Launched Time’s Up, a Massive Antiharassment Action Plan

Four Powerful #MeToo Stories Take Center Stage at the ‘Glamour’ Women of the Year Awards

#MeToo Founder Tarana Burke on What Needs to Happen After the Hashtag



Source link

Categories
Health

300 Powerful Hollywood Women Just Launched Time's Up, a Massive Anti-Harassment Action Plan


Women in Hollywood have had enough of sexual harassment—whether it’s in Hollywood or for their sisters in agricultural, service, and domestic industries. On Monday, more than 300 women working in the entertainment industry, including actresses, agents, writers, directors, and producers, announced an ambitious action plan called Time’s Up Now, with the goal of ending the imbalance of gender power across all industries. According to The New York Times, a few of the women who helped start the plan are actresses America Ferrera, Eva Longoria, Ashley Judd, Natalie Portman, Rashida Jones, Emma Stone, Kerry Washington, and Reese Witherspoon, along with producer Shonda Rhimes and lawyers Tina Tchen and Nina L. Shaw.

“The struggle for women to break in, to rise up the ranks and to simply be heard and acknowledged in male-dominated workplaces must end; time’s up on this impenetrable monopoly,” the group wrote in an open letter posted to their dedicated site, TimesUpNow.com.

The letter further explained that the group was moved by another open letter it received in November on behalf of 700,000 female farmworkers who said they stood with the actresses and felt their same pain.

“To the members of Alianza and farmworker women across the country, we see you, we thank you, and we acknowledge the heavy weight of our common experience of being preyed upon, harassed, and exploited by those who abuse their power and threaten our physical and economic security,” the Time’s Up Now letter read.

To fight gender inequality and all the trappings that come with it, the group has come up with several ways to fight the battle—including a legal defense fund that is already backed by $13 million in donations. This, the Times explained, will be used to assist less-privileged women to protect themselves after incidences of sexual misconduct. Moreover, the group announced it will work on passing legislation that will penalize companies that remain tolerant of “persistent harassment” and use nondisclosure agreements to intimidate victims. Right now, the group isn’t centralized around a particular leader, and it’s also run completely by volunteers.

The open letter also explained that the group is asking women in Hollywood to wear black at the Golden Globes and to speak out about sexual harassment at the red carpet. As Longoria told The Times, the majority of women contacted about the all-black protest have signed on.

“For years, we’ve sold these awards shows as women, with our gowns and colors and our beautiful faces and our glamour,” Longoria said. “This time the industry can’t expect us to go up and twirl around. That’s not what this moment is about.”

As Rhimes further noted to the paper, “It’s very hard for us to speak righteously about the rest of anything if we haven’t cleaned our own house.” She added, “If this group of women can’t fight for a model for other women who don’t have as much power and privilege, then who can?”

The group isn’t just looking to protect the rights of women, but also aims to protect all marginalized groups including minorities, gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people. “No one wants to look back and say they stood at the sidelines,” Lena Waithe, one of Master of None‘s stars, added.

Read the group’s entire mission statement and learn more about the program on their site here.

Related Content:
#MeToo Founder Tarana Burke on What Needs to Happen After the Hashtag
Hundreds Turn Out for Take Back the Workplace, #MeToo Demonstrations in Hollywood
Four Powerful #MeToo Stories Take Center Stage at the ‘Glamour’ Women of the Year Awards



Source link

Categories
Health

Damn Right Taylor Swift Deserved Being Time's Person of the Year


“Spineless feminism” and “political passivity” are some of the phrases Taylor Swift’s critics used this week, after Time revealed “The Silence Breakers” as its Person of the Year. In the back right corner of the issue’s cover, Swift leans against a wall, joined by Ashley Judd, another familiar face. But the other women that share the cover aren’t familiar—in fact, there’s even a partial shot of a woman’s elbow, which was done intentionally to represent the anonymous women who came forward to Time. And yet, as with everything Taylor Swift touches, a social media firestorm was ignited at the proclamation that the star was a Silence Breaker.

Lots of people, including influential journalists, reviled the singer, making outrageous claims that Time only used her to sell magazines, or suggesting that Swift’s experiences with sexual harassment were somehow less important than others’. But the dissecting and ranking of people’s experiences with sexual harassment and abuse is alarming, as is the discussion of which victim “deserve” a cover spot. Any woman who has been sexually harassed or abused “deserves” that spot, and newsflash, none of these women wanted to be sexually harassed in the first place.

Knocking Taylor Swift has become a sport in America, often for reasons that are relatively harmless—her feud with the Kardashian-Wests, her dancing, her music. But, we’ve also taken to calling her out for missteps that hold more gravitas. The overwhelming issue feminists take with Swift surrounds her inaction on social issues. Yes, the pop star was silent during the 2016 election. No, she didn’t publicly use the #MeToo hashtag on Twitter to support her sisters in arms. Many felt it was her duty on both counts to stand up for women and pick a side—makes sense when you’re someone with a platform as massive as hers —but she is, first and foremost, a pop singer. Throwing her hat into the activism ring shouldn’t be required.

But the thing is, she did. Time included Taylor as a Silence Breaker because she was one. Earlier this year, DJ David Mueller sued Swift for defamation of character. Swift claimed he reached under her skirt at a public meet and greet and grabbed her ass—and there is photo evidence to support it. To prove a point that predatory men can’t get away with harassment anymore, Swift counter-sued him for a comical, petty price of one dollar. She won the case, and gave a notoriously fierce testimony, of which she commented, “I’m told it was the most amount of times the word ‘ass’ has ever been said in Colorado Federal Court.” So while her critics censured Swift for her lack of participation in the #MeToo social campaign, in this case, her actions spoke louder than words.

Plus, as if suing her harasser and winning wasn’t enough, the move itself was impactful. The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) saw a 35 percent increase of phone calls in the weekend following Swift’s trial alone. She wanted to send a message to young women and men that we should stand up to predators, and it worked. She told Time, “I figured that if he would be brazen enough to assault me under these risky circumstances and high stakes, imagine what he might do to a vulnerable, young artist if given the chance.” While Swift is unfathomably privileged, she did exactly what someone with that kind of power should do: she used her it to usher in positive change, even if she chose not to follow it up with a hashtag.

And let’s not forget that last year Swift donated $250,000 to Kesha to help with her financial fees after being denied an injunction in her lawsuit against Dr. Luke, and did so quietly. This move had no impact on her career, and she had no reason to insert herself into that headline. When Swift went through with the counter-suit, she also had no reason to bolster her image. Plus, the entire lawsuit took place before the Harvey Weinstein report went public, and before the massive second wave of #MeToo (the original movement was started by Tarana Burke in 2007).

No matter how rich or famous someone is, suggesting that a woman came forward about sexual assault for attention is revolting. Being harassed or assaulted is traumatic, and the added stress of coming forward doesn’t alleviate that, it intensifies it. Research shows that reporting sexual harassment can actually worsen one’s job, psychological and health outcomes. One of the main reasons women don’t come forward is fear of a negative response or further harassment, which Taylor proved is a valid fear. The bravery it takes someone to come forward at all—let alone a woman who knew she would be crucified for “attention-seeking,” is hard to imagine. Money and privilege don’t make any person’s body public property.

Ranking which victims’ circumstances are worse or “deserving” of media attention has to stop. Regardless of your opinions on Taylor Swift as a musician or celebrity, it’s imperative we view her trauma objectively. While Swift often shies away from social issues, she hasn’t done anything wrong. No survivor owes the public his or her story, and Swift should be commended for sharing hers, end of story.

Jill Gutowitz is an LA-based writer who has written for VICE, Broadly, Teen Vogue, AwesomenessTV, Dame Magazine, and more. Follow her on Twitter @jillboard.





Source link