Categories
Health

The Black Women's Wage Gap Is Systemic, but That Doesn't Mean It Can't Change


What would you do with an additional $20,000 dollars? It’s a question that might seem rhetorical, but to many women of color, it’s one that’s perfectly logical due to an overwhelming wage gap; a disparity that’s acknowledged yearly with Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, which is today.

Recent data from the National Women’s Law Center shows that while women in the U.S. make 80 cents to every dollar white men make, black women working the same number of hours typically make just 63 cents for every dollar paid to their white, non-Hispanic male counterparts. And with median wages for black women in the United States at $35,382 per year, compared to $56,386 for white, non-Hispanic men, this amounts to a loss of about $21,698 each year for African American women and their families.

Considering the high-profile strides black women have made in various industries during the past few years, it’s hard to fathom the gap exists so broadly. Black women—who, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, are attaining college degrees at higher rates than before—are leading politically (and campaigning to make history), are changing the Hollywood landscape with nuanced storytelling (and unprecedented deals), crushing the sports world and even maintaining the top spot as the fastest growing group of entrepreneurs.

And the gap isn’t unique to black women in lower and middle wage jobs who are facing discrimination: According to a new joint study by Leanin.org, the National Urban League, and SurveyMonkey, “the [wage] gap actually widens for black women with more education.” In fact, for black women, it takes 200 days to “catch up.”

In 1996, the National Committee on Pay Equity decided to bring awareness to this disparity by creating Equal Pay Day. The day signifies how long it takes for a woman to make the same amount of money a white man makes for the prior year. Each year, Equal Pay Day for All is held in April to acknowledge that it takes an average woman about 16 months to make what a typical white man makes in a year.

But when we look at the wage gap for Black women, this day of “catching up” falls later in the year on August 7. Black women have to work more than 200 additional days to make the same amount of money a white man makes in a year. And these numbers matter, especially as the gap widens. It’s not clear when black women will be able to catch up. But there are things we can do to inch closer. On Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, we take a look:

Why Does the Black Women’s Wage Gap Matter?

For the millions of black women, who are working hard and still struggling to make ends meet, it’s obvious that losing out on thousands of dollars in income each year is detrimental for their well-being. But there are additional reasons why closing the black women’s wage gap is so important. Aside from obvious discrimination, black women, perhaps more than any other demographic, need higher wages.

According to 2013 data from the Center for American Progress, nearly 75 percent of black breadwinning mothers are unmarried (compared to 29 percent of white women). In other words, they are paying the rent or mortgage, feeding the family, procuring healthcare, and more on their own. This also impacts black women’s ability to build wealth. Wealth, defined as what you own minus what you owe, is the ultimate measure of economic security and black women have far too little of it. According to the Asset Funders Network, median wealth for single black women in the U.S. is $200. Raising wages, will provide black women with more money to save and invest.

What Can We Do About It?

The good news is that there are policy proposals to increase black women’s wages and close the wage gap. Below are just a few key proposals.

Raise the minimum wage:

According to Bare Minimum: Why we Need to Raise Wages for America’s Lowest Paid Families, a new report by the Leadership Conference Education Fund and Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality, black women are more likely than any other group to benefit from a $15 minimum wage. (Black women are disproportionately working in low wage jobs.)

And, while there is very little action at the federal level to increase the minimum wage, many state legislators know that raising wages is good for both families and the local economy. And they are acting.

In fact, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, “eighteen states began the new year with higher minimum wages. Eight states (Alaska, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, Ohio, and South Dakota) automatically increased their rates based on the cost of living, while 10 states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington) increased their rates due to previously approved legislation or ballot initiatives.”

Economic justice advocates are also working hard locally to advance a $15 hour minimum wage that increases with inflation over time. As a result, New York City, Seattle, Los Angeles, and San Francisco have passed $15 hour minimum wage ordinances.

Go to Raise the Minimum Wage to learn more about how you can get involved. In addition, be sure to check out Fight For $15.

Revitalize unions:

According to Economic Policy Institute, union membership is key to helping to close the black women’s wage gap:

“Black women have traditionally faced a double pay gap—a gender pay gap and a racial wage gap. EPI (Economic Policy Institute’s) research has shown that… unions help reduce these pay gaps. Working black women in unions are paid 94.9 percent of what their black male counterparts make, while nonunion black women are paid just 91 percent of their counterparts.”

Unfortunately, the recent Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME will weaken unions. The new ruling creates a situation where workers like Janus—a white man—are no longer required to pay their “fair share” in union dues, even though they benefit from union organizing and collective bargaining agreements.

To learn more the importance of advancing collective bargaining initiatives and fair labor practices, check out inequality.org.

Pass the Paycheck Fairness Act:

At the end of the day, it’s employers, not the government, that set wages. And the Equal Pay Act, which was signed into law 50 years ago, was designed to regulate the behavior of corporations by outlawing wage discrimination based on sex. Unfortunately, it’s clear from the persistence of the wage gap that the Equal Pay Act hasn’t worked.

We need to strengthen the Equal Pay Act and ensure that it protects black women from wage gaps based on race and gender. That’s where the Paycheck Fairness Act comes in. According to the National Partnership for Women & Families, the Paycheck Fairness Act will add teeth to the Equal Pay Act by helping to “ensure the Department of Labor (DOL) uses the full range of investigatory tools to uncover wage discrimination.”

For example, the Paycheck Fairness Act would make employers accountable for proving that wage differences are a result of legitimate, job-related issues. It would also protect women and men who share their salaries with each other from retaliation by employers. Finally, the Act would provide women and girls with training in negotiating skills.

Make no mistake. Wage discrimination has a direct impact on the balance sheets of black women. The wage gap hurts both families and the economy. Addressing this damage is key to improving our personal and communal financial health. By learning more about the policies above and advocating with our legislators and corporate leaders, we can ensure that we achieve wage equality and are finally paid what we deserve.

Jessicah Pierre is a media specialist at Inequality.org and founder of Queens Company, an organization dedicated to empowering women of color.

Jocelyn Harmon is the co-founder of BlackHer, an online platform dedicated to educating and inspiring Black women to take action for progressive change.

Related Stories:

Despite Major Wins, Women Are Still Losing When It Comes to Equal Pay

Starbucks Says It’s Achieved Pay Equity For Women and Minorities



Source link

Categories
Health

90 Day Fiancé: Why I Can't Watch the Reality Show in 2018


“Things are about to get a little bit more stupider.”

If you watch TLC with any sort of regularity, you’ve probably heard this prophecy—preceded, ironically, by “They thought they met some stupid Americans”—countless times in promos for this season of 90 Day Fiancé: Happily Ever After?, which wraps up this Sunday (July 29).

It is painfully true.

When the original 90 Day Fiancé premiered, in 2014, it offered an intriguing look at the K-1 visa process, whereby a United States citizen petitions to bring over their foreign fiancé; they then must wed within 90 days of their arrival or return to their home country. Since then, it’s become one of the network’s core franchises, spawning not one but three spin-offs: 90 Day Fiancé: Happily Ever After?, which follows 90 Day Fiancé fan favorites after they’ve married; 90 Day Fiancé: Before the 90 Days, which follows couples in long-distance relationships as they decide whether or not to get engaged and pursue the K-1 visa; and 90 Day Fiancé: What Now?, which began its second season last week and seems to only differ from 90 Day Fiancé: Happily Ever After? in name.

But the world has gotten “more stupider” since 90 Day Fiancé‘s debut, and now watching the show in our current political climate just…doesn’t feel right to me. There’s always been a certain cringe factor to the series as the couples navigate cultural differences and language barriers and deal with the assumptions of their families (most of the couples are true-love connections but still face the “They’re just marrying you for a green card” stigma from skeptical relatives). But what used to be easy to pass off as guilty-pleasure reality-TV tension now feels like a grim reminder of the xenophobia running rampant in our country these days. It’s hard for me to still enjoy a show that—however indirectly—presents the idea that immigrants are trying to scam their way into America when hundreds of children have yet to be returned to their parents.

PHOTO: TLC

Nicole and Azan

It doesn’t help that in recent years the show has placed more emphasis on its least believable couples. Danielle and Mohamed, who first appeared in season two of the series, were cast in two seasons of Happily Ever After? despite breaking up at the end of their original season; the current season of What Now? follows Danielle as she attempts to sue Mohamed for the money she spent bringing him to the States. Nicole and Azan, another couple whose relationship is implied to be a con, have appeared on two seasons of 90 Day Fiancé as well as one season of Happily Ever After? Next week, TLC will air a one-hour special devoted to their wedding. The show’s main promo shot on the network’s website is of Jorge and Anfisa, a Russian native who has openly admitted she is with her husband for his money and whom other cast members have referred to as a “mail-order bride.”

In the past, it was easier to explain away fascination with these couples—”How can someone be so oblivious?” “Are they that desperate for love?”—by focusing on the show’s “real” couples who were clearly in love and the odds they had to overcome to be together. “It’s not exploitative,” I’d tell myself. “It’s educational!”

And yet the couple whose story has convinced me to quit watching isn’t one of the fakes. Chantel met Pedro on a trip to the Dominican Republic, and over the course of their three seasons (one on 90 Day Fiancé and two on Happily Ever After?), her family’s cultural insensitivity and wild conspiracy theories about Pedro’s family—that his mother runs a marriage ring to “harvest the American dollar,” that his sister is actually his girlfriend, etc.—have left them trapped in a modern-day Romeo and Juliet scenario and contemplating divorce.

TLC

Chantel and Pedro

The show paints Chantel’s family as not exactly the brightest people (her mother is responsible for that “more stupider” quote), but never specifically calls out their ignorance. This gives their baseless concerns the same weight as those with a legitimate reason to believe their family member is being taken for a ride. All of their conflicts stem from miscommunications that could’ve easily been cleared up (Pedro’s sister Nicole emphasizes a point by saying “punto,” meaning “period,” and Chantel hears “puta,” thus setting off a multiseason “Pedro’s sister called me a whore” arc) or their refusal to open themselves up to another culture (they’re offended when Pedro’s mother serves them chicken feet; after his grandmother spends all day cooking for them, they refuse to get out of the car after seeing her modest home). And yet the disagreements are presented as two-sided because Pedro’s family doesn’t take kindly to that disrespect.

TLC clearly knows what they have on their hands with Chantel and Pedro. When Chantel’s brother, River, got in a physical fight with Pedro over dinner that culminated with Chantel’s mom threatening to get Pedro deported, yelling “IMMIGRATION PARA TI” at him, they held a special live aftershow that featured an interview with the cameraman who shot the scene and a host who mocked Pedro’s English by referring to Chantel’s family as “the family Chantel” like he does.

Before 2016 it was easier to gawk at this kind of thing. It felt obvious whose side we were supposed to be on, and any insensitivity felt outrageous in a “can you believe these guys?” kind of way. At the time, we weren’t being inundated with calls for a wall to be built or daily news stories about ICE raids and immigrant children being held in cages. But the world’s gotten uglier, and it’s become painfully obvious that it’s time to divorce myself from 90 Day Fiancé. Any show that furthers the narrative that immigrants are trying to deceive their way into our country—intentional or not—just isn’t one I’m comfortable watching these days. To be honest, I’m embarrassed it ever was.

TLC

PHOTO: TLC

Jorge and Anfisa

The xenophobia isn’t even limited to the Americans on the show. On the recent “Cast Tell All” reunion episode, Anfisa got into an argument with Paola, a Colombian woman who has been on the show since its very first season and had her green card for years now. “When are you getting deported?” she snapped. “Next season?”

I turned it off at that point because the answer to that question these days is “quite possibly.” We hear stories of legal residents being deported and families being separated seemingly every day. I watch reality TV to get an hourly escape from the horrors of our real-life news cycle. I can’t keep watching us get stupider.

Bonnie Stiernberg is a writer and editor based in Brooklyn.

Photos: TLC



Source link

Categories
Health

This Is the One Food Royals Can't Eat, According to Duchess Camilla


In news that will come as a shock for many lovers of a certain bulbous, delicious ingredient, there is apparently one food and one food only that royals aren’t allowed to eat. Found in cultures’ cuisines around the world, it seems as though the humble but decidedly supreme garlic isn’t allowed on royal plates. Much like not wearing red nail polish, messy buns (unless you’re Meghan Markle, that is), and going sans nylons, this is apparently as much a matter of royal protocol as any. Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, appeared on MasterChef Australia earlier this week and explained exactly why.

“I hate to say this, but garlic. Garlic is a no-no,” the duchess said.

“So garlic is a no-no?” one of the show’s judges asked. “Because you’re talking, chatting?”

“Yes, exactly. So you always have to lay off the garlic,” she said.

This news is, to be sure, exceptionally tragic—but it’s not the first time the royal family has come out as anti-garlic. Back in 2016, we discovered that Queen Elizabeth II is royally averse to the stuff (the Queen, let it be said, is “not a foodie at all”). As it turns out, it seems as though she might have set a bit of a precedent.

As former Buckingham Palace kitchen chef Darren McGrady said all the way back then, “When [the Queen] was at the table, there was no garlic at all,” he said. “She was very Victorian and believed when she was brought up that you don’t eat garlic—because if you were holding an audience the next day, you didn’t want to be breathing garlic. It was seen as antisocial.”

Just last month, he added that “anything with garlic” as well as anything with “too much onions” would never be on royal plates. “The Queen would never have garlic on the menu,” he added.

The Queen’s reasoning seems pretty similar to the Duchess of Cornwalls, but let’s be real: This is 2018, and things like breath mints, gum, and super-extra strength toothpaste are available to avoid offending international guests with garlicky breath.

We all know Markle has given up a lot to become a Duchess, and this means she will also have to cancel garlic—an ingredient that she loved to mix in her recipe for a Filipino-style chicken. We hereby humbly submit a petition to the Queen: Stock up on the minty stuff, and cut loose on the garlic. You won’t look back.

Related Stories:

The Queen’s Sweet Tooth and Serious Garlic Aversion: Former Chef Spills Royal Kitchen Secrets

It Sure Looks Like the Queen Inspired Meghan Markle’s Latest Outfit Choice

Meghan Markle Is Taking Over One of Queen Elizabeth’s Favorite Royal Duties





Source link

Categories
Health

The 'Game of Thrones' Cast Is Saying Goodbye to The Show, and We Can't Take It


Winter has come and gone—and we are not at all prepared for it. As the last season of Game Of Thrones stalks toward us like a relentless White Walker, the cast has been shooting their final scenes and taking to social media to say some hard goodbyes.

On Saturday, Maisie Williams was the latest GoT regular to bid the show adieu with an Instagram post that captures all the gory greatness of the Seven Kingdoms. Williams plays the badass Arya Stark, a character who goes from a precocious kid from Winterfell to a killing machine. The actress posted an image that captures Arya pretty accurately: A pair of white tennis shoes completely doused in blood.

“goodbye belfast. goodbye arya. goodbye game of thrones. what a joy i’ve had. here’s to the adventures to come #lastwomanstanding #barely #immasleepforthenextfouryears #justkiddingidontslee,” Williams wrote.

The photo also sparked immediate rumors about whether or not the shoes are a clue about the final season: Maybe they mean Arya mets a grisly fate—or maybe they mean she keeps carrying out lethal vengeance on her foes.

Earlier this month, Emilia Clarke also said goodbye on Instagram, albeit with a much less brutal photo. She wrote a moving note about the GoT journey, which has allowed her to play the unforgettable Daenerys Stormborn a.k.a. the Mother of Dragons a.k.a. the Khaleesi of the Great Grass Sea a.k.a. the Unburnt a.k.a. the Breaker of Chains.

“Hopped on a boat to an island to say goodbye to the land that has been my home away from home for almost a decade,” she wrote. “It’s been a trip @gameofthrones thank you for the life I never dreamed I’d be able to live and the family I’ll never stop missing #?#lastseasonitis.”

Nathalie Emmanuel, who plays Khaleesi’s right hand Missandei, wrote a more ambiguous tribute to Belfast, where the show often shoots. “When you see the sunrise over Belfast with the people who, over the last 6 years, have become family… in a city that now feels like home. A new day marks new beginnings. Ain’t that the truth…. Love you all you crazy kids ❤️,” she wrote.

Meanwhile, season-one favorite Jason Momoa joined the cast to commemorate the show’s ending. Although he said he was only back for “kisses and hugs and The the black stuff,” some fans speculated he might be back on location for something related to the show’s finale.

“I’m so grateful to be apart of the greatest show on earth. I’m honored to be able to come to Ireland and celebrate with my friends. I’m just here for kisses and hugs and The black stuff ????. mahalo David and Dan you are legends . Congrats to the talented crew and cast. Aloha j,” he captioned a bunch of photos with the cast.

The real waterworks are going to start when Peter Dinklage and Kit Harrington weigh in. At least Harrington doesn’t have Instagram—we know we’re going to lose it when Jon Snow leaves us.

Related Stories:

Emilia Clarke and Jason Momoa Had a Game of Thrones Reunion Literally on the Iron Throne

Sophie Turner May Have Just Spoiled the Game of Thrones Ending With Her New Tattoo

The Game of Thrones Prequel Will Have a Female Showrunner, and We’re So Excited



Source link

Categories
Health

A Federal Judge Ruled That Donald Trump Can't Block Users on Twitter—and of Course Chrissy Teigen Has Thoughts


A federal judge in New York ruled Wednesday that Donald Trump is in violation of the Constitution when he blocks users on Twitter, as he so often does.

In making her ruling, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald wrote that “no government official—including the President—is above the law, and all government officials are presumed to follow the law as has been declared.” She continued, “While we must recognize, and are sensitive to, the President’s personal First Amendment rights, he cannot exercise those rights in a way that infringes the corresponding First Amendment rights of those who have criticized him.”

In short, Buchwald holds that the “interactive space” where users can engage with the President’s tweets should be considered a public forum and blocking people based on their political viewpoints is a violation of their First Amendment rights.

At least one celebrity critic of Trump is looking forward to interacting with POTUS once more. Chrissy Teigen tweeted a video of herself watching news coverage of the decision with the caption, “Well well well we meet again @realdonaldtrump”.

Trump infamously blocked Teigen last July after a fairly innocuous tweet in which she said, “No one likes you.”

At the time she said, “It’s been a long time coming. I have been very anti-Trump since The Apprentice, like when it first started, so it didn’t start during the presidency like everyone thinks. This goes pretty deep.” But it’s not like she was all that bothered. “I don’t even follow him [on Twitter], so I’m definitely fine being blocked,” she continued. “There’s just this part of me that’s so happy that he had to actually do that. It’s just funny.”

The case that resulted in Wednesday’s ruling was brought to court by the Knight First Amendment Rights Institute of Columbia University on behalf of seven individuals who had been blocked by the @RealDonaldTrump account. “We’re pleased with the court’s decision, which reflects a careful application of core First Amendment principles to government censorship on a new communications platform,” Jameel Jaffer, the Knight Institute’s executive director, said in a statement on their site.

“The President’s practice of blocking critics on Twitter is pernicious and unconstitutional, and we hope this ruling will bring it to an end.”

It’s not clear at this moment when or how users once blocked will become unblocked. Will it be en masse? One at a time? Is there a prioritized list? We shall have to wait and see.





Source link

Categories
Health

13 New TV Shows We Can't Wait to Watch This Fall


It might only be May, but networks are already eager to show you what new TV shows are slated for the fall. Which is why, last week, the networks held their upfronts (events where they present plans for new and returning shows to press and advertisers). With this came a slew of trailers from new shows—some promising, others forgettable, many of them starring straight, white dudes. Seriously, how many Serious Medical Dramas do we need on the air?

There are some diamonds in the rough, though—13 to be exact. These TV series, below, are the ones to look out for when the leaves start changing and the pumpkin spice lattes reappear. One of them is the Charmed reboot, which feels appropriate. (Ya know: Witches. Fall. Halloween.) Anyway, watch the trailers below, and set your DVRs accordingly.

Single Parents

Blair Waldorf would have no patience for the character Leighton Meester plays in this new ensemble comedy, which also stars Taran Killam and Brad Garett. (She’d have a lot to say about the clothes.) The show centers around a group of single parents whose kids attend the same school. Killam’s character, though, is so wrapped up in fatherhood that he forgets he’s an adult. But never fear, because the other single parents band together to show him life (read: wine) again. Wednesdays at 9:30 P.M. ET on ABC

[embedded content]

A Million Little Things

Is A Million Little Things the This Is Us of 2018? It’s certainly sad enough. The new ABC drama tracks the lives of a group of Boston friends who stayed in touch through marriages, kids, relationships, and addictions. When one of them unexpectedly dies, it brings out a whole new level of emotional nuance that will translate to you bringing out the tissues. Be warned. Wednesdays at 10 P.M. ET on ABC

[embedded content]

The Red Line

Ava Duvernay is an executive producer on this gut-wrenching new show about a black doctor who’s mistakenly shot by a white cop. The lives of each of these men becomes intertwined in ways that will start conversations and break your heart. Premiering midseason on CBS

The Fix

This legal drama—produced by Marcia Clark—almost plays out like Clark’s dream post-O.J. Simpson scenario. In it, a whip-smart female attorney (Robin Tunney) fails at convicting a high-profile athlete charged with murdering his wife. When he’s suspected of committing the same crime years later, though, she’s given a second chance at putting him behind bars. It’ll be interesting to see what Clark parallels, if any, pop up on this show. Premiering midseason on ABC

[embedded content]

Happy Together

One of CBS’ most promising new shows, Happy Together looks like a pitch-perfect sitcom. Damon Wayans Jr. plays an accountant whose life turns upside down when his client, a Harry Styles-adjacent pop star, asks to crash on his couch for a few weeks. Hilarity ensues. (Fun fact: Styles is actually a producer on this series, and it’s partially based on his life.) Mondays at 8:30 P.M. ET on CBS

[embedded content]

Abby

Seven words: From the producers of The Good Place. That’s all you need to know about this Cheers-adjacent comedy starring Natalie Morales as a backyard bartender. This is where I want to do happy hour from now until the end of time. Premiering midseason on NBC

Murphy Brown

Candice Bergen is returning for this highly-anticipated reboot, and that’s the only reason you need to tune in. Thursdays at 9:30 P.M. ET on CBS

[embedded content]

Untitled Hulu Mindy Kaling Project

Not much is known about Kaling’s new Hulu project—just that it’s inspired by the classic 1994 Hugh Grant film Four Weddings and a Funeral. Need we say more? Coming to TBA

I Feel Bad

Another easy sell is I Feel Bad, which is produced by none other than Amy Poehler herself. The comedy series centers on Emet (Sarayu Blue), a mom, wife, and boss who frequently feels bad about basic problems that life throws her way. From telling her daughter she can’t dance to dream-cheating on her husband, there’s undeniable humor in Emet’s guilt—that’s what makes it fun to watch. Thursdays at 9:30 P.M. ET on NBC

[embedded content]

The Village

From Sons of Anarchy producer Mike Daniels comes this drama from NBC about a group of racially, culturally, and sexually diverse tenants living in a Brooklyn apartment building. Their background differences causes drama that we’ll watch from the claustrophobic confinements of one building. That will no-doubt create a specific kind of relatable tension for anyone whose neighbors are 10 feet away. Premiering midseason on NBC

Proven Innocent

Another intriguing midseason offering: This legal drama from Fox about a wrongfully convicted woman (Madeline Scott) who gets out of jail, becomes a lawyer, and is eager to dethrone the corrupt attorney that put her in prison in the first place. Premiering midseason on Fox

[embedded content]

Charmed

Sure, this new reboot of Charmed is more diverse, both in race and sexuality. (One of the sisters, Mel, is a lesbian.) But will it have the same addictive wit and, well, charm as it predecessor? Only time will tell, but we’re certainly excited to watch. Sundays at 9 P.M. ET on The CW

[embedded content]

Into the Dark

From horror maestro Jason Blum comes this new, 12-episode anthology series on Hulu. Each episode will be feature length and tell its own, standalone horror story. And the best part: It’s premiering right before Halloween. Consider your watch list complete. Starting October 5 on Hulu

Related Stories:

25 TV Shows Everyone Will Be Watching This Summer

20 TV Shows to Watch on Netflix When You’re Feeling Stressed AF



Source link