Categories
Health

Hillary Clinton's Speech at Glamour's Women of the Year Awards Will Convince You to Run for Office


2008 Women of the Year honoree Hillary Clinton spent much of midterms season campaigning for Democrats running for Congress, including Florida politician Donna Shalala and Chicago gubernatorial candidate J.B. Prtizker. So it’s really no wonder she surprised the crowd at Glamour‘s Women of the Year awards for an inspiring speech on the importance of women running for office.

Read the powerful message she delivered to the crowd, below:

“Congratulations to all of the Glamour Women of the Year being honored tonight—don’t they inspire us and give us hope about the future?

“This week, exactly two years ago, was a rough one. But, you know, my personal disappointment wasn’t so much about what happened, but how do we create even more opportunity for all the people in America. ‘An America that’s hopeful, inclusive and big-hearted,’ as I said afterward. That remains my mission today.

Maybe we didn’t crack that highest, hardest ceiling, but we did charge straight through the wall and into the arena.

“In that same speech, I told little girls that they deserved every chance and opportunity to pursue their own dreams. But I didn’t realize how many women were listening as well. And many of those women decided that they were going to get involved in politics, including running for public office. Maybe we didn’t crack that highest, hardest ceiling, but we did charge straight through the wall and into the arena.

“In 2018, women brushed themselves off and ran in record-breaking numbers: Just think, 233 for Congress, 16 for governor, and more than 3,300 for seats in state legislatures. And what was so great was that these women came from a variety of backgrounds, from military veterans to teachers to bartenders to small business owners. They ran grassroots campaigns, many of them as first-time-ever candidates, and each of them fought for the priorities of their local communities: seeking fully funded public education, justice system reform, environmental protection, an unprejudiced immigration system, economic equality, and so much more.

“From lifetime politicos to first-time candidates, busy, busy, people, busy executives and busy moms, women facing men and women facing each other, women went all in. Win or lose, their races really, energized us, and encouraged even more Americans of all kinds to run for public office, to get civically involved.

To those of you who think it’s impossible to make possible, we have lots of examples from last week that now we just have to try.

“Think about this the winners included a number of firsts: Debra Haaland and Sharice Davids, the first Native American women elected to Congress. Right? And what about Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, the first Muslim women ever elected to Congress; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the youngest woman ever elected to Congress; and Lucy McBath, a woman who I got to know well in the 2016 campaign who turned her grief of losing her son to gun violence to a movement to commons sense gun reform. She helped turn mourning into a movement, then she won a seat once held by Newt Gingrich. To those of you who think it’s impossible to make possible we have lots of examples from last week that now we just have to try. Just before I came on, I heard that the race in Arizona was called for Kyrsten Sinema.

“Can we please offer some thunderous applause for them, and for all of the women who ran this year? And for the women who will follow their lead and run for office in 2020…maybe some of them are in this room tonight. I hope that you are. Because we need you. We need you so much. I think people got a burst of energy from the victories from last week. I will be sure to continue to encourage a lot of you and encourage particularly young women and everyone who wants to see positive change to go ahead, get involved, and maybe even run for office. And may the best candidates win.”

Find more inspiring moments from this year’s Glamour Women of the Year Awards here.

Related Stories:

Brief History of First Ladies and Their Hats, From Martha to Melania

I Put Off Having a Baby to Cover Hillary Clinton’s Campaign—and I Don’t Regret It

This Is Why Hillary Clinton’s Twitter Bio Kicks Off With the Word ‘Wife’



Source link

Categories
Health

This One Quote From Bill Clinton's Latest Interview Says a Lot About His Feelings on #MeToo and Monica Lewinsky


Former President Bill Clinton is raising eyebrows after a Monday appearance on the Today show in which, during a segment to promote his new book, The President Is Missing (cowritten with James Patterson), he maintained that his decision to fight impeachment after the Monica Lewinsky scandal was the right thing to do.

But there was one quote in particular that says a lot about how he views the #MeToo movement, which was referenced in a segment of the conversation when NBC News’ Craig Melvin asked whether Clinton would have done anything differently had that scandal happened during the #MeToo era. In one swoop Clinton managed to praise the movement while simultaneously casting doubt with his own concerns.

“I like the Me Too movement, it’s way overdue,” he told Melvin. “I think the…it doesn’t mean I agree with everything. I still have some questions about some of the decisions that have been made.”

In the 20 years since the Ken Starr investigation that turned her into a household name, Lewinsky appears to have done a lot of thinking and analysis about her role in the scandal, as evidenced by her February essay for Vanity Fair. In the wake of the #MeToo movement that is changing cultural views about sexual harassment, Lewinsky opened up about being able to look at the situation differently, while still accepting responsibility for her own decisions. “Now, at 44, I’m beginning (just beginning) to consider the implications of the power differentials that were so vast between a president and a White House intern,” she wrote. “I’m beginning to entertain the notion that in such a circumstance the idea of consent might well be rendered moot. (Although power imbalances—and the ability to abuse them—do exist even when the sex has been consensual.)”

“He was my boss. He was the most powerful man on the planet. He was 27 years my senior, with enough life experience to know better,” she said. “He was, at the time, at the pinnacle of his career, while I was in my first job out of college.”

Clinton, however, is still making it about him.

“One of the things that this Me Too era has done is that it’s forced a lot of women to speak out. One of those women is Monica Lewinsky,” interviewer Craig Melvin says. “She wrote in an op-ed that the Me Too movement changed her view of sexual harassment….Looking back on what happened and through the lens of Me Too now, do you think differently or feel more responsibility?”

“I felt terrible then. And I came to grips with it,” Clinton said. When asked if he’s ever apologized, Clinton said that he hasn’t talked to Lewinsky personally, but has apologized “to everyone in the world.”

“Nobody believes that I got out of that for free. I left the White House $16 million in debt,” he says. “But you typically have ignored gaping facts in describing this. And I bet you don’t even know that. This was litigated 20 years ago, and two thirds of the American people sided with me.”

The conversation was an uncomfortable watch, albeit an important one. Two decades have passed, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look back and reflect on what happened in hopes of learning from the situation. Unfortunately, that does not seem to be Clinton’s point of view.

Yes, it’s great that he has supported women in many ways during his political career, but that doesn’t absolve him from bad behavior, especially as it relates to Lewinsky. Doing good work and behaving inappropriately are two things that can be true at the same time. But the defensive and smug tone of his responses indicates to me that Clinton is unchanged in looking at the role he played in the situation.

And that’s incredibly disheartening.

As women, we can continue to tell our stories, to speak our truth, to call out bad behavior that has been tolerated for far too long. But when men, especially leaders, refuse to acknowledge their own roles in the culture of harassment, progress will come much more slowly.





Source link

Categories
Health

I Put Off Having a Baby to Cover Hillary Clinton's Campaign—and I Don't Regret It


I’d been waiting a year—or my entire life, depending on how you look at it—for this envelope to arrive. It was a self-seal bubble mailer in standard-issue manila sent via messenger from a major publishing house, containing a single copy of the finished version of my first book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.

What I hadn’t anticipated during all those years I’d dreamed of becoming a real published author was that when this package finally arrived, I’d be sitting on the sofa soaked in a frothy mix of milk after a full bottle burst open and spilled all over me and my screaming infant son.

It felt like some cosmic life realignment that the finished edition of my memoir about covering Hillary Clinton for The New York Times, arrived during this mini-fiasco called new motherhood. I held my baby in my arms, the envelope taunting me from the floor, where it would remain unopened for the next several hours.

There was a time in my life when the pull of that envelope would’ve been impossible to resist. Instead, my son and I both wailed.


I’d hardly learned how to write when I began to imagine myself writing a book. I could see the pencil scrawls in my Big Chief notebook published and bound, perched on a shelf at the B. Dalton in North Star Mall in San Antonio, where I grew up. I thought if I worked hard enough and wrote every day, it would happen for me.

I’m a fifth generation Texan, a product of a public high school with metal detectors and an A.P. English teacher whose primary reading material was the J. Crew catalogue. In 1996, when I was 17, one of the teachers at the middle-school school where my mom worked took me to hear Hillary promote her first book, It Takes a Village. I was entranced by what she had to say.

Two weeks after college graduation, I moved to New York with no connections in media or politics and quickly realized how naive I’d been about becoming a writer. I ran around midtown clutching clips from The Daily Texan in a leather Trapper Keeper. I lived on a stash of savings from working in a snow cone stand in Austin. When that ran out, I took temp jobs all over town, at insurance offices and nonprofits, mostly. My writing submissions were either rejected or ignored; things got so bad that I actually contemplated law school. Little by little, I came to understand that winning the Young Author’s Conference of South Texas wasn’t going to open any doors.

After months with no job offers, my sister met a New York Times political reporter through a mutual friend and this reporter generously agreed to have coffee with me. I’ll never forget standing in the crusty lobby of the old Times building in a suit I’d bought at an outlet mall. The reporter never showed.

Three years later, a friend I’d met while temping at Conde Nast Traveler put me up to replace her as the foreign news assistant at The Wall Street Journal. That was my foot-in-the-door. I never imagined that a decade later, I’d be a political reporter at the Times covering the leading candidate for president. (The reporter who never showed is now my colleague.) I wasn’t about to let go of that for anything.

In 2013, when I was 34, then Times executive editor Jill Abramson plucked me out of relative obscurity covering media companies and put me on the Hillary beat ahead of the coming presidential election. I knew this wouldn’t just be a job, but an all-consuming, cross-country marathon that would stretch on for years and require countless nights in a Holiday Inn Express in [insert swing-state city here]. I’d covered Hillary and Barack Obama’s 2008 campaigns, an endeavor that brought me to 48 states, got me enough Marriott points to cover honeymoon lodging in Mexico and left me with an 20 extra pounds from eating whatever sandwich was thrown to us on the campaign bus.

At that point, I hadn’t given much thought to having a baby. I thought I wanted one, but the timing was terrible. I asked my doctor how much it would cost to freeze my eggs until after the election. She told me to get pregnant immediately and take an au pair on the campaign trail. I left the appointment convinced that the baby could wait a couple more years—and resolved to find a new doctor.

Whenever the subject of babies came up with my husband, Bobby, or with nosy but well-meaning friends, the conversation always found its way back to the same question: “What about Hillary?” Ever since she’d spoken about the cracked ceiling in her 2008 concession speech, I’d dreamed of doing it all over again. Thankfully, Bobby and I were in agreement on one thing: the chance to cover the election of the first woman President for the paper of record was too important to pass up—a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. We decided to put off the baby for a few more years. I might not have been so willing to put my personal life on hold had the path to covering a presidential campaign for the Times been even a tiny bit easier.

Two years later, after Hillary had become the first woman to capture the Democratic nomination for president and the Times’s Upshot data model projected that her lead against Trump was insurmountable, Bobby and I started to think ahead. We had the baby talk, again punctuated by the same question—What about Hillary?

After all those years of covering her, I didn’t want to stop when Hillary finally reached the White House. I wanted to see what happened when the candidate morphed into Madam President.

I suppose the good people of Wisconsin made our decision for us.

It was late on Election Night. I stood on the floor of the Javits Center surrounded by Hillary’s crestfallen supporters. I’d just emailed my editors a tip I’d heard from a campaign source. “Wisconsin,” I told them at exactly 11:51 p.m., “Not gonna happen for them. Gone.”

All around me, Hillary’s supporters sobbed. They held cupped hands over open mouths. Grown men collapsed on the floor. A Muslim woman in a hijab dove into the press area and grabbed my arm. “Tell me she can still win!” she said. I didn’t say a word. I was still in deadline mode, thinking only of the next story, reporting out my “how she lost” piece for the next day’s paper. Old habits die hard.

I didn’t realize it at the time, but after three years, visits to all 99 counties in Iowa (twice) and countless renditions of “Fight Song” and—in that instant, under the glass dome that had been set to spill two hundred pounds of confetti shaped like glass shards down on a victorious Hillary—I finally faced a future in which the “What about Hillary?” question no longer loomed.

Not long after Election Day, still in a sleep-deprived fog, I told my very understanding husband, who had visited me on the campaign trail, put up with my constant travel and only occasionally yelled at me to stop looking at Twitter, that I was ready to have a baby.

By then we’d been married for eight years and liked our life—tramping around Southeast Asia, fishing in Montauk, tubing down the Guadalupe River in Texas. He’d left the baby decision entirely up to me. “I could take it or leave it,” he’d say whenever I brought it up. But now that I’d made up my mind, he was all in.

In the weeks after Donald Trump’s inauguration, when I began my (coincidentally) nine-month book leave, I struggled to pull myself away from the adrenaline that comes with a byline, the warm bath of breaking news and re-Tweets. There was a lot about the campaign that I didn’t miss, the exhaustion, the ugliness, the campaign trying to control every word I wrote, but I loved the other “girls on the bus” who covered Hillary and the way that every day had the feel of a traveling circus. This was a far cry from sitting at my dining room table, staring at a blank screen.

But by June 2017, two remarkable, life-transforming things had happened– I’d written 80,000 words about Hillary’s pursuit of the presidency —and, at 38 years old, I was pregnant with our first child. A book and a baby—the two most terrifying, all-consuming things a procrastinator like me would ever do—now forever intrinsically linked.

Ten days after our son Cormac was born, I read a final version of Chasing Hillary. This was my last chance to (gulp!) make factual changes. He lay in my lap, my perfect little peanut, as I reviewed 384 printed pages. I posted a picture of us on Instagram. A friend called me Wonder Woman, another told me I made it look easy. What I left out of the caption: the fact that I had dried baby vomit in my hair. That the vomit had been there for 24 hours, probably longer. Who could be sure?

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on *Chasing Hillary.*

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on Chasing Hillary.

For years, when parents warned me how emotionally and physically grueling new motherhood would be, I nodded but thought: If I can function on no sleep for Hillary, I can do it for my own child.

This turned out to be only partly true. I could indeed endure three hours of sleep, down a cold brew with a shot of espresso and crank out a reasonably coherent front-page story. And, unlike Hillary’s campaign, my baby took a long afternoon nap. But the new baby knocked me back in ways that I hadn’t anticipated. For example, no one told me, that I’d be in so much pain that for the first five weeks just walking from couch to crib would be a challenge. Or that I would irrationally yell at my saint-of-a-husband over dirty bottles and diaper changes, unable to scream about my real frustration—that men, even the best ones, don’t have to go through any of this.

And even if someone had warned me, I wouldn’t have believed them that I would be so hopelessly, inexplicably in absolute, all-consuming love that I would start to see the book, my first “baby,” as an unwanted distraction. I couldn’t have imagined a scenario in which the arrival of my first book would essentially amount to an afterthought. And then it coincided with the arrival of a delightful little baby who filled a piece of me that, it turned out, newsprint never could.

However, I will admit that in recent weeks I’ve spent several sleepless nights agonizing over questions like: will my vagina still hurt while I’m on a multi-city, weeks-long book tour with my baby and my mom in tow? Is there any under-eye cover on that planet that could brighten the dark circles under my eyes? Will my raging hormones cause me to burst into tears on “Morning Joe”?

I had cabbage on my breasts (an old trick to reduce the pain) and an ice pack in my underwear when the publisher needed me to sign off on the jacket design. I wished I were staring into my baby’s eyes (even if they were closed). Or napping beside him. Or doing just about anything (changing a heaping diaper!) other than arguing with the fact checker about whether the bomb sniffing dogs used by the secret service were German Shepherds or Belgian Malinois. (They are the latter, in case you’re wondering.)

People always told me that you are supposed to read to your baby in utero, I’d considered talking to my bulging stomach a bridge too far. Then I realized that in recording the audio version of my book while nine months pregnant, I’d already read 80 hours of my own words to Cormac.

He’d been with me the whole time, kicking as I wrote. I couldn’t have done it without him, without the promise of him. We would open that envelope together. Just as soon as I found a pacifier.

Amy Chozick is a writer-at-large for The New York Times and the author of Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.



Source link

Categories
Health

This Is Why Hillary Clinton's Twitter Bio Kicks Off With the Word ‘Wife’


If you’ve ever come across Hillary Clinton‘s Twitter and wondered why her highly impressive list of roles included in her bio leads off with “wife,” you’re not alone. It does seem a strange that the former secretary of state and presidential candidate—who can boast decades of experience in politics, has gone up repeatedly against powerful men, and has been a longtime advocate for women in the workplace—starts off her bio with a role that defines her in domestic relation to a man. (“Wife, mom, grandma, women+kids advocate, FLOTUS, Senator, SecState, hair icon, pantsuit aficionado, 2016 presidential candidate,” is how it currently reads.) Writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie had that thought, too—and asked Clinton about it during a PEN World Voices Festival lecture on Sunday night in New York City.

“In your Twitter account, the first word that describes you is ‘wife.’ And then I think it’s ‘mom,’ and then it’s ‘grandmother,'” Adichie said, reports Jezebel. “And when I saw that, I have to confess that I felt just a little bit upset. And then I went and I looked at your husband’s Twitter account, and the first word was not “husband.'”

Adichie then went on to ask why Clinton had chosen to “first identify in relation to her husband.”

“When you put it like that, I’m going to change it,” Clinton replied, according to Jezebel. According to the website, Clinton continued by responding that “women should be able to celebrate both their accomplishments and their relationships,” citing a lecture she heard by former First Lady Barbara Bush (timely) at Wellesley in the ’90s.

“She said, you know, at the end of the day, it won’t matter if you got a raise, it won’t matter if you wrote a great book, if you are not also someone who values relationships,” Clinton explained.

“It shouldn’t be either/or. It should be that if you are someone who is defining yourself by what you do and what you accomplish, and that is satisfying, then more power to you,” she continued. “That is how you should be thinking about your life, and living it. If you are someone who primarily defines your life in relationship to others, then more power to you, and live that life the way Barbara Bush lived that life, and how proud she was to do it. But I think most of us as women in today’s world end up in the middle. Wanting to have relationships, wanting to invest in them, nurture them, but also pursuing our own interests.”

Clinton then went on to praise Senator Tammy Duckworth, who last week made history by casting a vote with her newborn accompanying her.

“I think that summed it all up,” Clinton said. “She’s a mom, she’s a senator, she’s a combat veteran. She is somebody who is trying to integrate all of the various aspects of her life. And that’s what I’ve tried to do for a very long time, and it’s not easy.”

Anyway, it seems like Clinton’s down for a revamp. Adiche, for her part, had an idea of what Clinton’s newly rewritten bio could read: “It could say, ‘Should have been a damn good president.'”

As of Monday morning, Clinton’s team hadn’t yet gotten on the bio update. We’re looking forward to seeing how the new one reads—because although, yes, Clinton is a wife, she has also made history defining herself in her own right.

Related Stories:
Hillary Clinton Had the Best Response After an ‘SNL’ Cast Member Got a Tattoo of Her
Hillary Clinton Thinks Women Voted Against Her Because of Pressure From Men
Hillary Clinton Calls Out the ‘Rank Hypocrisy’ of the Trump Administration’s Email Scandal





Source link

Categories
Health

Rachel Platten Talks Taylor Swift, Harvey Weinstein, and Hillary Clinton's Reaction to 'Fight Song'


Rachel Platten, 36, wants to be a uniter, not a divider. Although you may know her from her smash hit, “Fight Song,” (Hillary Clinton’s campaign anthem), the mission of her music isn’t to appeal to just one party—she’d rather bring them together. “When music can make us understand that we’re all similar, that’s the most powerful thing in the world,” Platten says. And her commitment to that goes beyond music: It’s also the aim of her new social media campaign #WomenCreatingWaves. “Even though we put on these fronts on social media and pretend our lives are so perfect, we’re actually all hurting and we’re all uncomfortable and we all have fears,” Platten continues. It’s the same philosophy she brings to her sophomore album, Waves (out October 27), which is the rawest and most vulnerable we’ve ever seen her. Here, Platten opens up about everything from drinking tequila in her onesie to why she stands by Taylor Swift and all women using their platform to speak out.

You just launched your #WomenCreatingWaves Instagram campaign. What made you want to start it?

Rachel Platten: I’ve been working with a lot of girl power organizations this year. I just launched Day of the Girl with the Girl Scouts. Also, “Broken Glass,” my first single, was all about breaking down barriers that we think women have. I have so many incredible women in my life that I’m supported by and I wanted to shine a light on them and encourage other women and girls to do the same. We’re often encouraged by the media to compete with one another, to bring each other down, or to feel small when seeing the success of someone else, and I just wanted to flip that script and challenge us to do the opposite. Instead, feel inspired and ignited by someone else’s success.

Who are some of the women your followers have been posting as their #WCWs?

RP: They’re doing a lot of their own friends and family members, which is perfect. We all look up to these strong women that we see in magazines and on TV, but it’s even more empowering to realize that change comes at the smallest level. It starts with us. It starts with me and my best friend, who I’m out on a walk with today, hearing about the amazing things she’s doing for her kid’s school. It can be everyday heroes and everyday women who work 9 to 5 and have kids and still balance a healthy social life. Or, it can just be your best friend from school, who stands up and makes a difference and runs for student council and wants to make change in our community.

You mentioned your single “Broken Glass,” which I know was inspired by your experience at the Women’s March, but also what it means to be a woman in 2017. Can you tell me more about what this year has been like for you, and why you felt compelled to write about it?

RP: Going back to last summer, when “Fight Song” was used by Hillary Clinton, it was inspiring—but I also got a lot of hate from it. [I received] hate mail and death threats on Twitter. It was terrifying. I understand that politics can divide, but I want my music to unite. So even having that small taste of getting attacked like that opened my eyes to how other women must feel who aren’t just singing top songs, but who are really inciting change around the world and standing up for something and speaking out. It opened my eyes to the fact that we have a long way to go in [terms of] equal rights. “Broken Glass” is inspired by all of that. The emotion of the year, what I was seeing, what I was feeling. Also, the Women’s March was so cool. It was electric. It was the first time in my lifetime that I felt that the world was shining a light on girl power and saying it was finally a cool thing for women to speak up and say, “we demand change,” “we deserve better than this.”

You also just released the song “Perfect for You”. What can you tell me about its message?

RP: When I released “Broken Glass” I realized I had to look at the world and say, ‘Hey, what do you think?’ It was this horrible awakening that I was going to go right back into this place of getting judged. I wasn’t ready for it. The song came out, and I was terrified. Instead of feeling glad and psyched, I was feeling insecure. Three days before the record was due in September I wrote “Perfect for You,” and the chorus is basically a fuck you to the world, to everything and everyone that I ever felt I had to be better than I am for. It’s basically saying, “I’m enough as I am, I’m good as I am, I can’t be perfect for you.” It feels so good to sing, and I want girls to hear that you don’t have to worry about what people think of you because then you can move mountains.

Waves is more of a cathartic album than Wildfire was. So I’m curious, what sort of things were you grappling with and working through on this album?

RP: I was responding to the emotion of the world, but I also had a lot of personal stuff I was working through. When I finished my two years of being on the road, I realized I hadn’t been writing songs, which is how I process my emotions. I was just trying to keep my head above water, catching up to the success of “Stand By You,” which was also brand new for me, all of that kind of stuff. So when I finally got to start writing again, it was like this faucet turned on. I quickly was able to let whatever music needed to come through come. I didn’t judge it. If it was me feeling angry at a friend because I had some experiences that were painful this year, I wrote about it. If it was about me feeling totally in love with my husband and kind of sexy, which I never really talk about or acknowledge, I wrote about that. If it was me making everyone in the studio wear onesies and drink tequila, we wrote a party song. If it was me waking up in the middle of the night crying at 3 a.m. asking for answers because I didn’t recognize the person, I wrote about that too. I was really honest and vulnerable on the album, and it was a blast to write. It made me feel how I used to feel before I cared what anybody thought. I was just creating for creation’s sake.

Going back to the beginning of your journey, one of the first big moments for you was when you performed “Fight Song” on Taylor Swift’s 1989 tour. This year, when Taylor took her assaulter to court, you were really active on Twitter supporting her. What has Taylor taught you about strength?

RP: I think that she was really brave to speak up; she got a lot of shit she shouldn’t have. She was using her voice and calling attention to something that’s terrifying, no matter how successful you are. To say that you have been touched or assaulted, it brings shame to you. It’s what happens to the person who’s been abused, we think that it’s our fault. It doesn’t matter who you are or how successful you are, that feeling doesn’t go away. I was really inspired by her speaking up, but even more so about the women speaking up in the past couple days about Harvey Weinstein. Those are such small examples we get to hear about because those people are famous. But can you imagine how many experiences happen around the world that women don’t feel they have the power to call attention to? Because they’re terrified for their lives and their reputations. It’s really important that when we do have a microphone and a platform that we set an example for girls who don’t have access to money or people believing us. So I’m proud of Taylor, I’m proud of the women who have come forward lately, and I’m proud of every woman who speaks up about something they’re terrified about.

In Hillary Clinton’s new memoir, What Happened, she talks about how she can’t hear “Fight Song” now without crying. I was wondering if it has a similar impact on you, or if you still hear the positive message in it?

RP: Oh my god, that’s really sweet, and it touched me, but we don’t feel at all the same on it. For me, that song was never anymore Hillary’s song than it was the little kids who used the song while fighting cancer’s song, or the US women’s soccer team’s song. It’s amazing that all these people embrace that message, but I wrote it over the course of a year and a half in all these different stages: in my bedroom by myself and in thousands of journals with so many different verses and thousands of combinations. That song was my release, my affirmation that I was going to believe in myself no matter what. That doesn’t change when I play it today, even if I play it to thousands of people now in an arena. I’m still brought back to the same feeling of determination and also the pain I felt when no one believed in me. Honestly, I don’t think that will ever change. No matter how successful I get, or how many times I sing it, [I don’t think] that it will ever change for because it’s just so deeply personal and healing for me.

Rachel is urging her fans to help uplift other women by uploading a photo of someone in their lives who is creating waves using #WomenCreatingWaves on social.



Source link

Categories
Health

Hillary Clinton's New Book *What Happened* Proves She's Not Going Away. That's a Good Thing


On the morning of the 2016 election, I slipped on some of the only pants that accommodated my pregnant belly and a “Hillary” T-shirt. Climbing up the steps after I checked off a box for my namesake, I stopped for a moment and put my hand on my stomach, right near the kicking foot of my unborn daughter. I had just voted for a highly qualified, highly intelligent, highly suitable woman for President of the United States of America, and she was going to win. Her inauguration would come just days before my daughter was due to arrive in the world.

Instead, I cried for most of the next week. And my story is no different than that of millions of other women across America who felt like they too had personally had a rug ripped out from under them on November 9.

On that post-election morning, as Hillary delivered her concession, I sputtered out loud, “How the hell is she doing this?” Imagine losing the presidency to an admitted sexual predator with the personality of a petulant Big Mouth Billy Bass.

What the hell happened?

In Hillary Clinton’s new book, aptly titled What Happened, she digs into the question, even if she doesn’t offer any comforting explanations. She discusses how she spent the day after her concession (“I don’t remember much about the the rest of that day. I put on yoga pants and a fleece almost immediately”), throws barbs at some of her critics (claiming that Bernie Sanders “impugned” her character), and puzzles over why exactly so much scorn has been fired at her over the decades (“What makes me such a lightning rod for fury? I’m really asking. I’m at a loss.”)

The book itself has already become a lightning rod (it just came out Tuesday), especially for Democrats who want to tuck Clinton into a special lined and scented drawer for failed candidates and never let her out again. Who think that her book distracts us from the future of the Democratic party because it’s wrapped up in the past. Who offered up such opinions as the former Clinton surrogate who proclaimed, “I wish she’d just shut the fuck up and go away.”

Apparently everyone in this country gets to dissect the 2016 election—except the woman who lost.

We don’t typically ask losing candidates to imprison themselves in their homes for all eternity—Al Gore recently completed the talk show circuit for his new film, John McCain is still mavericking through the Senate, and Mitt Romney is sitting on a beautifully appointed sofa somewhere. But Hillary? She should gracefully bow out of public life, her critics proclaim. Apparently everyone in this country gets to dissect the 2016 election—except the woman who lost.

A woman’s role in the world is exactly what a large portion of What Happened delves into. In three chapters—the least discussed bits of the book so far, of course—Clinton outlines her own history as a woman in politics and the contours of the still raging fight for gender equality. It’s clear Clinton is relieved to get this off her chest, to rant about the young man at the law school admissions test who told her “If you take my spot at law school, I’ll get drafted, and I’ll go to Vietnam, and I’ll die.” About the bizarre spectacle that surrounded the “tearful moment” (she says, “I didn’t even cry, not really”) she had on stage at the 2008 New Hampshire primary. About the impossibility of pleasing people as a woman in politics: “If we’re too tough,we’re unlikable. If we’re too soft, we’re not cut out for the big leagues. If we work too hard we’re neglecting our families. If we put family first, we’re not serious about the work.”

There is nothing new or exciting in what Hillary Clinton offers from her own biography—but that’s precisely the problem. These issues aren’t new, but they aren’t going away. One of the most accomplished women in the world still doubts whether she did the right thing when she was literally stalked onstage by her opponent during a nationally televised debate! The exchange has been widely reported (“Donald Trump was looming behind me … My skin crawled”) but the followup hasn’t. Clinton did not, as she considered, turn to him and say, “Back up, you creep, get away from me.” But she wonders to herself now, “Maybe I have overlearned the lesson on staying calm—biting my tongue, digging my fingernails into a clenched fist, smiling all the while, determined to present a composed face to the world.”

He stalked her and she’s still left doubting if her reaction cost her crucial votes. That’s the state of gender relations in our country today.

And Clinton doesn’t just hash out the details of her own issues. “Something I wish every man across America understood,” she explains, “is how much fear accompanies women throughout our lives. So many of us have been threatened or harmed.” And interrupted, and castigated, and told our voices are too shrill and our opinions too forceful. Clinton traces all that. “It’s maddening,” she writes, “that the basic fact that sexism is alive and well should be up for debate.” And yet it is—and it is specifically up for debate when you question the role sexism played in the 2016 election. It seems the country doesn’t want to re-litigate that question—just try telling a man that you think misogyny was a large factor in Trump’s rise and Clinton’s defeat.

It’s nearly impossible to discuss the election without being offered an explanation of Hillary’s failures as a candidate (Those pantsuits! That cold demeanor! Those celeb endorsements!) as if her opponent were Franklin Delano Roosevelt and not a real estate tycoon who was caught on camera boasting about committing sexual assault. We’re still free to hate on Trump—but not to love on Hillary.

We’re still free to hate on Trump—but not to love on Hillary.

I can feel myself rehashing the election right now. You’ve done it, too. How could this happen? How could democracy fail us on such a fundamental level? Clinton deserves her chance to work through that question, too—publicly if she chooses. She campaigned publicly. She battled publicly. She can certainly now wonder publicly about the day she lost the presidential election. Think about it: If it happened to you, wouldn’t you want your say?

The book, then, is an act of women’s liberation. A woman who failed in public wants to work towards course correction. And yet here comes the parade of people prepared to tell her that her voice—the one for whom all this has mattered the most—should go for a literal hike in the woods of Chappaqua and keep her feelings to herself. She should keep to the Netflix binges she writes so fondly about in this book, apparently, and ignore that the failed election was only one smaller portion of a decades-long career in public service.

But that makes Clinton just another woman in a long string of suppressed voices. Yes, she lost. But that doesn’t mean she’s less equipped to tell the country where we all went wrong. In fact, it may make her better informed.

It’s not going too far to say that a lot of women have been traumatized over the past year. If a former Secretary of State, Senator, First Lady, accomplished attorney and Yale Law graduate is repeatedly dismissed as a “flawed candidate” because she boasts policy over reality TV theatrics, then what does that say about our country’s attitudes towards women? That’s not the kind of wound that heals in 10 months–for the populace or Clinton herself. Why shouldn’t she tell her side in gritty detail? And why shouldn’t we take that particular narrative as a welcome reminder of how important the fight for women’s equality has become?

Related Stories:

Let’s Keep “I’m With Her” and Make It a Rallying Cry for All Women



Source link