Categories
Health

Twitter Has Strong Feelings About *TIME*'s 'Welcome to America' Cover Amid Border Crisis


President Donald Trump graced the latest cover of TIME magazine Thursday in what is perhaps their most harrowing visual critique of his presidency yet.

For the cover, TIME created a photo illustration of Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer John Moore’s now viral image of a two-year-old Honduran girl crying as her mother was being detained at the border. The president is seen towering over her. While Trump signed an executive order meant to end the separation of families at the border, thousands of families still remain apart and plans to reunite them are murky, Vox reports.

Moore has been photographing immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border for years, but when talking about taking this particular picture he told TIME, “This one was tough for me. As soon as it was over, they were put into a van. I had to stop and take deep breaths… all I wanted to do was pick her up. But I couldn’t.” The picture has already become the most emblematic symbol of America’s immigration debate, and this TIME issue has only further ignited the conversation.

In the hours after its release, many have taken to Twitter to praise the cover, criticize President Trump, and discuss the border crisis.

POWERFUL cover from @Time.

“Welcome to America. Sadly, torturing children by snatching them from their parents – and then sending them off with strangers thousands of miles away is how Donald Trump feels powerful.”

“Hey, @realDonaldTrump, you can hang this REAL @TIME cover on your wall and take down all those fake ones. Welcome to America! #MAGA”

“Setting aside the constant currency of outrage surrounding this chapter of our history rarely does a magazine cover nail it so poignantly #Time”

“Nailed it.The actual new @TIME coverBe ashamed people, this is what we’ve come to.I hope this is retweeted all day and all over twitter every time Trump logs on.”

“Time’s new cover: ‘Welcome to America’ kid… the tiny, innocent, frightened child speaks truth to the Tangerine Tyrant’s corrupt, dictatorial power.”

You can find more information on Trump’s zero tolerance policy, here.

Related Stories:

Ivanka Trump Said She’d Fight for Women. Where Is She on the Border Crisis?

Here’s How to Help Immigrant Families Who Have Been Separated at the Border

Here Are the Facts About Trump’s ‘Zero Tolerance’ Immigration Policy





Source link

Categories
Health

How to Cover a Pimple When Your Concealer Won't Stick


PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

Fact: There’s nothing more annoying than waking up with a massive pimple—especially around that time of the month. And for anyone who’s attempted to cover up a breakout during the summer, you already know all too well about the struggle that comes with applying concealer to oily, sweaty skin. A small dab of makeup on top of that zit just slides right off it, awkwardly gathering around the base for a halo-like ring that just draws more attention to the wickedly red spot.

However, before you toss your concealer aside and decide to call off all pending social plans indefinitely, take a minute to read our foolproof concealment plan courtesy of celebrity makeup artist Daniel Martin, whose clients include Meghan Markle and Jessica Alba. How do we know it works? We made our editor, Lindsay—who, lucky her, was having a struggle-is-real moment at the office—try it out. All it takes is a few easy steps to guarantee your makeup won’t budge, even in sweltering 90-degree heat.

The Essentials

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

Purell, Glossier Stretch Concealer in Light ($18, glossier.com), Giorgio Armani Luminous Silk Foundation in Color 3.75 ($64, sephora.com), Sephora Collection Confetti Mini Sponge ($12 for a set of 5, sephora.com), and Urban Decay Anti-Aging Eyeshadow Primer Potion ($24, ulta.com)

Here’s what you’ll need to start: hand sanitizer, concealer, foundation, a mini makeup sponge, and eyeshadow primer (this is major key!).

Step 1: Sanitize the Pimple

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

For some serious pimple-pulverizing action that works long-term, the best thing to start with is a tool like the Positively Clear 3-Step Acne Skincare Solution by Tria ($149), which uses non-UV light therapy to kill acne-causing bacteria within the pimple. However, if you’re at work or don’t have a blue light tool with you, Martin has an easy alternative: “I like to use hand sanitizer,” he says.

Not only will that small dollop of hand sanitizer disinfect the area (no need to spread more bacteria than what’s already there), but it will also dry the surface of the skin so that it won’t be overly oily for the next step. If you want to be extra precise so as to not dry out the skin around the pimple, Martin suggests using a pointed cotton swab to dab the disinfectant on.

Step 2: Apply Eyeshadow Primer

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

You know how eyeshadow primer helps to prevent eye makeup from migrating to other parts of your face? Well, the same can be said for when you apply it to a pimple before concealer. According to Martin, laying a light coating of eyeshadow primer (his favorite is by NYX) onto the surface of the pimple will not only seal off the surface of your skin for protection, it’ll also allow your concealer and foundation to adhere to the area. So dab a bit of primer (not tinted, though) onto the pimple and the area surrounding it. Then blend with your ring finger—it has the lightest touch.

Step 3: Layer on Concealer and Foundation

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

When it comes to the final makeup application for hiding that unwelcome mega-zit, remember that layering is your new best friend. Start by layering concealer (we like Honest Beauty’s Concealing Duo) on top of the eye shadow primer, then apply foundation as usual (try Dior Diorskin Forever Perfect). Once your face is set, you can go back and forth between adding concealer and dabbing on foundation until you get your desired coverage (don’t worry, it won’t take 100 layers). You can also set the look with translucent powder or setting spray if prefer extra coverage.

Step Five: Blend

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

Finally, grab a mini makeup sponge made for smaller areas and blend away until you can’t see anymore redness.

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

After that, you’re free to go about your day without wondering if anyone is staring at your zit. Even though they’re probably not. Really.

Looking for more concealer tricks? Start by checking out our guide to the most common application mistakes.

Watch Beyoncé’s Makeup Artist Show the Difference Between Contouring and Strobing:





Source link

Categories
Health

I Put Off Having a Baby to Cover Hillary Clinton's Campaign—and I Don't Regret It


I’d been waiting a year—or my entire life, depending on how you look at it—for this envelope to arrive. It was a self-seal bubble mailer in standard-issue manila sent via messenger from a major publishing house, containing a single copy of the finished version of my first book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.

What I hadn’t anticipated during all those years I’d dreamed of becoming a real published author was that when this package finally arrived, I’d be sitting on the sofa soaked in a frothy mix of milk after a full bottle burst open and spilled all over me and my screaming infant son.

It felt like some cosmic life realignment that the finished edition of my memoir about covering Hillary Clinton for The New York Times, arrived during this mini-fiasco called new motherhood. I held my baby in my arms, the envelope taunting me from the floor, where it would remain unopened for the next several hours.

There was a time in my life when the pull of that envelope would’ve been impossible to resist. Instead, my son and I both wailed.


I’d hardly learned how to write when I began to imagine myself writing a book. I could see the pencil scrawls in my Big Chief notebook published and bound, perched on a shelf at the B. Dalton in North Star Mall in San Antonio, where I grew up. I thought if I worked hard enough and wrote every day, it would happen for me.

I’m a fifth generation Texan, a product of a public high school with metal detectors and an A.P. English teacher whose primary reading material was the J. Crew catalogue. In 1996, when I was 17, one of the teachers at the middle-school school where my mom worked took me to hear Hillary promote her first book, It Takes a Village. I was entranced by what she had to say.

Two weeks after college graduation, I moved to New York with no connections in media or politics and quickly realized how naive I’d been about becoming a writer. I ran around midtown clutching clips from The Daily Texan in a leather Trapper Keeper. I lived on a stash of savings from working in a snow cone stand in Austin. When that ran out, I took temp jobs all over town, at insurance offices and nonprofits, mostly. My writing submissions were either rejected or ignored; things got so bad that I actually contemplated law school. Little by little, I came to understand that winning the Young Author’s Conference of South Texas wasn’t going to open any doors.

After months with no job offers, my sister met a New York Times political reporter through a mutual friend and this reporter generously agreed to have coffee with me. I’ll never forget standing in the crusty lobby of the old Times building in a suit I’d bought at an outlet mall. The reporter never showed.

Three years later, a friend I’d met while temping at Conde Nast Traveler put me up to replace her as the foreign news assistant at The Wall Street Journal. That was my foot-in-the-door. I never imagined that a decade later, I’d be a political reporter at the Times covering the leading candidate for president. (The reporter who never showed is now my colleague.) I wasn’t about to let go of that for anything.

In 2013, when I was 34, then Times executive editor Jill Abramson plucked me out of relative obscurity covering media companies and put me on the Hillary beat ahead of the coming presidential election. I knew this wouldn’t just be a job, but an all-consuming, cross-country marathon that would stretch on for years and require countless nights in a Holiday Inn Express in [insert swing-state city here]. I’d covered Hillary and Barack Obama’s 2008 campaigns, an endeavor that brought me to 48 states, got me enough Marriott points to cover honeymoon lodging in Mexico and left me with an 20 extra pounds from eating whatever sandwich was thrown to us on the campaign bus.

At that point, I hadn’t given much thought to having a baby. I thought I wanted one, but the timing was terrible. I asked my doctor how much it would cost to freeze my eggs until after the election. She told me to get pregnant immediately and take an au pair on the campaign trail. I left the appointment convinced that the baby could wait a couple more years—and resolved to find a new doctor.

Whenever the subject of babies came up with my husband, Bobby, or with nosy but well-meaning friends, the conversation always found its way back to the same question: “What about Hillary?” Ever since she’d spoken about the cracked ceiling in her 2008 concession speech, I’d dreamed of doing it all over again. Thankfully, Bobby and I were in agreement on one thing: the chance to cover the election of the first woman President for the paper of record was too important to pass up—a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. We decided to put off the baby for a few more years. I might not have been so willing to put my personal life on hold had the path to covering a presidential campaign for the Times been even a tiny bit easier.

Two years later, after Hillary had become the first woman to capture the Democratic nomination for president and the Times’s Upshot data model projected that her lead against Trump was insurmountable, Bobby and I started to think ahead. We had the baby talk, again punctuated by the same question—What about Hillary?

After all those years of covering her, I didn’t want to stop when Hillary finally reached the White House. I wanted to see what happened when the candidate morphed into Madam President.

I suppose the good people of Wisconsin made our decision for us.

It was late on Election Night. I stood on the floor of the Javits Center surrounded by Hillary’s crestfallen supporters. I’d just emailed my editors a tip I’d heard from a campaign source. “Wisconsin,” I told them at exactly 11:51 p.m., “Not gonna happen for them. Gone.”

All around me, Hillary’s supporters sobbed. They held cupped hands over open mouths. Grown men collapsed on the floor. A Muslim woman in a hijab dove into the press area and grabbed my arm. “Tell me she can still win!” she said. I didn’t say a word. I was still in deadline mode, thinking only of the next story, reporting out my “how she lost” piece for the next day’s paper. Old habits die hard.

I didn’t realize it at the time, but after three years, visits to all 99 counties in Iowa (twice) and countless renditions of “Fight Song” and—in that instant, under the glass dome that had been set to spill two hundred pounds of confetti shaped like glass shards down on a victorious Hillary—I finally faced a future in which the “What about Hillary?” question no longer loomed.

Not long after Election Day, still in a sleep-deprived fog, I told my very understanding husband, who had visited me on the campaign trail, put up with my constant travel and only occasionally yelled at me to stop looking at Twitter, that I was ready to have a baby.

By then we’d been married for eight years and liked our life—tramping around Southeast Asia, fishing in Montauk, tubing down the Guadalupe River in Texas. He’d left the baby decision entirely up to me. “I could take it or leave it,” he’d say whenever I brought it up. But now that I’d made up my mind, he was all in.

In the weeks after Donald Trump’s inauguration, when I began my (coincidentally) nine-month book leave, I struggled to pull myself away from the adrenaline that comes with a byline, the warm bath of breaking news and re-Tweets. There was a lot about the campaign that I didn’t miss, the exhaustion, the ugliness, the campaign trying to control every word I wrote, but I loved the other “girls on the bus” who covered Hillary and the way that every day had the feel of a traveling circus. This was a far cry from sitting at my dining room table, staring at a blank screen.

But by June 2017, two remarkable, life-transforming things had happened– I’d written 80,000 words about Hillary’s pursuit of the presidency —and, at 38 years old, I was pregnant with our first child. A book and a baby—the two most terrifying, all-consuming things a procrastinator like me would ever do—now forever intrinsically linked.

Ten days after our son Cormac was born, I read a final version of Chasing Hillary. This was my last chance to (gulp!) make factual changes. He lay in my lap, my perfect little peanut, as I reviewed 384 printed pages. I posted a picture of us on Instagram. A friend called me Wonder Woman, another told me I made it look easy. What I left out of the caption: the fact that I had dried baby vomit in my hair. That the vomit had been there for 24 hours, probably longer. Who could be sure?

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on *Chasing Hillary.*

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on Chasing Hillary.

For years, when parents warned me how emotionally and physically grueling new motherhood would be, I nodded but thought: If I can function on no sleep for Hillary, I can do it for my own child.

This turned out to be only partly true. I could indeed endure three hours of sleep, down a cold brew with a shot of espresso and crank out a reasonably coherent front-page story. And, unlike Hillary’s campaign, my baby took a long afternoon nap. But the new baby knocked me back in ways that I hadn’t anticipated. For example, no one told me, that I’d be in so much pain that for the first five weeks just walking from couch to crib would be a challenge. Or that I would irrationally yell at my saint-of-a-husband over dirty bottles and diaper changes, unable to scream about my real frustration—that men, even the best ones, don’t have to go through any of this.

And even if someone had warned me, I wouldn’t have believed them that I would be so hopelessly, inexplicably in absolute, all-consuming love that I would start to see the book, my first “baby,” as an unwanted distraction. I couldn’t have imagined a scenario in which the arrival of my first book would essentially amount to an afterthought. And then it coincided with the arrival of a delightful little baby who filled a piece of me that, it turned out, newsprint never could.

However, I will admit that in recent weeks I’ve spent several sleepless nights agonizing over questions like: will my vagina still hurt while I’m on a multi-city, weeks-long book tour with my baby and my mom in tow? Is there any under-eye cover on that planet that could brighten the dark circles under my eyes? Will my raging hormones cause me to burst into tears on “Morning Joe”?

I had cabbage on my breasts (an old trick to reduce the pain) and an ice pack in my underwear when the publisher needed me to sign off on the jacket design. I wished I were staring into my baby’s eyes (even if they were closed). Or napping beside him. Or doing just about anything (changing a heaping diaper!) other than arguing with the fact checker about whether the bomb sniffing dogs used by the secret service were German Shepherds or Belgian Malinois. (They are the latter, in case you’re wondering.)

People always told me that you are supposed to read to your baby in utero, I’d considered talking to my bulging stomach a bridge too far. Then I realized that in recording the audio version of my book while nine months pregnant, I’d already read 80 hours of my own words to Cormac.

He’d been with me the whole time, kicking as I wrote. I couldn’t have done it without him, without the promise of him. We would open that envelope together. Just as soon as I found a pacifier.

Amy Chozick is a writer-at-large for The New York Times and the author of Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.



Source link

Categories
Health

Time Magazine's Powerful New Cover Features First-Time Female Candidates


Time magazine revealed its newest cover yesterday, and it features nearly 50 first-time female candidates who say they were inspired to run for office following the election of Donald Trump and the 2017 Women’s March.

Time calls the candidates The Avengers, and a corresponding story by journalist Charlotte Alter explains how after marching, these women have taken politics by the reins and launched campaigns of their own. Alter also examines how a new grassroots movement has encouraged women to run for office in droves and empowered them to become more politically engaged in the Trump era.

“Call it payback, call it a revolution, call it the Pink Wave, inspired by marchers in their magenta hats, and the activism that followed. There is an unprecedented surge of first-time female candidates, overwhelmingly Democratic, running for offices big and small, from the U.S. Senate and state legislatures to local school boards,” Alter writes in the piece.

Pictured on the cover, and highlighted in the story, are women such as Lauren Underwood, a nurse with a heart condition who says she decided to challenge Illinois Congressman Randy Hultgren after he broke his promise to protect pre-existing conditions in a Republican healthcare bill, and Mai Khanh Tran, a pediatrician running for Congress in California.

Recent data shows that there is a significant new wave of political interest from women. In the article, Alter tracks stats from the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University that show that at least 79 women have thought about runs for governor in 2018—that’s about twice as much as a record previously set in 1994. Political action organizations like Emily’s List, which helps train and elect prochoice Democratic women, have also reported an increase in women who have reached out to them, interested in campaigns.

“In dozens of interviews with Time. progressive women described undergoing a metamorphosis. In 2016 they were ordinary voters,” Alter writes. “In 2017 they became activists, spurred by the bitter defeat of the first major female presidential candidate at the hands of a self-described pussy grabber. Now, in 2018, these doctors and mothers and teachers and executives are jumping into the arena and bringing new energy to a Democratic Party sorely in need of fresh faces.”

The new cover was published just weeks after Time revealed its 2017 Person of the Year: the women who started the #MeToo movement and spoke out about instances of sexual misconduct in Hollywood. It’s exciting to see Time continuing to put the spotlight on women spurring change across the country.



Source link

Categories
Health

Jessica Chastain Responds to Backlash From That All-White 'L.A. Times' Magazine Cover


Over the past couple of days, the Los Angeles Times’ Envelope magazine, which is dedicated to awards season, has managed to piss off a lot of people on Twitter, thanks to its December 21 cover, which featured a group of all white (and overwhelmingly blond) actresses. The women pictured in the group portrait—Margot Robbie, Diane Kruger, Saoirse Ronan, Annette Bening, Kate Winslet and Jessica Chastain—were placed above the coverline, “A Shift in Focus: Actresses Call for a Change in the Way Many Stories Are Told.”

The article was a roundtable-style story discussing working in Hollywood and how women are treated onscreen. The topic was definitely timely, but again, there were no women of color featured—at all. And a conversation about diversity and equality in storytelling can’t happen if you’re not representing all the stakeholders.

The backlash on social media pointing out the lack of women of color on the cover and in the feature was quick—and heavy. “It’s time white actresses speak up when their WOC colleagues are ignored,” one user wrote.

“I don’t understand how after all the conversations on #OscarSoWhite, White Feminism, etc a cover like this could be approved with this headline,” another tweeted. “And did any of these A-List actresses demand that actresses of color and other diverse demos be included?”

Jessica Chastain, who stars in Molly’s Game, responded to her participation in a series of tweets on Saturday evening and clarified in some responses that the cover focused on celebrating female-lead films. She admitted that it wasn’t a good look for the Los Angeles Times to omit women of color on its cover and called for more inclusive storytelling. She then prompted her followers to tell her their favorite WOC female-lead 2017 films. In her next tweet, she incredulously told her followers that she can’t even name five 2017 films that featured WOC leads. And it’s not for a loss of memory: That’s how much women of color and their experiences continue to be underrepresented, ignored, and erased in the film industry.

After she responded, many on Twitter continued to call her out for knowingly being part of a cover shoot that featured only white women and blatantly contradicts the values she promotes—and suggested that she could have used her platform to change the conversation instead. (The other actresses on the cover still haven’t commented at the time of publish.)

It’s incredibly important in the male-dominated industry of Hollywood to advocate for telling women’s stories. But they need to be inclusive of all women—not just white women—and this cover illustrates the absolutely urgent need for that.

Related Stories:
Twitter Is Not Pleased About This Magazine Cover—With Good Reason
Jessica Chastain Calls Out the ‘Disturbing’ Portrayal of Women in Cannes Movies
Jessica Chastain Reveals Exactly How She Negotiates for Equal Pay





Source link

Categories
Health

Twitter Is Not Pleased About This LA Times Magazine Cover


2017 has been a year filled with tough, complicated conversations about everything from sexual harassment, religious freedom to class issues and diversity. Some people’s eyes have been opened to systemic problems in American society, while others continue to refuse to see what segments of our population face on a daily basis.

For all the ‘wokeness’—both real and performative—that permeated the culture, sometimes all it takes is one simple image to remind us how much work still needs to be done. The most recent example is the cover of the Los Angeles Times’ Envelope—a magazine dedicated to awards season. The image features actresses Margot Robbie, Diane Kruger, Saoirse Ronan, Annette Bening, Kate Winslet and Jessica Chastain with the cover line, “Actresses call for a change in the way many stories are told.” While I’m guessing the intent was to celebrate the female point-of-view in Hollywood, it seems to be pointing to a particular type of women’s stories—the ones portrayed by white women, and generally blonde ones at that.

It’s utterly ridiculous to not include any women of color in this cover and conversation. And people on Twitter are rightfully angry.

Each of these points is incredibly valid. It’s unknown who exactly decided this was a good idea, but one might hazard a guess that there weren’t people of color at the table. Diversity in the stories being told by Hollywood is incredibly important and women absolutely need to be in more positions of power to make that happen. But that can’t just mean white women and their stories.

None of the actresses have commented yet, but Jessica Chastain has been quite vocal lately about inclusion and other feminist issues so perhaps she’ll share some thoughts.

In the meantime, let’s do better in 2018, everybody.





Source link