Categories
Health

I Don't Have Children, But I'm Still a Mom—Kind of


When we meet strangers, and I have to introduce the girls, I sometimes avoid having to identify our relationship by just saying their names, but everyone assumes I am their young mom. Other times, I say, “This is my kid.” Sometimes, the girls will get a wicked look in their eye and introduce themselves—“I’m her daughter.”

When they come over to our apartment for taco night or to eat my famous dinner of “engagement chicken”—which I got from this very magazine—and roast potatoes, we choose shows to watch “as a family”—like High School Musical, or AJ and the Queen, and it is forbidden to watch those outside of that arrangement—the four of us and our dog, Frankie, on the couch, with chamomile tea and snacks, blankets draped over us. The girls always raid our pantry for snacks seconds after finishing dinner and my partner makes their teas just so, with ice cubes and sugar, in mugs they choose.

The girls’ dad once told me I should be able to claim the girls as dependents on my taxes, but I wasn’t keeping them alive. I didn’t feed or clothe them daily, didn’t put a roof over their heads. Their parents did that. But I was spending a lot of money on them, and there was no way for me to formally recognize with the government that I kind of did have kids. Sort of. It was an alternative family structure, and the IRS has never been good at recognizing those. Not for queer families, of which I’m a part, and not for those who relationships don’t adhere to the traditional nuclear structure. I also, for example, help take care of my mom and brother and the IRS doesn’t have a form for that either.

Having the girls in my life hasn’t changed my decision about wanting kids in the conventional sense. But it has made me resolve to always have enough money and be emotionally stable enough to serve as a sturdy presence. I didn’t seek out Franny and Brianna. We stumbled onto each other and we fell in love with each other and we became family. I do think of them as my children and I know they think of me as their mom. I hope and assume that once they’re grown up, and I no longer have this exact role in their lives, I’ll find more family. I would like to do this again, I mean, and so would my partner. Other kids need us, too.

I’ll never forget the look on their faces when one Christmas, I gave them gift cards to Barnes & Noble, when they wanted some hot new Air Jordan release. And they’ll never forget the look on my face when they showed me what they’d bought with those gift cards—not books, but Yale hoodies and stuffed animals from the Yale bookstore, where I earned a graduate degree.

I’ll never forget the feeling of getting a call from Brianna, her knowing she could tell me [redacted] and we wouldn’t judge.

I’ll never forget the feeling of finding out the boy advice I’d given Franny and Brianna had spread from girl to girl in their high school like wildfire, putting the fucbois in their lives on notice.

They’re my kids. And they’re not. I’m their mom. And I’m not. And that’s the case for millions of families in this country, families who have been affected by the war on drugs, by mass incarceration, by detentions, by deportations, by poverty, by the opioid crisis, by Covid-19. Millions of us have stepped in to take care of children who need us in very specific ways and we’ve come to love them so that they might as well be our blood. This is what family looks like.

Karla Cornejo Villavicencio is a writer who lives in New Haven. Her first book The Undocumented Americans is out now.



Source link

Categories
Health

The Women's March 2020 Is This Weekend. Go, So You Don't Have to Go Next Year.


In 2018, the marches were smaller, which was to be expected—it’s almost impossible to recreate a historic event.

In 2019, discord among the national leadership of the march and serious accusations of anti-Semitism against some of its leaders fractured and fizzled the momentum. (Since then, the original leadership has been almost completely replaced with a new board of directors.)

Millions of marchers in 2017 turned into hundreds of thousands in 2018 turned into tens of thousands in 2019. Now what? The relentlessness of bad news—and the feeling of our powerlessness in the face of it—is overwhelming. The world is burning and kids sicken and die in cages and women’s rights to health can be rescinded and wars can be started on social media. How do you even presume to respond to that?

“I think that there’s a lot of sense of people not necessarily knowing how to make their best contribution” says Rachel O’Leary Carmona, the new COO of the Women’s March. “There’s been a lot of efforts to distract women from building power, and a lot of distractions in the news—it’s very hard with a country going through an impeachment of the president, an international provocation that brought us to the brink of war, and in the midst of a presidential election,” she added. “But I think that’s why it’s more important than ever all those things are a demonstration of the abuses of power that Trump has engaged with.”

“How do I contribute?” is the first question that so many of us ask about our role in making the world feel less like one all-encompassing PortaPotty. After Trump’s election, thousands of people—and women in particular, if the outcome of the 2018 midterms is an indication—were spurred to participate in politics and political activism far outside their comfort zone, whether it embarrassed them or felt a little lame or not. Women surged into office. But for more of us, “How do I contribute?” is also the last question we ask before throwing up our hands.

The thing that the Women’s March did so well was give us an answer that made political engagement simple. In sending a national invite to join a clear action that required merely that people be able to move in one direction, it welcomed millions of people to the world of protest. The Women’s March allows people to participate in an act of organized political protest at little personal cost. To be a part of a march, show up. It’s quicker and easier than (but not a replacement for) voting. It’s a bridge between the isolation of reading the news and the much bigger ask of phone banking or donating. It’s not sufficient on its own, but it’s also the easiest possible first step.

The Women’s March also made people feel good. That’s partially why it’s treated with suspicion, as if having a good time means what you’re doing isn’t also serious. (Meanwhile, attendees at Trump rallies don’t seem to do a lot of hand wringing about mixing fun and politics.) Marching in 2017 made joining together in a massive action feel both consequential and joyous. Winning in 2020, not to mention the general project of making America more just and more livable, will require more from us than spending a few hours in the streets. Marching is often less like protesting or canvassing, and more like praying—it refocuses and centers you, it sharpens your resolve, it can form exceptionally strong bonds and build a sense of fellowship.

“The broader goal is to create a big tent for people to organize with community and build capacity and build relationships so that there’s an infrastructure for feminist organizing in 2020,” Carmona says. Marching isn’t a replacement for other forms of activism, it’s fuel for them. If marching isn’t your thing, there are plenty of alternatives, even more effective ways of influencing political and social change. But we shouldn’t dismiss the form of activism that welcomed millions of people to political involvement—or worst of all, feel embarrassed about it.

Don’t wait for 2021, for the fifth march, for another Trump administration. If you’d go next year, go this time too. Better to be there when we still have time to march, to donate, to register ourselves and others, and to vote. Better to feel a little dumb at an under-attended march, a little cold in the January weather, a little unsure if waving a sign around makes a difference. Ask the woman next to you—maybe she’ll have an idea.

Jenny Singer is a staff writer for Glamour.



Source link

Categories
Health

Jennifer Aniston Says She'll Never Stop Coloring Her Hair: 'I Don't Want Gray'


Jennifer Aniston might have moved past her famous Rachel cut, but there’s one thing she says she’s never changing about her hair: her regular appointments with her colorist.

In a new interview with InStyle magazine, the actress admitted that she no intention of ever going gray.

The interview was part of the Instyle‘s October beauty issue, in which the publication asked Aniston about her favorite beauty tips and routines. At one point in the conversation, the reporter noted that in Aniston’s new Apple+ TV series The Morning Show she plays an ambitious television host with “perfectly highlighted tresses.” To this, Aniston confided that “she plans to keep her monthly colorist appointments until the bitter end.”

Jon Kopaloff/FilmMagic/Getty Images

She added, “I’m not gonna lie — I don’t want gray hair.”

The gray hair topic is especially interesting because Aniston, who just turned 50, also opened up about how she thinks society should address beauty and aging. “Fifty was the first time I thought, ‘Well, that number,’ ” Aniston says. “I don’t know what it is because I don’t feel any different. Things aren’t shutting down in any way. I feel physically incredible. So it’s weird that it’s all of a sudden getting telegraphed in a way that’s like, ‘You look amazing for your age.’ I think we need to establish some etiquette around that dialogue and verbiage.”

Jennifer Aniston seen on location for 'The Morning Show' at Pier 45 at Hudson River Park on May 10 2019 in New York City.
James Devaney/GC Images/Getty Images

She might not want gray hair, but she did have a lot to say about maintaining soft, glowing skin. “I think it’s because my mom told me to start moisturizing when I turned 15,” she said. “I’ve been using Aveeno since I was a teenager.” She also shared that her skin standbys include a daily glass of celery juice, superfood supplements, and a 24-karat-gold sculpting bar made by the makeup artist Jillian Dempsey. “It feels so damn good to put oil on your face and just roll.”



Source link

Categories
Health

Don't Call Lizzo 'Brave' for Being Confident


Every pop star has a career-defining performance. For Madonna, it was “Like a Virgin” at the 1984 MTV Video Music Awards. For Britney Spears, it was “I’m a Slave 4 U” at the same show, 17 years later. And for Lizzo, inarguably 2019’s buzziest breakout star, it was “Truth Hurts” at the BET Awards this past June.

Clad in a bridal getup and flanked by 11 dancers, also dressed in white, Lizzo delivered a spellbinding rendition of her smash hit, which reached number-six on Billboard‘s Hot 100. She sang live. She danced. She played the damn flute (which, if you’re a Lizzo fan, shouldn’t come as a surprise). Her performance was so good Rihanna herself gave it a standing ovation.

Fans are still talking about it months later. Just look at these YouTube comments as proof. They’re all positive—or at least, that’s the intention—but there’s a caveat. See if you can figure it out:

“Lizzo is the proof y’all. A confident woman is always the most
attractive person everywhere.”

“Wow, she sang, rapped, danced, twerked, and then played the flute
whilst twerking and yelling ‘Bitch!’ She’s amazing and I wish I had
her confidence.”

“Once I get Lizzo’s confidence, it’s over for all y’all”

“She makes me feel confident about my body. If that sounds offensive,
I don’t mean for it to. I love her.”

“I love how much confidence she has. it blows me away and I hope she
keeps it up. She is so beautiful and strong. It’s inspiring.”

Each one of these remarks seems to express surprise at Lizzo’s confidence, as if it’s something that shouldn’t be inherent. When Madonna and Britney delivered those aforementioned performances, people didn’t marvel at their strength. As thin women, our culture expects them to have a certain base level of confidence. Meanwhile, it’s viewed as shocking or novel when a plus-size woman, like Lizzo, displays the same agency.

[embedded content]

“When people look at my body and be like, ‘Oh my God, she’s so brave,’ it’s like, ‘No I’m not,'” Lizzo, 31, tells Glamour. “I’m just fine. I’m just me. I’m just sexy. If you saw Anne Hathaway in a bikini on a billboard, you wouldn’t call her brave. I just think there’s a double standard when it comes to women.”

A byproduct of Lizzo’s meteoric rise to fame is that she’s become a face of the body positivity movement. She embraces it, but wishes people would stop thinking it’s miraculous for a plus-size woman to have confidence.



Source link

Categories
Health

The Bachelorette's Hannah Brown Opens Up About Being Slut-Shamed: 'I Don't Tolerate Hate'


To say Hannah Brown has been put through the ringer on The Bachelorette this season would be an understatement. She’s had to deal with several guys who maybe-probably-definitely had girlfriends when they signed on to the show, lame fights between the contestants, and, of course, Luke P.

Things hit a fever pitch for Brown on last night’s Bachelorette episode, when she and Luke had a tension-filled conversation about sex and religion that ended with her flipping him off as he was sent packing. Before he left, Brown said this season’s most-teased quote: “I have had sex, and Jesus still loves me.”

As truly fantastic as that line is, it’s caused slut-shamers to come for Brown on social media. Thankfully, the Alabama beauty queen says she has a “thick skin” to deal with the hate—and everything else The Bachelorette has thrown her way. Below, she opens up about trolls, her season finale, and finally finding clarity (a word she used frequently) with the men.

Glamour: OK, how sick are you of the word clarity?

Hannah Brown: It’s funny because the first thing I said to the guys was, “I want you to be bold,” and it would latch on and they would say it a zillion times. Then it was, “stay in your lane,” and we would hear them say, “stay in your lane.” Then I would say “clarity,” and you’d hear “clarity” a zillion times. It was like I had a theme for every week. It was so funny.

Glamour: You wrote an amazing Instagram post about the shaming you’ve experienced from viewers and how hurtful it was. What’s the response been like since you posted that? Or has it not improved?

Hannah: That post definitely did get a lot of response. Ultimately, I have pretty thick skin. I don’t really let that stuff get to me, but I felt like I had to say something because people are looking at my social and seeing those things. These people don’t know me or the experience, but what I don’t tolerate is hate and shaming for something that I’m not. I refuse to allow my page to be that.

I just felt like it was really important to make sure that I fought hate with love. I think that, yes, it’s gotten a little better, but there’s still people out there that have hate in their heart and are going to have something to say because they have their own issues and have been hurt. They’re hurting and don’t know how to deal with that so they look for outlets, and I’m in a position where I’m an easy target for that. That’s OK, I can handle it. But there’s some people that can’t handle it. I’m in a position that can be a voice for that.





Source link

Categories
Health

Even Kate Middleton and Prince William Don't Know Baby Sussex's Name Yet


Kate Middleton and Prince William gave their first on-camera interview about Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s newborn son today (May 7), and they revealed something surprising: Even they don’t know Baby Sussex’s name.

“We look forward to meeting him, and finding out what his name is going to be,” Middleton told Hello! magazine, referring to Markle and Prince Harry’s baby. “So it’s really exciting for both of them. And I’m wishing them the best in these next few weeks. It’s always a bit daunting the first time around.”

To play devil’s advocate, it’s possible Prince Harry and Markle still haven’t named their son yet. After all, the Duke of Sussex told journalists yesterday, “We’re still thinking about names. The baby’s a little bit overdue, so we’ve had time to think about it. That’s the next bit.” It’s also possible Middleton and Prince William do know the name, but they’re just playing coy.

Regardless, Prince William says he’s “absolutely thrilled” for his brother and Markle: “We’re looking forward to seeing them in the next few days. I’m very pleased and glad to welcome my brother to the sleep deprivation society that is parenting.”

He added, “I wish him all the best. I hope in the next few days they can settle down and enjoy having a newborn in their family and all the joys that come with that.”

Middleton is especially excited that Baby Sussex’s birthday lines up so closely with two of her own children: Princess Charlotte (born May 2) and Prince Louis (born April 23). “It’s such a special time, and with Louis and Charlotte just having had their birthdays, it’s such a great time of the year to have a baby,” she said. “Spring’s in the air and everything, so it’s pretty great.”

Fingers crossed we get some cute joint birthday parties next year. Check out Kate Middleton and Prince William’s new interview in the video, above.



Source link