Categories
Health

The Peru Water Crisis Steals Time, Money and Safety from Women


To learn more about how the water crisis is impacting women in Peru, I traveled to Lima with Water.org and Stella Artois as part of their #PourItForward campaign. After visiting women in the suburbs, I learned that the water crisis doesn’t always look the way you might think.


Imagine living in the suburbs of a major metropolitan city: You have a nice two bedroom house on a tree-lined street, just up the hill from a lush green park with views of the ocean. You have a sunny, covered courtyard—the kind of place you might have a barbecue, filled with a few potted plants and a spacious picnic table. You have a cozy kitchen with bright blue cabinets stacked high with sparkling dishes. You have all this, but you’re missing one vital thing: running water.

When we talk about the water crisis, it’s often in the context of polluted rivers or remote villages that force women to walk for hours each day just to find clean water. Those are major issues but the full picture of the water crisis is a lot slipperier. In the suburbs of developing countries like Peru, the problem isn’t as simple as digging wells or installing water filters. Here, the water crisis has more to do with money and infrastructure—the actual pipes that bring clean water from the city’s water source into showers and sinks throughout the area—and money.

Lima’s water infrastructure is so overburdened that you can’t flush toilet paper—a fact I learned when faced with this sign in the airport bathroom.

“The water system is here but the challenge is that it’s tilted towards the affluent and middle class,” says Gary White, co-founder and CEO of Water.org, a social good organization that pioneers financial solutions to the global water crisis. That means residents in towns outside of the city limits often don’t have access to running water in their homes, either because they can’t afford to install a sink or toilet, or because the water pipes simply aren’t there. (Or both.)

In the peri-urban areas of Peru, three million people lack access to clean water and five million lack access to sanitation like a bathroom in their home. These are the suburbs we’re talking about—imagine driving to a neighborhood two hours outside of New York City and finding that hand-dug toilets and bucket showers are the norm. Even in the most low-income neighborhoods, that would be unfathomable but in developing nations, it’s not uncommon.

Women often face the biggest burden of the water crisis. Globally, women and girls spend 200 million hours every day collecting water and another 266 million hours finding a place to go to the bathroom, according to Water.org. In areas like the neighborhoods outside of Lima, they might live on a nice block with a park around the corner and still not have access to a bathroom in their home. “It doesn’t always have the face of total desperation you’ll see in rural areas where people are walking six hours [to find clean water] or drinking out of a hand dug well,” says Matt Damon, co-founder of Water.org. “It’s the day-to-day grind and what that does in people’s lives.”

Without running water, women often have to haul heavy buckets from large communal water tanks (which can cost 10-15 times more to fill than it would cost for direct water access from a water utility) and find safe places to use the bathroom. Sanitation is a major issue. “The lives of girls are totally changed because they’re spending their time in this daily grind. It completely robs them of their potential,” Damon says. And it’s not just time-consuming, it’s often a safety issue: Imagine having to walk around your neighborhood alone in the middle of the night trying to find a place to pee, or having to bathe without any privacy.

Treelined street in the suburbs of Lima.

Even in nicer suburbs with tree-lined streets and green parks, access to running water is still out of reach for many families outside of Lima.

Photo of a bathroom in the suburbs of Lima.

Giovanna, 47, and her family live in a nice house. But until they were able to get financing for a proper bathroom, they had to use an open hole out back—a safety and sanitation risk.

Giovanna helps her grandson wash his hands.

A loan through the WaterCredit program helped Giovanna and her family put in two bathrooms, an improvement that’s helped make their home safer and cleaner—and afforded Giovanna the opportunity to grow her business selling cosmetics.

The solution isn’t about digging wells or trucking in more clean water. To truly fix the problem and remove that chronic daily grind from the shoulders of women, Water.org argues financial empowerment is the key. In 2013, they launched the WaterCredit program, which works with banks in places like Lima to help women and their families get micro loans—the average size of which are just $1,200—to make home improvements. In areas that do have access to water pipes, it’s as simple as getting the few hundred dollars it takes to tap into the main line and install a faucet or toilet in their home. In more rural areas, a loan can help women pay for a water tank that will provide running water for luxuries like showers and toilets.

What the Water Crisis Looks Like

If you stand directly in front of Grecia’s house, it looks like the kind of cute starter bungalow you might find outside of San Francisco: the angular facade looks like it’s been freshly painted and the sunny front porch has a verdant shade tree. Grecia, 26, lives in the airy white house with her husband and their two-year-old son and one day, she hopes to run a pharmacy for the neighborhood out of her home.

White stucco house with tree and fence.

Grecia’s home outside of Lima.

Turn to the left, and it’s clear Grecia’s home is the outlier on the block. The streets in her neighborhood aren’t paved and the majority of the homes on the block have tin roofs and wooden slats for siding. Everything surrounding Grecia’s house is brown and lopsided. Until recently, she didn’t have so much as a water tap let alone a shower or toilet.



Source link

Categories
Health

Rift Valley Fever Could Be the Next Global Health Crisis For Pregnant Women


The Zika virus is not the only mosquito-borne virus pregnant women need to know about. According to new research, Rift Valley fever is poised to become an even more dangerous global health crisis—especially if you’re pregnant.

The idea that something as innocuous as a mosquito bite could cause severe birth defects, is nothing short of terrifying. When cases of Zika broke out in 2015, experts quickly declared it a global health crisis, issuing travel warnings and safe-sex recommendations to help stem its spread. But Zika isn’t the only mosquito-borne virus that pregnant women need to know about—researchers are growing increasingly concerned about the virus that causes Rift Valley fever (RVF), which is found throughout Africa and the Middle East.

In a recently published study, a team of researchers studied the effects of Rift Valley fever using infected rats and human fetal tissue—and their findings are setting off alarm bells among global health officials. The virus, according to the report, can infect the layer of cells in the placenta that’s responsible for delivering nutrients to the fetus. Translation: Unlike Zika, which indirectly affects the placenta, RVF is able to take a short cut, which can mean birth defects and death when pregnant women are infected, according to a report on the study by the New York Times.

To be clear, RVF hasn’t yet reached the level of global health crisis for pregnant women like we’ve seen with Zika—the World Health Organization has called the RVF a potential public health emergency, according to the New York Times. But researchers are on alert now in an effort to help pregnant women across the globe stay ahead of the curve. “Zika caught everybody by surprise,” study author Amy Hartman, Ph.D., an infectious disease specialist at the University of Pittsburgh, told the New York Times. “If doctors had known about Zika’s birth effects, they could have done a lot more to protect pregnant women and babies. With Rift Valley fever, we’re trying to get ahead of the curve.”

RVF isn’t exactly new. The virus is primarily found in livestock throughout sub-Saharan Africa but it can be transmitted to humans via mosquitos where it can cause flu-like symptoms, liver issues, and in pregnant women, birth defects that can be life-threatening for the fetus. In 2000, there was also an outbreak of RVF in the Middle East, according to the World Health Organization, which raised the possibility that it could spread to other parts of the world just like Zika.

The good news? So far, there are only two cases of fetuses infected with RVF on record, the New York Times reports, but since the disease can be asymptomatic (meaning pregnant women may not even know they’ve been infected), the researchers note it’s possible many more cases could have been misdiagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the most common symptoms of RVF include fever, weakness, back pain, dizziness, and weight loss. Most people recover after a few days but severe cases can involve brain swelling, and in extremely rare cases, death.

At this stage, there are no Zika-like travel advisories for pregnant women related to RVF. But if you’re traveling while pregnant, it pays to take extra precautions, says Adeeti Gupta, M.D., a board-certified OB/GYN and founder of Walk-In GYN Care in New York. “I would say, exercise caution while traveling to sub-saharan Africa, West Africa and Madagascar. Thankfully, it is not a widespread health emergency yet,” she says. The best thing you can do is protect yourself against mosquito bites—especially when you’re traveling in Africa or the Middle East.

And to be extra safe, Dr. Gupta advises flagging any travel to your doctor while you’re pregnant so that you can stay up on any risks and get any appropriate vaccinations. “You should also be aware of any infections—even mild flu like illnesses,” upon your return, Dr. Gupta says. “If you experience any such symptoms, seek medical care to get tested for conditions such as Zika to stay ahead of the game.”

Related Stories:

This Is When Zika May Show Up Near You

Scientists Say Pregnant Women Should Be Aware of These Zika-like Diseases Too



Source link

Categories
Health

Miss Michigan Called Out the Flint Water Crisis During the Miss America Pageant


Last night, Nia Franklin of New York was crowned the latest Miss America, but it is Miss Michigan, Emily Sioma, who is making headlines thanks to her short introduction during the broadcast.

Instead of using the moment to highlight her achievements or qualifications—she graduated with a degree in women’s studies and works to support survivors of sexual violence—Sioma instead chose to call attention to the continuing water crisis in Flint, MI. “From the state with 84% of the United States’ fresh water but none for its residents to drink, I am Miss Michigan Emily Sioma,” she said.

The city’s water problems have been ongoing since 2014 when it was found that the water in the city’s pipes was contaminated with high levels of lead and other toxins.

Social media users were quick to praise Sioma for her bold move with one writing this was “clearly not your mother’s Miss America pageant.”

Another said, “Been rolling my eyes all weekend that Miss America is still a thing but MISS MICHIGAN FOR PRESIDENT.”

This is surely the type of positive attention that the Miss America organization is looking for as it continues to rebrand and attempts to focus more on the intellect of its contestants. Back in June, board of trustees chairwoman Gretchen Carlson announced that the pageant would no longer include its famous swimsuit competition. “We are no longer a pageant,” Carlson told Good Morning America at the time. “We are a competition. We will no longer judge our candidates on their outward physical appearance. That’s huge.”

“Who doesn’t want to be empowered, learn leadership skills, and pay for college and be able to show the world who you are as a person from the inside of your soul,” she continued. “That’s what we’re judging them on now.”

While Sioma didn’t even make the final 15 in the competition, her message was most definitely heard.





Source link

Categories
Health

Twitter Has Strong Feelings About *TIME*'s 'Welcome to America' Cover Amid Border Crisis


President Donald Trump graced the latest cover of TIME magazine Thursday in what is perhaps their most harrowing visual critique of his presidency yet.

For the cover, TIME created a photo illustration of Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer John Moore’s now viral image of a two-year-old Honduran girl crying as her mother was being detained at the border. The president is seen towering over her. While Trump signed an executive order meant to end the separation of families at the border, thousands of families still remain apart and plans to reunite them are murky, Vox reports.

Moore has been photographing immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border for years, but when talking about taking this particular picture he told TIME, “This one was tough for me. As soon as it was over, they were put into a van. I had to stop and take deep breaths… all I wanted to do was pick her up. But I couldn’t.” The picture has already become the most emblematic symbol of America’s immigration debate, and this TIME issue has only further ignited the conversation.

In the hours after its release, many have taken to Twitter to praise the cover, criticize President Trump, and discuss the border crisis.

POWERFUL cover from @Time.

“Welcome to America. Sadly, torturing children by snatching them from their parents – and then sending them off with strangers thousands of miles away is how Donald Trump feels powerful.”

“Hey, @realDonaldTrump, you can hang this REAL @TIME cover on your wall and take down all those fake ones. Welcome to America! #MAGA”

“Setting aside the constant currency of outrage surrounding this chapter of our history rarely does a magazine cover nail it so poignantly #Time”

“Nailed it.The actual new @TIME coverBe ashamed people, this is what we’ve come to.I hope this is retweeted all day and all over twitter every time Trump logs on.”

“Time’s new cover: ‘Welcome to America’ kid… the tiny, innocent, frightened child speaks truth to the Tangerine Tyrant’s corrupt, dictatorial power.”

You can find more information on Trump’s zero tolerance policy, here.

Related Stories:

Ivanka Trump Said She’d Fight for Women. Where Is She on the Border Crisis?

Here’s How to Help Immigrant Families Who Have Been Separated at the Border

Here Are the Facts About Trump’s ‘Zero Tolerance’ Immigration Policy





Source link

Categories
Health

Ivanka Trump Said She'd Fight For Women. Where Is She On The Border Crisis?


The banner photo on Ivanka Trump’s Twitter feed shows her holding a baby, tenderly nestled to her heart. But even as the president’s daughter visually projects the centrality of motherhood in her life, she’s being called to task for not speaking out publicly about the separation of immigrant children and parents at America’s borders.

The Democratic National Committee this week directly chastised Trump—a high-ranking advisor in her father’s administration—for remaining publicly quiet on the immigration debate despite her vow to serve as a voice for women and families.

“Children are being detained and separated from their families while senior administration official Ivanka Trump attends glamourous fundraisers for congressional Republicans,” the party said in a statement, referring to Trump’s Monday appearance with House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

“Ivanka Trump claims to be an advocate for families in the Trump administration, yet she’s nowhere to be found while men, women, and children are suffering on the American border from this administration’s inhumane family-separation policy,” the DNC broadside continued.

Trump occupies a unique spot in U.S. politics: In addition to her official self-description, which leads off with “wife, mother, sister, daughter,” she was a critical presidential campaign surrogate who went on to take a formal job in the new family business of running the country as an advisor to POTUS for “economic empowerment, workforce development & entrepreneurship,” her bio reads. That positioning both opens her up to criticism on the issue at hand and begs a broader question: How much responsibility does (or should) she bear for her father’s words and actions?

When Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination for president in the summer of 2016, Ivanka was the much-anticipated opening act. Her duty was clear: To paint an empathetic picture of her dad—who’d slashed and burned his way through the primaries—as a man who cared about people, and about women in particular.

“Throughout my entire life, I have witnessed his empathy and generosity towards others, especially those who are suffering. It is just his way of being in your corner when you’re down,” she said from the podium at the Cleveland convention.

“As a mother myself, of three young children, I know how hard it is to work while raising a family. And I also know that I’m far more fortunate than most. American families need relief,” Trump said at the convention. “Policies that allow women with children to thrive should not be novelties, they should be the norm. Politicians talk about wage equality, but my father has made it a practice at his company throughout his entire career.”

Fast forwarding to the current day, Trump has eschewed public comment on the immigration crisis while other prominent women—notably including all five living first ladies—spoke out on the family separations.

Ivanka Trump’s public silence may be well reflective of a conscious choice to take up the searing issue of immigration enforcement with her father and individual lawmakers in private. GOP members of Congress told reporters the president on Tuesday night acknowledged speaking with his daughter about the impact of images showing detainees having their children wrested away from them. The White House subsequently confirmed to CNN that Trump had acted on her offer to speak directly to legislators on the topic.

When asked about the Democrats making an issue of Ivanka Trump’s absence from public discourse on one of the most intensely discussed—and highly unpopular—policies of the day, Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany told Glamour in emailed comments that “no one wants to see families separated at the border, which is why the Trump administration encourages Congress to fix the broken loopholes forcing these separations.”

“For her part, Ivanka Trump will not let the media’s negativity deter her tireless work for women and families both at home and around the world.”

McEneny additionally credited Trump for creating “a fund at the World Bank for aspiring female entrepreneurs,” playing a key role in increasing the child tax credit, and continuing “her push for paid family leave, to name a few of the many important initiatives in her portfolio.”

In the case of GOP lawmakers and hopefuls caught between a conservative (read: pro-Trump) primary electorate and Democratic efforts to topple Republicans in November’s midterms, speaking out is somewhat of a gamble. This month, incumbent Republican Alabama Rep. Martha Roby saw herself forced into a primary runoff—a result analysts have attributed to her vigorous rejection of Trump during his run for president and which other candidates may chalk up as a cautionary tale.

As to why more Republicans haven’t challenged the president more aggressively on the detainee issue, given public sentiment, “It’s really the timing,” a noted GOP strategist explained to Glamour: Republicans are focused not only on the separations, but the future of the legal status of immigrants claiming protections under the tenets of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA program.

“That is a huge priority — not that these children are not a priority, but we have to get the president to stay on board with us to pass DACA, and then hopefully we’ll come out and start supporting the kids and their families,” the Republican said. “I’m sorry the kids aren’t getting the support that they probably deserve, but this is a strategy that we have to continue to implement through the week.”

And when it comes to Ivanka Trump, Anna Sampaio of Santa Clara University’s department of ethnic studies said critics are entirely justified in questioning why she has absented herself from the public arena at a time of national turmoil and whether she’s complicit, in part because she “has wrapped herself in the language of women’s rights, and by virtue of that she has gained a lot of political capital for herself, but also political cover for the Trump administration and the Republican Party generally.”

Trump’s actions deserve particular scrutiny, Sampaio continued, because the furor over immigration and the breaking up of families is “a clear moment” that represents “arguably one of the most important moments for women and children” since the president took office.

The president’s daughter may be taking heat for her dad’s behavior in some of the same ways First Lady Melania Trump has fielded criticism for what he chooses to do and how he acts.

But as for any pushback associated with Trump directly confronting her father, “This is a woman who’s got a lot of privilege and a lot of money and a lot of resources,” Sampaio said.

“I doubt she’s in a very precarious position.”

Related Stories:

Here Are the Facts About Trump’s ‘Zero Tolerance’ Immigration Policy

All 5 Living First Ladies Have Spoken Out About Trump’s Separating Immigrant Families at the Border

Couple Makes Facebook History by Raising $5 Million for Separated Immigrant Families





Source link

Categories
Health

The Real American Job Crisis Isn’t in Coal Mines, It's At the Mall


The coal miners parading into the room had reason to clap. Minutes earlier, President Trump announced that he would single-handedly revive the coal mining industry. “The miners told me about the attacks on their jobs and their livelihoods,” he recounted to his suited audience last March, just before inking his name on an executive order to end the so-called war on coal.

“They told me about the efforts to shut down their mines, their communities and their very way of life,” Trump continued. “I made them this promise: We will put our miners back to work.”

Trump’s vow was little consolation to the tens of thousands of other Americans whose jobs, livelihoods and ways of life have evaporated since the dawn of the retail apocalypse in 2016. No one is standing at a podium, waving a fountain pen and pledging to put them back to work. In fact, no one in Washington is saying much of anything at all about the retail industry’s collapse.

Instead, the president has put all his eggs in one controversial basket, pandering to white working class men with the promise of jobs (and of making America as great as it was in the 1950s, when coal was the nation’s primary energy source). There’s one snag: other conservatives and even Murray Energy founder Robert Murray, the man behind one of the largest independent US coal mines and a vocal Trump supporter, consider that battle lost. Natural gas is a more pocket-friendly energy source, and wind and solar power are more environmentally friendly. Up against such stiff competition, Murray warned the president that even “he can’t bring [coal jobs] back.” Former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg likened reviving the coal industry to resurrecting the telegraph industry. With today’s technology, it just doesn’t make sense.

To put things in perspective, retail employees account for nearly 10% of the total US labor force. Roughly 101,000 retail workers have lost their jobs so far in 2017, nearly half a million positions eliminated since 2001. That’s about eighteen times more retail layoffs than coal industry saw in the same span. In fact, add up al the coal industry’s current employees and you get just 52,000 people, 95% of them men. Nearly half of America’s retail employees are women — about 8 million, altogether — a figure that jumps to almost 75% in clothing stores.

Cheaper, cleaner energy sources threaten the coal industry. Pinpointing a specific culprit is harder when it comes to retail’s catastrophic collapse. E-commerce giants like Amazon shoulder some of the blame as they cannibalize brick-and-mortar sales. Automated technology, too, will eliminate 7.5 million retail jobs in the not-so-distant future, if financial services firm Cornerstone Capital Group’s predictions are accurate. And then, of course, there’s the imminent decline of shopping malls, built (and arguably overbuilt) at a break-neck pace over the last four decades.

Credit Suisse foresees a quarter of America’s shopping malls closing in the next five years, sending thousands of employees packing when they do. Even those shopping centers that avoid the wrecking ball may see traditional anchor stores — what’s left of them, anyway — vanish. Sears, JCPenney and Macy’s have together closed about 550 stores since 2014, with Macy’s alone eliminating 10,000 jobs in the process. More downsizing anticipated for early next year.

Mall corridors aren’t faring much better. The list of retailers who filed for bankruptcy protection this year reads like a suburban mall directory: Wet Seal, BCBG Max Azria, Rue21, True Religion Apparel, Perfumania, Vitamin World and Toys R Us, among others. About 1,000 Radio Shacks, 350 Gymborees, 200 Gaps and all Bebe, American Apparel and The Limited stores have already closed, along with more than 1,000 other doors bearing familiar names.

The retail apocalypse simultaneously ascended like King Kong on America’s cities, leaving a trail of abandoned storefronts in its wake. One particularly hard-hit thoroughfare was on the Upper East Side of New York, which saw iconic flagships like Polo Ralph Lauren and Donna Karan Collection close in unison with Juicy Couture, Diesel and all Scoop NYC locations over the last two years.

A few months after delivering promises in Washington, Trump reiterated his devotion to working families. “It’s finally time to… fight for the jobs our great American workers deserve,” he proclaimed to an Arizona crowd, “and that’s what we’re doing.” Whether retail workers factor into that statement remains to be seen.

As nearly 8 million women face an uncertain future in the retail industry, Glamour is sharing six of their stories. The following interviews have been edited and condensed for clarity.*



Source link