Categories
Health

Meryl Streep Just Broke Her Own Oscars Record for the Most Acting Nominations


Typical Streep! Grande Dame of film acting Meryl Streep was just nominated for Best Actress for her role as Katharine Graham in Steven Spielberg’s The Post, a historical drama about The Washington Post battle against the Nixon administration to publish the Pentagon Papers. This is Streep’s 21st acting nomination, breaking her own record for most nominated actor ever. She’s well ahead of the game, since Jack Nicholson and Katharine Hepburn are tied for second place, with a measly 12 nominations apiece. While Streep is the most nominated actress in history, she isn’t actually the biggest winner; while she and a handful of others have three statuettes at home, Katharine Hepburn is the only person ever to take four for acting.

“I am honored beyond measure by this nomination for a film I love, a film that stands in defense of press freedom, and inclusion of women’s voices in the movement of history,” Streep said in a statement, per the Huffington Post following Tuesday’s nominations announcement. “Proud of the film, and all her filmmakers. Thank you from a full heart.”

The Post was also nominated for Best Picture, but the buzzy and timely drama failed to crack other categories. Still, there’s no denying that Streep is really good in it. Streep faces stiff competition for Best Actress, though. She’s up against Sally Hawkins (The Shape of Water), Frances McDormand (Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri), Margot Robbie (I, Tonya), and Saoirse Ronan (Lady Bird). McDormand is the clear favorite to win after this past weekend’s SAG Awards win.

But, undoubtedly, this latest nomination only further cements Streep as the greatest film actress of her time. She only very rarely makes a bad movie, and it’s never bad because of her. She can next be seen on the big screen in two highly anticipated musical sequels: Mamma Mia: Here We Go Again! and Mary Poppins Returns. Viva La Streep!

Related: Meryl Streep Is Trying to Fix Hollywood’s Sexism Problem



Source link

Categories
Health

Meryl Streep Wants Ivanka and Melania Trump to Speak Up


In a joint interview with Tom Hanks published in The New York Times Wednesday, Academy Award-winning actress Meryl Streep got candid and shared her thoughts on sexual misconduct in Hollywood, Harvey Weinstein, and the silence of Melania and Ivanka Trump amid the #MeToo movement.

The interview revolved around Streep and Hank’s new movie The Post, though Times reporter Cara Buckley shifted the conversation to the backlash Streep faced last year for not speaking out against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein more quickly, after many actresses came forward and accused him of sexual misconduct. Although Streep released a statement about Weinstein three days after the allegations surfaced, many criticized her for initially remaining quiet.

In response to Buckley’s questions about her silence, Streep said, “I don’t want to hear about the silence of me. I want to hear about the silence of Melania Trump. I want to hear from her. She has so much that’s valuable to say. And so does Ivanka. I want her to speak now.”

Streep explained that after first hearing about the Weinstein scandal, she “went home deep into my own life.” Then she heard the public was waiting for her to respond.

“I don’t have a Twitter thing or – handle, whatever. And I don’t have Facebook. I really had to think. Because it really underlined my own sense of cluelessness, and also how evil, deeply evil, and duplicitous, a person he was, yet such a champion of really great work,” she said.

Streep has publicly criticized Donald Trump before, notably during a Golden Globes speech last year in which she called the president out for mocking a disabled reporter. Her comments about Melania and Ivanka reflect wider criticism that the First Lady and First Daughter haven’t said enough about sexual harassment. Ivanka’s few comments on the topic came during a speech Tokyo, in which she said that “all too often, our workplace culture fails to treat women with appropriate respect” and that harassment should “never be tolerated.” Neither of them has addressed allegations of harassment that Trump faces.

Buckley also asked Hanks what he thought of the #MeToo movement, and he admitted that he too had participated in crude language worthy of a baseball locker room while at work. Streep piped up that there “shouldn’t be the idea of a locker room.”

“The payload is unloaded on women, because that’s the last group it’s kind of OK to demean, degrade,” she said.

Read the rest of the interview here.

MORE: I’m Ready to Say #MeToo—Now Men Need to Say ‘I’m Sorry’



Source link

Categories
Health

Meryl Streep Replies to Rose McGowan's Criticism: 'I Didn't Know' About Harvey Weinstein


During the last few days, it’s been said that actresses attending the 2018 Golden Globes would be banning together to all wear black as a silent protest against the sexual harassment of women both in Hollywood and around the globe. While no stars or stylists confirmed the reports, the rumors were enough for actress Rose McGowan to take to Twitter to blast any actress willing to take part.

In a tweet, which has since been deleted, McGowan said, “Actresses, like Meryl Streep, who happily worked for The Pig Monster, are wearing black @goldenglobes in a silent protest. YOUR SILENCE is THE problem. You’ll accept a fake award breathlessly & affect no real chance. I despise your hypocrisy. Maybe you should all wear Marchesa.”

While Amber Tamblyn was one of the first actresses to come out and slam McGowan for her tweet, calling it “beneath” McGowan to do, she would not be the last. On Monday, Meryl Streep, the target of McGowan’s tweet, came out with a lengthy statement both defending herself, and further lending her support to McGowan.

“It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent decades when he proceeded to attack others,” Streep said in a statement shared with HuffPost by her publicist Leslee Dart.

Streep further added that she “wasn’t deliberately silent” about Weinstein and his horrific crimes simply because she didn’t know.

According to Streep, she didn’t have a friendly relationship, or any relationship, with Weinstein through the years. She explained that like most people whose films were distributed by Weinstein she had only a tangential tie to the man and never truly knew him.

“…Not every actor, actress, and director who made films that HW distributed knew he abused women, or that he raped Rose in the 90s, other women before and others after, until they told us,” She said. “We did not know that women’s silence was purchased by him and his enablers. HW needed us not to know this, because our association with him bought him credibility, an ability to lure young, aspiring women into circumstances where they would be hurt.” In a meaningful line Streep added, “He needed me much more than I needed him and he made sure I didn’t know.”

Streep added that now that she, and everyone, knows, a legal defense fund for victims is being assembled to which, “hundreds of good-hearted people in our business will contribute, to bring down the bastards, and help victims fight this scourge within.”

She ended her statement by expressing her sorrow that McGowan sees her as an adversary, rather than a friend. Instead of further fractioning Streep said she hopes all women in the entertainment business can stand together “in defiance” of the same enemy: “a status quo that wants so badly to return to the bad old days, the old ways where women were used, abused and refused entry into the decision-making, top levels of the industry. That’s where the cover-ups convene. Those rooms must be disinfected, and integrated, before anything even begins to change.”

Below, Streep’s full statement:

It hurt to be attacked by Rose McGowan in banner headlines this
weekend, but I want to let her know I did not know about Weinstein’s
crimes, not in the 90s when he attacked her, or through subsequent
decades when he proceeded to attack others. I wasn’t deliberately
silent. I didn’t know. I don’t tacitly approve of rape. I didn’t know.
I don’t like young women being assaulted. I didn’t know this was
happening. I don’t know where Harvey lives, nor has he ever been to my
home. I have never in my life been invited to his hotel room. I have
been to his office once, for a meeting with Wes Craven for “Music of
the Heart” in 1998. HW distributed movies I made with other people. HW
was not a filmmaker; he was often a producer, primarily a marketer of
films made by other people—some of them great, some not great. But not
every actor, actress, and director who made films that HW distributed
knew he abused women, or that he raped Rose in the 90s, other women
before and others after, until they told us. We did not know that
women’s silence was purchased by him and his enablers. HW needed us
not to know this, because our association with him bought him
credibility, an ability to lure young, aspiring women into
circumstances where they would be hurt. He needed me much more than I
needed him and he made sure I didn’t know. Apparently he hired ex
Mossad operators to protect this information from becoming public.
Rose and the scores of other victims of these powerful, moneyed,
ruthless men face an adversary for whom Winning, at any and all costs,
is the only acceptable outcome. That’s why a legal defense fund for
victims is currently being assembled to which hundreds of good hearted
people in our business will contribute, to bring down the bastards,
and help victims fight this scourge within. Rose assumed and broadcast
something untrue about me, and I wanted to let her know the truth.
Through friends who know her, I got my home phone number to her the
minute I read the headlines. I sat by that phone all day yesterday and
this morning, hoping to express both my deep respect for her and
others’ bravery in exposing the monsters among us, and my sympathy for
the untold, ongoing pain she suffers. No one can bring back what
entitled bosses like Bill O’Reilly, Roger Ailes, and HW took from the
women who endured attacks on their bodies and their ability to make a
living.. And I hoped that she would give me a hearing. She did not,
but I hope she reads this. I am truly sorry she sees me as an
adversary, because we are both, together with all the women in our
business, standing in defiance of the same implacable foe: a status
quo that wants so badly to return to the bad old days, the old ways
where women were used, abused and refused entry into the
decision-making, top levels of the industry. That’s where the
cover-ups convene. Those rooms must be disinfected, and integrated,
before anything even begins to change.

Related Content:

Amber Tamblyn Slams Rose McGowan for ‘Shaming’ Actresses Planning to Wear Black to the Golden Globes
#MeToo Founder Tarana Burke on What Needs to Happen After the Hashtag
MeToo: Thousands of Women Share Stories of Sexual Harassment and Assault on Twitter



Source link

Categories
Health

Meryl Streep Shares the Story of Her Own Experience With Violence


During the last six weeks, we’ve heard stories from dozens of empowered women, finally sharing their experiences with sexual assault and harassment at the hands of powerful men. But as Meryl Streep reminded us in a recent speech at an award ceremony for the Committee to Protect Journalists, that kind of threat is only one of the dangers women still face.

The Oscar-winner said there had never been a more dangerous time to be a female investigative journalist. “We do recognize the special cocktail of venom and ridicule which is always tinged with sexual threat that’s served up online for women—any woman in any profession—that stands up to tell the truth. I revere the people who do this because I am not a naturally brave person,” she said.

“But I do know something about real terror—the two times in my life when I was threatened and dealt with real physical violence, I learned something about life that I wouldn’t have known otherwise and I was lucky because my instincts served me well,” Streep said, according to The Daily Beast. “In one instance, I played dead and waited until the blows stopped—watching like people say you do from about 50 feet above from where I was beaten. And in the second instance, someone else was being abused and I just went completely nuts and went after this man. Ask Cher—she was there. And the thug ran away, it was a miracle.”

Streep and Cher both acted (and received Oscar nominations for their work) in the 1983 drama Silkwood. Cher had previously revealed that she and Streep once “saved a girl from a large mugger in New York City.”

She went on to explain how experiencing these moments of violence had changed her “on a cellular level,” saying women have been conditioned to be on “hyper alert,” to anticipate the violence so many generations of women have had to endure.

Streep also thanked the journalists who are making sure stories about women dealing with harassment and violence are not being silenced, saying, “You are the enemy of the people, yeah! Just the bad people. And I, on behalf of a grateful nation, thank you.”

Related: How Bad Does a Movie Have to Be for Meryl Streep to Not Get an Oscar Nomination? I Watched 23 to Find Out



Source link