Categories
Health

Ben Affleck Says His Divorce from Jennifer Garner Is the ‘Biggest Regret’ of His Life


In a new interview with the New York Times, Ben Affleck gets candid about his 2018 divorce from Jennifer Garner, calling it the “biggest regret” of his life.

“The biggest regret of my life is this divorce,” he told the newspaper. (The couple separated in 2015.) “Shame is really toxic. There is no positive byproduct of shame. It’s just stewing in a toxic, hideous feeling of low self-worth and self-loathing.”

Affleck is now sober, but he says his drinking exacerbated the issues in his marriage to Garner. “I drank relatively normally for a long time,” he said to NYT. “What happened was that I started drinking more and more when my marriage was falling apart. This was 2015, 2016. My drinking, of course, created more marital problems.”

He doesn’t get into specifics, and says he tries not to harp on mistakes from his past—but he does own up to them. “It’s not particularly healthy for me to obsess over the failures—the relapses—and beat myself up,” he said. “I have certainly made mistakes. I have certainly done things that I regret. But you’ve got to pick yourself up, learn from it, learn some more, try to move forward.”

Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck in June 2018

Getty Images

Later in the article he says, “People with compulsive behavior, and I am one, have this kind of basic discomfort all the time that they’re trying to make go away. You’re trying to make yourself feel better with eating or drinking or sex or gambling or shopping or whatever. But that ends up making your life worse. Then you do more of it to make that discomfort go away. Then the real pain starts. It becomes a vicious cycle you can’t break. That’s at least what happened to me.”

Affleck and Garner were married in 2005 and officially divorced in 2018. They have three children together: Violet, 14, Seraphina, 11, and Sam, 7. Read more of Affleck’s candid interview with the New York Times here.



Source link

Categories
Health

Ashley Tisdale Doesn’t Regret Her 2000s Beauty Choices


Definitely the Neutrogena Beauty Boost Resurfacing Micro Polish because you’re going to want to exfoliate that dead skin off. I would say mascara. I don’t know why, I just think mascara really makes you look good, and if I’m on an island, I think I really want to let my hair air-dry and have a good mascara. And the Beauty Boost SPF, because I don’t want to get burnt.

Neutrogena Bright Boost Moisturizer with Sunscreen SPF 30

Neutrogena Bright Boost Moisturizer with Sunscreen SPF 30

$23.99

Buy Now

Neutrogena Bright Boost Resurfacing Micro Polish

Neutrogena Bright Boost Resurfacing Micro Polish

$10.49

Buy Now

What’s your go-to getting ready music?

I’ll just put something on Spotify—usually top hits because I’m such a pop fan. I don’t have any specific songs I put on, but I love Halsey. I also love Dua Lipa. Any of her stuff gets me super excited.

What’s the last Instagram rabbit hole you went down?

I haven’t gone down an Instagram rabbit hole in a long time, but I’ve gone in a TikTok rabbit hole. I watch what’s on the For You page, and I just keep scrolling and scrolling. I always get stuck watching the weird dance challenges.

What’s your favorite emoji?

The laughing-crying face.

You travel all the time. Is there a city that inspires you the most when it comes to beauty?

I’d have to say New York. It really is the place where everybody walking on the streets looks fashionable. I get so inspired whenever I go there.

What color are you loving on your nails right now?

Because I’ve been on the show, I’ve been having to stick with one specific color, but I really love the ombré manicures from Olive & June. They’re really pretty because every nail is a different color. My favorite is the Cookies and Cream mani the salon offers, which is different shades of gray.

Olive & June Cookies and Cream Kit

Olive & June Cookies and Cream Kit

$48

Buy Now

Who are the women inspiring you the most right now?





Source link

Categories
Health

I Grew Out My Hair for Months Before My Wedding. I Regret It.


Some people have a signature look. I, however, have never been one of them. Throughout my most formative years, adults would constantly tell me to not to touch my long, brown ringlets, which only spurred a burning desire to mess with them. Where friends of mine carefully maintain their hair with cautious, occasional trims, I’ve relished in the rebellion of taking a less prudent approach. I’ve had blond hair, black hair, many iterations of ombré highlights, and more rounds of bangs than I can count on one hand. Some of my impulses have been less successful than others (see: helmet bangs and Crayola yellow hair), but I’ve always found that the combined elements of spontaneity and risk add to the fun—or at least they did, until I got engaged last year.

My fiancé and I decided to plan the wedding ourselves, which is probably why it should come as a surprise to no one that after just a few short months of planning, I felt the familiar urge bubbling up to sprint to the nearest salon and go wild. I was in dire need of some stress relief, and for me, a quick hair change has always been a reliable way to get it.

Truth be told, I had only ever imagined myself getting married in a courthouse wedding, wearing a white pantsuit. With a venue booked and that scenario now out of the picture, I was in over my head. What did turning myself into a “real” bride look like? I knew there was no singular way to fulfill that role, but it felt like an uncomfortably performative one nonetheless.

Being a bride meant being subjected to unsolicited commentary on nearly every aspect of my life.

Every bridal decision felt like a thinly veiled barometer of who I was as a person—my tastes, my style, my character. I just wanted to do it right, and it was exhausting. I was supposed to look like a “princess” but maintain my feminist identity; deal with the stress of event planning but maintain a chill composure at all times. I thought I would be prepared to greet the seriously messed-up pressures with two emphatic middle fingers, but it was…a lot. I felt like I was just a person who wanted to get married to my partner, not a bride.

Being a bride meant being subjected to unsolicited commentary on nearly every aspect of my life. When an acquaintance asked how “sweating for the wedding” was coming along after spotting me mid-bagel one morning, I was sure my angry pulse was visibly throbbing through my forehead. And when people I didn’t know particularly well suddenly felt comfortable asking personal questions about my plans for changing my last name, I had to force myself to hold back my tongue.

My thoroughly shot nerves made a cathartic and—the operative word here—dramatic hair change sound all the more appealing. Feeling a smidge lighter at the prospect of a transformation I could control, I happily alternated between saving photos of wedding tablescapes and snaps of Jenna Dewan’s piecey, chin-length cut on Instagram. I was already halfway through booking an appointment to get my bob-length chop when five words I’d never really considered (at least, where my hair is concerned) stopped me in my tracks: Is this a bad idea?

My limited knowledge of wedding prep told me that women usually grew out their hair ahead of the big day, not the other way around. I racked my brain trying to think of any iconic bride who’d walked down the aisle with a blunt bob and came up empty. Long, flowing hair or cascading updos seemed like the de facto move. Would I be ruining most of my hairstyle options if I chopped it all off?

Never mind that it had already been gently pointed out to me that short hair can be really versatile, my momentum was quashed. Operating on my last nerve, I didn’t feel like I had it in me to add another potential opening for unwanted commentary onto my plate. Ultimately, I decided this wasn’t the time to follow my risky hair impulses. I put down the phone and made a contract with myself to keep growing out my hair.

It seems almost unbelievable that I let that pressure and anxiety to “not mess up” get so far under my skin.

What followed was nine long months spent cursing the lion’s mane growing on top of my head. I’d stare longingly at women with short haircuts as they passed me by on the sidewalk. When masses of damp hair clung to my back in muggy subway tunnels, I imagined having the sweet, ventilated freedom of a bob. And each time I had the distinct privilege of fishing gigantic knots of long hair out of the clogged shower drain, I silently counted the number of days I had left living under the rule of a thick mop—probably not the sort of countdown I should’ve been tracking with excitement just days ahead of the wedding.

Eventually our wedding day finally rolled around, and I didn’t spend it pining for different hair or worrying about my scoring on some sort of unofficial bridal report card. The high of being surrounded by everyone we loved in one room was something everyone should get to experience at least once.

PHOTO: ELIZABETH TSUNG PHOTOGRAPHY

My talented glam team made me feel beautiful, and I informed my husband (who, by the way, had patiently listened to me vent about my hair for months like the saint that he is) that I want to be buried in the pearl hairpiece I wore down the aisle. But even though the rational part of my brain gets that my bridal hair lands below the very bottom of the totem pole in terms of the most important things to happen on our wedding day, I can’t help it: I look back and wish that I had just gone for the damn bob all those months ago.

In the end, the best parts of our day were the laughing, dancing, being surrounded by loved ones, and getting married bits. It seems almost unbelievable that I let that pressure and anxiety to “not mess up” get so far under my skin. All of those overwhelmingly wonderful aspects would have been there just the same, regardless of how many bagels I ate, what I chose to do about my last name, or even whether I said “I do” sporting the typical princess-length hair or the world’s most unfortunate, triangular-shaped bob.

A whole 72 hours after my wedding, I was back in the salon. A sigh of relief I didn’t even realize I’d been holding back came out when I plopped down into the familiar arms of the hairstylist’s chair. Once my thick mane was finally just a heap on the ground, it occurred to me that I really had been onto something with my carefree approach to hair all these years. I just lost sight of it for a little while.

The author with her (now slightly more grown-out) haircut.

Related Stories:
I Did My Own Wedding Makeup—and I Regret It
The Best Glowy Skin Tips From Meghan Markle’s Makeup Artist
I Did Microneedling Before My Wedding and It Gave Me the Best Skin of My Life



Source link

Categories
Health

I Did My Own Wedding Makeup—and I Regret It


Ask me what I regret about my wedding, and I’ll tell you: Nothing. Not the fact that a freak October snowstorm plunged Manhattan into a frozen, dystopian Day After Tomorrow scenario that morning, shutting everything down and forcing me to procure my flowers from a deli; not a misjudgement regarding the alcohol content in our signature cocktails so grievous that I spent my first hours as a bride with my childhood best friend holding my hair back while I barfed; not even my decision to get a last-minute bang trim the night before, which left them slightly too short and too blunt, like a toddler’s bowl-cut. But ask me again—and I mean, really press me—and I’ll admit that there’s one thing that I would change. I would have hired a makeup artist.

I’ve had a ring on it for five (happy!) years now, but I thought about this again recently, when a fellow beauty editor posted snaps from her wedding on Instagram in which she glowed gloriously alongside the makeup artist—an actual famous makeup artist—who did her face for the Big Day. She would have looked gorgeous regardless, but I’m sure it must have been supremely confidence-boosting to have someone with actual skills on board. The topic, too, has been in the news recently as rumors circle that Meghan Markle might do her own makeup for the royal wedding, just as Kate Middleton did.

My choice not to hire someone for my own stroll down the aisle was partly penny-pinching, and partly because I honestly thought that it wouldn’t matter that much. I guess I also assumed that having so much exposure to beauty products at work meant that I had acquired macquillage mastery by osmosis. Turns out, I hadn’t.

When I caught my reflection, all I saw was a giddy, slap-happy, dancing-eyed bride.

That morning, after squinting into the mirror and assessing my options, I ended up applying my makeup in the same way I do every day—with maybe a teensy bit more eyeliner—because I wasn’t quite sure how to amp it up without veering Vegas. My wedding was small and thrifty—my now-husband is British and was subject to visa constraints, so we had to act quickly—and the whole ethos was no-fuss. We held our ceremony at City Hall, then toasted (and toasted, and toasted) our future along with a 30-strong mob of friends and family at a downtown restaurant. I wore a $250 TopShop dress (because it was inexpensive, yes, but also because I loved it infinitely more than any pricier gown I tried on); his suit was from Asos. The Royal Wedding, it was not.

PHOTO: Courtesy of April Long

The author and her husband on their wedding day.

Still, when I look back at the photos, I wish I had considered the state of my face a bit more—and yeah, spent a little extra money on it. For one thing, the lighting at New York’s City Hall seems designed to render everyone a 1,000-year-old troll: under the direct-from-above fluorescents, even my 5-year-old niece had eye bags. A trained professional would have known how to compensate for that cruel, unforgiving glare, and might even have known how to turn it my advantage—instead of inadvertently giving myself Trump-tan raccoon eyes by using too-light-reflective a concealer, the appropriate products could have made me simply luminous.

And honestly, it would have been fantastic to have someone on hand even for the basic stuff: making sure that my eyeliner was straight (it wasn’t), or that I was wearing a mascara that wouldn’t run down my cheeks a la The Joker if I cried (which I did, and it did). I loved the spectrum of beauty looks I saw at City Hall that day, from the OTT faux-lashes-and-Kardashian-contouring bride to the just-wearing-a-sweatsuit-and-getting-this-thing-done bride to the incredible septuagenarian white-gloves-and-red-lipstick bride. It was a forum in which everyone could be uniquely themselves. But somehow, I felt a little too much myself. In retrospect, I know that if there’s one day in your life when you should look a little wow, it’s when you take a vow.

The moment doesn’t last forever; the photos do.

This sounds vain, I’m sure. As does the fact that I don’t show many people my wedding photos. It’s unlikely that anyone who was there that day would have noticed the difference whether I was painted to perfection or had just rolled out of bed—certainly not my husband. And in the moment, it didn’t matter. I never looked in the mirror and thought, I look gross. When I caught my reflection, I saw a giddy, slap-happy, dancing-eyed bride, and even if I had noticed the wonky eyeliner, I was having far too much fun to care.

But here’s the thing: The moment doesn’t last forever; the photos do. And in the tangible memories of my wedding, I see the difference between the way I felt inside (radiant, glorious, rapturously happy) and the way I looked on the outside (exhausted, a little greasy). If I could go back in time and pay someone to close that gap, I’d do it in a heartbeat.

Oh, and did I mention that I also didn’t hire a photographer? Maybe I would change that, too.

PHOTO: Courtesy of April Long




Source link

Categories
Health

I Put Off Having a Baby to Cover Hillary Clinton's Campaign—and I Don't Regret It


I’d been waiting a year—or my entire life, depending on how you look at it—for this envelope to arrive. It was a self-seal bubble mailer in standard-issue manila sent via messenger from a major publishing house, containing a single copy of the finished version of my first book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.

What I hadn’t anticipated during all those years I’d dreamed of becoming a real published author was that when this package finally arrived, I’d be sitting on the sofa soaked in a frothy mix of milk after a full bottle burst open and spilled all over me and my screaming infant son.

It felt like some cosmic life realignment that the finished edition of my memoir about covering Hillary Clinton for The New York Times, arrived during this mini-fiasco called new motherhood. I held my baby in my arms, the envelope taunting me from the floor, where it would remain unopened for the next several hours.

There was a time in my life when the pull of that envelope would’ve been impossible to resist. Instead, my son and I both wailed.


I’d hardly learned how to write when I began to imagine myself writing a book. I could see the pencil scrawls in my Big Chief notebook published and bound, perched on a shelf at the B. Dalton in North Star Mall in San Antonio, where I grew up. I thought if I worked hard enough and wrote every day, it would happen for me.

I’m a fifth generation Texan, a product of a public high school with metal detectors and an A.P. English teacher whose primary reading material was the J. Crew catalogue. In 1996, when I was 17, one of the teachers at the middle-school school where my mom worked took me to hear Hillary promote her first book, It Takes a Village. I was entranced by what she had to say.

Two weeks after college graduation, I moved to New York with no connections in media or politics and quickly realized how naive I’d been about becoming a writer. I ran around midtown clutching clips from The Daily Texan in a leather Trapper Keeper. I lived on a stash of savings from working in a snow cone stand in Austin. When that ran out, I took temp jobs all over town, at insurance offices and nonprofits, mostly. My writing submissions were either rejected or ignored; things got so bad that I actually contemplated law school. Little by little, I came to understand that winning the Young Author’s Conference of South Texas wasn’t going to open any doors.

After months with no job offers, my sister met a New York Times political reporter through a mutual friend and this reporter generously agreed to have coffee with me. I’ll never forget standing in the crusty lobby of the old Times building in a suit I’d bought at an outlet mall. The reporter never showed.

Three years later, a friend I’d met while temping at Conde Nast Traveler put me up to replace her as the foreign news assistant at The Wall Street Journal. That was my foot-in-the-door. I never imagined that a decade later, I’d be a political reporter at the Times covering the leading candidate for president. (The reporter who never showed is now my colleague.) I wasn’t about to let go of that for anything.

In 2013, when I was 34, then Times executive editor Jill Abramson plucked me out of relative obscurity covering media companies and put me on the Hillary beat ahead of the coming presidential election. I knew this wouldn’t just be a job, but an all-consuming, cross-country marathon that would stretch on for years and require countless nights in a Holiday Inn Express in [insert swing-state city here]. I’d covered Hillary and Barack Obama’s 2008 campaigns, an endeavor that brought me to 48 states, got me enough Marriott points to cover honeymoon lodging in Mexico and left me with an 20 extra pounds from eating whatever sandwich was thrown to us on the campaign bus.

At that point, I hadn’t given much thought to having a baby. I thought I wanted one, but the timing was terrible. I asked my doctor how much it would cost to freeze my eggs until after the election. She told me to get pregnant immediately and take an au pair on the campaign trail. I left the appointment convinced that the baby could wait a couple more years—and resolved to find a new doctor.

Whenever the subject of babies came up with my husband, Bobby, or with nosy but well-meaning friends, the conversation always found its way back to the same question: “What about Hillary?” Ever since she’d spoken about the cracked ceiling in her 2008 concession speech, I’d dreamed of doing it all over again. Thankfully, Bobby and I were in agreement on one thing: the chance to cover the election of the first woman President for the paper of record was too important to pass up—a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. We decided to put off the baby for a few more years. I might not have been so willing to put my personal life on hold had the path to covering a presidential campaign for the Times been even a tiny bit easier.

Two years later, after Hillary had become the first woman to capture the Democratic nomination for president and the Times’s Upshot data model projected that her lead against Trump was insurmountable, Bobby and I started to think ahead. We had the baby talk, again punctuated by the same question—What about Hillary?

After all those years of covering her, I didn’t want to stop when Hillary finally reached the White House. I wanted to see what happened when the candidate morphed into Madam President.

I suppose the good people of Wisconsin made our decision for us.

It was late on Election Night. I stood on the floor of the Javits Center surrounded by Hillary’s crestfallen supporters. I’d just emailed my editors a tip I’d heard from a campaign source. “Wisconsin,” I told them at exactly 11:51 p.m., “Not gonna happen for them. Gone.”

All around me, Hillary’s supporters sobbed. They held cupped hands over open mouths. Grown men collapsed on the floor. A Muslim woman in a hijab dove into the press area and grabbed my arm. “Tell me she can still win!” she said. I didn’t say a word. I was still in deadline mode, thinking only of the next story, reporting out my “how she lost” piece for the next day’s paper. Old habits die hard.

I didn’t realize it at the time, but after three years, visits to all 99 counties in Iowa (twice) and countless renditions of “Fight Song” and—in that instant, under the glass dome that had been set to spill two hundred pounds of confetti shaped like glass shards down on a victorious Hillary—I finally faced a future in which the “What about Hillary?” question no longer loomed.

Not long after Election Day, still in a sleep-deprived fog, I told my very understanding husband, who had visited me on the campaign trail, put up with my constant travel and only occasionally yelled at me to stop looking at Twitter, that I was ready to have a baby.

By then we’d been married for eight years and liked our life—tramping around Southeast Asia, fishing in Montauk, tubing down the Guadalupe River in Texas. He’d left the baby decision entirely up to me. “I could take it or leave it,” he’d say whenever I brought it up. But now that I’d made up my mind, he was all in.

In the weeks after Donald Trump’s inauguration, when I began my (coincidentally) nine-month book leave, I struggled to pull myself away from the adrenaline that comes with a byline, the warm bath of breaking news and re-Tweets. There was a lot about the campaign that I didn’t miss, the exhaustion, the ugliness, the campaign trying to control every word I wrote, but I loved the other “girls on the bus” who covered Hillary and the way that every day had the feel of a traveling circus. This was a far cry from sitting at my dining room table, staring at a blank screen.

But by June 2017, two remarkable, life-transforming things had happened– I’d written 80,000 words about Hillary’s pursuit of the presidency —and, at 38 years old, I was pregnant with our first child. A book and a baby—the two most terrifying, all-consuming things a procrastinator like me would ever do—now forever intrinsically linked.

Ten days after our son Cormac was born, I read a final version of Chasing Hillary. This was my last chance to (gulp!) make factual changes. He lay in my lap, my perfect little peanut, as I reviewed 384 printed pages. I posted a picture of us on Instagram. A friend called me Wonder Woman, another told me I made it look easy. What I left out of the caption: the fact that I had dried baby vomit in my hair. That the vomit had been there for 24 hours, probably longer. Who could be sure?

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on *Chasing Hillary.*

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on Chasing Hillary.

For years, when parents warned me how emotionally and physically grueling new motherhood would be, I nodded but thought: If I can function on no sleep for Hillary, I can do it for my own child.

This turned out to be only partly true. I could indeed endure three hours of sleep, down a cold brew with a shot of espresso and crank out a reasonably coherent front-page story. And, unlike Hillary’s campaign, my baby took a long afternoon nap. But the new baby knocked me back in ways that I hadn’t anticipated. For example, no one told me, that I’d be in so much pain that for the first five weeks just walking from couch to crib would be a challenge. Or that I would irrationally yell at my saint-of-a-husband over dirty bottles and diaper changes, unable to scream about my real frustration—that men, even the best ones, don’t have to go through any of this.

And even if someone had warned me, I wouldn’t have believed them that I would be so hopelessly, inexplicably in absolute, all-consuming love that I would start to see the book, my first “baby,” as an unwanted distraction. I couldn’t have imagined a scenario in which the arrival of my first book would essentially amount to an afterthought. And then it coincided with the arrival of a delightful little baby who filled a piece of me that, it turned out, newsprint never could.

However, I will admit that in recent weeks I’ve spent several sleepless nights agonizing over questions like: will my vagina still hurt while I’m on a multi-city, weeks-long book tour with my baby and my mom in tow? Is there any under-eye cover on that planet that could brighten the dark circles under my eyes? Will my raging hormones cause me to burst into tears on “Morning Joe”?

I had cabbage on my breasts (an old trick to reduce the pain) and an ice pack in my underwear when the publisher needed me to sign off on the jacket design. I wished I were staring into my baby’s eyes (even if they were closed). Or napping beside him. Or doing just about anything (changing a heaping diaper!) other than arguing with the fact checker about whether the bomb sniffing dogs used by the secret service were German Shepherds or Belgian Malinois. (They are the latter, in case you’re wondering.)

People always told me that you are supposed to read to your baby in utero, I’d considered talking to my bulging stomach a bridge too far. Then I realized that in recording the audio version of my book while nine months pregnant, I’d already read 80 hours of my own words to Cormac.

He’d been with me the whole time, kicking as I wrote. I couldn’t have done it without him, without the promise of him. We would open that envelope together. Just as soon as I found a pacifier.

Amy Chozick is a writer-at-large for The New York Times and the author of Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.



Source link

Categories
Health

These Are the Actors Who Now Regret Working With Woody Allen—and the Ones Who Don't


On January 1 more than 300 powerful women in Hollywood launched a movement called Time’s Up, which is aimed toward ending gender imbalance and sexual harassment in the workplace across all industries. Time’s Up is undoubtedly a product of the sexual harassment reckoning that happened in Hollywood late last year; following the explosive exposés about Harvey Weinstein in The New York Times and The New Yorker, dozens of famous women—and men—came forward with their own stories of sexual harassment, both at the hands of Weinstein and others. For the first time ever, it feels like sexual assault survivors are actually being heard and their perpetrators are receiving consequences for their actions.

But there’s one exception here: Woody Allen. In 2014 Allen’s daughter Dylan Farrow wrote an open letter to The New York Times, alleging he had molested her at seven years old. Allen was never convicted of anything, but it’s telling that his son Ronan Farrow has publicly stood by Dylan’s side. “I believe my sister,” he wrote in an article for The Hollywood Reporter. (Ronan is also one of the journalists who broke the Weinstein story.) Dylan’s accusation was first made in 1992, but little was done then—and nothing’s really happened now. In fact, Allen’s still very much a working director: His next movie stars Selena Gomez, Elle Fanning, and current awards-season favorite Timothée Chalamet. So where is the disconnect? Why is Allen still able to receive steady work—and acclaim, no less—despite this shift happening in Hollywood?

For some reason, actors, many of whom have voiced their support for Time’s Up, agree to make movies with him…and publicly ignore Dylan Farrow’s accusations. Kate Winslet, Blake Lively, Justin Timberlake—all of these stars (and more) have made movies with Allen in the past few years. Some have even sung his praises. It’s this cone of silence that keeps Allen in power.

Maybe this is going to end, though. Lady Bird director Greta Gerwig, who acted in Allen’s 2012 film To Rome With Love, said in a New York Times op-ed this week that she wouldn’t have worked with Allen had she known the allegations against him—and she won’t work with him again.

“If I had known then what I know now, I would not have acted in the film,” Gerwig said. “I have not worked for him again, and I will not work for him again. Dylan Farrow’s two different pieces made me realize that I increased another woman’s pain, and I was heartbroken by that realization. I grew up on his movies, and they have informed me as an artist, and I cannot change that fact now, but I can make different decisions moving forward.”

This statement comes just days after Gerwig side-stepped a question about Allen at the Golden Globes:

While Gerwig’s NYT piece is a start, other artists who’ve worked with Allen have not followed suit. Hollywood is ignoring his behavior because the actors in his movies are. The only way to effect change is for people to stop working with him. And the people who have worked with him need to speak out—loudly.

Here’s a nonexhaustive list of what actors who starred in Allen’s most recent films have said. Note how many of these quotes are wishy-washy, vague, or even congratulatory:

Kate Winslet (Wonder Wheel, 2017): “He understands the female characters he creates exceptionally well. His female characters are always so rich and large and honest in terms of how they’re feeling, and he just knows how to write dialogue for them to communicate all that.” —Sydney Morning Herald

Selena Gomez (A Rainy Day in New York, 2018): “To be honest, I’m not sure how to answer—not because I’m trying to back away from it. [The Harvey Weinstein allegations] actually happened right after I had started [on the movie]. They popped up in the midst of it. And that’s something, yes, I had to face and discuss. I stepped back and thought, Wow, the universe works in interesting ways.” — Billboard

Blake Lively (Café Society, 2016): “It’s very dangerous to factor in things you don’t know anything about. I could [only] know my experience. And my experience with Woody is he’s empowering to women.” —Los Angeles Times

Kristen Stewart (Café Society, 2016): “At the end of the day, Jesse and I talked about this. If we were persecuted for the amount of shit that’s been said about us that’s not true, our lives would be over. The experience of making the movie was so outside of that, it was fruitful for the two of us to go on with it.” —Variety

Cate Blanchett (Blue Jasmine, 2014): “I mean, it’s obviously been a long and painful situation for the family, and I hope they find some sort of resolution and peace.” — *Hollywood Elsewhere* via Reuters

Diane Keaton (Annie Hall, 1977): “I have nothing to say about that. Except: I believe my friend.” —The Guardian

Rebecca Hall (A Rainy Day in New York, 2018): In a statement posted to her Instagram, Hall revealed that she’ll be donating her wages from A Rainy Day in New York to the Time’s Up fund. “The day after the Weinstein accusation broke in full force I was shooting a day of work on Woody Allen’s latest movie in New York. I couldn’t have imagined somewhere stranger to be that day,” she wrote. “When asked to do so, some seven months ago, I quickly said yes. He gave me one of my first significant roles in film for which I have always been grateful, it was one day in my hometown—easy. I have, however subsequently realized there is nothing easy about any of this. In the weeks following I have thought very deeply about this decision, and remain conflicted and saddened. After reading and re-reading Dylan Farrow’s statements of a few days ago and going back and reading the older ones—I see, not only how complicated this matter is, but that my actions have made another woman feel silenced and dismissed. That is not something that sits easily with me in the current or indeed any moment, and I am profoundly sorry. I regret this decision and wouldn’t make the same one today. It’s a small gesture and not one intended as close to compensation but I’ve donated my wage to Time’s Up. I’ve also signed up, will continue to donate, and look forward to working with and being part of this positive movement towards change not just in Hollywood but hopefully everywhere.”

Timothée Chalamet (A Rainy Day in New York, 2018): The actor revealed in an Instagram post that he cannot answer questions directly about working with Woody Allen because of “contractual obligations,” but he doesn’t want to “profit” from his work on the film. Because of this, he’s donating his entire salary to three charities: Time’s Up, the LGBT Center in New York, and RAINN. Here’s his full statement:

“This year has changed the way I see and feel about so many things; it
has been a thrilling and, at times, enlightening education. I have, to
this point, chosen projects from the perspective of a young actor
trying to walk in the footsteps of more seasoned actors I admire. But
I am learning that a good role isn’t the only criteria for accepting a
job–that has become much clearer to me in the past few months,
having witnessed the birth of a powerful movement intent on ending
injustice, inequality and above all, silence.

I have been asked in a few recent interviews about my decision to work
on a film with Woody Allen last summer. I’m not able to answer the
question directly because of contractual obligations. But what I can
say is this: I don’t want to profit from my work on the film, and to
that end, I am going to donate my entire salary to three charities:
TIME’S UP, The LGBT Center in New York, and RAINN. I want to be worthy
of standing shoulder to shoulder with brave artists who are fighting
for all people to be treated with the respect and dignity they
deserve.”

Alec Baldwin (Blue Jasmine, 2014, along with the 1990’s Alice and 2012’s To Rome With Love): Baldwin took to Twitter on January 16, 2018 and said that it’s “sad” and “unfair” so many actors are distancing themselves from Allen. “Woody Allen was investigated forensically by two states (NY and CT) and no charges were filed,” he wrote. “The renunciation of him and his work, no doubt, has some purpose. But it’s unfair and sad to me. I worked w WA 3 times and it was one of the privileges of my career.” In a second tweet, he posited that Allen could even be innocent because he’s never been formally charged with anything. “This is a charge that was investigated aggressively and resulted in…nothing,” he said.”What would it take for you to at least consider that he is telling the truth?”

Rachel Brosnahan (Crisis in Six Scenes, 2016): Brosnahan is adding her voice to the chorus of actors who admit they regret working with Allen. “Honestly, it’s the decision that I have made in my life that is the most inconsistent with everything I stand for and believe in, both publicly and privately. And while I can’t take it back, it’s important to me, moving forward, to make decisions that better reflect the things that I value and my worldview,” she told The Hollywood Reporter. “Look, I had a great experience working on that project. But I do have to take this opportunity to say that, for me, I have really struggled with the decision to do that project for a long time.”

Related Stories:

Greta Gerwig and 13 Other Golden Globes 2018 Snubs We Just Can’t Get Over

Selena Gomez “Isn’t Sure How to Answer” Questions About Why She’s Working With Woody Allen

Selena Gomez and Elle Fanning Are Starring in Woody Allen’s Next Movie





Source link