Categories
Health

If Those in Power Won't Give Us Our Rights, We Must Fight to Get Them


From the moment then-candidate Donald Trump said that women would deserve “some form of punishment” if abortion were to become illegal, we have been preparing for dire threats to the constitutional right to abortion.

On Wednesday, Justice Anthony Kennedy—the deciding vote on the Supreme Court when it came to protecting the core of the constitutional right to abortion—announced his retirement, creating a vacant seat that President Trump has promised to fill with an anti-abortion justice who will overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court case that established the right to abortion.

Because he has attacked access to reproductive health care at every opportunity, we believe he’ll make good on that threat.

The right of women to make their own decisions about their bodies and their futures will be determined by who fills Justice Kennedy’s seat. So now the balance of the most powerful court is a tug of war between Trump and the 70 percent of Americans who support safe legal abortion.

Of course, this isn’t the first time we have had to fight to save our access to reproductive health.

When Trump promised to repeal the Affordable Care Act and block patients from coming to Planned Parenthood, people from across the country flooded Twitter, the U.S. Capitol, town halls, and congressional inboxes. And we stopped him.

Any justice Trump nominates must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate, so Planned Parenthood and our 11 million supporters will do everything we can to make sure that the Senate only confirms justices who explicitly state they will uphold Roe v. Wade and women’s rights to safe, legal abortion.

Because what happens on the Supreme Court could alter the course of women’s lives for generations.

The stakes are high. At least 20 states would be at high risk of banning abortion outright if Roe is overturned, either because of laws already in place or because they have legislatures and governors so hostile to women’s health that they will jump at the chance to take away our rights. Four of those states already have laws in place that would ban abortion as soon as the court allows.

One of them is my home state of Louisiana, where in 1983, as a freshman at LSU, I became pregnant. I didn’t want to be. Like so many people who find themselves in the same predicament, I was near broke and only beginning to figure out who I was and what I wanted to do with my life. But I knew, without a doubt, that I was not ready to be a mother. I borrowed money and had an abortion at the health center in town.

If it had been illegal in Louisiana, I’m certain I would have found a way to get an abortion in another state. Many women don’t have that option. They have children to feed, bills to pay and jobs that don’t give paid time off. Others don’t have insurance or a car or the savings to pay for their travel and care. Even now, when Roe is the law of the land, too many women must contend with extreme barriers to care, because Louisiana state politicians have spent years chipping away at the constitutional right to abortion and made it as difficult and as burdensome as possible.

Today, I am the proud mother of triplet teenage daughters, daughters I am sure I would not have without that abortion in 1983. When I feel worn out by the news and the work ahead, I think of them. And I think of the 1 in 5 women who come to Planned Parenthood, and how we have changed their lives by helping them to own their own bodies through access to birth control, education, cancer screenings, STI testing and treatment, and abortion.

So much has changed since 1973. Half of American families today have a female breadwinner. We work at every level in every industry. We are CEOs and computer scientists and increasingly members of Congress. Women are more than half of college students. More women are running for office this year than ever before.

When my daughters were growing up, I told them they could be anything they wanted to be. And I believed that. I still believe it.

But I also know, from decades of fighting for women’s rights, LGBTQ rights, voting rights and racial justice, that the world doesn’t become more fair and just on its own.

Those in power don’t simply give us our rights. We have to demand them, and protect them. And sometimes, fight to get them back.

Dawn Laguens is the Executive Vice President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Related Stories:

How Justice Anthony Kennedy’s Retirement From the Supreme Court Could Erode Women’s Rights

A Reminder That We Won’t Need a Full Repeal of Roe v. Wade for Abortion to Be Restricted



Source link

Categories
Health

Ivanka Trump Said She'd Fight For Women. Where Is She On The Border Crisis?


The banner photo on Ivanka Trump’s Twitter feed shows her holding a baby, tenderly nestled to her heart. But even as the president’s daughter visually projects the centrality of motherhood in her life, she’s being called to task for not speaking out publicly about the separation of immigrant children and parents at America’s borders.

The Democratic National Committee this week directly chastised Trump—a high-ranking advisor in her father’s administration—for remaining publicly quiet on the immigration debate despite her vow to serve as a voice for women and families.

“Children are being detained and separated from their families while senior administration official Ivanka Trump attends glamourous fundraisers for congressional Republicans,” the party said in a statement, referring to Trump’s Monday appearance with House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

“Ivanka Trump claims to be an advocate for families in the Trump administration, yet she’s nowhere to be found while men, women, and children are suffering on the American border from this administration’s inhumane family-separation policy,” the DNC broadside continued.

Trump occupies a unique spot in U.S. politics: In addition to her official self-description, which leads off with “wife, mother, sister, daughter,” she was a critical presidential campaign surrogate who went on to take a formal job in the new family business of running the country as an advisor to POTUS for “economic empowerment, workforce development & entrepreneurship,” her bio reads. That positioning both opens her up to criticism on the issue at hand and begs a broader question: How much responsibility does (or should) she bear for her father’s words and actions?

When Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination for president in the summer of 2016, Ivanka was the much-anticipated opening act. Her duty was clear: To paint an empathetic picture of her dad—who’d slashed and burned his way through the primaries—as a man who cared about people, and about women in particular.

“Throughout my entire life, I have witnessed his empathy and generosity towards others, especially those who are suffering. It is just his way of being in your corner when you’re down,” she said from the podium at the Cleveland convention.

“As a mother myself, of three young children, I know how hard it is to work while raising a family. And I also know that I’m far more fortunate than most. American families need relief,” Trump said at the convention. “Policies that allow women with children to thrive should not be novelties, they should be the norm. Politicians talk about wage equality, but my father has made it a practice at his company throughout his entire career.”

Fast forwarding to the current day, Trump has eschewed public comment on the immigration crisis while other prominent women—notably including all five living first ladies—spoke out on the family separations.

Ivanka Trump’s public silence may be well reflective of a conscious choice to take up the searing issue of immigration enforcement with her father and individual lawmakers in private. GOP members of Congress told reporters the president on Tuesday night acknowledged speaking with his daughter about the impact of images showing detainees having their children wrested away from them. The White House subsequently confirmed to CNN that Trump had acted on her offer to speak directly to legislators on the topic.

When asked about the Democrats making an issue of Ivanka Trump’s absence from public discourse on one of the most intensely discussed—and highly unpopular—policies of the day, Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany told Glamour in emailed comments that “no one wants to see families separated at the border, which is why the Trump administration encourages Congress to fix the broken loopholes forcing these separations.”

“For her part, Ivanka Trump will not let the media’s negativity deter her tireless work for women and families both at home and around the world.”

McEneny additionally credited Trump for creating “a fund at the World Bank for aspiring female entrepreneurs,” playing a key role in increasing the child tax credit, and continuing “her push for paid family leave, to name a few of the many important initiatives in her portfolio.”

In the case of GOP lawmakers and hopefuls caught between a conservative (read: pro-Trump) primary electorate and Democratic efforts to topple Republicans in November’s midterms, speaking out is somewhat of a gamble. This month, incumbent Republican Alabama Rep. Martha Roby saw herself forced into a primary runoff—a result analysts have attributed to her vigorous rejection of Trump during his run for president and which other candidates may chalk up as a cautionary tale.

As to why more Republicans haven’t challenged the president more aggressively on the detainee issue, given public sentiment, “It’s really the timing,” a noted GOP strategist explained to Glamour: Republicans are focused not only on the separations, but the future of the legal status of immigrants claiming protections under the tenets of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA program.

“That is a huge priority — not that these children are not a priority, but we have to get the president to stay on board with us to pass DACA, and then hopefully we’ll come out and start supporting the kids and their families,” the Republican said. “I’m sorry the kids aren’t getting the support that they probably deserve, but this is a strategy that we have to continue to implement through the week.”

And when it comes to Ivanka Trump, Anna Sampaio of Santa Clara University’s department of ethnic studies said critics are entirely justified in questioning why she has absented herself from the public arena at a time of national turmoil and whether she’s complicit, in part because she “has wrapped herself in the language of women’s rights, and by virtue of that she has gained a lot of political capital for herself, but also political cover for the Trump administration and the Republican Party generally.”

Trump’s actions deserve particular scrutiny, Sampaio continued, because the furor over immigration and the breaking up of families is “a clear moment” that represents “arguably one of the most important moments for women and children” since the president took office.

The president’s daughter may be taking heat for her dad’s behavior in some of the same ways First Lady Melania Trump has fielded criticism for what he chooses to do and how he acts.

But as for any pushback associated with Trump directly confronting her father, “This is a woman who’s got a lot of privilege and a lot of money and a lot of resources,” Sampaio said.

“I doubt she’s in a very precarious position.”

Related Stories:

Here Are the Facts About Trump’s ‘Zero Tolerance’ Immigration Policy

All 5 Living First Ladies Have Spoken Out About Trump’s Separating Immigrant Families at the Border

Couple Makes Facebook History by Raising $5 Million for Separated Immigrant Families





Source link

Categories
Health

Beyoncé Once Talked Tiffany Haddish Out of a Fight


Girls Trip‘s Tiffany Haddish has had an amazing year. She was the breakout star of a hit summer comedy, announced the Academy Award nominations, signed a deal with HBO, will appear in a Super Bowl ad, and is in talks to work with director Paul Thomas Anderson. But nothing can top the fact that she met the Queen herself, Beyoncé Giselle Knowles-Carter, at a party and got a selfie with Her Majesty—all in the name of world peace.

Take a look:

Speaking to Vulture about her amazing ride, she told as much as she could about how she ended up getting the picture, and the wisdom Bey shared with her. “Okay, so what had happened was, something had went down with somebody at the party, right? I’m not at liberty to say what had went down at the party, but Beyoncé was just telling me to have a good time, and I was like, ‘No, I’m gonna end up fighting this bitch!’ She was like, ‘No, have fun, Tiffany,’ and I said, ‘I’m only going to have fun if you take a selfie with me,'” Haddish said.

“[Beyoncé] said, ‘Okay,’ and then she buried her face in my wig. We took the picture and I was like, ‘Is my wig slipping?’ And she was like, ‘Mmm-hmm.’ But she knew who I was! She came up to me and was like, ‘I think you are so funny, Tiffany Haddish.’ I was like, ‘What? You know me?!’ She said, ‘I’m Beyoncé.’ ‘I KNOW!'”

Okay, now we really need to know who Tiffany was about to fight. Another comedian? Another actress? Someone who said Beyoncé was overrated? Because if that’s the case, honestly, sometimes you just have to take it outside.

Related: Tiffany Haddish Just Called Out Sexual Harassment in Comedy



Source link

Categories
Health

Rose McGowan Is Selling Her House to Pay for Her Fight Against Harvey Weinstein


Earlier this month, Rose McGowan attended the Television Critics Association’s press tour in Pasadena, California, where she told reporters that she was planning to sell her house in order to pay for the legal bills she’s accumulated from “fighting off the monsters.” On Friday, the actress and activist, who has publicly accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault, listed her home near Nichols Canyon in the Hollywood Hills for $1.9 million.

McGowan has said she reached a $100,000 settlement in 1997 with Weinstein about the alleged rape—and was then promptly blacklisted from Hollywood. But the legal bills McGowan has referred more recently to aren’t due to a broken NDA from the settlement: “I never signed an NDA, actually,” McGowan said at the TCA. “That was a mistake the press made, and actually a mistake that I made for a long time. [I was misinformed] by a lawyer that I had signed one, when in fact it turned out I hadn’t. I thought I remember refusing that. I think NDAs, as we’re finding out, can be broken.”

“It’s really scary,” McGowan said in January about her (unspecified) legal battles. “I’m having to sell my house right now to pay legal bills fighting off the monsters.”

McGowan’s house, which she purchased in 2011 for $1.39 million, is being sold by Tracy Tutor Maltas from Bravo’s Million Dollar Listing: Los Angeles.

The actress’ account of her experience with Weinstein and her work as an activist will appear in both her memoir, Brave, and her new E! docu-series Citizen Rose. The book will be available on January 30, the same day as the show’s premiere.

Related Stories:
–Rose McGowan Opens the Women’s Convention by Calling Out Sexual Harassment in Hollywood
–These Are the Women Who Have Accused Harvey Weinstein of Sexual Harassment or Assault
–Meryl Streep Is Trying to Fix Hollywood’s Sexism Problem





Source link

Categories
Health

'This Is Us' Season 2 Episode 11 Recap: The Pearson Three Have Their Biggest Fight Ever


This Is Us is back, and it’s weepier than ever. Huzzah! Read the recap, below—I’m not going to keep you waiting. Spoilers ahead, obviously.

We start with a flashback: Child Kate’s playing Monopoly with Rebecca. Child Randall—the world’s most perfect child—has new glasses, and he’s afraid the kids at school will call him Urkel. Pre-teens are terrible. Child Kate asks Rebecca for more cookies, and Rebecca says they should eat apples instead; it’s awkward. But all of this is interrupted by Mustache Working Dad Jack, who comes home, much to the delight of Kate. (His ‘stache looks particularly off the rails in this shot.)

Jack’s co-worker has a cabin in the Poconos and says he and his family can have it for a full week, if they want. So the Pearsons are going on vacation, which means emotional fuckery is afoot.

Child Kevin arrives to the Poconos a few days after everyone else because he was at football camp or something. Rebecca has to straight-up tell Kevin not to make fun of Randall’s glasses because he’s a monster. And she’s also concerned about Kate, too: She notices everything exciting Kate about their trip revolves around food. Jack says Rebecca’s overreacting and that Kate is just “big-boned.” Oy. There’s a lot to unpack here; hopefully This Is Us deals with this subplot respectfully.

Kate, Kevin, and Jack start playing a football game, and Kate says she’s tired and wants to stop. Jack says she’s been “eating a lot of sweets” and wants her to exercise to be healthy. This upsets Kate, and she runs away. Jack follows her, and she asks him straight-up if he thinks she’s fat. It’s a poignant scene. The actress who plays Child Kate, Mackenzie Hancsicsak, is heartbreaking here.

But you know who isn’t? Child Kevin, who throws a football at Child Randall and calls him “four eyes.” WTF?!? Randall then loses his glasses, and Rebecca immediately thinks Kevin had something to do with it…as she damn well should. Kevin then goes on a rant, saying he “hates” Rebecca and that she “sucks” and their family “sucks.” Well, you know what? I hate him, and I don’t care if he’s a child. He’s the worst! Always and forever!

In the middle of the night during a thunderstorm, Kevin finds Randall’s glasses under the bed and rushes to his parents’ room to tell them. There, he finds Randall and Kate sleeping in the bed with their parents, and there’s no room for him. So he goes to sleep on the floor, which is beyond heavy-handed foreshadowing for what happens in this episode.

Adult Kate

Kate’s packing for something and lamenting about how it’s been a month since she’s seen Kevin. He’s in rehab—remember the DUI from last episode?—and she thinks that’s somehow her fault. Toby takes out the trash, but the bottom of the bag gives in, revealing junk food containers. It appears Kate’s broken her diet, and he looks concerned. I could write an essay about how policing Kate’s eating on this show is icky, but let’s just focus on what happens next. (FWIW, Toby looks considerably less annoying in this episode, and I don’t know why.)

Adult Randall

Randall’s going on a trip, too. Apparently, all of the siblings and Rebecca are visiting Kevin in rehab. We learn Tess hopped into the back of Kevin’s car because she was sad about Déjà moving out of the house. She promises not to run away again, but Randall and Beth are still worried. (Randall also looks hot AF in the jacket he’s wearing, but that’s neither here nor there.)

“If she was doing a little worse, then I could stay here with her and not have to visit your jackass brother.” —Beth, reading Kevin for filth.

Beth, Queen of This Is Us, starts dragging Kevin right out the gate. She calls him a “jackass” and says she’s pissed they have to visit him. They’re both upset with Kevin, but Randall says they need to be there for him because Kevin helped him during his lowest points last year. Essentially, they’re grinning and bearing their anger on this trip, which Beth calls “white people repression.” Iconic.

Adult Kevin

Everyone shows up at the rehab center for Kevin. He emerges looking like his old self; the beard is gone, and he’s enthusiastic and lively. He looks like a damn snack again and, honestly, thank God. He’s very jumpy, though, which is weird. His therapist, Barbara, suggests a therapy session between him, his siblings, and Rebecca, which is going to be interesting.

Kevin apologizes to Kate, Randall, and Rebecca during the session, but it’s clear Randall is pissed because he keeps saying, “We’re here for you, Kev.” (That’s what he and Beth agreed to keep saying to mask their anger toward Kevin.)

But the therapy goes deeper. Kevin says he became an addict because he’s always felt like the third runner-up to Kate and Randall. Kate always had the attention of their father, and Randall their mother. He drowned out his insecurities with football, fame, and then drugs and alcohol. He then says the Pearsons are a family of addicts: Kevin’s one, Jack is one, their grandfather is one, and Kevin suggests even Kate is one—with food—and this strikes a nerve in her. Rebecca vehemently defends Jack, saying he’s “so much more” than an addict.

“Of course, he’s Mr. Rehab.”—Beth, dragging Kevin more.

And then the family completely explodes. Randall says Kevin isn’t an addict, but just desperate for attention. This causes the two brothers to go at it: Kevin says Rebecca’s always loved Randall the most and that Tess hopped in the backseat of his car to avoid the insanity of Randall’s home. This leads to a pretty shocking confession: Rebecca thought Randall was the “easiest” child to love.

The Pearson Three then have a tranquil debriefing on a park bench. Randall says they all view their upbringing through different perspectives and he doesn’t want to “crap all over” Kevin’s. They apologize and smile and make lighthearted jokes about their intense therapy session because this show shifts emotions every five seconds.

Meanwhile, the supporting family members kicked out of the therapy session—Beth, Toby, and Miguel—go have beers at a bar. Their conversation pivots to Jack, who Beth and Miguel dub the ultimate “Pearson no-fly zone.” They say they’ll never meet Jack or live up to him. Toby confesses Kate’s “fallen off the wagon” with her eating and he’s upset she isn’t talking to him about it. It’s clear all three of them feel on the outside of the Pearson gang—no one more than Miguel, who says point-blank he married his best friend’s wife.

Things end with Toby confronting Kate about her secret junk food. But Kate beats him to the punch: She says she has “a lot of issues” with food, so we’ll probably delve deeper into that as the season continues. Honestly, I’m here for that—so long as it’s done carefully and empathetically.

The final scene is rough: Rebecca reveals to Kevin she didn’t think she had to worry about him growing up, and now she’s seeing how she’s wrong. Oof, talk about coming back with a vengeance. This Is Us has me bawling all over again…and rolling my eyes. But mostly crying.

Related Stories:

New This Is Us Photos Offer Big Clues About Kevin’s Fate

This This Is Us Fan Theory Might Just Reveal When We’ll Find Out About Jack’s Death

A Devastating This Is Us Theory Explains Why Kevin Can’t Talk About Jack’s Death



Source link

Categories
Health

How to Fight About Anything—and Win—in 7 Steps


These days avoiding talking about politics is like trying to eat organic at Taco Bell—well-intentioned but ultimately pointless. Whether you thrive on lively debates or dread confrontation, complex and divisive issues are bound to dominate our national consciousness (and conversation) for the next four years. Your challenge, should you choose to accept it: Instead of opting out of tough exchanges, learn how to fight by staying present, standing tall, and speaking up about what matters most to you. As Hillary Clinton recently said in her first video message since Trump took office: “We need strong women to step up and speak out. We need you to dare greatly and lead boldly.”

With so many people’s basic civil rights already under threat by the Trump administration, millennial women no longer have the luxury of taking ours for granted. “To women who are silent because they feel like they’re not a subject-matter expert, I would say that everything starts with a point of view,” says Bo, a 28-year-old product manager in New York City. “If you stay silent, you unwittingly become complicit in what’s happening around you. Stay informed, develop your opinions, and become a fully voiced woman.”

But if you’d still rather jump into the Arctic in February than start a political debate, there are some strategies that can help. Below, experts in the fields of communication and persuasion share their best tips for arguing better, smarter, and more effectively. Even if you thought you weren’t the type, you might be surprised by how satisfying it feels to have the last word on a subject you care about. Mic drop, anyone?

Deprioritize being liked.
Before you can argue well about anything serious, you have to get over the natural craving for approval. “Women tend to want to be liked, so we may back off too easily from our positions when we sense others aren’t agreeing,” says Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Ph.D., professor of psychological and brain sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. “Because the stereotyped view of women is that we agree with others—and if we don’t, we’re nasty women—it’s important to ground yourself in your position and stick with it when you’re trying to persuade others.” So, if you’re at a dinner party and someone starts talking about how Planned Parenthood will be fine even if it’s defunded, don’t keep quiet just because you don’t want to make a scene. Instead, make your point with precision and grace (read on to learn how).

Ask questions—a lot.
Don’t just throw a barrage of opinions and facts at your opponent and expect to win an argument. In order to connect and open up a real dialogue, frame your thoughts as questions, says John Daly, Ph.D., professor in the department of communication studies at the University of Texas at Austin. “Asking questions is almost always better than making indictments,” he says. “Rather than saying, ‘It makes absolutely no sense that you voted that way,’ try saying, ‘Why’d you vote that way? I’m trying to understand.’ Who knows? Maybe they have a really good reason.” And even if you disagree with their reasoning, questions can be the difference between a constructive, civilized exchange or a futile, surly one.

Make it personal.
Offering background on why you have strong feelings about an issue can promote mutual empathy, according to Daly, which makes it easier to be persuasive. “I come from India, where women are abused at home, there’s female feticide, and patriarchal society makes it all but impossible for women to make progress on issues like education and equal pay,” says Kalpana, a 33-year-old management consultant in New York City. “That’s why I believe anything that curtails women’s growth and security shouldn’t be tolerated.” Sharing personal details like this will humanize you to your opponent, help them understand your reasoning, and make them likelier to concede that you’re making a good point. Bo, too, uses this strategy: “I like to start with personal anecdotes that weave into facts to point to a larger, holistic picture. Eliciting empathy from the other side is how you win debates and cause people to shift their mind-set.”

Embody womanhood, not girlhood.
A girl might shy away from conflict, but a woman isn’t afraid to dig in her heels and give someone a piece of her mind. “Be aware of body language to the extent that you don’t try to offset the views you’re expressing with overly feminine stances or behaviors like hair twirling,” says Krauss Whitbourne. Even if you’re feeling nervous on the inside, breathe deeply, maintain eye contact, and resist the urge to make a joke to ease the awkwardness. If you’re uncomfortable with the views this person’s expressing, why not dish it right back and put her or him on the spot? It’s an effective strategy: By projecting courage and power, your message will have a deeper impact.

Use strong language.
Speaking of messaging, an important argument isn’t the time to hold back in the name of diplomacy. “In the political and activist arena, sometimes antagonism and outrage are more appropriate than reason and finding common ground,” says Dana L. Cloud, Ph.D., director of graduate studies in the department of communication and rhetorical studies at Syracuse University. “It’s important to teach all oppressed people, including women, to become confident in speech because confrontation is the only effective strategy to show that certain ideas have no place in our society.” However, harsh terms like liar, bigot, or fascist are more effective when you’re not calling names, so try calmly explaining why experts are comparing some of the President’s actions to dictators like Hitler and Stalin, rather than just label Trump one out of context.

Get specific.
With the current onslaught of headlines, press conferences, tweets, and legislative updates, it can be challenging to home in on individual events and problems. “If it’s 40 different lies coming everybody’s way every day, nobody has the time or attention span to say, ‘Well, the first lie is wrong because of this,’ and so on,” says Yascha Mounk, a government lecturer at Harvard University, in a recent interview on Slate’s Trumpcast. So instead of trying to take a verbal stand on everything that’s happening, Daly suggests getting granular. “If you talk about general issues, it’s hard to find agreement, but if you talk about individual issues, it’s easier to discuss,” he says. “Instead of saying, ‘None of these executive orders makes sense,’ try asking, ‘What do you think about the order on Dodd-Frank?’” Once you’ve heard your opponent out, you can always disagree heartily with his or her position, but dialogue is more productive when the topic is focused and manageable, not large and unwieldy.

Don’t agree to disagree.
You might wonder whether it’s OK to resort to the old adage about “agreeing to disagree” when you can’t come to a mutual understanding. Occasionally it might make sense (say, if you’re arguing with a 90-year-old grandparent), but in most situations, that’s actually taking the easy way out. “In my view you should never resign yourself to agree to disagree,” says Cloud. “I’m not going to tolerate a bigot, a person who opposes marriage equality, or someone who condones sexual assault.” If you’re dealing with a loved one, Cloud suggests breaking off the conversation and expressing sadness that your positions aren’t reconcilable. But with a political antagonist who you have no relationship with, realize that the argument may have no resolution—in fact, it may end in tension or frustration, and that’s OK (assuming it doesn’t escalate to violence). “There are divisions between groups with different ideas about how society should move forward—or backward,” says Cloud. “It’s important to recognize that what we’re struggling over right now really are matters of life and death.”



Source link