Categories
Health

5 Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s Abuse on Trauma, Justice, and Sisterhood


Rachel Benavidez: This is important stuff, and this is an important sisterhood that we have. And Virginia said, “Well, we want to focus on moving forward,” which absolutely, I do. I want to move forward with this, and help other women and children.

Virginia Giuffre: That’s what we were.

Rachel Benavidez: So, it’s very important. For me, I’m still in that phase of healing and trauma, and processing that. But I want to move forward. And I feel like with my sisterhood, with these women, and all the other hundreds who aren’t here, that that can really help me. So, thank you, Virginia, for putting yourself out there on all levels, and providing this opportunity for all of us.

Virginia Giuffre: It means the world.

Rachel Benavidez: You’re beautiful. And you’re so strong. And I love when you speak, you’re like, “Yeah, and what about going after that bitch” [laughter]. It was like, yeah, yes. I’m just happy to be here, and I’m happy to share my story. But I’m very teary, so I’m sorry. And I’m a ugly crier.

Virginia Giuffre: Don’t worry!

Rachel Benavidez: It’s not too pretty.

Teresa Helm: Speaking about the sisterhood of everyone gathering throughout these, this time? I don’t even know how to put it. These times, this time? What is this?

Rachel Benavidez: It’s a time warp. It feels like I’m in a time warp, actually.

Virginia Giuffre: It’s a past, present, and future topic.

Teresa Helm: It is. It is a past, present, and future. I mean, it’s been nearly two decades since this all began. Who knew that nearly two decades later, I would be sitting around discussing this now, going through it, seeing the events unfold as they have? And who knows how they’re going to continue to unfold?



Source link

Categories
Health

Serena Williams Is Speaking Out About Financial Abuse During Domestic Violence Awareness Month


Perhaps you’ve heard that one in four women will experience domestic violence in her lifetime. It’s a staggering statistic. Here’s the part you probably don’t know: 99% of those cases will involve some form of financial abuse.

Serena Williams wants to do something about that. In honor of Domestic Violence Awareness Month, Williams has partnered for the third time with the Allstate Foundation’s Purple Purse initiative to raise awareness around the rampant problem of financial abuse in relationships. “She is the embodiment of women’s empowerment,” Allstate Foundation senior program officer Ellen Lisak says. “We’ve been so grateful she has brought her influential voice and platform to our program to help elevate a national conversation around these issues that are so unknown to so many people.”

“When I signed up three years, I was really shocked by the statistics,” Williams told Glamour. “It’s basically every single case [of domestic violence]. When you think about that way, it’s like how did I not know about it? What can I do to bring my voice to it and talk about it?”

“I hope that people can learn the common signs of financial abuse and that if people are victims they know that there are resources like PurplePurse.com out there to help,” she continues. “I want people to know about the horrors of financial abuse.” Through her partnership with Allstate and Purple Purse, she’s had the opportunity to talk with survivors, something that has been very meaningful to her. “I feel really lucky to be among such powerful women,” she says. “It’s important for me to use my voice to support them and help tell their stories. Together, we can help other women.”

[embedded content]

“Victims of domestic violence are often asked, ‘Why don’t you just leave?’ and what we found is that financial abuse is one of the reasons. We found that domestic violence happens to one in four women, regardless of race or socioeconomic status and 99% of those cases also involve financial abuse,” Lisak tells Glamour. “It’s is one of the main reasons that victims remain in or return to an abusive relationship.”

“It can take on many forms, depending on the situation, but some examples include when an abuser prevents a victim from working, or they really limit their access to money or credit cards, or they even intentionally ruin their credit,” she continues. “If you have bad credit you can’t get an apartment. If you’re not working, you’re not bringing in income and you’re kind of stuck in this vicious cycle.”



Source link

Categories
Health

This Bubble Mask Is the Best Savior If You Abuse Dry Shampoo


I’m not sure what caught my attention first: the scalp treatment or the word bubble.

It makes sense that Kristin Ess, the stylist who spawned a line of high-quality, surprisingly affordable hair products and has masterminded many a celebrity cut (see Lauren Conrad and Jenna Dewan), would look beyond the roots. After all, healthy hair comes courtesy of a healthy scalp.

Her recent collection is all about the scalp, a term that doesn’t have to work very hard to entice me at the moment. Of all my winter gripes—dryness, dullness, the usual—I’ve been catching little flakes strewn through my hair, and they’re for sure not snow. Since they’re not the yellowish, oily flakes created by dandruff, I can only assume that I’m dealing with your average dry scalp. The detoxifying bubble mask seems as though it could do the trick.

First: If you’re unsure how, exactly, to use a bubbling scalp mask, Ess helpfully posted a thorough how-to and demo on Instagram. A budding Luddite without Instagram, I missed these, which is why I failed to shake the bottle well enough and ended up squirting some very cold liquid into my hand.

I eventually figured it out, finding it to be a mousselike foam. As soon as I applied it onto the part in my hair, I could feel the cooling, tingling action (which supposedly boosts scalp circulation, which in turn stimulates hair growth). Then I heard the popping. Technically, it’s the sound of oxygenated bubbles lifting away grime, oil, and impurities, as Ess writes in an Instagram post, but to my ears, it was reminiscent of Pop Rocks and deeply satisfying. There’s also salicylic acid in the formula, the gentle exfoliator you might recognize from your acne face wash. In this case, it’s sloughing off dead skin cells so you can rinse them away in the shower—versus them floating onto your shoulders in the middle of a conversation with your boss.

I massaged the mask in at my roots. I felt like it wasn’t evenly spreading, so although the instructions say to use a golf ball-size amount, I blew through at least a grapefruit’s worth of bubbles. The tingling eventually subsided, but the popping continued for a few minutes, even as I got in the shower and wet my hair. My scalp and roots felt so fresh and clean that I probably could’ve skipped the shampoo (though I didn’t this time) and gone straight to conditioner.

It’s like the opposite of dry shampoo: Instead of adding stuff to absorb dirt and oil (and creating residue in the process), this mask lifts them away and then disappears by popping. Genius. And while it obviously doesn’t have the same convenience factor, it only takes two or three minutes, tops—eliminating the one thing that’s kept me away from masks in the past. I have zero interest in sitting around for 15 minutes with goop in my hair.

And despite the flash-bang look of it, it’s not all diversion tactics. While the bubbles and popping are cool, they offer real results. So far I’ve noticed far fewer flakes after just one use. And maybe it’s just because I miss the experience, but damn, I can’t wait to use it again tomorrow morning.

Kristin Ess Scalp Detoxifying Bubble Mask, $14, target.com

Related Stories:
–How to Cure a Flaky, Dry Scalp: Treatment and Causes
–Scalp Exfoliation Sounds Gross, But It’s Given Me the Shiniest, Bounciest Curls Ever
–Bye Forever, Itchy Scalp: Dandruff Products Are Chic Now





Source link

Categories
Health

93 More Women Have Accused Former USC Gynecologist George Tyndall of Sexual Abuse


The University of Southern California continues to reckon with sexual assault allegations leveled against its former campus gynecologist George Tyndall. On Thursday, two new lawsuits were filed on behalf of 93 additional women who claim the university purposefully concealed the abuse—which brings the total number of Tyndall’s accusers to about 500.

The new claims come after 51 women came forward back in July. They joined six women who had alleged in a lawsuit filed in May that USC had failed to protect them from Tyndall’s abuse and mishandled complaints about his behavior, as well as dozens of others, bringing the total number of accusers at that point to more than 200. Following backlash, USC’s former president C.L. Max Nikias announced he would step down.

Tyndall is now retired after working at the university for almost three decades. According to CNN, accusations of misconduct against him date back to 1990 and include allegations from women who say he abused or harassed them under the guide of medical treatment at the university’s student health center. The AP reported that Tyndall’s license was suspended in August.

A group of approximately 20 women announced the two new lawsuits at a press conference on Thursday, and some of them spoke publicly about their experiences.

“I am part of an accidental sisterhood of hundreds of women because the university we love betrayed our trust,” Dana Loewy, a woman who alleges that Tyndall assaulted her in 1983, was quoted as saying in Time.

Following the press conference, USC announced their agreement to a tentative settlement of $215 million on Friday, which, according to NPR, could make anyone who received treatment from Tyndall eligible to receive a minimum of $2,500 (victims who allege Tyndall abuse them could receive up to $250,000, the Los Angeles Times reports.) USC’s interim president, Wanda Austin, said in a public statement that its Board of Trustees supported the settlement.

“By doing so, we hope that we can help our community move collectively toward reconciliation,” Austin said. “I regret that any student ever felt uncomfortable, unsafe, or mistreated in any way as a result of the actions of a university employee.”

The settlement requires court approval, and lawyers for accusers have said that the sum is not enough.

“The only guaranteed number in this case is $2,500—$2,500 won’t even get you a 50-yard-line seat at a USC football game, let alone compensate somebody for being sexually assaulted by their doctor when they were 18 or 17,” said John Manly, an Irvine-based attorney who represents 180 accusers.

Related Stories:

Six Women Are Suing USC for Allegedly Failing to Protect Them From Campus Gynecologist’s Sexual Abuse

There Are Now More Than 200 Women Suing USC and a Former Gynecologist Accused of Sexual Abuse



Source link

Categories
Health

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp Mistakenly Identified Sexual Abuse Survivors in a Campaign Ad


North Dakota Democrat Heidi Heitkamp was already in a tough battle to retain her senate seat in a state that President Donald Trump won by 36 points. And now a mistake by her campaign could be costing her more votes.

Earlier this week, Heitkamp’s campaign published a newspaper ad that was meant to serve as a rebuttal to her Republican opponent Kevin Cramer, but ended up naming sexual assault survivors without their permission or misidentifying them altogether. Cramer has come under fire for his comments about the #MeToo movement in the New York Times. He questioned whether “you’re just supposed to believe somebody because they said it happened.”

“They cannot understand this movement toward victimization,” Cramer said, referencing the women in his life, including his mom, wife and daughters. “They are pioneers of the prairie. These are tough people whose grandparents were tough and great-grandparents were tough.”

The letter was supposed to show Cramer “what prairie tough looks like.” It included signatures from more than 120 women who were supposed to be survivors of “domestic violence, sexual assault, or rape.” But once it went public, some women came forward saying they either weren’t survivors or had never given permission for their information to be used.

The campaign quickly apologized. “We recently discovered that several of the women’s names who were provided to us did not authorize their names to be shared or were not survivors of abuse,” Heitkamp said in a statement. “I deeply regret this mistake and we are in the process of issuing a retraction, personally apologizing to each of the people impacted by this and taking the necessary steps to ensure this never happens again.”

But, that may not be enough. “I don’t know what she [Heitkamp] could do that would make it better,” Lexi Zhorela, a self-identified liberal and one of the women named in the ad, told CNN. “I know that’s why a lot of the people in this situation are reaching out to seek legal counsel because of, you know, what she did is wrong.” She went on to call the mistake “reckless” and said, “You know, the names that didn’t want to be out there are already out there for the world to see. You can’t really retract that, the damage is done.”

And, as of now, Heitkamp has lost her vote, according to CNN.

Heitkamp has been vocal in her support of survivors, including voting “no” on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. She has also spoken out about her own mother’s experience. “I think it’s wonderful that his [Cramer’s] wife has never had an experience, and good for her, and it’s wonderful his mom hasn’t,” she said previously to the Times. “My mom did. And I think it affected my mom her whole life. And it didn’t make her less strong.”

It remains to be seen how this misstep will ultimately affect Heitkamp’s poll numbers, but the issue is almost certain to come up in her first debate with Cramer Thursday night.

MORE: North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp Arm-Wrestles in New Campaign Ad



Source link

Categories
Health

Verbal Abuse Is Hurting Women in the Workplace


At first, it seemed funny.

“Temper tantrum” was how I described his behavior to my friends. Michael (not his real name) would raise his voice at me, then flounce out of the room in a huff. At first, his outbursts seemed innocuous, if unprofessional: Can you believe he did that?

We worked together, and I’d read enough books about office culture to believe I could handle the situation, so I spoke to Michael about his outbursts. Because he seemed to feel bad about it, I wrote it off.

But the behavior escalated. One afternoon, he didn’t like the direction of a project. In front of another woman, he criticized the work I’d done, declared it a waste of his time, and stormed out of the conference room. As with all of his outbursts, I felt undermined, humiliated, and frustrated that preventing another temper tantrum—or trying to—had become part of my responsibilities. I raised the issue with higher-ups, and everyone believed (it seemed to me) that I was good at my job and that his immature lashouts needed to stop.

That isn’t what happened. And a few weeks later, I was out of a job.

The experience was awful, but others have it much worse. Verbal abuse in the workplace doesn’t take just one form. It can involve screaming, humiliation, sexist, homophobic or racist slurs, aggressive behavior like pounding tables or slamming phones, and intimidation, like blocking doors or stairs. Some of these behaviors fit the legal definition of assault and harassment. But some don’t.

Even now in our post #MeToo world, many kinds of verbal abuse—and the toxic environment that abuse fosters—doesn’t violate the law.

I no longer have to deal with Michael, but I still feel his effect. As someone who considers herself a hard worker and a resilient woman, I wince now at how his words made me feel and the extent to which I wondered whether I was “too sensitive” to cut it in our office. The experience made me question future coworkers, too. Who would be next to lash out? And would other coworkers let it happen?

Even now in our post-#MeToo world, many kinds of verbal abuse—and the toxic environment that abuse fosters—doesn’t violate the law. Worse still, the behavior tends to be dismissed as natural, if somewhat unpleasant in competitive, achievement-oriented work environments. In May, the New York Times published a roundtable with the cast of Arrested Development, kicking off an overdue public conversation about the phenomenon. In it, actress Jessica Walter cried as she described her co-star Jeffrey Tambor’s verbal abuse. “[In] almost 60 years of working, I’ve never had anybody yell at me like that on a set and it’s hard to deal with,” Walter said. But some of her male co-stars seemed to make excuses for such behavior, with Jason Bateman opining, “[I]n the entertainment industry, it’s incredibly common to have people who are, in quotes, ‘difficult.’”

I was incensed not only at Walter’s mistreatment, but by some of her male colleagues’ minimization of it. The “that’s just the way it is” excuses sound hollower than ever as movements like #MeToo readjust our cultural response to sexual harassment and assault. The power structures that compel women to be silent in the face of misconduct have been exposed. Some have crumbled. But the work is not done.

Verbal abuse is rampant. I had experienced it. Jessica Walter had experienced it. How many women like us were there?

In the months since I tweeted this very question out, over 2,000 women shared that they had been yelled and screamed at, “shushed” and called names like “bitch” and “cunt.” It came from male bosses, colleagues, subordinates—even interns. It has happened one-on-one, in meetings, on conference calls and in front of customers. Women have been screamed at for refusing to pay men a day early, not serving expired food, and enforcing potentially life-saving safety rules. (“Hell hath no fury like a dad whose kid is too short to ride a slide safely,” tweeted one ex-amusement park employee.) In other words, women have been verbally abused by men just for doing their jobs.

The volume of responses surprised me. So I decided to dig deeper into how and why this debasement came to be so widespread and normalized in our workplaces. Who is committing it and why? If so many of us think it is wrong, why doesn’t it stop? How does it impact the women who are harmed? And what should we do about it?


The first hurdle to get over may be acknowledging that workplace verbal abuse is actual abuse.

Verbal abuse can be “any spoken comments that are made to criticize, demoralize, insult, hurt [or] manipulate somebody,” says Lena Derhally, a licensed psychotherapist in Washington, D.C. “The intention is to hurt, control, manipulate, shame, humiliate.” And it has consequences for both our mental and physical health. While much of the existing research on verbal abuse focuses on intimate partners, or parents and children, studies have shown that the long-term effects of severe emotional abuse can have consequences akin to physical abuse.

“When women are the victims of this kind of aggression … [it can lead to] post-traumatic stress disorder,” Kathleen Shea, Ph.D., a licensed clinical psychologist on the North Shore near Chicago tells me, adding that verbal abuse has a “seriously negative” effect on our self-esteem.

Trauma can activate the “fight or flight response,” says Derhally. One way the flight response manifests itself is with “freeze mode,” or shut-down and disengagement—say, no longer contributing ideas in meetings or diminished productivity.

All-too-frequently, it is a “him” who is committing the bad behavior. A 2017 survey by the Workplace Bullying Institute looked at bullying behavior (not just verbal abuse) and found men targeted women in 65 percent of incidents related to “repeated abusive mistreatment at work.” Among all bullying behavior, 70 percent of the perpetrators were men. While men and women are supposedly “equals” in a workplace, too many women don’t experience it that way.

The experience “destroys you mentally,” says Ashley (not her real name), a 23-year-old in Las Vegas.

Ashley’s first job out of school was a position at an entertainment company that began with a 90-day probationary period, during which her manager Brad (not his real name) yelled at her when she struggled with mathematical equations.

“I used to drive to work and think, ‘I wonder if today will be the day that he was gonna fire me,’” she recalls. “That would consume my thoughts every day.” She didn’t feel she was in a position to speak up then, because trainees could be let go for any reason.

Once her 90-day probation finished, Ashley informed the company’s HR department about Brad’s behavior. She didn’t want to “ruffle any feathers,” she says, but confidantes urged her to say something. Not long after speaking to HR, Brad took Ashley aside and she was “yelled at for kind of ratting him out.” Instead of apologizing, he upbraided her further. Shocked, she recalled that she “nodded and said ‘OK.’”

Not long after speaking to HR, Brad took Ashley aside and she was “yelled at for kind of ratting him out.” Instead of apologizing, he upbraided her further.

The abuse took an obvious toll: “I went to the bathroom and cried,” she says. And the outbursts continued in the weeks and months that followed. “I became a shell of the person that I was,” Ashley says, “And the personality traits I like about myself were not really coming through anymore.”

One day in January, Brad was fired. Ashley quit about two weeks later, a move she says “proved to be much better for me [and] for my own mental health, for my own physical health.”

She had been at the company for six months.


It might seem like Michael or Brad are just bad apples. But toxic work environments are more complicated than that—an interplay between how an individual functions unhealthfully and how the organization as a whole functions unhealthfully.

First, it helps to understand that verbal abuse is usually brandished by “very insecure people as a way of having control,” says Derhally. “Secure, happy, confident people do not abuse. … [Verbal abuse is] a way to take control, to have power, to manipulate, to compensate for deeper insecurities.”

Abusive work environments typically adhere to one of three patterns, according to feminist legal scholar Joan C. Williams, professor of law at University of California, Hastings College of the Law San Francisco and founding director of the Center for WorkLife Law. In one scenario, abuse is the norm. “In some workplaces, screamers are valued and, at some level, informally encouraged,” Williams says.

Other workplaces claim not to tolerate abuse, and generally don’t, but some people—“almost always men who hold power in the organization,” says Williams—get a pass. Often these exceptions-to-the-rule make a lot of money for the company, or lend it prestige. (Think: Would an extra who yelled at Jessica Walter get the same treatment as Jeffrey Tambor?)

In the third scenario, abuse is a way of establishing loyalties. In these environments “if you want to not be bullied, you have to kind of take part in the bullying,” says Williams. Instead of one individual inflicting abuse, a group gangs up on her together.

In addition to these scenarios, abusive behaviors at work can be classified as either overt—direct acts of hostility in front of customers, in meetings, in group Slack channels—or covert, behind-the-scenes passive aggressiveness or undermining.

Women, of course, can also behave abusively at work. However, sexist double standards mean that women may pay a price for behaviors which are excused, even rewarded, in men. A recent study out of Arizona State University found male attorneys who displayed aggressive behavior, such as yelling and pounding their fist against the lectern, during identical closing arguments were “commanding, powerful, competent and hirable.” Women attorneys who exhibited the exact same behaviors were seen as “shrill, hysterical, grating and ineffective.”

In other words, when women act aggressively, they are seen as loose cannons, while men look passionate and continue to get work. Men are socially conditioned to show they are “in charge”—even when they are not actually in charge—and this entitled behavior is validated as a show of “authority” or “leadership.”

Of course, abusiveness is not necessarily a personality trait—it’s a widespread problem within our cultural instruction of masculinity. Boys are raised seek the upper hand to avoid humiliation, explains Shea. “In order for men to ‘be men,’ they have to dominate” and the code they live by is “‘humiliate before you’re humiliated,” she says.

So when abusive men feel insecure about themselves and how others perceive them, Shea adds, they overcompensate with displays of power and control—throwing a stapler, screaming at an intern. It’s a performance of what “being a man” or “being a success” looks like. Masculinity needs to be witnessed.

Kate (not her real name), 41, who lives in Southern California, learned that more than a decade ago when someone on her team at the radio station where she worked was verbally abusive. Steve (not his real name) gave her an assignment. Kate recorded a piece that was three minutes long, but Steve had needed it to be five minutes. Maybe he assumed she knew how long the piece should be, she concedes, but she doesn’t recall him giving her those instructions. And while she was out in the field reporting, Steve called her phone and began to yell.

“He freaked out,” Kate remembers. “He was bugging out because I did it wrong: ‘You don’t know what the fuck you’re doing! You’re a fucking idiot! What the fuck is the matter with you?’”

So she hung up on him—“because I don’t have time for this shit,” she says—and continued working. Steve called her phone more than a dozen times, according to Kate.

Kate reached out to management for help, eventually meeting with Steve and someone from Human Resources. At first, he denied verbally abusing her. Eventually he admitted, “‘I suppose it’s possible that I may have said something to you.’”

“HR [was] looking at him and nodding,” Kate recalls. “I’m, like, I have no chance here!’” At the end of the meeting with Steve and HR, she says, “They ordered us to shake hands.”

Kate was dismissed a few weeks later. She says she was told it was due to performance issues.

Women, of course, can also behave abusively at work. However, sexist double standards mean that women may pay a price for behaviors which are excused, even rewarded, in men.


Federal employment law lacks teeth for the nuances of verbal abuse, and not a single state has passed a complete version of the Healthy Workplace Bill—meant to address verbal abuse and other behaviors not covered under federal law—despite its introduction in more than 25 states. The best course of action, it seems, is to identify this behavior when it occurs and stop making excuses for it. As The Cut reported in June, the fashion industry—infamously portrayed in The Devil Wears Prada—is already undergoing its own reckoning. And one important change would be to stop penalizing women who stand up for their rights. Asserting oneself at work should not be a lose-lose situation.

“Unfortunately women should realize that by the fact that they are encountering this dynamic, their careers are already at risk,” Williams says. She adds, jokingly, “One of the things I always say [is] one of the worst career moves a woman can make is being the subject of gender discrimination.”

Men, of course, need to do the lion’s share of work here. “This is a deficit that men are finding in terms of being able to communicate professionally when anger, frustration, [and] passion are all in the mix,” says Emilie Aries, the founder and CEO of Bossed Up, a personal and professional training organization for women.

Verbal abuse should not be dismissed as the price of admission for women in the workforce. “It’s not about being treated equal [to men],” says Derhally. “When men have that response—‘Suck it up and deal with it!”—that’s toxic male culture, that we can treat people like they’re scum and then expect them to tolerate it. To me, that’s bullshit.”

Ultimately, the more we speak up about this type of abuse and demand the behavior stop, the easier for everyone else to speak up, too.

As Aries puts it, “Women have been taking the brunt of abuse in workplaces for so long without significant justice being served … I think there’s a very righteous sense of resentment that’s bubbling up about it all.”


Jessica Wakeman is a writer in Brooklyn. Her work has appeared in Glamour, Rolling Stone, Bitch, Bust and many other publications.





Source link