Categories
Health

There May Be a Very Logical Reason We're All So Obsessed With the Royal Family Right Now


The world can feel like an utter and complete garbage fire at times, and our news cycle is both faster and more chaotic than ever before. Just logging on to social media in the morning can send me into a panicked state before I’ve even brushed my teeth—and I know I’m not alone in this. But everybody deserves a reprieve from time to time, and I’ve finally settled into mine: royals content.

Now, I’m no newcomer to British royal family fandom. As a kid, I followed along with the ups and downs of Prince Charles and Princess Diana’s relationship via my mom’s People magazine subscription. I know exactly where I was when news of Diana’s fatal car crash broke. And until he got serious with Meghan Markle, I used to joke that Prince Harry was my longest (fictional) relationship. Although my dream of him marrying a slightly older American woman didn’t pan out exactly as I had planned, I am very happy for them.

I have devoured every episode of The Crown, The Tudors, and even the CW’s Reign. I’ve oohed and awwed over Prince George and his siblings like a faraway aunt they’ll never meet. But, recently, there’s been a shift in my focus—and my intensity. Given the sheer number of official royal handles, royals reporters, and Instagram fan accounts, I have quite literally altered my feeds’ algorithms.

In other words, I wake up to each morning to an onslaught of imagery and tweets that don’t make me want to crawl back under the covers. It’s a delight, this royal Xanax.

Part of it, of course, are the beautiful clothes, great blowouts, messy buns, newlywed heart-emoji eyes, and adorable little children. But there’s something else that I find so incredibly calming about knowing every last in and out of the royal schedules and protocols.

Dr. Donna Rockwell, Psy.D., a clinical psychologist specializing in the area of celebrity and fame, says that the feeling can be akin to a child finding peace in structure and boundaries, even when they don’t realize that’s what they need. And what’s more structured and filled with rules than a monarchy?

“It’s comforting to see a structure where that structure seems to create a semblance of order,” she told me. “So in the same way, I think that when an adult is feeling a sense of inner chaos, it’s comforting, even neurologically speaking, to be able to observe something of structure. We see structure, and we feel comforted. So it’s actually a neurological response of relaxation that occurs in us in seeing the queen, and the [grand]daughters-in-law, and the line [of heirs].”

“The universe is profoundly chaotic,” Rockwell continued. “So whenever we can anchor ourselves into a sense of order and safety, really, we tend to relax. And that generates the reward center of the brain. Ahhhh, is the reaction.”

Ding, ding, ding. I love when science backs up the pop-culture obsessions I use for self-care: I’m craving structure in the form of royal protocol and a steadfast monarch (and her family) who seems unflappable, even more so compared to the most erratic leader we’ve seen in some time in D.C.

Rockwell also referenced Queen Elizabeth II’s meeting with President Trump earlier this summer. “She was gracious, and it was lovely to see. And maybe here’s the other piece as we’re so polarized in this country right now: graciousness. To see it witnessed right there where some of us, perhaps, are pulling our hair out and we’re at our wit’s end—we see the monarch, the monarchy, exhibiting graciousness to what we see as confusion and upset.”

Listen, I’ll take the serenity anywhere I can get it these days—and you should, too. Even if that means learning completely useless-IRL information about whether somebody you’ll never meet has to curtsy in front of her sister-in-law or whether or not panty hose are required at the Royal Ascot.

Your brain, after all, might just might need it to de-stress.

My favorite royal follows:

@Scobie

Omid Scobie is one of the top royal journalists in the game. He often travels with the family on tours and can offer historical context to protocols and history that are quite foreign to we Americans. He also co-hosts a great royals podcast called “On Heir” with another fantastic royal reporter, Emily Andrews (@byemilyandrews).

@KensingtonRoyal on Instagram and Twitter

These are the official handles of William, Kate, Harry, and Meghan—anything that claims to be otherwise is a fake. But the young royals’ social staff is pretty on point with live coverage of events and first looks at photos from the big wedding or Prince Louis’ christening (William even tweeted via this handle during the World Cup).

@TheElegantDuchess

An account dedicated to all things Kate? Sign me up. You’ll find everything you need to know about the Duchess of Cambridge’s fashion. Plus, if you’re new to royal fandom, there are tons of old photos and fun facts dating all the way back to her university days at St. Andrews, where she met her future husband.

@MeghansMirror

Of course, the newest member of the royal family has become an international fashion icon. If you want to find out what brands she’s wearing immediately, Meghan’s Mirror should be your first follow. They get the details fast and have even more fashion and beauty content inspired by the Duchess of Sussex on their site.

@RoyalDickie

Dickie Arbiter is the royal correspondent for the BBC. Plus, he used to work for the Queen as a press spokesman until 2000, so you know his insights are the real deal. He tweets about all the members of the family which is great when you need some dish on Princess Anne, one of my low-key faves.

@RoyalAddicted2

For those of you who want to obsess over more than just the British royals, this is the account for you. And if you aren’t already a fan of Queen Letizia of Spain, you soon will be: Her Majesty is chic.





Source link

Categories
Health

For Some Reason Celebrities Can't Get Over Reese Witherspoon's Body Double


Yesterday, the eternal human sunshine commonly known as Reese Witherspoon delighted her legion of followers by introducing them to an incredible Reese Witherspoon doppelgänger: a woman named Marilee Lessley, who’s been serving as the actor’s body double for over a decade now. (For those unfamiliar, a body double stands in for an actor while a set is being prepared, often to make sure the lighting and whatnot is alright for the scene in question. Sometimes, they’ll also do light stunt work.)

Witherspoon gushed about her pal in an Instagram video, noting how she’s been her body double for an astounding five films as well as Big Little Lies. “Okay you guys, I want to introduce you to someone who’s been working with me for years. This is Marilee! And she’s my double! Don’t we look alike?!” Witherspoon asked her followers. “We do, we totally look alike,” Lessley responded. “We totally do.” In an additional Instagram Story, Witherspoon said the two crossed paths on the set of Legally Blonde 2, and their resemblance was so uncanny that they started their working relationship shortly thereafter with Just Like Heaven.

As pointed out by BuzzFeed, many well-known actresses have responded to Witherspoon’s Instagram post with an equal sense of envy and amusement. “Wow!” Julianne Moore wrote. “Twins,” Elizabeth Banks opined. “CraZy,” Katie Couric wrote with unusual capitalization and a few emojis. As for Rita Wilson: “That is crazy!” Zoe Saldana also got in on the fun, writing, “So beautiful!”

Interestingly, as People reports, Witherspoon and Lessley’s friendship goes outside the boundaries of work — when Lessley fell on hard financial times after a divorce in 2016, Witherspoon was there to support her friend to ensure she was able to get the help she needed. “Reese came to me on this shoot as she learned about all the tragedies and trials that had unfolded in my life that month and she asked how she could help,” Lessley wrote on Instagram at the time. “Even told me I could go home paid.”

If that’s not blond sisterhood, we don’t know what is.

Related Stories:

This Pic of Reese Witherspoon Hurling Ice Cream at Meryl Streep Is a Work of Art

Reese Witherspoon Is Launching Her Own Channel and Unscripted Series





Source link

Categories
Health

Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner Just Got Coordinating Tattoos for the Sweetest Reason


Following what seems to be a trend of celebrity couples getting tattoos together honoring their forefathers (recent example: Ariana Grande and Pete Davidson’s matching “8418” tattoos honoring Davidson’s late father, a 9/11 firefighter with that badge number), Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner decided to get some fresh ink together, each honoring their respective grandfathers.

According to Just Jared, the two got tattoos on Friday by Mr. K at celeb-fave ink spot Bang Bang Tattoos honoring each of their granddads.

Jonas opted for a postage-stamp-esque protrait of “PaPa Miller,” with what appears to be his birthdate (August 21, 1940) below. He posted the final product on Instagram. Turner, meanwhile, paid tribute to her grandfather (whom she called her “hero” on Instagram) with a delicate tattoo on her pinky finger.

Turner, meanwhile, paid tribute to her grandfather (whom she called her “hero” on Instagram) with a delicate tattoo on her pinky finger.

This isn’t the couple’s first tattoo speaking to their coupled-up status: Jonas got a tattoo of Turner on his arm—along with some potentially coded messaging—back in March. The tattoo, a line art representation of a woman looking over her shoulder, was placed right below some ink of an intricate knot. Given that the couple are engaged, some fans read into it as a “tying the knot with Sophie” kind of thing. Whatever the actual meaning, the tattooing has continued, and the results are beyond sweet.

As far as when these two are going to get another permanent addition to their fingers—i.e. a wedding ring—that’s still TBD: Although they got engaged in mid-October last year, Jonas and Turner reportedly haven’t yet really started planning their wedding, opting to wait instead until season eight of Game of Thrones was finished filming. But now that it has, we’re all here for the details if and as they’re revealed.

One thing we do know: Turner’s Game of Thrones co-star Maisie Williams will be a bridesmaid for the festivities—and given the Game of Thrones turnout at Kit Harington and Rose Leslie’s June wedding, we can only hope for another.

Related Stories

Rose Leslie and Kit Harington Just Got Married, and Their Wedding Looks Incredible

Sophie Turner Has Already Asked Maisie Williams to Be a Bridesmaid

Joe Jonas’ New Tattoo Might Be of Sophie Turner, and Fans Are Flipping



Source link

Categories
Health

The Genius Reason Why Meghan Markle Wears Her Shoes Too Big


Meghan Markle, a.k.a the Duchess of Sussex, is quickly following in Kate Middleton’s footsteps to become a style icon of her own—whether she’s following the royal dress code or breaking it. Either way, it’s safe to say that the “Meghan Markle Effect” is in full force.

But there’s one particular thing she does that’s been making royal-waters scratch their heads time and time again: She consistently wears shoes that are way too big for her feet. She wore the wrong shoe size as recently as June 19 when she was in Berkshire for the Royal Ascot.

If you peek at photos of Meghan over the past few months, it’s evident this isn’t a one-time mistake by her stylist. After all, everyone has their shoe size memorized. As it turns out, there’s a very good, extremely practical reason for it.

First, however, some photographic evidence.

On her first solo trip with the Queen on June 14:

PHOTO: Samir Hussein

At a memorial service in St Martin-in-the-Fields, London on April 23:

Stephen Lawrence memorial service

PHOTO: WPA Pool

In Lisbern, Northern Ireland with Prince Harry on March 23:

BRITAIN-NIRELAND-ROYALS

PHOTO: ARTHUR EDWARDS

At her engagement announcement photo call in November:

Announcement Of Prince Harry's Engagement To Meghan Markle

PHOTO: Karwai Tang

According to The Sun, wearing her shoes too big is a conscious sartorial decision by Meghan Markle. “Celebs often go a size up, or even two, in the shoe department when they’re at an event or on the red carpet, and it’s for one reason we can all relate to — to avoid blisters,” fashion expert Harriet Davey told the online newspaper.

“The swelling can cause blisters and in the long run bunions… ” she told The Sun.

You’d think walking in shoes that are way too large would be a difficult task, but as Davey told the Sun, “a trick of the trade is to stuff the toe with padding like tissue or cotton wool, and this can be taken out once they feel like they need a bit more room in their shoes.”

If it means we’ll never get blisters ever again, this might be one royal habit we can get behind.

Related Stories:



Source link

Categories
Health

The Archaic Reason Why Meghan Markle's Daughters Wouldn't Inherit Her Title


Meghan Markle was bestowed the title Duchess of Sussex by Queen Elizabeth II on her wedding day to Prince Harry. She’s the first woman to ever hold that title, and according to People, she’ll be the last—unless some major change happens ASAP.

The magazine reports that if Markle and Prince Harry have any daughters together, they won’t be able to call themselves Duchesses of Sussex (say that five times fast), nor will they get to carry on Markle’s Scottish title of Countess of Dumbarton or her Northern Irish moniker, Baroness Kilkeel. Any sons they have together, however, will be able to inherit their father’s titles of Duke of Sussex, Earl of Dumbarton, and Baron Kilkeel. The reason why, you ask? An ancient (and archaic) peerage law that says only male children can inherit titles. The British news site Express confirms this, as well.

The ancient peerage laws governing family inheritances have been changed before, however. Most recently, Queen Elizabeth introduced the Succession to the Crown Act in 2013, which rules that the next king or queen of the U.K. will be decided by birth order only, rather than biological sex. As a result, Princess Charlotte is able to retain her position as fourth in line to the throne, rather than dropping down to fifth upon the birth of her younger brother, Prince Louis.

Unfortunately, the 2013 ordinance applies only to the direct line to the throne, so it would take yet another law change to allow Prince Harry and Markle’s daughters to automatically inherit their titles. Unless the monarch at that point assigns them any additional honorary titles, their children will be called Lords and Ladies of Mountbatten-Windsor, according to The Independent. Meanwhile, because Prince William is the oldest son of the Prince of Wales, his children will all be titled Princes and Princesses, due to yet another recent rule tweak by Queen Elizabeth.

These peerage laws, which give boys priority over their sisters no matter their birth order, have been around since the 17th century, and apply to U.K. citizens well beyond the royal family. Just last year, for example, the eldest daughter of a baron was denied her claim to her late father’s title and 6,000 acres of land. According to The Telegraph, since Robin Neville, the 10th Baron Braybrooke, had seven daughters and no sons, his title went instead to a distant male cousin.

Related Stories:

Queen Elizabeth II Just Gifted Prince Harry and Meghan Markle the Vacation House of Dreams

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Are Reportedly Heading to This “Royal Retreat” on Their Honeymoon



Source link

Categories
Health

Hawaii's Sunscreen Ban Doesn't Hit Until 2021, But the Reason For It Is Scary


Sunscreen is the best it’s ever been. It’s lightweight, fast-absorbing, beautifully fragranced, and at long last a pleasure to use. There’s just one problem: Despite 2014’s Sunscreen Innovation Act, the FDA hasn’t okayed any new sunscreen ingredients in 10 years. And now, researchers are finding evidence that some commonly used chemicals pose a huge threat to our marine environments and may have unintended consequences on human health. This month, Hawaii became the first place in the U.S. to turn these findings into something concrete, a first-of-its-kind legislation to outlaw the sale of sunscreens that contain the ingredients oxybenzone and octinoxate starting in 2021. For context, those two actives are in more than 3,500 sunscreens on the market.

Talking to scientists and lawmakers about these two chemicals, it becomes clear that this may be a somewhat dire situation for the environment. Some background on sunscreen: It’s technically a drug, so the FDA has full control over which ingredients we get to use. That’d be fine, except of the 17 sunscreen ingredients on the market, almost all of them were approved back in the ’70s. And according to Craig Downs, Ph.D and executive director of the Haereticus Environmental Laboratory, a non-profit dedicated to the conservation of natural habitats, almost no toxicity testing was done back then, and there certainly weren’t the stringent standards in place that there are today. So oxybenzone and octinoxate, among other chemicals, have been grandfathered in since then.

That doesn’t sound good, but it wouldn’t necessarily be cause for concern. Yet, the legislation is happening now because over the past two years, numerous studies have found evidence that these two chemicals (but especially oxybenzone) may be doing harm to marine life and possibly people. They’re what researchers call “endocrine disruptors.” So when we slather on sunscreen, the chemicals can then make their way into our bloodstream. There, according to recent studies, they may mess with our hormones in various ways. Downs says that several studies have found that oxybenzone in particular can significantly decrease testosterone levels. Hawaiian state Senator Mike Gabbard, (D) who introduced the bill, along with five other Democratic state senators, recounts a laundry list of evidence-supported consequences. In the ocean, it causes deformed coral larvae; in people, he says the chemicals may be associated with breast cancer becoming more aggressive, polluted breast milk, deformities in newborns, women’s uterine diseases, threatened male sexual health, and damaged DNA.

David Andrews, Ph.D. and a senior scientist at the Environmental Working Group, says that in the water off the beaches of Hawaii, where tourists flock and sunscreen flows, the coral reefs are unable to recover from bleaching events, which are like a hit to the reefs’ ecosystem. And oxybenzone is everywhere: Downs describes the chemicals as similar to a virus, with oxybenzone showing up everywhere from the drinking water in Honolulu, to Alaska, to inside the fish we eat. And according to a 2008 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it’s found in the blood of 97 percent of Americans.

This is big news, and it’s been a long time coming. “It really points to what’s become a failure of both the sunscreen industry and the FDA to bring new, safer and more effective ingredients to the market,” Andrews says. While new sunscreen formulas have been available for over a decade in other countries, Andrews says that the FDA has left the public with a catch-22. Even outside of oxybenzone and octinoxate, Downs says there’s no firm data to prove whether or not other sunscreen ingredients, like avobenzone, are safe.

“If the toxicity requirements by the FDA were applied now to the 17 chemicals, only non-nanosized zinc oxide and non-nanosized titanium dioxide would be left standing,” Downs says. Knowing how much sunscreen people now expose themselves to, the FDA needs detailed safety information to approve new formulas—but because there’s nothing to stop companies from doing so, Downs says that most have continued to use the same old ingredients, in the same old ways.

On the plus side, the FDA has recently initiated a study testing absorption of ingredients in sunscreens currently on the U.S. market. A spokesperson told Glamour that the study will “measure and evaluate the levels of active ingredients found in the blood of human subjects after exposure when applied under maximal use conditions.” For now, Dr. Andrew Alexis, the Chair of Dermatology at Mount Sinai hospital in New York City, warns against jumping to conclusions. While studies using extremely high doses of oxybenzone show some hormonal side effects, Alexis says we don’t typically encounter those levels in the everyday world. To put the doses into perspective, he explains that using a sunscreen containing 6 percent oxybenzone, it would take 277 years of daily application to reach exposure comparable to what the rats in the studies get. So while oxybenzone can be detected in the blood and urine of sunscreen users and the population at large, Alexis says that doesn’t necessarily mean oxybenzone is causing negative, systemic health effects.

Speaking to the ban, the Personal Care Products Council, which represents the global cosmetic and personal care products industry, released a statement acknowledging the importance of combating coral reef degradation, but arguing that fighting the prevalence of skin cancer is as important. And with the sunscreen ban waiting for Hawaii’s governor to sign it into law, enforced change is at best in the distant future. According to lawmakers, the bill will only take effect in 2021, so at least legally, nothing has to happen until then—and even after 2021, there will be no legal way to keep sunscreens with the chemicals from coming into Hawaii.

Nicole Lowen, vice chair of Hawaii’s House Committee on Energy and Environment, says that’s fine. While they’re giving the sunscreen industry the next few years to come up with formulas that comply (and Gabbard says tons of sunscreens out there already do), a major aim of the legislation was raising public awareness about these toxic chemicals, and sending a message to companies and the FDA that, yes, change is something people care about, and we want it now.

In that respect, women in Hawaii agree that the bill is making them think twice about their sunscreen. Since the legislation came into the spotlight, Hawaii resident Emma Wo says that she’s gone through her medicine cabinet and tossed the sunscreens with controversial ingredients. Longtime Oahu resident Kathy Croman says she used to not be choosy about the sunscreen she used, but “when you grow up here and see the actual damage it’s causing, you become more aware.” It’s likewise struck Oahu newcomer Kait Hanson: “Before I moved to Hawaii, I used sunscreens with [oxybenzone and octinoxate] a lot. That was mostly due to being misinformed, unaware or trusting the labels of products.” After the conversation started around the ingredients, she says she switched to reef-safe sunscreens like Stream2Sea and Badger (Stream2Sea relies on non-nanosized titanium dioxide, and Badger on non-nanosized zinc oxide. Both are confirmed eco-friendly ingredients).

Marine conservationist Lauren Kitayama seconds it: Once you know the effect of these ingredients, you steer clear. “Most of our cosmetics do end up in the ocean, and they wreak havoc. If making small changes in my daily routine can protect the oceans and animals in them, I do what I can,” she says. To that end, Wo’s not waiting for 2021. “Even before the sunscreen ban goes into full effect, I think it’s a matter of social responsibility. One of my favorite quotes by Maya Angelou applies here: ‘Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better,’” Wo says. According to Lowen, it’s going to take more of the same attitude to fuel change.

“We have to create a consumer demand for safer products. We’re obviously facing many environmental crises with climate change, so there’s a lot coming that we’re going to have to deal with. And it’s all true—all those things weigh in,” Lowen says.

Related Stories:
–How to Cover Sunburn the Right Way—And Actually Make It Heal Faster
–Sunscreens That Don’t Suck, According to ‘Glamour’ Staffers
–Your Sunscreen Might Not Actually Be Working—Here’s Why





Source link