Categories
Health

A Timeline Of The Women's March Controversy And Recent Developments


The 2019 Women’s March is scheduled to take place this Saturday. The main event will start in Washington, D.C.’s Freedom Plaza, where demonstrators are expected to rally and eventually march toward the Trump Hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue.

But although Saturday marks the third Women’s March, attendance is projected to be much lower than the previous two years. Much of this is because Women’s March, the organization behind the event, has been marred with controversy after its chairs were accused of a number of issues, ranging from mismanagement to anti-Semitism. Many supporters and partner groups, including the Democratic National Committee, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and EMILY’s List, have pulled out of the upcoming D.C. schedule.

How did this go from the largest protest in history, to one that might be starting to unravel? And what’s happening in states across the country? To find out what’s happening near you, type in your zip code here.

January 2017The movement began with rage: a lawyer in Hawaii, Teresa Shook, and a fashion executive in Brooklyn, Bob Bland, took to Facebook to urge friends to protest Donald Trump’s inauguration. Soon they joined forces, and more women got involved, and together got the permits and port-a-potties and everything else that was needed to stage the largest single-day protest in the nation’s history, the day after President Trump’s inauguration. While there were critiques that the white women were easily jumping into a space where black women had worked for decades, organizers—led by Bland and her other national co-chairs, Tamika Mallory, and Linda Sarsour—worked to build an inclusive coalition of women of all ages, ethnicities, religions, locations, sexualities. Glamour honored the national organizers as Women of the Year for sparking a global movement.

February 2018CNN’s Jake Tapper tweets clips from acontroversial speech given by Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan, in which Farrakhan makes several anti-semitic comments. Tapper notes that Mallory was at the event and that she posted photos of it on Instagram. Criticism of Mallory, and other chairs connected to Farrakhan, spreads on social media.

March 2018The Women’s March organization issues a statement, saying, “Minister Farrakhan’s statements about Jewish, queer, and trans people are not aligned with the Women’s March Unity principles. The world Women’s March seeks to build is one free from anti-Semitism, homophobia, transphobia, sexism, racism, and all forms of social violence.” However, many people take issue with the fact that the statement does not formally denounce Farrakhan. Some call for the co-chairs to step down.

Mallory addresses the backlash in a piece for News One.

October 2018Alyssa Milano brings the Farrakhan controversy up in an interview with The Advocate. Referring to the march’s chairs, she explains that it is “unfortunate that none of them have come forward against him at this point,” and says she will not speak at the next march: “Any time that there is any bigotry or anti-Semitism in that respect, it needs to be called out and addressed. I’m disappointed in the leadership of the Women’s March that they haven’t done it adequately.”

November 2018The Women’s March organization releases another statement, this time defending Mallory and Sarsour. “Women’s March wouldn’t exist without the leadership of women of color, and we stand with Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory,” the statement reads. “Women’s March leaders reject anti-Semitism in all its forms. We recognize the danger of hate rhetoric by public figures. We want to say emphatically that we do not support or endorse statements made by Minister Louis Farrakhan about women, Jewish and LGBTQ communities.”

Sarsour also speaks out through a statement on November 20, saying, “Every member of our movement matters to us—including our incredible Jewish and LGBTQ members. We are deeply sorry for the harm we have caused, but we see you, we love you, and we are fighting with you.”

Meanwhile, the Women’s March discloses financial records to several publications after being hit with accusations of mismanagement. The organization’s chief operating officer, Rachel O’Leary Carmona, said in a statement quoted in the Intercept that releasing the documents was part of a transparency effort. “The power of the Women’s March is in our people. We might not have the most funding, but we have millions of passionate, strong, and diverse women who deeply believe in building an intersectional women’s movement so that we can all get free,” she said.

December 2018Tablet Magazine, an online Jewish publication, publishes a lengthy, 10,000-plus word article that highlights many of the issues surrounding the march and its leaders. The piece accuses Mallory and Perez of making anti-Semitic remarks on more than one occasion.

In a New York Times article a few weeks later, Brooklyn-based activist Vanessa Wruble says she was pushed out of the organization and discusses some of the early schism in the Women’s March. She implied her Jewish identity played a role in her ouster. She has since gone on to help launch another women’s organization called March On.

January 2019Mallory and Bland make an appearance on The View to discuss the accusations against the organization. Both deny an anti-semitic exchange that reportedly took place. In a heated exchange with Meghan McCain, Mallory says that Farrakhan’s words were not her own: “It’s not the way that I speak, it is not how I organize. And I think it is very clear, over the 20 years of my own personal activism, my own personal track record, of who I am. And I should never be judged through the lens of a man.”

Following the segment, the Daily Beast reports that many of the groups that partnered with the 2018 march would not return for 2019, and that one of the largest supporters, the Democratic National Committee, had pulled out.

Despite the controversies, the Women’s March posted in a tweet on Jan. 16 that while the event would relocate because of snow, it would continue. But the conflict has affected other marches outside of Washington, D.C., most notably in New York, where there will be two separate marches since organizers could not come to an agreement. (A third rally, organized by Rise and Resist will take place in Grand Central Station, designed to be more inclusive and accessible for people with disabilities.) Some advocates say women still shouldn’t sit out the events on the 19th: “March with one of them,” Gloria Steinem told the New York Times, “But march.”





Source link

Categories
Health

Trump Judicial Nominee Neomi Rao's Thoughts on Rape Are Sparking Controversy


When Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed and sworn in to the Supreme Court in October, his seat on the prestigious U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit was left vacant. In Novembe, Donald Trump nominated Neomi Rao, who now serves as administrator in the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, an agency within the White House Office of Management and Budget, to fill the seat. “She’s going to be fantastic—great person,” he said at the time.

While it’s no surprise that Trump tapped a nominee whose views are conservative, a new BuzzFeed News report cites pieces that Rao wrote that suggest extreme (and horrific) opinions on women and rape. BuzzFeed discovered a 1994 article from the Yale Herald in which then undergraduate Rao wrote that though a drunk man who raped women should be prosecuted, “a good way to avoid a potential date rape is to stay reasonably sober.” While as many as 50 percent of campus sexual assault cases involve alcohol, Reo, in those writings, put the blame squarely on victims’ shoulders: “And if she drinks to the point where she can no longer choose, well, getting to that point was part of her choice,” she wrote. “Implying that a drunk woman has no control of her actions, but that a drunk man does strips women of all moral responsibility.”

It’s classic victim blaming and while the article is old, it doesn’t do much to calm the fears of those who’ve expressed concern about how Trump nominees might rule when it comes to sexual assault. On social media, the new revelations are sounding warning bells. “What Rao is saying here is that getting drunk means a woman kinda-sorta chose to get raped. Cool defense,” tweeted writer Jill Filipovic.

In a statement to Glamour, End Rape on Campus executive director Jess Davidson said Rao’s comments “are disqualifying for a judicial nominee or anyone interested in holding public office. Her comments condone victim blaming and perpetuate the rape culture in our schools and society that are dangerous to all individuals. Survivors are not ‘responsible’ for the violence they experience, and I am disturbed by Rao’s suggestion otherwise.”

Other writing from Rao uncovered by BuzzFeed News shows equally concerning viewpoints regarding race and LGBTQ+ issues. (In a 1994 column published in the Yale Herald about LGBTQ+ associations on campus, Rao wrote that “[t]rendy political movements have only recently added sexuality to the standard checklist of traits requiring politics.”) Nan Aron, president of the liberal advocacy group Alliance for Justice, told BuzzFeed that Rao’s columns are “consistent with the administration’s support of candidates who make racially insensitive statements and comments hostile to sexual assault survivors.”

“She shouldn’t be awarded a seat on what many view as the second highest court in the country, which is often a stepping stone to the Supreme Court,” Aron said.

Neither Rao nor the White House has commented on this latest development.





Source link

Categories
Health

Bette Midler Sparks Controversy with Vulgar Melania Trump Tweet


Bette Midler has never held back from sharing political topics on her social media accounts, but a recent tweet about First Lady Melania Trump has the iconic performer taking more heat than usual.

The tweet in question, posted on November 14, includes an old photo of FLOTUS from her modeling days—specifically a shoot for British GQ back in 2000, according to People. In it, Mrs. Trump is wearing what looks to be a clear plastic bikini adorned with metal accouterments in the cockpit of an airplane. Midler’s caption reads, “The dry cleaning bill for the upholstery on Air Force One must be insane. #FLOTITS”

To say that many on Twitter were outraged might be a mild understatement. “You know what? Love you, hate what she stands for but NO. Attack her values or lack thereof 100 percent,” one user wrote. “But shaming over showing her body for money when I stand against misogyny makes me uncomfortable no matter the politics of the target.” Another said, “What a crass and inelegant remark. Perhaps upbringing is harder to overcome than previously thought. Money hasn’t bought you class, Betty.”

Others referenced cyber-bullying and the First Lady’s efforts to combat it with her Be Best campaign.

It wasn’t all haters, though—some Midler supporters found the post funny. “Relax people! Bette’s a comedian with every right to make a joke about that ghastly outfit. I wish #JoanRivers were still around to chime in,” a Twitter user wrote. “Now it’s the right wing who is being overly PC…THIS is bullying? Hypocrites.”

“You’re getting a lot of flack for this tweet from fans,” said another. “Not from this fan, I thought it was hysterical. Melania offers nothing for young women to inspire them.

Neither Midler nor Trump’s office has made any further comment.





Source link

Categories
Health

NBC Cancels Megyn Kelly’s Morning Show Following Blackface Controversy


Megyn Kelly Today has been canceled by NBC following comments she made about wearing blackface on Halloween in a Tuesday taping. An NBC spokesperson said in a statement to Glamour, “Megyn Kelly Today is not returning. Next week, the 9:00 A.M. hour will be hosted by other Today coanchors.” Though Kelly made an on-air apology, rumors have been swirling about the future of the show for days and she did not appear live on Thursday or Friday morning after NBC confirmed to People that it would air taped episodes for the remainder of the week. “They’re contacting the staff and reassigning everyone today. Everyone’s being told that they still have a home here, but it won’t be on Megyn’s show,” one source told People.

The Tuesday incident had some believing that Kelly was defending blackface, asking “What is racist?” She added: “You do get in trouble if you’re a white person who puts on blackface for Halloween or a black person who puts on whiteface for Halloween. Back when I was a kid that was OK as long as you were dressing up as, like, a character.”

“I can’t keep up with the number of people we’re offending just by being normal people,” Kelly continued.

The backlash was swift. Kelly’s Today colleagues condemned her behavior on the air. “She owes a bigger apology to folks of color,” Al Roker said. And Craig Melvin called her statement “ignorant and racist.”

Kelly was a contentious hire for NBC from the start, given her background at Fox News, where she had a reputation for inflammatory statements like declaring that Santa Claus and Jesus could only be white. And the controversies didn’t stop once she took over the nine o’clock hour of Today. There was an awkward interview with Jane Fonda during which Kelly kept pressing the actress to speak about her plastic surgery. Then there was the time she joked with Suzanne Somers about sex while asleep. Or when she spoke out against gun control after the Las Vegas shooting.

The show has also struggled in the ratings, which is a problem for the network when Kelly is signed to a contract that is reportedly worth $23 million a year. Sources say that Kelly is still negotiating her exit package from NBC which could amount to tens of millions of dollars.

Reactions on social media were mixed, with some praising the choice to cancel the show and others finding it unfair.

Kelly has yet to comment on the cancellation.





Source link

Categories
Health

A Complete Breakdown of the Garrett Yrigoyen Controversy on 'The Bachelorette'


Garrett Yrigoyen was one of Becca Kufrin’s favorite suitors on her first night as the Bachelorette—so much so that she gave him the coveted first impression rose. But Bachelor Nation’s impression of Yrigoyen quickly wilted when reports surfaced he has a history of liking bigoted memes on Instagram. What followed in the days after this story came out was dramatic, even by Bachelorette standards.

If you’re just now catching up on this controversy, don’t worry: We broke it down, below, so you’ll know exactly what your Bach friends are talking about.

May 24: Former Bachelor contestant Ashley Spivey posts a series of tweets claiming Yrigoyen “liked” several Instagram posts that made offensive jokes about boys who wear makeup, Caitlyn Jenner’s transition, and the Parkland shooting survivors, among other topics.

“Can we do a better job of social media deep dives on the dudes that try out for #thebachelorette – FYI douchebags we can see your likes [sic]…After Lee’s problematic @$$, [sic] I truly thought this would be something we paid better attention to,” Spivey tweeted, referring to Bachelorette season 13’s Lee Garrett, whose racist tweets were discovered after his appearance on the show. “A contestant on this season of #thebachelorette liked all of these posts on Instagram and I’m thinking it will be very hard to pull for the type of person likes [sic] any of this.”

Check out her tweets—and Yrigoyen’s alleged “likes”—below:

Neither Kufrin nor Yrigoyen immediately responded to the tweets, and ABC told Glamour they had no comment. However, the silence was short-lived.

May 30: Kufrin gives an interview to E! News about Yrigoyen. “I’ve heard a little bit about it these past couple days,” she said. “I’ve just been so busy traveling around the country with press that I haven’t really been able to read too much up on it, but everyone is entitled to their own opinions, and at the end of the day I wanted to go on this journey to open up myself and have people see my love story unfold, and I would hope that they would stay open and respect me but also stay open and respect these 28 guys that went along on the journey with me.”

She expanded on the subject in a second interview with ON with Mario Lopez, according to People. “I met 28 guys who our ideals weren’t always the same,” she said. “They have different interests. They have different hobbies, different things that they believe, and that’s what’s been so great about getting to know these guys, because everyone has different viewpoints and that’s what I loved about this journey…I just want everyone to watch it back and to get to know these guys and to get to know me for who we really are and not social media, because that’s just a small glimpse into a person and it’s not always reflective of who they are.”

May 31: Late Thursday night, Yrigoyen took to his new Instagram account—he deleted his old one with the offensive “likes” attached—to confirm this activity was true and that he deeply regrets it. Below, read his full response:

To those who I have hurt and offended: This is all new to me. I wenton the Bachelorette for the adventure and possibility of falling inlove, not fame. “I did not know what to expect once the show aired. Iam sorry to those who I offended, and I also take full responsibilityfor my ‘likes’ on Instagram that were hurtful and offensive,” hecontinued. “garret_yrigs12 was my former Instagram handle and Idecided to take it down and start fresh because I have learned anextremely valuable lesson and am taking steps to grow, become moreeducated, and be a better version of myself. I am not perfect, and Iwill never be anywhere close, but now I will always be more informedand aware of what I am liking and supporting, not just on Instagram,but in life. I never realized the power behind a mindless double tapon Instagram and how it bears so much weight on people’s lives. I didnot mean any harm by any of it. My Instagram ‘likes’ were not a truereflection of me and my morals. I am not the negative labels peopleare associating me with. For those who do know me, I am a sincere,genuine, loving, light-hearted, open-minded and non-judgementalindividual. I like to make new friends with anyone I meet and wanteveryone to find their happiness. I love to laugh often and enjoyseeing others do the same. I hope that some day you can get to knowthe real me and the man that I am. Let my mistakes be a lesson forthose who mindlessly double tap images, memes. and videos on anysocial media content that could be many things including hurtful,degrading, and dehumanizing. I do not want my social media to definewho I am, and I will take better care moving forward to support allwalks of life. Again, I sincerely apologize and am sorry for any hurt,damage, or offense I may have caused.”

And so ends this drama—for now. Let’s see how the rest of The Bachelorette unfolds this season.

Related Stories:

Bachelorette Fans Are Divided Over Garrett Yrigoyen’s Social Media History

Arie Luyendyk Jr. Will Reportedly Make an Appearance on This Season of The Bachelorette

Aly Raisman’s Ex Colton Underwood Is Competing on The Bachelorette, and Twitter Can’t Deal





Source link

Categories
Health

'Bachelor in Paradise' Season 4 Episode 1B Recap: The Cast Addresses the Corinne-DeMario Controversy


There are three parts to tonight’s Bachelor in Paradise: the wedding of Carly and Evan, a discussion of the situation that caused the production shutdown, and then a normal segment of the show. If you are upset by the discussion of an alleged sexual assault, I urge you to think carefully before watching this episode (if you haven’t already) or reading that part of this recap. Your mental health is much more important than knowing what happens on this episode. If you are currently struggling in the aftermath of a sexual assault, you can call RAINN’s National Sexual Assault Telephone Hotline at 800-656-4673.

Part 1: Carly and Evan Getting Married

balayage

Thankfully, the wedding special kicks off with a recap of who TF Carly and Evan are, since I missed their seasons. Carly is a singer who cried on the beach. Evan is “in the business of erectile dysfunction” and fought with someone named Chad. Carly’s eyebrows are, uh, ambitious, in their quest to dominate her face.

Apparently Evan FAKED HIS OWN DEATH to get Carly’s attention, which is…I mean, I’m sure he was doing it as a joke, but that’s a terrifying tactic—to make someone think that you will die if they leave you. He proposed by asking, “Will you freakin’ marry me?” but, sadly, did not proceed to do a kickflip and ollie away.

Now there’s a montage of couples of old; we’re throwing it all the way back to Trista and Ryan, the only good couple to come out of this franchise, TBH.

(I just checked Twitter, and for the first time since I started recapping, the show is not trending in my feed during the episode. Hmm, I wonder what happened today that people want to talk about instead?)

Nick and Vanessa (from The Bachelor, not Nick and Vanessa Lachey) arrive at the wedding, looking as unenthused as ever. I notice that one of Carly’s bridesmaids is pregnant. And then I realize that it’s Jade, at whose wedding Nick and Liz had sex. And now I’m furiously Googling, “How much info can the brain hold?” because if mine gets any fuller with Bach info I’m scared what may happen.

“He’s a weird, crazy, quirky, wonderful, deep, compassionate person” –
Carly about Evan

No shade, but Ashley I. kinda looks like if Emily Ratajkowski did her makeup drunk.

Wells, our BiP bartender.

Some stuff that’s happening at this wedding: aggressive flower crowns, a wooden recorder, Evan crying, a lotta unbuttoned shirts on the menfolk.

“You look so beautiful. I love you.” – Evan to Carly

I have nothing catty to say about their vows. They love each other! They get each other! They make each other laugh! Carly makes a Friends reference (“you’re my lobster”)!

A Mexican shaman and his wife arrive to perform a ritual marriage ceremony. I wish we had more context for this. It’s great to learn about other cultures’ wedding traditions, but it feels a little random thrown in for 10 seconds? I’d like to understand the significance of the smoke and the feathers.

One of the twins says that Carly got her “happily Evan after.” That pretty much sums it up.

Part 2: The Corinne-DeMario Debrief

Paradisers return.

We’re headed to Paradise, sans Corinne and DeMario. The narrative has skipped through last week’s cliffhanger and the days of the shutdown; we’re back in the cabanas with the remaining contestants. But first, Chris is conducting a group…chat-sesh? “A serious talk,” he says.

Chris says (paraphrased): Warner Brothers hired a firm, they looked at the footage and talked to everyone, and they concluded nothing bad happened between cast members.

The contestants essentially agree. The consensus here is that the controversy was blown out of proportion; the media misunderstood what the producers do; and no one did anything wrong. Derek explains that the producers don’t manipulate or “puppet-master” the contestants. Taylor points out that she doesn’t drink alcohol and has never been pressured to drink by the production.

Diggy brings up the racial aspect: DeMario is a black man who will now be forever linked to unseemly allegations. Chris asks the cast if they think race “played a part in this” (what is “this”?), and some of them nod and solemnly say “yes.” Then we cut to commercial.

Here, I’d like to reiterate what I said in my recap of last night’s episode: We don’t know what happened, and we don’t need to know. We are not entitled to more information about what transpired between Corinne and DeMario.

Even if none of the alleged incidents crossed the line in this case, we do know that there are, definitely, many, many women and people of all genders out there who have been hurt by sexual assault, and one and effective way to support them is to process our country’s massive backlog of untested rape kits. You can learn how to support that effort here.

Aaaaaand we’re back. To talk more about race. Raven and Jasmine speak eloquently about how black men are often unfairly punished for interacting with (or even existing near) white women. They also state that they did not slut-shame Corinne—but then they go in on Corinne’s statement, calling it vague and from a lawyer. Danielle even says that she claimed to be “a victim” to “save face.” Raven brings up her own sexual assault in an abusive relationship and hopes that “this” doesn’t deter “actual victims” from coming forward (hmmm).

Now we’re doing Consent 101: verbal consent is best, nonverbal consent also exists (but please try to get the verbal one), and you have to have consent throughout. An unconscious person cannot give consent; a too-drunk person cannot give consent. All true!

Last week, I wanted the show to take a moment to talk about consent. I’m glad they did, though this cursory overview feels inadequate. At the same time, if your consent education is entirely comprised of points brought up on Bachelor In Paradise, you need to educate yourself (and also, I’m not surprised, because the American education system does a lousy job of teaching this).

Part 3: Back to Paradise

Well, they didn’t fly all the way back to Mexico just to talk about race and then go home again, so the contestants unanimously agree that Paradise is BACK ON. With Lacey!

In gender-segregated groups, everyone recaps who they like and how they think the roses will play out. Apparently, Dean and Kristina went on a road trip during the production shutdown. Taylor cries. She was definitely the type of kid who would go to slumber parties but then have her mom pick her up right before everyone went to sleep so that she could wake up in her own bed.

meh.

“Every action that I’ve made so far has been in pursuit of a rose with
her.” – Alex

Maybe they’re being given an unfair edit, but Alex and Amanda seem like two of the most boring people on the show. Alex says “de-conflicting” which is not a word. Apparently Amanda has two children. Huh!

This is what Amanda makes me think of:

[embedded content]

Alex pulls Amanda aside to more or less beg her for/pressure her into giving him a rose. And she’s like, “it’s a friendship rose.”

Lacey is wandering around being annoyed that she doesn’t have a guy. (Me AF.)

Our apparent leader, Raven, leads the group down to Taylor and Derek to present them with their date card.

Lacey is crying.

Derek and Taylor go on a candlelit “Dia De Los Muertos”-themed dinner date…even though that holiday is in October.

Dean and Kristina (Deantina?) cuddle. It rains.

Derek and Taylor spend the night together.

Jasmine cries because she wants to party and Matt wants to sleep.

Dean and Kristina have a weird, tense talk.

This show is putting me to sleep.

With minutes left in the episode, some unseen guy arrives. There is no rose ceremony. The “this season” promo is expectedly crazy; the highlight is definitely Taylor talking about her “emotional piggy bank.” Dean cries!

Parting Thoughts: Next week’s episode is on Tuesday because of football.



Source link