Categories
Health

President Donald Trump Admits He's Not A Feminist


In a promotional tweet for his show Saturday night, Piers Morgan tweeted what he thought was a juicy sound bite from his soon-to-air interview with President Donald Trump.

“BREAKING NEWS: President Trump has declared he is NOT a feminist,” Morgan wrote.

Given the tone of Morgan’s latter responses to users, one can likely assume he’s throwing in some dry British humo(u)r here. After all, just one week ago, Trump trolled the Women’s March by urging the American public to march in celebration of the great economy instead.

According to Morgan’s tweet this is exactly what Trump said in his interview after he was asked if he were a feminist. “I think that would be, maybe, going too far,” he said. “I’m for women, I’m for men, I’m for everyone.”

Morgan expanded on Trump’s response for his Daily Mail column: “No, I wouldn’t say I’m a feminist,” Trump said, according to Morgan. “I mean, I think that would be, maybe, going too far. I’m for women, I’m for men, I’m for everyone. I think people have to go out, they have to go out and really do it, and they have to win. And women are doing great, and I’m happy about that.”

Of course, being a feminist—at its most elemental level—means that you believe that the sexes should be equal, so “going too far” really shouldn’t be an issue. And for women, to “go out” and “really do it” and “win” is a lot harder when you have a wage gap and systemic sexual harassment to deal with.

While the President’s admission is not entirely surprising to the general public—not since those Access Hollywood tapes, at least—Morgan’s tweet did elicit a lot of thoughts on social media.

Related Stories:
12 Things to Watch This Week (Including, Yes, the State of the Union Address)
Melania Trump’s Spokesperson Has Addressed All Those Infidelity Rumors
Maxine Waters Will Follow Trump’s First State of the Union By Giving Her Own Speech





Source link

Categories
Health

What It's Really Like to Travel With Vice President Mike Pence? One Female Journalist Explains Her Experiences Thus Far


You may have seen the hashtag #PenceFence erupt on Twitter this week, after female journalists covering Vice President Mike Pence‘s trip to the Western Wall in Israel were forced to report from the other side of a fence, behind their male colleagues. Some of those journalists, unsurprisingly, were not happy about it—and said as much on Twitter. Prominent Israeli journalist Tal Schneider wrote: “Separation at the Western Wall. The women stuck in isolation and can not photograph, work. Women journalists are second-class citizens.”

This incident had especially viral potential, considering what Pence has said in the past about working with women. Pence previously made headlines when comments re-surfaced that he does not dine alone with a woman other than his wife, and that he won’t attend events where alcohol is served without his wife, either. Both rules, of course, got their own share of blowback.

But Jenna Johnson, a political reporter for the Washington Post, who was traveling with the Vice President on his Middle East trip, says that the Vice President’s team was actually advocating on behalf of the women reporters at the Western Wall. We asked Johnson, who just completed her second international trip with Vice President Pence, to give us the inside scoop on what she saw happen in Israel—and what it’s really like to work alongside Pence as a reporter, who is, you know, a woman.

Can you explain the story behind #PenceFence? What happened at the Western Wall this week, when women journalists were forced to stand behind male journalists?

When you visit the Western Wall, you get put into two groups: Men can go to one section, and women can go to another section. There is talk in Israel of adding another section, where men and women can go, and that idea has caused a big controversy. Last year, it seemed like everyone had reached a mutual agreement—there could be a co-ed section—but that upset the ultra Orthodox jews in the area, so Prime Minister Netanyahu closed that plan. So again, anytime you go to the wall, men and women are split up. That complicates a visit like the one that Pence did, because only the men would be able to see it.

Who controls the rules at the Western Wall? It’s not Pence, to be clear.

Correct. It is called the Western Wall Heritage Foundation. The Vice President was a guest there. And while his staff did work with them to get everything ready, it is their wall. They set the rules. And the [Western Wall Heritage Foundation] set up a work-around. They put up a platform on the male side so that all of the men could be a little higher up and get a good look at the Vice President. Then they made a platform on the female side, so that women could stand over the wall and look over and see the Vice President. This is the same setup that they did when President Trump was there. In the van ahead of time, [the Vice President’s] staff explained to us that this is how it works, this is what to expect. Once we got there, we got out of the vans. The male reporters went one way, the female reporters went another way. We got to our section and there were a number of female journalists, a lot of them local, who were already there. And they were very upset. Because on the women’s side, you just don’t have as great of a view as the guys do. We were behind them.

Did the Pence team step in to try to resolve the situation for the female reporters?

The Vice President’s office had really jumped in and tried to make things better. They added chairs to the women’s side—that way we could stand up on chairs and be a little bit higher. There had been some rain earlier in the day, so there was actually a little tent up over the men. It totally blocked the view that the women had, so they took the tent down.

Did the set-up obstruct your view, or prevent you from doing your job in any way, shape, or form?

For me, as a print reporter, I reported in a little notebook with a pen, and I was able to stand on a chair, see the Vice President through the crowd, and get what I needed for my story. But it was a big problem for women [reporters] who were taking photos—or taking video. One woman who ran a television station said, “The guys who did their stand-up [shots] were able to have the Western Wall as their backdrop. When I did my stand-up, there was a crowd of people behind me.” They felt like it was not fair, and they started tweeting about it.

Do you think the Pence team handled the situation well? Do you wish they handled anything differently?

I think they were honestly trying their best to make it as good of a situation as possible. Again, we walked into a hot topic—there is a lot of disagreement over who can go where at the Western Wall. So given that, they did their best to try to make it as good as they could. And anytime a United States’ leader is traveling overseas, the [leader’s] communications [department] has a tough job of trying to negotiate how much access American reporters can get, especially in countries that aren’t used to that. Earlier in the trip, we were in Egypt and President el-Sisi’s staff did not want American reporters to come into a meeting that Pence and el-Sisi were having. And at one point, we were trapped in a bus for a couple of minutes. The security guard barred us from going into the Palace and doing our jobs. It actually took Pence’s staff passing a note to the Vice President during the meeting—and letting him know what was going on—so that he could appeal to el-Sisi himself to get the issue resolved. So this is part of being a reporter overseas: Navigating countries and the way they handle journalists.

“The Vice President really makes an effort to get to know thereporters who are traveling with him … On our way back [from theMiddle East], we could look up and see him standing there in hissocks, talking to his staff.”

What is it like to travel with the Vice President?

This was my second trip with him. Right before Christmas, we did a secret trip to Afghanistan to see troops there. These are often really long days. You’re watching something unfolding and trying to absorb every detail. Or you’re writing as quickly as you can, to get your story in before you lose wireless. Or you’re exhausted and sleeping.

Do reporters have any informal interaction with the Vice President on these trips?

The Vice President really makes an effort to get to know the reporters who are traveling with him. At the beginning of the [Middle East] trip, and at the end of the trip, he and his wife would come back and thank us for coming along and chat with us about what was to come or what had happened. On our way back, we could look up and see him standing there in his socks, talking to his staff. He didn’t have any shoes on, chatting with his staff. [Laughs.]

What were your biggest takeaways from this Middle East trip?

Back in December, President Trump announced that the United States was going to formally recognize Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel. It’s a decision that pretty much every ally urged him not to make. It has not been popular over in the Middle East, other than in Israel, and so, at each stop, this is something that was being talked about, whether publicly or behind closed doors. When we were in Jordan, King Abdullah [II] publicly laid out his concerns, and was kind of lecturing the Vice President about it. But Vice President Pence did not budge at all on this decision. At the end of the trip, he was as confident as ever. He heard the concerns, but he really didn’t see that much protest while he was there, because we were kept to barricaded-off streets, red carpets, palaces, and things like that. And he was welcomed, in Israel, as a hero. He became the first Vice President to address the Knesset, which is the Israeli parliament, and there were trumpets playing and people cheering. I think, for him, this trip just confirmed that the Trump administration made the right decision, despite what others might be saying.





Source link

Categories
Health

No, Oprah Is Not Running for President in 2020


Ever since Oprah’s Cecil B. DeMille Award acceptance speech at the 2018 Golden Globes, the rallying cry from the masses has been one insisting that she take her powerful rhetoric to the campaign trail and run for President of the United States in the next election. Throughout the speech, Oprah mentioned her support of the Time’s Up and #MeToo movements, resonating with the actresses in the audience and the viewers at home. The acceptance speech was not just a simple, humble pep talk—it was naturally very poised and did feel somewhat presidential, and left many in tears as they stood to congratulate her for the award.

“Oprah 2020” has become a slogan hoisted upon Oprah, with friends like Meryl Streep endorsing a presidential run from the queen of all media. In a cover interview with InStyle, Oprah has finally addressed the subject of “Oprah 2020,” insisting that she is by no means interested in running for President of the United States. “I’ve always felt very secure and confident with myself in knowing what I could do and what I could not. And so it’s not something that interests me. I don’t have the DNA for it,” she said. Even Gayle has sided with Oprah, telling her best friend, “I know, I know, I know! It wouldn’t be good for you—it would be good for everyone else.”

“That’s not for me,” Oprah told InStyle, after revealing that someone had offered to help start her campaign. Even if there was a chance that having Oprah in office could be even mildly medicinal for all of us, we have to trust that Oprah knows herself better than anyone else. And she already has enough on her plate: Oprah is scheduled to return to 60 Minutes on CBS, getting back to her roots as a journalist on assignment, and she recently volunteered her time and efforts towards cleaning up in the Santa Barbara fires and Montecito mudslides.

Related: Behold Oprah’s Glorious Backstage Golden Globes 2018 Speech, Which Rivaled Her Showstopper on TV





Source link

Categories
Health

Oprah for President in 2020 Is Apparently Not a Far-Fetched Possibility


Oprah for President” is a campaign that has been wistfully bandied about by her devotees for quite a while now, but after her incredible speech at last night’s Golden Globes, it’s evolved into a matter a little more serious—and it seems like Oprah might be embracing the idea.

#Oprah2020 began trending on Twitter toward the end of the night after she wrapped her passionate acceptance speech for the Cecil B. DeMille Award. The first black woman to be awarded the honor in its 66-year history, her speech—mixing shade at the current administration, tribute to women living in a “culture broken by brutally powerful men,” and some incredibly inspiring words to remind us all that “a new day is on the horizon”—brought the room to its feet.

The L.A. Times found her at her table, where she was sitting with Gayle King and Ava DuVernay (power trio), and asked her about Twitter’s proposed campaign. She smiled, and replied, “OK!”

We’re not entirely sure whether she’s joking there, but the Internet promptly erred on the side of “This speech was her kicking off her campaign”—hence the trending hashtag.

Her partner, Stedman Graham, didn’t do much to damper the excitement, either: The Times asked him whether she would actually, IRL, you’re-not-messing-with-us-are-you run for president, and he replied: “It’s up to the people. She would absolutely do it.” Twitter hype aside, that sounds like a legit, firm response saying “If you want Oprah to be president, she will forge onward and make it so.”

Of course, a few pointed out that, somewhat like the current president, she doesn’t have legislative experience (at least she’s an actual self-made billionaire, though?). One Twitter user gave a different, but incredibly valid, take: “Y’all want #Oprah2020 so bad? Prove it. Spend this year electing Black women to office in 2018. Put in the work. Show some receipts. Then we can talk about the presidency in 2020. Deal?”

Keeping in the spirit of the evening, getting more women in politics—especially women of color in politics—is an incredible way to keep crumbling away at the structure of men who abuse the system and the power they have. Whether or not #Oprah2020 becomes a real thing, turning out on Election Day this year to empower women on the ballots is one thing that will have tangible, lasting impact.

Related Stories:
Oprah Winfrey Accepts Cecil B. DeMille Award at 2018 Golden Globe Awards With Empowering Speech
8 Unforgettable Speeches From 2017 That Every Woman Needs to See
Reese Witherspoon on Running for Office and Working with Oprah





Source link

Categories
Health

President Trump Tweets He Turned Down Time Magazine's 2017 Person of the Year Award


In just a couple of weeks, we’ll find out who has the distinction of being Time’s 2017 Person of the Year—typically, yes, a person (though it can also be a group, object, or idea) who has most influenced the year’s events, whether that’s in a good way or not so much. Last year, the nomination went to just-elected, not-yet-inaugurated Donald Trump. But the now-President is apparently contemplating his place in the canon once again: On Friday, Trump tweeted that he was “PROBABLY going to be named” (emphasis his) Person of the Year once again; however, he wrote, he turned the magazine’s offer down because “probably” just wasn’t good enough. And it wasn’t long before Time issued a correction to Trump’s story.

Trump tweeted, “Time Magazine called to say that I was PROBABLY going to be named ‘Man (Person) of the Year,’ like last year, but I would have to agree to an interview and a major photo shoot. I said probably is no good and took a pass. Thanks anyway!”

A few hours later, the magazine tweeted its response, stating, “The President is incorrect about how we choose Person of the Year. TIME does not comment on our choice until publication, which is December 6.”

Even the chief content officer of Time Inc. tweeted to clarify Trump’s claim: “Amazing. Not a speck of truth here—Trump tweets he ‘took a pass’ at being named TIME’s person of the year.”

Of course, Twitter users threw their two cents into the ring about Trump’s tweet—and the results were incredible.

(Speaking of, it’s worth noting that #MeToo is currently beating Trump in Time‘s reader poll for Person of the Year nominations.)

When Trump was named 2016’s Person of the Year, he told Matt Lauer that he considered it “a very, very great honor.” Meanwhile, the magazine’s then-editor-in-chief, Nancy Gibbs, wrote about Trump’s nomination following the announcement: “So which is it this year: Better or worse? The challenge for Donald Trump is how profoundly the country disagrees about the answer.”

It’s not the first time Trump’s had a thing about Time: He often brags about the number of times he’s appeared on the publication’s cover. He’s even claimed to hold the record for number of cover appearances, at 14—however, former President Nixon has had more than three times as many. Earlier this year, it came out that Trump displayed fake issues of Time with his face on the cover in five of his golf clubs.

In the meantime, we’ll be waiting to find out who the person of the year actually will be—but for now, it seems we can chalk Trump’s tweet up to fake news.

Related Stories:
Michelle Obama Is the Best Candidate to Beat Trump in 2020, Says Bill Clinton Pollster
Trump’s Team Reportedly Staged a “Twitter Intervention”
Hillary Clinton Had the Perfect Response to Trump’s Mean Tweets About Her Book





Source link

Categories
Health

Samantha Bee Says Ivanka Trump Might Be America's First Woman President


It’s now one year since Donald Trump was elected president—and what a whirlwind year it’s been. As the President has issued a controversial travel ban, cracked down on protections for young undocumented immigrants, attempted to undermine the Affordable Care Act, and routinely lashed out on Twitter, millions of Americans are counting down the days till his term is up. But if you ask Full Frontal host Samantha Bee, Trump might have ushered in a new political dynasty—one that First Daughter Ivanka Trump could one day lead.

During a Q+A with fellow actress/comedian Ana Gasteyer at this year’s New York Comedy Festival, Bee was asked whether she thinks there will be a female president in her lifetime. The good news: Yes, she does think there will be a woman in charge of the White House. The bad news: she thinks that woman will be Ivanka Trump.

“I feel so sad that you asked me that question because I’m gonna give you my honest answer…It’s gonna ruin everyone’s night,” Bee said during Tuesday’s event. “I honestly—I’m so sorry…I think maybe our first female president might be Ivanka Trump.”

Bee then turned to Gasteyer for confirmation as the audience audibly gasped. “Right?” she asked.

Gasteyer, however, wouldn’t back Bee up—but she did think that Trump has opened

“No, I can’t ‘right’ you on that,” she said. “I do think we may go into an era of dumb shits that are popular.”

Gasteyer continued, “I think this all about charisma and popularity. He’s the most hateful, tremendously terrible leader but something about Americans needs to have someone that they recognize from television.”

Further building her case, Gasteyer predicted we might see a Real Housewife run for office—or even a President Honey Boo Boo one day.

Who knows? In this post-Trump political world, sadly, anything is possible.

Watch the full Q+A below:

[embedded content]



Source link