Categories
Health

Ivanka Trump Calls Family Separations A 'Low Point,' but Twitter Wonders Why She Didn't Speak up Sooner


Despite positioning herself as a champion for women’s rights, Ivanka Trump has repeatedly drawn criticism for refusing to speak out against some of her father’s most controversial viewpoints. (Remember SNL’s “Complicit” perfume ad?)

Most recently, critics noted how conspicuously quiet she’d been on the topic of the family separations that resulted from the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance immigration policy. But on Thursday, she broke her silence and said the issue was “a low point” for her.

During an event with the news site Axios, Trump, who is also an advisor to the White House, shared her thoughts on separations at the border, which have splintered nearly 2,700 parents and children. An interviewer remarked that some administration officials have come to regard the policy as a “low point.”

“That was a low point for me as well,” she said. “I feel very strongly about that. And I am very vehemently against family separation and the separation of parents and children.”

She went on to describe illegal immigration as an “incredibly complex” topic, but didn’t offer further insight or potential approaches the administration could take. “These are not easy issues; these are incredibly difficult issues,” she said. “And like the rest of the country, I experience them in a very emotional way.”

Trump has been tight-lipped on immigration in the past. In 2017, after the president announced he would end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, she again described the issue as “complicated” and called on Congress to act.

On social media, many people wondered why Trump has waited so long to to share her views about family separations, especially since she held opposing beliefs. According to some reports, Trump had donated $50,000 to a church helping to care for migrant children, but she never used her position to publicly denounce the policy while children were still being forcibly removed from their parents. She was even slammed at one point for posting what some called a “tone-deaf” photo holding her son amid the crisis.

In the same interview, someone also asked Trump if she believed the media was “the enemy of the people,” as her father has suggested in the past. She seemed to split from her dad yet again, claiming she does not share that opinion.

“I’ve certainly received my fair share of reporting on me personally that I know not to be fully accurate, so I have some sensitivity around why people have concerns and gripe, especially when they’re sort of targeted,” Ms. Trump said. “But no, I do not feel that the media is the enemy of the people.”

A few hours later, her father chimed in on the interview with a tweet that read, “They asked my daughter Ivanka whether or not the media is the enemy of the people. She correctly said no. It is the FAKE NEWS, which is a large percentage of the media, that is the enemy of the people!”

Related Stories:

Ivanka Trump’s Fashion Brand Is Shutting Down

The Story of Ivanka Trump’s Fashion Brand Illustrates the Power of a Shopping Boycott





Source link

Categories
Health

One of Meghan Markle's Bridesmaids Didn't Have a Bouquet at the Royal Wedding—Here's Why


When Meghan Markle walked down the aisle of St. George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle last weekend for her royal wedding, she did so surrounded not by the requisite childhood pals and college girlfriends, but a group of tiny toddler bridesmaids and pageboys. This surprisingly well-behaved crew, which included Prince George and Princess Charlotte, trailed Markle to the altar, carried her veil, and were prominently featured in not one but two of the newlyweds’ official wedding portraits. If you’ve spent most of your waking hours since they were released on Monday studying every single inch of the photos (same), you may have noticed a curious detail: The pint-size wedding party appears to be one bouquet short.

Before you dive into “The Case of the Missing Royal Wedding Bouquet,” however, People has already cleared up the mystery. The bouquet-less bridesmaid is Ivy Mulroney, daughter of Meghan Markle’s close friend Jessica Mulroney, who had to keep her hands free during the ceremony for a pretty big job: holding the Duchess of Sussex’s own flowers. The 4-year-old didn’t seem to mind not having her own arrangement to carry, though, because she was able to hold hands with two of her new friends and fellow bridesmaids as they walked down the aisle together. And in one of the official portraits, bridesmaid Florence van Cutsem, Harry’s goddaughter, appears to have kindly let Ivy share her bouquet.

Earlier this week, wedding photographer Alexi Lubomirski explained just how he got the kids to sit still for those sweet portraits. “They were being bribed with one Smartie here, one Smartie there, so as soon as the kids came onto the set, I immediately just shouted out, ‘Who likes Smarties?’ and then everybody, hands up, smiles, even some adults put their hands up,” Lubomirski said, which completely explains the huge grins on every kid’s face.



Source link

Categories
Health

After Losing My Mom, I Didn't Know How to Be a 'Bride'


The dresses were whites and creams, lacy and chiffon, and a stranger stood beside me, zipping me into gown after gown. “How exciting,” the stranger said. “The happiest day of your life!”

I cringed.

“Oh, beautiful,” my aunts said, clapping, as I walked out to model the dresses. I spun and sashayed, blew kisses. My aunts were lovely, as were the gowns. But I already knew I’d never buy one of these things everyone had traveled so far to see me try on.

My partner and I had decided to get hitched. That was the good news: the love! But there was a lot about weddings that I didn’t understand. Changing your name to your husband’s, wearing white to mark your virginity, being “given away” to another man by your father—many of the traditions seemed more like market transactions. I told my stepdad the only way I was comfortable being given away was if he also included a herd of goats. He thought I was kidding.

In our wedding, everything will be different, I thought. All new traditions! Everything equal! All about us! We began planning. How could we avoid the wedding industrial complex? How could we remain unwaveringly clear about our core values?

I did a bunch of online research. “For a feminist wedding, give your bridesmaids different style dresses!” the advice said. Have the bride stand to the right of the altar while the groom stands to the left! Wear a cream dress instead of white! I was baffled. The suggestions seemed just one degree off of a completely traditional wedding.

I didn’t know exactly what I was looking for, though I had an idea that maintaining a rigid set of principles was a cornerstone. I tried to start somewhere small. When my partner’s sister asked what her 3-year-old son, who would be in the ceremony, should wear, I said, “Let him wear anything he wants.”

“You’re going to regret that,” she said. I could hear the stress in her voice. Maybe the kind of feminism I wanted had to do with individual strength of character. “This is your day,” the internet told me. “Stick with your gut.”

I learned about feminism from my mom. I only know a few things about her wedding to my dad. I know she wore an antique kimono that she found in a vintage shop somewhere in Seattle.

And then I got a call from my future mother-in-love (her term, and how sweet). She wanted help figuring out what to wear. She sent over pictures. And did I tell her I was a feminist and she should decide her own outfit depending upon whatever values she held dearest? I did not. I told her we were thinking coastal colors, and that her dress was very, very pretty.

But I’m still a feminist, I thought. And then I thought: I’m not sure what being a feminist actually means to me.

I learned about feminism from my mom. I only know a few things about her wedding to my dad. I know she wore an antique kimono that she found in a vintage shop somewhere in Seattle. I know it was December, that they passed a giant chalice of wine between the guests. Everyone took a sip to bind the love together.

I know a bit more about my mom’s second wedding to my stepdad. I was three, so remember little, but there’s a VHS tape. It took place in a small clearing in a Redwood forest, the enormous trunks four times the width of any person. The officiant was a woman who did not follow any religious or traditional text. My mom had sewn her own dress out of the fabric she hand-painted for her business, ribbons of it, in pale pinks and purples, overlapping to the ground. She wore a crown of dried flowers.

There’s so much more I want to know about her weddings, but I can’t ask. My mom has been dead ten months.

A ritual becomes meaningful through intention and repetition. The book a father reads to his kid on Christmas. A walk in the park with your lover every Saturday. I didn’t understand for a long time that one reason the rituals used in most wedding traditions felt so meaningless to me is that they weren’t part of my family. My mom’s two funky weddings were the legacies I knew. Her sensibility was what I believed to be true. Her values. Like girl power. Rejecting the word “bitch” entirely. Never being beholden to a man for financial stability. These were the lessons my mom taught me.

As I’d begun planning, my mom’s two sisters, my lovely aunts, said they’d like to be with me while we went wedding dress shopping. I considered this, what it would signify to them if I said no. I didn’t especially want to wear a wedding dress, and the shopping tradition wasn’t important to me, but maybe it was to them. Maybe a feminist wedding included not just the things my partner and I wanted for ourselves, but a careful consideration of others as well?

I wanted a cheap dress because I wanted it to come from a thrift store after a day gallivanting around with my mom

We went to the mall. A very nice mall. Expensive. Not exactly what I’d classify as feminist or anti-wedding-industrial-complex, but hey. I tried on stunning dresses that cost between eight hundred and two thousand bucks. What I said to my aunts when I was done, what felt true, was that I couldn’t morally square spending that kind of money on a piece of clothing to wear once. They were baffled. Why had we come, then, to this store? Why had they driven hours to meet me here?

I couldn’t finish the second half of my desire: I wanted a cheap dress because I wanted it to come from a thrift store after a day gallivanting around with my mom. How could I say that? What I wanted was a ghost of a memory from years before. I wanted us to wander through vintage shops, picking up dolls with matted hair and missing eyeballs while we browsed, making them tell jokes to one another. I wanted to be trying on ugly hats with my mom and using rusted metal pokers to tap each other on the shoulder. I imagined her best parts, her funny, wild self, sauntering down crammed aisle after crammed aisle.

In my dress shopping fantasy, the dress was beside the point.

My aunts and I left the store empty-handed. None of this was their fault. They tried to be what they thought I wanted, and I tried to be what I thought they wanted. Without my mom around, they were trying to fill in. I loved them for that. What was a feminist to do?

One night, my aunt confessed that she and her mom, my grandmother, had never really known what to do with my mom. She was always so different than they were, a painter, a non-sorority-sister, a weirdo, an adventurer.

Maybe they thought I could be a more understandable stand-in for the daughter and sister they lost. On the surface, I was. I’d tried to blend in while my mom tried to stand out. Encouraging me to have a more traditional wedding might be a way to make me someone they could connect to.

But leaning into the weird, into the invitations we painted and Trader Joe’s flowers we wanted to use—that’s who I was. My mother’s daughter.

The months leading up to the wedding were rough, full of holes and shadows and my inability to tell anyone what I actually wanted or, really, to understand it myself. My partner was loving and flexible, willing to talk through whatever came up, eager to forego any traditions that didn’t feel good. Still, I was nervous for the actual day. I thought I may hide beneath the bathroom sink, weeping.

I told a few friends this. I was so consumed by who wasn’t present that I didn’t really pay attention to the five or six very good friends who checked on me often, asked if I needed help planning. I wish I’d paid better attention to them. Let their love through my cracks. There’s no right way to be sad, but my head was buried so deep in the sand of grief, I forgot sometimes to even tell my partner how glad I was to be committing to him. No other person has brought me more joy, even through what felt like a desert of loss.

We had pie for dessert and no champagne toast. I kept my name. Our mixed gendered wedding crews wore coastal colors, and my new adorable nephew donned a bowtie. Our officiant was a tree scientist.

When the day arrived, my partner and I walked down the aisle hand in hand. I made bouquets from Trader Joe’s flowers with girlfriends I adored, drank boxed wine.

We had pie for dessert and no champagne toast. I kept my name. Our mixed gendered wedding crews wore coastal colors, and my new adorable nephew donned a bowtie. Our officiant was a tree scientist. I wore one of those beautiful off-white lacy dresses I tried on—purchased once it went on super sale.

One aunt arranged a string of bay leaves and yellow-orange roses on a little altar we’d made, and built table centerpieces in old silver pitchers. They were stunning. The other aunt led us in a women’s prayer. Just before the ceremony, twenty-five women, friends and family, stood with me in a circle. They offered advice and love and jokes and wisdom. Look around, my aunt said. I did. The faces of so many people I loved shone back. I could feel something physical, tangible, like taking a deep breath in the mountains after a long hike. I don’t know exactly what it was, but I think it had to do with the power of so many incredible women bound together, however temporary. We are here to support you. If you ever forget that, we will remind you.

In the end, the wedding was wholly us in a wild, expansive, compromised hootenanny of love and hilarity. What feminism meant to me changed. It began as hard-lined abstract principles with me in the center, and came to mean something bigger, more complicated, something about strength with flexibility. Of doing whatever felt right for us, while still remembering that no matter what, we were lucky enough to be within the circles of incredible women and men in our lives. I smiled the whole damn day.

I’m still not sure what kind of feminist I am—a mediocre one, probably. But I’m trying. My mom taught me that. Even though she wasn’t there, she was everywhere.

Tessa Fontaine is the author of The Electric Woman: A Memoir In Death-Defying Acts, which chronicles the season she spent in a circus sideshow as well as her memories of the mother who taught her how to live fearlessly and on her own terms.



Source link

Categories
Health

The Kardashian Christmas Card Didn't Show Kylie Jenner, and Fans Are Freaking Out


When the Kardashian-Jenner family started rolling out their annual Christmas card (or “Krismas” card) photoshoot piecemeal at the beginning of December—while keeping lips zipped about the reports that youngest Jenner daughter Kylie is pregnantmany fans put two and two together and concluded that Kylie’s “reveal” would come via the card, likely on December 25. Especially after the family confirmed that Kim Kardashian and Kanye West are expecting via surrogate, and that Khloé Kardashian and Tristan Thompson are expecting their first, it was kinda like, people just wanna say congrats, so, you know, why not confirm it already?

But Christmas Day came and went with nary a Kylie-related post in sight. In fact, Kim posted the full card, a picture of basically the whole family, plus a tree, and didn’t even mention the fact that Kylie was nowhere to be seen. Which is kind of weird even if Kylie isn’t pregnant, right? There’s all the sisters, there’s Kendall, there are the kids, but…no Kylie.

Of course, Kylie doesn’t owe the world pictures, or even an announcement, and if she wants to say something, she has every right to do it when she wants. But many fans had some thoughts about it: What was all that rollout for, especially when we all know something might or might not be up? Why not just post a message saying how happy the family is for Kylie and maybe the month she’s due, so we can all get on with our lives? What game are you playing at, PR Queen Kris Jenner?

Below are some of the more, er, passionate fan reactions the the not-news:

Even celebrities were invested in the story. Hills star Spencer Pratt theorized that Kylie was too expensive for the card, while country singer Kelsea Ballerini summed up pretty much everyone’s feelings with, “there is too much space in my brain being consumed by this thought currently and I’m really needing to get an answer and move forward with my life.”

Seriously.

Related Stories:
I’m as Far Along in My Pregnancy as Kylie Jenner, and Our Bodies Don’t Need to Be ‘Proof’
Predictably, Twitter Users Can’t Handle the Kylie Pregnancy News
‘Pregnant Kylie Jenner’ Is the Latest in Offensive Halloween Costumes





Source link

Categories
Health

Anna Kendrick's Iconic 'Cups' Performance in 'Pitch Perfect' Almost Didn't Happen


One of the most iconic scenes in the first Pitch Perfect film is Anna Kendrick‘s “Cups” audition. If you’re one of the three people on Earth who’s never seen this movie and doesn’t know what I’m talking about, here’s a quick boiler plate: Kendrick’s character, Beca, decides to audition for her college’s all-female acapella group (the Barden Bellas) by randomly hitting cups on the floor and singing “When I’m Gone” with no background music. It’s quirky and weird and ultimately lands her a spot on the Bellas. But here’s the interesting part: Kendrick didn’t come up with this herself. Way before Pitch Perfect happened, she actually found people on the Internet who had performed the song acapella with cups and learned it secondhand—just for fun. She had no idea it would come in handy for the film.

“Handy” is definitely an understatement, too. When it came time to film Pitch Perfect, the producers needed to make sure Kendrick and the other Bellas could actually sing. “They were like, ‘Can you sing something for us?’ and I was like, ‘I get to do [‘Cups’].’ I had no use for it before.”

Producers were so impressed with Kendrick’s “Cups” performance that they decided to put it in the film in place of what they’d originally planned for Beca’s audition—which was “I’m a Little Teacup.”

“I don’t know how I was supposed to play [‘I’m a Little Teacup’], so thank God they changed that,” Kendrick said. “I would’ve been like, ‘I don’t know how to make this scene work, guys.'”

Watch Kendrick explain this, below.

[embedded content]

Seriously, can you imagine Beca singing “I’m a Little Teacup” in front of terrifying Aubrey Posen? Talk about aca-awkward.

Pitch Perfect 3 hits theaters on December 22.

Related Stories:

Anna Kendrick Said No to a “Problematic” Love Interest in Pitch Perfect 3

Anna Kendrick Was Told to ‘Show More Skin’ in ‘Pitch Perfect 3’

Anna Kendrick Is Down for Pitch Perfect 4, Reviving All Our Wildest Dreams



Source link

Categories
Health

Meryl Streep Replies to Rose McGowan's Criticism: 'I Didn't Know' About Harvey Weinstein


During the last few days, it’s been said that actresses attending the 2018 Golden Globes would be banning together to all wear black as a silent protest against the sexual harassment of women both in Hollywood and around the globe. While no stars or stylists confirmed the reports, the rumors were enough for actress Rose McGowan to take to Twitter to blast any actress willing to take part.

In a tweet, which has since been deleted, McGowan said, “Actresses, like Meryl Streep, who happily worked for The Pig Monster, are wearing black @goldenglobes in a silent protest. YOUR SILENCE is THE problem. You’ll accept a fake award breathlessly & affect no real chance. I despise your hypocrisy. Maybe you should all wear Marchesa.”

While Amber Tamblyn was one of the first actresses to come out and slam McGowan for her tweet, calling it “beneath” McGowan to do, she would not be the last. On Monday, Meryl Streep, the target of McGowan’s tweet, came out with a lengthy statement both defending herself, and further lending her support to McGowan.

“It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent decades when he proceeded to attack others,” Streep said in a statement shared with HuffPost by her publicist Leslee Dart.

Streep further added that she “wasn’t deliberately silent” about Weinstein and his horrific crimes simply because she didn’t know.

According to Streep, she didn’t have a friendly relationship, or any relationship, with Weinstein through the years. She explained that like most people whose films were distributed by Weinstein she had only a tangential tie to the man and never truly knew him.

“…Not every actor, actress, and director who made films that HW distributed knew he abused women, or that he raped Rose in the 90s, other women before and others after, until they told us,” She said. “We did not know that women’s silence was purchased by him and his enablers. HW needed us not to know this, because our association with him bought him credibility, an ability to lure young, aspiring women into circumstances where they would be hurt.” In a meaningful line Streep added, “He needed me much more than I needed him and he made sure I didn’t know.”

Streep added that now that she, and everyone, knows, a legal defense fund for victims is being assembled to which, “hundreds of good-hearted people in our business will contribute, to bring down the bastards, and help victims fight this scourge within.”

She ended her statement by expressing her sorrow that McGowan sees her as an adversary, rather than a friend. Instead of further fractioning Streep said she hopes all women in the entertainment business can stand together “in defiance” of the same enemy: “a status quo that wants so badly to return to the bad old days, the old ways where women were used, abused and refused entry into the decision-making, top levels of the industry. That’s where the cover-ups convene. Those rooms must be disinfected, and integrated, before anything even begins to change.”

Below, Streep’s full statement:

It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this
weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s
crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent
decades when he proceeded to attack others. I wasn’t deliberately
silent. I didn’t know. I don’t tacitly approve of rape. I didn’t know.
I don’t like young women being assaulted. I didn’t know this was
happening. I don’t know where Harvey lives, nor has he ever been to my
home. I have never in my life been invited to his hotel room. I have
been to his office once, for a meeting with Wes Craven for “Music of
the Heart” in 1998. HW distributed movies I made with other people. HW
was not a filmmaker; he was often a producer, primarily a marketer of
films made by other people—some of them great, some not great. But not
every actor, actress, and director who made films that HW distributed
knew he abused women, or that he raped Rose in the 90s, other women
before and others after, until they told us. We did not know that
women’s silence was purchased by him and his enablers. HW needed us
not to know this, because our association with him bought him
credibility, an ability to lure young, aspiring women into
circumstances where they would be hurt. He needed me much more than I
needed him and he made sure I didn’t know. Apparently he hired ex
Mossad operators to protect this information from becoming public.
Rose and the scores of other victims of these powerful, moneyed,
ruthless men face an adversary for whom Winning, at any and all costs,
is the only acceptable outcome. That’s why a legal defense fund for
victims is currently being assembled to which hundreds of good hearted
people in our business will contribute, to bring down the bastards,
and help victims fight this scourge within. Rose assumed and broadcast
something untrue about me, and I wanted to let her know the truth.
Through friends who know her, I got my home phone number to her the
minute I read the headlines. I sat by that phone all day yesterday and
this morning, hoping to express both my deep respect for her and
others’ bravery in exposing the monsters among us, and my sympathy for
the untold, ongoing pain she suffers. No one can bring back what
entitled bosses like Bill O’Reilly, Roger Ailes, and HW took from the
women who endured attacks on their bodies and their ability to make a
living.. And I hoped that she would give me a hearing. She did not,
but I hope she reads this. I am truly sorry she sees me as an
adversary, because we are both, together with all the women in our
business, standing in defiance of the same implacable foe: a status
quo that wants so badly to return to the bad old days, the old ways
where women were used, abused and refused entry into the
decision-making, top levels of the industry. That’s where the
cover-ups convene. Those rooms must be disinfected, and integrated,
before anything even begins to change.

Related Content:

Amber Tamblyn Slams Rose McGowan for ‘Shaming’ Actresses Planning to Wear Black to the Golden Globes
#MeToo Founder Tarana Burke on What Needs to Happen After the Hashtag
MeToo: Thousands of Women Share Stories of Sexual Harassment and Assault on Twitter



Source link