Categories
Health

Coachella Hairstyles and Festival Hair Trends That Don't Require a Flower Crown


Welcome to music festival season, which unofficially kicks off every year with Coachella. The annual pilgrimage to Indio, California is always a gold mine for good music, boundary-pushing fashion, and cool hairstyles. The festival draws in celebrities and influencers by the hundreds and sets the tone for what the big trends of the summer will be.

But if you’re thinking of flower crowns and rolling your eyes (look, we love flower crowns, but—as one fictional editrix said—florals for spring aren’t exactly groundbreaking), we’re happy to report our troops on the ground have spotted plenty of fresh new takes on festival hair. Think arts-and-crafts “camp” hair, headbands galore, and plenty of glitter.

Here, 37 fresh ideas you can use all summer long, seen on people at the fairgrounds.



Source link

Categories
Health

9 Soothing Rosacea Treatments That Don't Require a Prescription


“Are you wearing blush?” is a question I’ve received since I was old enough to understand English. My answer has always been an automatic, “No, that’s just my face.”

As skin conditions go, I know that I can’t really complain about mine. I have a case of rosacea so mild that it passes for makeup most days. Exceptions occur only when I exercise, drink alcohol, eat spicy food, or overheat, which is when my face becomes noticeably more flushed. In these instances, the question typically changes to the somewhat less flattering, “Are you okay? Your face…” Still, I’ve never had a flare-up so extreme that it called for an urgent visit to a dermatologist. A regimen of products labeled “soothing” and “hydrating” is the only change I ever bothered making.

A recent meeting with dermatologist Dr. Timm Golueke alerted me that I might want to rethink that attitude. “You have rosacea,” he informed me mid-conversation (in the kindest way possible). I considered it a welcome reminder to start assembling a more tailored skin care routine.

A very important point to remember when it comes to rosacea is that the chronic condition gets worse over time. According to dermatologist Dr. Joshua Zeichner, it’s best to prevent progression in the earlier stages. “Rosacea is in your genes and while we cannot change our genetic make up, we can change the way that our genes are expressed,” he says. Dr. Golueke notes that a milder version will manifest as facial redness (although having facial redness doesn’t necessarily indicate that you have rosacea), while more aggressive versions cause pimple-like bumps on your cheeks and nose. Triggers include spicy foods, the sun, and irritating skin care ingredients (particularly retinols, exfoliants, and anything acid-based).

As for treatments, there are common prescription options that are both topical and oral. I’m currently using Soolantra on Dr. Golueke’s suggestion, which contains the active ingredient, ivermectin. Ivermectin helps reduce the level of mites living on your skin, which is increased (thereby causing inflammation) in those with rosacea. Your dermatologist may also prescribe Mirvaso or Rhofade, which constrict blood vessels in your face, reducing the appearance of redness for hours.

Then, there’s Oracea, a medication taken by mouth that reduces inflammation from the inside out. “While it’s technically considered an antibiotic, the dose is so low that it doesn’t kill any bacteria,” says Dr. Zeichner. “It really works as an anti-inflammatory treatment, and because of this, it can be taken for extended periods of time without the risk of bacterial resistance.”

In the realm of beauty tech, LED light therapy also scores points for reducing redness. This is an option celebrity esthetician Joanna Vargas often recommends. “It thickens your skin and helps eliminate that persistent redness,” she says. “LED light has been proven to increase the energy in living tissue, which is why it stimulates collagen production, reduces inflammation, and speeds healing.” In her practice, she often administers the treatment with her RevitaLight Bed.

While LED facials and derm appointments are highly recommended if you want to effectively treat your rosacea, they don’t cover everything else you do at home. So to make sure your top shelf is fully expert-approved, I asked the pros to also weigh in on effective over-the-counter products for rosacea. Below, an everyday routine that will keep your face cool and calm—no prescription needed.



Source link

Categories
Health

Why I Don't Post Photos of My Child on Social Media


A few months ago, at a family gathering, we took a group photo of all the cousins and our kids. As my cousin’s wife examined the picture on her phone and got ready to post it, my cousin slapped—literally, slapped—the phone out of his wife’s hand. We’re living in an era in which using social media has become an instinct. The assumption whatever happens—to us, near us—is fair game for #content. But that cousin knew that my husband and I don’t post pictures of our daughter on social media and he didn’t think he’d be able to communicate that to his wife in time to stop her from hitting “upload.” (His wife was fine, if rattled.) His reflexes kicked in. Around us, people in the restaurant stared at him until he sheepishly handed his wife her phone back.

When I was pregnant with our daughter, my husband told me he’d like to keep her off our—well, my—social media. The request surprised me. As a writer, I’m always mining my personal life for stories, and my social media accounts (while hardly well-followed) reflect how open I am. I am a sharer. My husband uses Facebook maybe once a fiscal quarter and doesn’t have Instagram, so I wasn’t sure why he cared what I was or wasn’t posting. I’m used to scrolling past newborn after newborn in my feed, and I expected mine to be among them. So I said as much, pushing back. But he made a kind, convincing argument, telling me he was concerned about her privacy and the digital footprint she might have before she could even consent to being photographed. It’s a significant concern—not just for our family, but socially, as our culture reckons with everything from revenge porn to whether countries should allow individuals to erase unwanted digital content. (France seems to think the answer is “yes.”)

Even at the start, there were parts of the idea I liked: She’ll never get mad at us for showing a photo of her in the bathtub to dozens of strangers. But there were parts I didn’t like: Like, what if she does something really, insanely cute and I want everyone to see? “Just text it to people you actually know,” he said. I sighed. I wasn’t sold on the fix—I didn’t want to assume people cared enough to see her unprompted. (Whereas scrolling past her in their feed seemed much more passive.) Still it didn’t strike me as an immediate problem. “Fine. We can reassess when she starts doing really, insanely cute things,” I said. He rarely asks for anything like this, and really he was asking me to not do something. I decided I could handle it.

Sharing baby stories is the currency of the new mom.

Once she entered the world, I began to feel some regret about the decision. I was spending more hours than ever plugged in to social media, filling late nights and endless afternoons on my phone while I was home alone with an infant. I was desperate to connect to people with whom I could relate. Sharing baby stories is the currency of the new mom. I tried to participate while following the rule we came up with: no face photos, don’t share her full name. But obscuring her while trying to post about her started to seem pointless. I felt like I was missing out on opportunities to bond with other moms. I was DMing women posting about their babies just to feel less alone.

I had to make sure not to grow resentful towards my husband, since it hadn’t been my rule. Erin, a mom of one in New York City, a model, and a doula who is building her business on Instagram, told me she could relate—her husband also asked her not to post their son. “I’m super public and my husband is super private,” she explains. “Since the internet is forever, my husband doesn’t want our son to have his image out before he chooses. Which I get, but I’m also like—this is what I do!” She also doesn’t post face photos but has found a lot of work-arounds. I get it. But for me, it became easier just to retreat.

After a few months of feeling left out of social media #mom culture, I decided to post about how I wasn’t going to be showing my daughter’s face.

I felt kind of like I had been lying by omission by not coming right out and saying that we wouldn’t be sharing her, and it was oddly cleansing to make the declaration. Instantly, I saw positive comments populate: “love this!” “yes!” and applause emojis. I started to feel empowered by the decision rather than restricted. In fact, once I went public with it, it became something I felt proud of.

For one, I love that people interested in my kid actually ask me about her. As it turns out, it’s much more gratifying to get texts saying, “I need to see a picture of C!” than it is to watch likes roll in. It also avoids that awkward dance of telling an anecdote when you meet up with someone in real life and trying to suss out if that person already saw it on social media. I know for a fact that no stories about my child are boring repeats for anyone who’s watched the stories I post on Instagram. An unexpected twist? It’s reinforced some friendships—the people getting the “content” that I would have posted are the people I really care about and who really care about me and my daughter.

On a more serious note, it’s also forced me to make social media a reprieve from being “C’s mommy.” With next to no child content on my account, I have to highlight other things going on in my life. I have to take more stock of the non-mom activities I do and share those moments, reminding me that I’m a person outside of this role. I love being a mom, but it doesn’t consume me. And it matters that the world sees it doesn’t appear to be consuming me either, as it does so many new parents who suddenly flip from posting beers to posting bassinets. Some friends have made half-joking comments that they haven’t had to mute me or tune me out, that I’m one less poster of endless kiddie spam. On some level I get that, too: Even though I have a kid and like knowing what other parents are up to, there are a few children I see so often on my feed that I’ve memorized their bath-time routine. Keeping C off social media, as trivial as it might seem, has given me a stronger sense of my identity, post-baby.

Of course in the end this is about her, and it’s a relief to know that posting her is not a habit I’ll have to wean myself off of when I become like, so embarrassing as her mom. And I loved a point made by Lisa, a mom of one in Los Angeles who I spoke to who also doesn’t post her baby. She does it for her child’s privacy, but she had one additional reason: “I feel like when I was struggling to get pregnant it killed me to see images of happy families and bouncing babies. The comparisons felt so awful,” she says. “I try and remember how that felt to see an image of perfection, regardless of what was really going on behind the scenes.” I was comforted to think I wasn’t adding to anyone’s pain like that, too.

There are still moments it’s not easy. I hate having to police others’ behavior—I’ve had to explain at big family gatherings that the group photo can only be posted if you can’t see my daughter’s face, and once had to ask a good friend to take something down after it had gone up. Personally, I haven’t faced any backlash over that, but Lisa told me she has been pressured to share more about her family by moms in her circle. “I have been getting a fair amount of pushback from my friends who take lots of pics of our babies [together] and post them all over,” she says. I’ve seen comments like this directed at celebs like Sarah Michelle Gellar and Kristen Bell who don’t post pics of their kids, too. It surprises me, because who cares? And also: We’re gong to bully people for what they do post and what they don’t? When I want to hit upload, I scratch the itch in the ways I know how: I send it to a group text, or to my dad. Or I’ll stick an emoji on her face and just go ahead and post. But I know we made the right decision for us. At some point, I hope she’s grateful. But even if she never expresses appreciation for her digital blank slate, I know I am. And besides, I’ll find plenty of un-grammable ways to embarrass her in the meantime.

Sara Gaynes Levy is a writer and editor in New York City.





Source link

Categories
Health

Mammograms Don't Have to Be Terrible, Thanks to This Breakthrough Screening Technology


As far as conversations about your breasts go, cancer screenings aren’t exactly the most fun topic. Mammograms are a powerful tool for catching breast cancer early, but they’re also, let’s be honest, extremely uncomfortable. According to current guidelines, women should be getting screened once a year starting at age 40, but even that’s too much for some of us—studies estimate anywhere from 25 to 46 percent of women skip their regular screenings.

To improve the exams, who better to ask for insight than women getting them? An all-female team of engineers at GE Healthcare did just that when developing their latest breast cancer screening technology. The goal: “How do we get patients to, quite frankly, not hate this exam?” Kathleen Schindler, global mammography clinical product leader at GE, explains.

Instead of an anxiety-inducing, awkward experience, they wanted to design a mammogram process created by females, for females. “Women are the ones who are having the exams done, and women are [often] the people who are performing the exam, as well,” Schindler says. “If we’re going to really focus on why women don’t like having mammograms, then we should be talking to women. It’s an incredibly intimate and powerful exam—the patient should be involved, not just simply having the exam done to them.”

After talking to more than 1,000 mammography technologists, radiologists, and patients, the answer was clear: To make mammograms suck less, put the women having them in control.

Called Senographe Pristina, the resulting mammogram technology developed by GE’s team of female engineers allows you—the patient—to control the speed and intensity of the screening by using a small handheld device called Pristina Dueta. After the mammography technologist positions your breast, you get to control the compression using plus and minus buttons. “You know where your limit is more than I do,” Schindler says, speaking as a former mammography technologist.

So when exactly does getting a mammogram matter? “Women should begin screening mammography at age 40 and continue yearly mammograms as long as they are healthy,” says Laurie Margolies, M.D., system chief of breast imaging at Mount Sinai Health System. (Official guidelines vary: The American Cancer Society advises starting yearly screenings at 45.)

That said, there are a few risk factors that might prompt you to start screening in your thirties or even younger. “The most common risk factor for early screening is a family history in a first-degree relative, i.e., your mother, sister, or daughter,” says Margolies. In these cases doctors recommend you start getting mammograms 10 years before the age your relative was diagnosed. So, if your mom was diagnosed with breast cancer at 37, you’d want to start getting screened at 27.

To assess your individual risk, online tools like Bright Pink’s Assess Your Risk Quiz can help, but always make sure to talk to your doctor to create the health plan that makes the most sense for you and your breasts.



Source link

Categories
Health

'Get Out' Producer Is Catching Heat for Saying Women Don't Want to Direct Horror Movies


Jason Blum is a key figure in the horror movie business. He and his production company, Blumhouse, are responsible for some of the most popular (and critically acclaimed) scary flicks of the past few years, including Get Out, Paranormal Activity, and The Purge. His recent comments about female horror directors, however, aren’t receiving the same praise.

In an interview with Polygon earlier this week, Blum said the reason Blumhouse has never hired a woman director is because female filmmakers aren’t interested in horror. “There are not a lot of female directors period, and even less who are inclined to do horror,” he explained. (Hmmm, we can think of a few.) “I’m a massive admirer of [Babadook director] Jennifer Kent. I’ve offered her every movie we’ve had available. She’s turned me down every time.” Twitter users, unsurprisingly, weren’t too keen on his comments.

Blum was later asked about his comments by Variety, and he admitted that he “totally misspoke.” “I made a mistake about it,” he said. “Our audience is 55 percent women; the executives at the company we have are 50 percent women. I am passionate about hiring women, and I totally made a mistake in the way I represented that. We already work with a lot of women…. Today was a great day for me because I learned a lot and because there are a lot of women out there that I’m going to meet as a result of today, so I’m grateful for it.” To further his point, Blum also issued an apology on Twitter, reiterating how he’ll be more cognizant of women creators going forward.

Let’s hope he stands by his word.

Related Stories:

Here’s Every New Scary Movie and TV Show Hitting Netflix Before Halloween

The Most Feminist Horror Movies of All Time

Why Getting Dumped Made Me Love Horror Movies





Source link

Categories
Health

Here's Why the Royal Husbands Don't Have to Wear Wedding Bands


During Princess Eugenie’s wedding on Friday (October 12), eagle-eyed royal watchers noticed that after her now-husband Jack Brookshank awkwardly struggled to get the wedding band on her finger, Eugenie didn’t slip a ring on his. Cue us, the puzzled Americans: What gives?

As it turns out, it’s because he simply has chosen not to wear one. But it’s not just the spouses of minor royals (Princess Eugenie is ninth in line to the throne) that don’t have to: Apparently all royal men get to choose whether they wear one or not. “There is no royal tradition for men wearing or not wearing a wedding ring,” British and European royalty expert Marlene Koenig told Town & Country.

And, if you have to ask: “I am unaware of any royal woman not wearing a wedding ring,” Koenig told Glamour.com on Saturday.

PHOTO: WPA Pool

There is just one ring in this photograph.

If you look closely, it turns out that Prince William, who is second in line to the throne after his father, Prince Charles, also doesn’t wear a ring. Reportedly, he’s not a fan of jewelry. As a royal spokesperson told People before his nuptials to Kate Middleton in 2011, “There is only going to be one ring, in accordance with the couple’s wishes.”

Princess Eugenie Of York Marries Mr. Jack Brooksbank

PHOTO: Max Mumby/Indigo

L: ring. R: no ring.

Perhaps Brookshank is following in the footsteps of his now-father-in-law Prince Andrew, who opted out of a ring as well while he was married to Princess Eugenie’s mother, Sarah Ferguson, from 1986 to 1996.

Sarah, Duchess Of York With Prince Andrew, Duke Of York, Watching A Fashion Show At The Royal York Hotel In Ontario, Canada.

PHOTO: John Shelley Collection/Avalon

Nope, that’s just a pinky ring.

The patriarch of the royal family, Prince Philip, has also never worn a ring on his finger—and he and Queen Elizabeth II have been married for more than 70 years. Apparently there are some things, like love and royal tradition, that are stronger than platinum.

Royalty - Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee

PHOTO: Fiona Hanson – PA Images

Prince Charles, husband to Camilla, does wear a wedding band, but instead of wearing it on his ring finger, he stacks his wedding band with a giant gold signet ring on his left pinky finger that he’s been sporting since the ‘70s.

Charles  And Camilla Visit Cornwall

PHOTO: Anwar Hussein Collection

The Duke & Duchess of Sussex Visit The Nelson Mandela Centenary Exhibition

PHOTO: Max Mumby/Indigo

But it’s a little different with Prince Harry, who some see as a more modern royal. When he and Meghan Markle married on May 19, the wedding program included a section called “the giving of the rings,” where Meghan and Harry exchanged wedding bands, with a plural. Now Harry proudly wears a platinum wedding band on his ring finger (a definite upgrade from the matching beaded bracelets he and Markle wore early on in their relationship).

Apparently, it’s not just royal men who opt out of this piece of symbolic jewelry, either: Koenig told Town & Country that men wearing wedding bands is a fairly new thing, and a lot of posh aristocrats still don’t (former Prime Minister David Cameron doesn’t either, she said).

The times change, but royal tradition changes slower.

Related Stories

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Were All About the PDA at Princess Eugenie’s Royal Wedding

All the Celebrity Arrivals at Princess Eugenie’s Royal Wedding

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Moving Into Kensington Palace



Source link