Categories
Health

The Self-Tanner Taylor Swift Allegedly Buys in Bulk


Prior to this year, if you had told me that I would eventually purchase an entire box of self-tanner, I would have scoffed. This is a product, I thought, that requires practiced, calculated application. It needs to come with the additional purchase of an exfoliating mitt. It will stain every set of sheets and towels I own. Then, spring came, I realized my legs hadn’t seen the sun in almost four months, and I was looking especially washed out. So, despite my reservations, I made a detour to Sephora in the middle of a springtime snowstorm.

“I think I need self-tanner,” I said plaintively, wrapped in my scarf and beanie. The sales associate gave me a look that said, “Say no more,” and walked me over to a wall of bronze bottles. But instead of handing me one, she reached over and, in one fluid movement, presented me with a bright yellow box of Kate Somerville 360° Tanning Towelettes. “This is what you want,” she said emphatically. “Taylor Swift came into the 5th Avenue location once,” she said, suddenly lowering her voice, “and she bought out our entire stock.”

Wondering if it was too good to be true, I looked her straight in the eye. “All of it?” I asked. “Honest,” she said, so seriously I thought she might pinkie-swear on it.

It should come as no surprise that I bought the towelettes. Whether or not they’re actually Swift-approved, I can confirm that they are indeed worthy of stockpiling after using them extensively. Each presoaked towelette comes individually wrapped, making it ideal for travel. They are truly foolproof and create a natural bronze effect, as though you’ve just spent the past two days leisurely drinking CBD-infused seltzer water on the beach. Best of all, even novices can’t mess up the application.

Kate Somerville 360° Tanning Towelettes

Nordstrom

$48

Buy Now

Having never gone near a bottle of faux tan before, I simply did what Google instructed. After showering and exfoliating, I hopped out, dried off, and rubbed the towelette all over my face and body (yes, it can be used on both). I washed my hands after application to prevent overly bronzed palms, put on an old T-shirt, and went to bed. The entire post-shower process took no more than five minutes.

The next morning I woke up aglow. There wasn’t a single orange streak or patch in sight, and I smelled only faintly of lemon-tinged DHA (the ingredient in self-tanner that makes you tan but also has that distinct self-tanner smell). My T-shirt and white sheets were pristine. Perhaps the best way to describe the final effect is that it doesn’t look like you’re wearing any self-tanner, which is kind of the whole point. “You look tan,” my roommate said to me that day. (To my great disappointment, she did not say, “You look like Taylor Swift!”)

One box of eight towelettes will run you $48, which means that each tan comes out to a reasonable $6. The convenience and the long-lasting color (I get about two weeks of wear time out of each sachet) keep me coming back. To maximize usage, I’ll sometimes cut off tiny towelette pieces for touch-ups on the areas that fade faster—like around my ears or on my face. I should also add that these don’t make me break out, which is more than I can say about 95% of the beauty products that I have tried. I have yet to witness Taylor Swift buying these at my local Sephora, but I’m already on my second box, and I’ll be back for more the second I run out.



Source link

Categories
Health

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Allegedly Stole Their New Instagram Handle, and I’m Living for the Drama


Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are many things: philanthropists, activists, roast-chicken eaters. But they’re also, according to a new report from the BBC, a couple of thieves. Yup, you read that correctly. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are apparently out here stealing Instagram handles from civilians.

What am I talking about, you ask? Well, let me take you back to earlier this week, when the couple launched their own Instagram account, @sussexroyal. It’s been active for only three days, and yet it’s amassed nearly 4 million followers. That’s a lot of people wanting to see photos of Markle smiling and waving.

But Page Six reports a @sussexroyal account already existed. A driving instructor from the English county of West Sussex, Kevin Keiley, claims that was the name of his IG for three years. No, this isn’t a Kensington Palace family member you don’t know about: Keiley had that handle because of where he lives and his favorite soccer team, Reading FC, which is nicknamed the Royals.

“I got a jokey text from my son, which said, ‘Ha ha, I see your handle has gone then,’” Keiley told BBC’s Radio 1 Newsbeat. “I thought, What’s that all about? He said, ‘Look on Instagram,’ so I looked on Instagram and suddenly my handle wasn’t @sussexroyal anymore. It was @sussexroyal. It had been taken.”

Taken, he says. The queen needs to launch an investigation immediately. Call Liam Neeson! Call Kris Jenner! Ryan Murphy, I’ve found the next true-crime story you should adapt for Netflix.

Keiley says he was “annoyed” no one from the royal family or Instagram reached out about taking his handle. “I didn’t ask for this,” he says. “I’ve had the account for years. It’s not very pleasant.”

For what it’s worth, Instagram did cop to scooping up the name, citing a policy that permits them to make changes to inactive accounts. (Keiley didn’t post much to Instagram prior to this incident.)

Here’s my question: Are Markle and Prince Harry even aware they took this man’s Instagram handle? How did they find out? Given Markle’s preroyal affinity for social media—RIP, The Tig—she seems like the one who would step in with an explanation. She should call Keiley and be like, “We’re so sorry for taking your Instagram handle; here are 3,000 loaves of homemade banana bread as an apology.” This man lost something near and dear to him, after all. He needs answers, as do I.

The plus side to all of this? Keiley’s Twitter following has grown exponentially: from four to more than 200. We love an influencer on the rise.



Source link

Categories
Health

Gigi Hadid Just Blasted the Paparazzi After She Found Out One Is Allegedly Suing Her


On Thursday (October 18), Gigi Hadid took to Instagram to respond to paparazzi after she found out a photo agency is “legally pursuing” her for reposting a photo of herself without proper permission. “These people make money off us everyday, LEGALLY stalking us day in and day out- for nothing special- for us to walk six feet to a car and six feet into a work building. They drive dangerously close and extremely recklessly; they put the general public in danger in pursuit of a photo (I and many people I know have gotten in car accidents in cabs/car-services because of paparazzi) and it seems that they can never get enough,” she wrote, adding that she typically tries to cooperate as much as possible with photographers.

“All this to say that it is not spoken about enough the mental/emotional toll that this kind of pressure has on people,” Hadid continued. “For someone to take a situation where I was trying to be open, and sue me for a photo I FOUND ON TWITTER (with no photographers name on the image), for a photo he has already been paid for by whatever outlet put it online (!!!), is absurd.”

The 23-year-old went on to express her sympathy for the fan accounts that have been similarly sued and, in many cases, forced to shut down their accounts. “Please know that if I could help more I would, and I think about you all the time,” she wrote. “To the paparazzi, I understand that this is how you make your living, and I respect that this is something I must accept with my job. But there is a line. We are human beings.”

Hadid’s post earned likes from fellow regularly photographed celebs like Kim Kardashian West, Taylor Swift, Chrissy Teigen, Blake Lively, Gisele Bündchen, and more. “We’re ‘public figures’ and it’s legal for them to invade our privacy. it’s pretty disappointing. we gotta change this,” Kylie Jenner commented, while Emily Ratajkowski added, “Yesss thank you.”

Related Stories:

Gigi Hadid’s Brandon Maxwell Rosé Bag Is a Serious Mood



Source link

Categories
Health

Hilary Duff Calls Out Paparazzo for Allegedly 'Hunting Her Down'


Though it can sometimes seem like celebrities live in a completely different world with its own set of rules, it’s important to remember that they’re still people and are just as entitled to their privacy and personal space as the rest of us. Hilary Duff attempted to get this point across over the weekend, when one paparazzo allegedly had been following her around for hours, making her feel preyed upon and “uncomfortable.” On Saturday she shared a video on Instagram in which she confronted the alleged photographer in his car and explained the situation in her caption.

“This guy has been at my [son’s] soccer game this mornin,g then followed me to my [sister’s] house and was basically parked in her [driveway] to get photos. Followed me to run errands,” Duff wrote. “This is not OK. I am [nine] months pregnant. When people say, ‘That’s what you get for signing up to be a celebrity,’ it honestly makes me sick. This is every day of every month, and it’s simply not OK. If a non ‘celeb’ (I’m sorry to use that word) was dealing with this, the law would be involved.”

In the accompanying video, the Younger star appears to have pulled up alongside the accused pap’s car in a parking lot to ask him to stop following her. “I’m nine months pregnant and I have the flu, and I’ve asked you once to leave me alone. Can you please stop taking my picture? You’re, like, hunting me down,” she tells him. He responds by saying he hasn’t gotten any photos of her yet. “It doesn’t matter. I’m just asking you to please leave me alone for the day,” Duff replies. “You’re, like, hunting me down.”

Amid his continued protests, she adds, “I feel very uncomfortable. Please, please leave a pregnant woman alone.” Missing every bit of the point, the photog retorts that he’s “lost [his] whole morning” following her around. “It’s not my fault!” she replies, and correctly so. “Please leave me alone. It’s the weekend, sir, please.”

Duff is far from the first celebrity to call out the paps. Kylie Jenner and Sarah Hyland both recently did so after feeling like their privacy had been invaded by photographers, and when photos surfaced of Bella Hadid hanging out with a friend inside of her own apartment last year, she tweeted, “Whoever thinks it’s OK to photograph into someone’s home and private space is straight-up sick, sad, and f*cked up.”

Related:

Hilary Duff Has an A+ Method for Dealing With Mommy-Shamers



Source link

Categories
Health

This Bride Is Allegedly Making Her Guests Give a $75 Gift to Get Into Her Wedding


If you’ve ever been a bride or attended a wedding, you know to expect some guidelines—no matter how loose or simple—that make sure things run at least kind of smoothly. The vast majority of these guidelines are very reasonable (don’t wear jeans, don’t wear white, no need for a gift, etc.), but occasionally they raise an eyebrow for some people. Take, for instance, the alleged expectations of one bride that are sparking discussion right now.

As Cosmo reported, Reddit user u/laika_cat uploaded a screenshot of an email supposedly sent to guests of a wedding. The email is allegedly from a “wedding coordinator,” but the ridiculous demands, not to mention the numerous spelling/grammar errors, call that into question. The deceptively short list of rules includes a $75+ gift for admission, a mandatory hashtag, and no talking to the bride. Read the full list, below. (Again, keep in mind the obvious spelling errors make the validity of the demands suspicious.)

“Rules and regulations:

  1. Please arrive 15-30 minutes early.

  2. Please DO NOT wear white, cream or ivory.

  3. Please do not wear anything other than a basic bob or ponytail.

  4. Please do not fave a full face of makeup.

  5. Do not record during the seramony.

  6. Do not check in on FB until instructed.

  7. Use #[REDACTED] when posting all pictures.

  8. DO NOT TALK TO THE BRIDE AT ALL.

  9. Everyone will toast with Rémy. No acceptance.

  10. Lastly must come with gift 75$ or more or you want be admited in.”

The email ends with the writer asking guests to call them if they “have any questions or need clarification.”

This isn’t the only bride who has unwittingly gone viral for charging an admission fee for her wedding. A month ago, one couple reportedly had to call off a wedding days before the scheduled date, all because not enough people were willing to send them the $1,500 attendance fee.

Related Stories:

Twitter Can’t Handle This Bride Who Fired Her Bridesmaid Over Email



Source link

Categories
Health

Ashley Judd Sues Harvey Weinstein for Allegedly Damaging Her Career


Yesterday, actress Ashley Judd filed a lawsuit against former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein alleging that her career was damaged by lies he spread against her in the Hollywood community after she rejected his sexual advances. Judd was one of the first women to come forward with her story about the producer. In October, she told the New York Times she remembered thinking of an encounter with Weinstein, “How do I get out of the room as fast as possible without alienating Harvey Weinstein?”

The Times notes that it is rare for people to recover damages in suits such as this, as they can be hard to prove. But Judd appears to have a corroborating witness on her side, Lord of the Rings‘ director Peter Jackson. Judd claims that she was being for a prominent role in the film franchise when suddenly, the talks came to an abrupt halt. She told ABC News that she went from being invited to consider two roles to “poof,” nothing. “We never heard anything back and I remember calling my agent multiple times,” Judd said.

Her lawsuit alleges that Weinstein “torpedoed Ms. Judd’s incredible professional opportunity” by falsely telling Mr. Jackson that Ms. Judd was a “nightmare” who should be avoided “at all costs.” Jackson appears to back this up in a December interview with Stuff. “I recall Miramax telling us they [Judd and Mira Sorvino] were a nightmare to work with and we should avoid them at all costs. This was probably in 1998,” Jackson said. “At the time, we had no reason to question what these guys were telling us – but in hindsight, I realize that this was very likely the Miramax smear campaign in full swing. I now suspect we were fed false information about both of these talented women – and as a direct result their names were removed from our casting list.”

According to the Times, Judd is suing Weinstein for defamation and sexual harassment and for violating California’s broadly written Unfair Competition law, which prohibits “unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business acts and practices.” Her lawyer, Theodore Boutrou Jr says, “Ashley is fighting back, but she also wants to point the way for others” and that “if this isn’t an example of unfair business practice then I don’t know what is.” Judd says that any money won in the suit will be donated to the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund.

Weinstein issued a statement denying Judd’s claims: “The most basic investigation of the facts will reveal that Mr. Weinstein neither defamed Ms. Judd nor ever interfered with Ms. Judd’s career, and instead not only championed her work but also repeatedly approved her casting for two of his movies over the next decade. The actual facts will show that Mr. Weinstein was widely known for having fought for Ms. Judd as his first choice for the lead role in Good Will Hunting and, in fact, arranged for Ms. Judd to fly to New York to be considered for the role. Thereafter, Ms. Judd was hired for not one, but two of Mr. Weinstein’s movies, ‘Frida’ in 2002 and ‘Crossing Over’ with Harrison Ford in 2009. We look forward to a vigorous defense of these claims.”



Source link