Categories
Health

Kim Kardashian Is Renaming Her Shapewear Line Following Criticism


Following accusations of cultural appropriation, Kim Kardashian West announced she’ll be renaming her forthcoming shapewear line, previously called Kimono.

“Being an entrepreneur and my own boss has been one of the most rewarding challenges I’ve been blessed with in my life,” she wrote on Instagram. “What’s made it possible for me after all of these years has been the direct line of communication with my fans and the public. I am always listening, learning and growing—I so appreciate the passion and varied perspectives that people bring to me.”

“When I announced the name of my shapewear line, I did so with the best intentions in mind. My brands and products are built with inclusivity and diversity at their core and after careful thought and consideration, I will be launching my Solutionwear brand under a new name. I will be in touch soon. Thank you for your understanding and support always.”

Kardashian announced her latest venture, a “solutionwear” brand of undergarments available in sizes XXS to 4XL and in nine shades, last week. And though it was praised for its inclusive approach to sizing and pricing, the name Kimono drew criticism, specifically from people of Japanese origin, who felt it was disrespectful to the traditional garment.

As this conversation started gaining traction on social media—even inspiring a hashtag, #KimOhNo—Kardashian issued a response to the New York Times, clarifying her intention with the name: “I understand and have deep respect for the significance of the kimono in Japanese culture and have no plans to design or release any garments that would in any way resemble or dishonor the traditional garment. I made the decision to name my company Kimono, not to disassociate the word from its Japanese roots but as a nod to the beauty and detail that goes into a garment. Filing a trademark is a source identifier that will allow me to use the word for my shapewear and intimates line but does not preclude or restrict anyone, in this instance, from making kimonos or using the word kimono in reference to the traditional garment. My solutionwear brand is built with inclusivity and diversity at its core and I’m incredibly proud of what’s to come.”

Kardashian didn’t reveal the new name for the brand, but promised to share it with the public soon. The products are expected to launch this month.





Source link

Categories
Health

Scarlett Johansson Withdraws From "Rub and Tug" After Criticism of Her Casting as a Trans Man


Scarlett Johansson has withdrawn from the film Rub and Tug following widespread criticism of her casting as a transgender man, Dante “Tex” Gill. The actor announced the news on Friday in a statement to Out Magazine:

“In light of recent ethical questions raised surrounding my casting as Dante Tex Gill, I have decided to respectfully withdraw my participation in the project,” she said. “Our cultural understanding of transgender people continues to advance, and I’ve learned a lot from the community since making my first statement about my casting and realize it was insensitive. I have great admiration and love for the trans community and am grateful that the conversation regarding inclusivity in Hollywood continues.”

“According to GLAAD, LGBTQ+ characters dropped 40% in 2017 from the previous year, with no representation of trans characters in any major studio release,” she continued. “While I would have loved the opportunity to bring Dante’s story and transition to life, I understand why many feel he should be portrayed by a transgender person, and I am thankful that this casting debate, albeit controversial, has sparked a larger conversation about diversity and representation in film. I believe that all artists should be considered equally and fairly. My production company, These Pictures, actively pursues projects that both entertain and push boundaries. We look forward to working with every community to bring these most poignant and important stories to audiences worldwide.”

Johansson’s words are a significant departure from her previous statement. In the wake of the immense backlash against the news of her casting, she originally shifted attention to other cisgender actors who have portrayed transgender characters. “Tell them that they can be directed to Jeffrey Tambor, Jared Leto, and Felicity Huffman’s reps for comment,” she said simply, via a rep, to Bustle.

Previously, Johansson’s casting was heavily criticized by many, including trans actors Trace Lysette, who stars in Transparent, and Jamie Clayton, who stars in Sense8.

“Oh word?? So you can continue to play us but we can’t play y’all? Hollywood is so f*cked… I wouldn’t be as upset if I was getting in the same rooms as Jennifer Lawrence and Scarlett for cis roles, but we know that’s not the case. A mess,” Lysette wrote on Twitter. “And not only do you play us and steal our narrative and our opportunity,” she added, “but you pat yourselves on the back with trophies and accolades for mimicking what we have lived… so twisted. I’m so done…”

Clayton chimed in with the same criticism. “Actors who are trans never even get to audition FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN ROLES OF TRANS CHARACTERS,” she tweeted. “THATS THE REAL ISSUE. WE CANT EVEN GET IN THE ROOM. Cast actors WHO ARE TRANS as NON TRANS CHARACTERS. I DARE YOU #RupertSanders @NewRegency #ScarlettJohansson”

Johansson was previously criticized for playing a whitewashed version of a Japanese character in Ghost in the Shell, which was also directed by Rupert Sanders, the director of Rub and Tug. It is unclear who will be replacing her in Rub and Tug, and whether the film will cast a transgender man.

Related: Scarlett Johansson Called Out James Franco for Wearing a Time’s Up Pin





Source link

Categories
Health

Kim Kardashian Wore Cornrows to the MTV Movie & TV Awards, Despite Past Criticism


While casually scrolling through my social media feeds on Saturday, I came across a photo of Kim Kardashian at the 2018 MTV Movie & TV Awards red carpet debuting yet another braided hairstyle—and this time wearing tribal braids. A few months ago, my immediate reaction would have been to get upset that the reality star continues to appropriate black culture. But this time, I just felt tired. Tired of seeing Kardashian profit by appropriating a multitude of black cultural aspects over and over again. Tired of hearing about the double standards of black women being discriminated against and wrongfully disciplined by their jobs or teenage girls getting suspended for wearing their hair in cornrows at school, while Kardashian casually wears the style on the red carpet and get praised for the exact same look. Just tired.

But let’s face it, this isn’t the first time that Kardashian has worn her hair in cornrows and it likely won’t be the last. Earlier this year, Kardashian wore blond Fulani braids with beads and credited her braided look to ’70s model and actress Bo Derek, who is white.

While many people were frustrated about her choice—and took to Twitter to share why it’s appropriation—Kim instead excluded herself from partaking in important discussion and posted a dismissive Instagram with the caption “Hi, can I get zero f-cks please, thanks.”

This time around, not much has changed. While Kim hasn’t yet said anything about her hair at the show, which aired Monday night, women on social media haven’t been afraid to share how fed up they are. As one Twitter user wrote, “Kim Kardashian in these braids is exhausting. The most annoying part is that at this point she knows what she’s doing, she knows what cultural appropriation is and that it upsets people yet she still chooses to do it because she knows it doesn’t upset the right ppl or cost her $$.” She’s right. Kim probably won’t lose any money because she wore her hair in cornrows. Plenty are even complimenting her for how amazing she looks.

Here’s just a small sampling of the discussion going down on Twitter right now:

As a black woman, it’s frustrating to see a hairstyle that comes with extreme cultural history and significance being paraded around as the latest trend. I’m just waiting for the day when I hear someone call them “Kim K braids.” There are multiple reasons why Kardashian wearing these braids is problematic, but the point that should be acknowledged is her lack of effort to credit the style from its rightful origins. And as frustrating and tiring as situations like these are, we can’t let them go unnoticed.

Related Stories:
Sigh: Kim Kardashian Wore Cornrows and Called Them ‘Bo Derek Braids’
Kim Kardashian Just Chopped Her Hair Into a Blunt Lob
This Woman Re-created Kim Kardashian’s Perfume Ad to Prove a Point About ‘Perfect’ Bodies





Source link

Categories
Health

Meryl Streep Replies to Rose McGowan's Criticism: 'I Didn't Know' About Harvey Weinstein


During the last few days, it’s been said that actresses attending the 2018 Golden Globes would be banning together to all wear black as a silent protest against the sexual harassment of women both in Hollywood and around the globe. While no stars or stylists confirmed the reports, the rumors were enough for actress Rose McGowan to take to Twitter to blast any actress willing to take part.

In a tweet, which has since been deleted, McGowan said, “Actresses, like Meryl Streep, who happily worked for The Pig Monster, are wearing black @goldenglobes in a silent protest. YOUR SILENCE is THE problem. You’ll accept a fake award breathlessly & affect no real chance. I despise your hypocrisy. Maybe you should all wear Marchesa.”

While Amber Tamblyn was one of the first actresses to come out and slam McGowan for her tweet, calling it “beneath” McGowan to do, she would not be the last. On Monday, Meryl Streep, the target of McGowan’s tweet, came out with a lengthy statement both defending herself, and further lending her support to McGowan.

“It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent decades when he proceeded to attack others,” Streep said in a statement shared with HuffPost by her publicist Leslee Dart.

Streep further added that she “wasn’t deliberately silent” about Weinstein and his horrific crimes simply because she didn’t know.

According to Streep, she didn’t have a friendly relationship, or any relationship, with Weinstein through the years. She explained that like most people whose films were distributed by Weinstein she had only a tangential tie to the man and never truly knew him.

“…Not every actor, actress, and director who made films that HW distributed knew he abused women, or that he raped Rose in the 90s, other women before and others after, until they told us,” She said. “We did not know that women’s silence was purchased by him and his enablers. HW needed us not to know this, because our association with him bought him credibility, an ability to lure young, aspiring women into circumstances where they would be hurt.” In a meaningful line Streep added, “He needed me much more than I needed him and he made sure I didn’t know.”

Streep added that now that she, and everyone, knows, a legal defense fund for victims is being assembled to which, “hundreds of good-hearted people in our business will contribute, to bring down the bastards, and help victims fight this scourge within.”

She ended her statement by expressing her sorrow that McGowan sees her as an adversary, rather than a friend. Instead of further fractioning Streep said she hopes all women in the entertainment business can stand together “in defiance” of the same enemy: “a status quo that wants so badly to return to the bad old days, the old ways where women were used, abused and refused entry into the decision-making, top levels of the industry. That’s where the cover-ups convene. Those rooms must be disinfected, and integrated, before anything even begins to change.”

Below, Streep’s full statement:

It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this
weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s
crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent
decades when he proceeded to attack others. I wasn’t deliberately
silent. I didn’t know. I don’t tacitly approve of rape. I didn’t know.
I don’t like young women being assaulted. I didn’t know this was
happening. I don’t know where Harvey lives, nor has he ever been to my
home. I have never in my life been invited to his hotel room. I have
been to his office once, for a meeting with Wes Craven for “Music of
the Heart” in 1998. HW distributed movies I made with other people. HW
was not a filmmaker; he was often a producer, primarily a marketer of
films made by other people—some of them great, some not great. But not
every actor, actress, and director who made films that HW distributed
knew he abused women, or that he raped Rose in the 90s, other women
before and others after, until they told us. We did not know that
women’s silence was purchased by him and his enablers. HW needed us
not to know this, because our association with him bought him
credibility, an ability to lure young, aspiring women into
circumstances where they would be hurt. He needed me much more than I
needed him and he made sure I didn’t know. Apparently he hired ex
Mossad operators to protect this information from becoming public.
Rose and the scores of other victims of these powerful, moneyed,
ruthless men face an adversary for whom Winning, at any and all costs,
is the only acceptable outcome. That’s why a legal defense fund for
victims is currently being assembled to which hundreds of good hearted
people in our business will contribute, to bring down the bastards,
and help victims fight this scourge within. Rose assumed and broadcast
something untrue about me, and I wanted to let her know the truth.
Through friends who know her, I got my home phone number to her the
minute I read the headlines. I sat by that phone all day yesterday and
this morning, hoping to express both my deep respect for her and
others’ bravery in exposing the monsters among us, and my sympathy for
the untold, ongoing pain she suffers. No one can bring back what
entitled bosses like Bill O’Reilly, Roger Ailes, and HW took from the
women who endured attacks on their bodies and their ability to make a
living.. And I hoped that she would give me a hearing. She did not,
but I hope she reads this. I am truly sorry she sees me as an
adversary, because we are both, together with all the women in our
business, standing in defiance of the same implacable foe: a status
quo that wants so badly to return to the bad old days, the old ways
where women were used, abused and refused entry into the
decision-making, top levels of the industry. That’s where the
cover-ups convene. Those rooms must be disinfected, and integrated,
before anything even begins to change.

Related Content:

Amber Tamblyn Slams Rose McGowan for ‘Shaming’ Actresses Planning to Wear Black to the Golden Globes
#MeToo Founder Tarana Burke on What Needs to Happen After the Hashtag
MeToo: Thousands of Women Share Stories of Sexual Harassment and Assault on Twitter



Source link

Categories
Health

J.K. Rowling Finally Responds to Criticism About Johnny Depp's Grindelwald Casting


In the spring of 2016, Amber Heard was granted a temporary restraining order against her then husband, Johnny Depp, after accusing him of domestic violence. The story sent shockwaves throughout Hollywood, and things only intensified as more details started trickling out. Several months later Heard dropped the charges against Depp, and her domestic violence case was dismissed. This happened in tandem with the finalization of their divorce.

The specifics of their case have never been confirmed, but Depp’s public image took a major hit as a result. Soon after, Harry Potter fans started protesting Depp’s casting as Grindelwald in the Fantastic Beasts franchise. (He had a cameo role in the first film, which came out in 2016, and has the titular role in the sequel, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald.)

J.K. Rowling, who wrote the screenplays for both films, remained mum on the controversy for quite some time, but she finally spoke about it on Thursday, December 7, leaving a lengthy message on her personal website.

“When Johnny Depp was cast as Grindelwald, I thought he’d be wonderful in the role,” she wrote. “However, around the time of filming his cameo in the first movie, stories had appeared in the press that deeply concerned me and everyone most closely involved in the franchise. Harry Potter fans had legitimate questions and concerns about our choice to continue with Johnny Depp in the role. As David Yates, long-time Potter director, has already said, we naturally considered the possibility of recasting. I understand why some have been confused and angry about why that didn’t happen.”

Rowling says her inability to “speak openly to fans” about the Depp issue has been “difficult, frustrating, and at times painful.” Be she contends her silence was out of respect for the “agreements that have been put in place to protect the privacy of two people, both of whom have expressed a desire to get on with their lives.” (She’s presumably referring to Depp and Heard here.)

Rowling noted the people involved with The Crimes of Grindelwald are “genuinely happy” with Depp’s casting. However, she offered this caveat: “I accept that there will be those who are not satisfied with our choice of actor in the title role. However, conscience isn’t governable by committee. Within the fictional world and outside it, we all have to do what we believe to be the right thing.” You can read her full statement here.

The social media reactions to Rowling’s statement have been less than enthusiastic, to say the least. Many fans are upset more action wasn’t taken in this situation; they fear keeping Depp on board is only enabling his reported abuse. Here are just a few of the responses we found:

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is slated for a 2018 release.

Related Stories:

J.K. Rowling Shares How Harry Potter and Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them Are Connected

J.K. Rowling Had the Perfect Response to Tomi Lahren’s Anti-Trans Tweets

J.K. Rowling Just Shut Down Someone Who Mansplained What a Book Was to an Author





Source link