Categories
Health

Meghan Markle Casually Flew to Canada for a Girls Weekend, and No One Knew About It


Just what has Meghan Markle been up to this August? We now know. One day after the royal made her first public appearance since her August 4th birthday, a new report sheds light on how the actress turned Duchess of Sussex has been spending her hiatus. Get this: Markle is so low-key that she reportedly managed to travel across international waters undetected.

The former Suits star and humanitarian apparently flew to Canada on a commercial airplane, no less, in mid-August to visit her best friend and current stylist, Jessica Mulroney. (She was reportedly responsible for Markle’s tuxedo dress from yesterday.) Her BFF’s name also will ring a bell for close observers of the royal wedding, where Mulroney’s three children adorably served as bridal party members. Royal commentator Omid Scobie confirmed Markle’s trip on Good Morning America and on Twitter, writing, “Duchess Meghan quietly traveled to Toronto last Tuesday for a three-day stay at the family home of close friends Jessica and Ben Mulroney.”

The two friends did totally normal things together in Canada, where Markle lived while filming Suits, like spending time with Mulroney’s family. “Meghan and Jessica spent their days catching up, lounging poolside and playing with children Ivy, Brian and John, who, adds a source, ‘love seeing their Auntie Meg,'” Scobie tweeted. “There was also an evening out with friends.”

Considering the timing of the trip—during August 19—their night out may have been documented by Mulroney, who shared a photo on that day of her and her children dressed up in all white. “Another day, another jumpsuit,” she wrote on Instagram, without giving the slightest hint that she was with Markle. “That Brian face though.”

Scobie called it “the perfect trip ahead of a very busy (and engagement-packed!) fall,” referencing Markle and Prince Harry’s Royal Foundation work engagements and, down the road, their reported upcoming U.S. tour.

The most fascinating part of Markle’s Canada trip, though, is the fact that she got onto a regular plane like any other regular person—and still managed to go mostly undetected. There were reports, however, that surfaced on August 19, with Express UK noting Kensington Palace allegedly requested that Air Canada prevent any other passengers from snapping Markle’s picture. At the time, the headline highlighted the fact that Markle was traveling without Prince Harry.

Related Stories:

Why Meghan Markle’s Stella McCartney Reception Dress Won’t Be on Display With Her Wedding Gown





Source link

Categories
Health

Fans Think The Weeknd's New Song, 'Thought I Knew You,' Is About Selena Gomez


It’s been a hot minute since Selena Gomez and The Weeknd were together: The two broke up in November after 10 months of dating (possibly earlier; The Weeknd just confirmed it by deleting a ton of pics of her from Instagram in November). Since then, she had a brief return to Bieber—prior to his engagement with Hailey Baldwin, of course—while The Weeknd is rumored to be on again with a certain Hadid. (Yes, that would be his ex Bella Hadid.)

But all this ~ drama ~ seems to have stirred The Weeknd’s melodic impulses: He dropped another song on Friday in collaboration with Nicki Minaj. It contains some telling lyrics (which he helped pen), and fans think it’s maybe-probably about Gomez.

There’s, uh, quite a bit going on here. After a first verse that’s basically The Weeknd being sad, he makes it clear he’s not into communication at the moment, while implying that he sees himself as a bit of a rebound—and he’s over it. “Nevermind, you were never mine for real,” he sings. “Hit my line, I’ma hit decline for real / I ain’t tryin’ for a second time for real.”

And then we get to the pre-chorus, in which The Weeknd alleges Gomez was playing the victim in the story, especially considering she’s incredibly popular on Instagram: “*Honestly, I think this shit excites you (excites you) / All that drama that you’re tied to (oh, yeah),” he sings. “You play the victim every time too.” So cold, but he forges on: “That shit came back and hit you times two.”

The whole thing about “times two”? As Elle points out, the “break” they were on turned into a breakup and boom, now Bieber’s engaged to Baldwin and The Weeknd is back with Hadid.

Fans were quick to dissect the track and point out some things:

There is precedent for such lyrics from The Weeknd: His My Dear Melancholy album, which dropped toward the end of March, also had a few seemingly pointed lyrics. Ah, young love and access to recording devices.

Related Stories:

Selena Gomez Opens Up for the First Time About Her Breakup With The Weeknd

The Weeknd Is Totally Fine With Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber Hanging Out Again

These Lyrics on The Weeknd’s New Album Are Probably, Definitely About Selena Gomez





Source link

Categories
Health

Here's the Moment Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Bishop Knew They Were in Love


Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have had no shortage of adorable moments—either before or after their royal wedding for the ages. Case in point: That time recently when Harry, ever so gallantly, stepped in in the nick of time to save Markle from a topple. It’s honestly all a bit much sometimes, but just to compound the cute, the Most Reverend Bishop Michael Curry has spoken out in an interview with Us Weekly about the moment he knew that the two were really, truly in love (as if there were a doubt!).

If you remember, Bishop Curry was the real star of the royal wedding (the couple getting married excluded, obviously). He gave a rousing sermon, the likes of which many in the audience had never heard before, aptly named The Power of Love. Given that he’s pretty much an expert on it, of course he was the right person to talk about the moment he knew the two were 100-percent smitten.

“They look at each other like they love each other. I remember thinking after the sermon, once I preached the sermon, I said, ‘These two people love each other,'” he told Us Weekly. “They look at each other, and their love brought the rest of us together.”

But he wasn’t done yet—he had something even more poignant to say about the couple who once stood before him.

“Their love, even if it was just for a few moments, showed us the power of what unselfish love that gives itself to another can actually do,” he told the magazine.

Well, if that isn’t #couplegoals, we don’t know what is.

Related Stories

Bishop Michael Curry Was the Real Star of the Royal Wedding

Bishop Michael Curry Says the Palace Approved His Powerful Sermon Before the Royal Wedding

A Gospel Choir and a Fiery Sermon: How the Royal Wedding Celebrated Meghan Markle’s Identity



Source link

Categories
Health

Jake Tapper on 'Hellfire Club': I Knew I Wanted to Write a Strong Woman


If you’ve taken Fiction 101, you may be aware of the golden rule: Write what you know. CNN chief Washington correspondent Jake Tapper stuck to this idea when he wrote his debut political thriller—to an extent. The Hellfire Club is rife with Beltway intrigue and backroom deals, but Tapper’s leading lady is what kept us turning pages. And we’re not alone: Margaret has been praised by Nicole Wallace and Elizabeth Banks, and is perhaps best described by a member of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand‘s staff as a “resourceful badass” and “true queen.” We checked in with Tapper to find out how it feels to be the creator of a woman readers won’t be able to stop thinking about.

Glamour: I know you’re getting all kinds of praise for your Margaret. Can you tell me a little bit about how she came to be?Jake Tapper: As a reader of thrillers, I was well aware that the usual formula is for a single, studly James Bond type to jump from martinis to romance to shootouts. I knew I wanted Charlie Marder to be married to a woman he was madly in love with, and I knew I wanted her to be strong. I think that’s sexier and more romantic than the normal prototype. As a fan of Nick and Nora from The Thin Man, I started off wanting them to have what I hope is witty repartee. As Charlie begins to compromise his principles, Margaret objects to what’s happening to the man she loves and admires. From there, she took on a life of her own.

Glamour: Have you been surprised by the response?JT: Absolutely. I don’t pretend to be Mr. Woke 2018 or to have any special insight into women. I’m just a normal meatheaded man, though I do read, so I’m aware of feminist criticism of art made by men—the Bechdel Test and such. So I’m kind of amazed readers out there think I pulled it off.

Glamour: What was it like to write a woman who is pregnant? I’d love to hear a little bit about your research here.JT: The first challenge was to give Margaret her own complicated backstory, involving her own family struggles and interests and ambitions. Then I wrote for her as I would for any character, though with more noble motivations, since she’s such a kind person of such character. When the book starts, Margaret has just found out she’s pregnant, so I did a lot of checking with my editor, who happens to be a woman, and also my wife (we have two kids), to make sure the physical challenges she faces as she enters her second trimester were even possible. There were some scenes that had to be rewritten because my editor insisted there wasn’t a pregnant woman alive who who would have Margaret’s stamina.

Glamour: Do you think the experience of writing Margaret has made you a better colleague, husband, or friend—or a more empathic one?JT: The simple answer is no. But I do think it’s make me a more critical reader when it comes to the roles of women in fiction, as written by men, and more appreciative of authors who make the effort to include many different types of characters. Look, I think part of it is, at least as far as I’m concerned, I didn’t want to mess it up. I felt a similar anxiousness about an African American character I wrote, in terms of: Who the hell am I to even attempt to create this character? That trepidation might be part of the issue for some authors. But I’m really glad I tried.





Source link

Categories
Health

Margot Robbie's Tonya Harding Will Make You Rethink Everything You Thought You Knew


The imagery is iconic: Nancy Kerrigan’s virginal white lace dress versus Tonya Harding’s vampy maroon get-up. So are the sounds: Kerrigan’s wails of “Why?” as she clutches her knee, versus Tonya’s sobs to the Olympic judges while clutching her broken lace skate. The year was 1994, and these two were vying to be America’s figure skating sweetheart. One was an assailant, the other a victim. The stage was set, the character tropes determined.

Twenty-three years ago, popular imagination had room enough for only one kind of ice queen: the good girl, the one with the lithe body and shiny hair, who followed the rules. Tonya Harding—with her homespun costumes, moussed-up bangs, and routines set to bass-heavy soundtracks—cut a starkly different figure. After the legendary dust-up at the 1994 Lillehammer Olympics, Nancy went on to host Saturday Night Live and wave (grudgingly) from the Disney Parade. Tonya receded from the spotlight as little more than a punchline.

PHOTO: Mike Powell

Director Craig Gillespie’s new film I, Tonya resurrects Harding, but in 2017 she’s given the homecoming she never could have received in 1994. Instead, the movie celebrates Harding, played viciously by Margot Robbie in all her white-trash glory: her heavy metal skate routines, her foul mouth, her rural poverty. She decries a system rigged against her. After receiving low scores at one competition, despite out-skating her more demure challengers, she glides up to the judge’s box and asks, “How do I get a fair shot?” “We also judge on presentation,” the evaluator retorts, gazing down his nose at the 5’1” scrapper before him.

It’s a moment that’s unequivocally sympathetic to Harding—who we’ve just seen slaving with needle and thread over the outfit the judges are scorning—but it wouldn’t always have had that effect. Her image is cast in the light of today’s progressive feminism. In a flat Oregon accent with frizzy blonde hair, Robbie as Tonya tells the camera: “Most people’s reaction to me is that I’m a real person, in a sport where the judges want you to be an old-timey version of what a woman is supposed to be.”

The sympathetic portrayal of Tonya Harding shows us how far feminism has come in just over two decades. What makes this Tonya different is that we get the whole of her—especially parts that were edited out in the 1994 media coverage. For the first time, we get a clear picture of her lifelong victimization: first at the hands of her maniacal stage mother, played by Allison Janney—whose hilariously diabolical portrayal is worth the price of admission—and later at the fists of her abusive husband Jeff Gillooly. Margot Robbie serves an Oscar-worthy performance, reveling in Harding’s contradictions: her raw talent and self-sabotage, the unfair aspersions cast upon her, and her unwillingness to admit responsibility.

She was ahead of her time; today, pop culture has anointed realness and authenticity as queen. Squeaky-clean Taylor Swift is on the wane, while the regular degular schmegular girl from the Bronx, Cardi B, reigns supreme. Lifestyle doyennes like Gwyneth Paltrow and her pristine white jeans (genes?) seem retro compared to down-to-earth and self-deprecating Chrissy Teigen. The Kardashians handily shoved the Hiltons off their pedestal, swapping the pedigree of a hotel empire for the fame of a sex tape. The bulk of Keeping Up With the Kardashians depicts them standing around kitchen islands and lounging under blankets. Somehow, our heroines shape-shifted from the unattainable perfection to aspirational normality.

PHOTO: NEON

We are now far more sensitive to the influence of powerful men over women. When women come forward, as they have been in droves across all industries decrying sexual harassment, or as victims of sexual violence, the culture is much more willing to hear out these accusers. We are even more willing to consider the person’s context. We now have a word for people who question a woman’s background and use it against her: slut shaming. But in the ’90s it was considered perfectly acceptable.

In 1991, the same year Harding skated her history-making triple axel, Anita Hill was delivering testimony to Congress about how Clarence Thomas routinely sexually harassed her at work from 1981 to1983. Instead of hearing out the routine abuse and humiliation she endured, she had her character and personal life assassinated, with Missouri Senator John Danforth suggesting she might suffer from “erotomania,” the delusion that a powerful superior is in love with her. Many asked why she waited nine years to bring these allegations to light, a classic move to undermine women as played out in the case of Cosby’s victims. Conservative pundit David Brock painted her, in his words, as “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty.”

This knee-jerk designation stuck throughout the ‘90s. Monica Lewinsky, a 22-year-old intern, was excoriated not only by conservatives licking their chops to send Bill Clinton down, but by feminists on the left as well. Gloria Steinem wrote a defense of Clinton in a 1998 NYT op-ed, arguing: “The power imbalance between them increased the index of suspicion, but there is no evidence to suggest that Ms. Lewinsky’s will was violated, quite the contrary.” In the wake of the Shitty Media Men list and more nuanced understandings of the dynamics of power, coercion, and consent, this sentence reads like it hails from the Stone Age. In 1999, New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd characterized Lewinsky as a “sexual climber” who “…connived to trade beauty and sex for affluence and status.” That a self-described feminist lobbed this assertion makes the 2017 head explode. Katie Roiphe recognized the irony in 1998, saying, “What’s interesting is that women overwhelmingly, even more than men…still strongly support Clinton. Even mainstream feminists, who you’d think would come out and say, ‘You know, here’s this poor young woman being exploited, let’s take her side,’ they’re not taking her side.”

Though Harding’s black mark was for violence and class animosity rather than sexual victimization, the ‘90s media still relished in the schadenfreude of her fall from whatever grace she momentarily held. But I, Tonya is fully steeped in today’s ethos. The film excavates facts of Harding’s biography that, if not unknown, were underreported at the time. Her mother abused her throughout her childhood, even beating her with a hairbrush before a competition. “She skates better when she’s mad,” she declares. Later, she even pays off a heckler to lob insults like, “Where’d you park your double wide?” as Harding toddles out onto the ice. Harding dropped out of high school at 15 years old to pursue skating—the same age she had her leering stepbrother, who she called “Creepy Chris,” arrested for attempting to molest her. This happened to be the same day she met Jeff Gillooly, the man who would ultimately destroy her career. Following the pattern of abuse she grew up with, Gillooly, too, beat her horribly. In a moment of black-as-night comedy, Robbie deadpans: “Nancy gets hit one time and the world shits. I got hit all the time!”

In one poignant and revealing scene, Gillooly gets pulled over for speeding. The reason for his haste is that he’s ferrying his bride to the hospital, after he shot her in the eye. The cop sees her in distress, yet does nothing. “And that’s why I don’t trust the authorities,” she tells us. One can see why.

Even the knee-capping scheme in light of today’s news doesn’t seem all that crazy. If in 1994 an emissary from the future could have swooped down and told us that in 2016 the Russians would hack our election and a quasi-illiterate, hate-mongering reality star would be president, a casual kneecapping sabotage doesn’t seem that far out.

Harding claims to have no knowledge of the planned attack, which was carried out by her bodyguard Sean Eckhardt and her then-husband Gillooly. Today, had the reality of the domestic violence she endured been public record, a far more sympathetic embrace of Harding would be expected. Instead, Harding became a laughingstock and was robbed of her passion. When the judge barred Harding from figure skating after she plead guilty to hindering the prosecution, she told him she’d rather do jail time. Skating was all she’d ever known—and loved. She was denied. So she used her body as her profit again, becoming a professional boxer. She now works as a landscaper and is “a good mom” (her words) to a 12-year-old son. This week, she even joined Margot Robbie on the red carpet for I, Tonya‘s premiere. She’s living the American dream—after we snatched it from her.

NEON and 30WEST Present the Los Angeles Premiere of "I, Tonya" Supported By Svedka

PHOTO: Vivien Killilea



Source link

Categories
Health

15 Surprising Facts About Vibrators You Never Knew


You likely already know that the vibrator is one of the most important inventions since the advent of the wheel. This is truer than ever, since not only are sex toys are becoming less taboo with each passing year, but more popular: According to a survey conducted by Adam and Eve, 63 percent of people have used some type of sex toy in their life, and nearly 20 percent of all sex toys purchased online last year were vibrators. They’ve also permeated the culture, from the iconic Sex and the City scene in which Charlotte buys a Rabbit to the groundbreaking Broad City pegging episode.

But while it may seem like we’ve reached peak vibrator, there are still plenty a lot of things that many people don’t realize about their favorite toy. Here are 15 facts about vibrators that could give you a whole new appreciation for this magical little device.

1. Vibrators predate electricity

The first vibrator model was released in 1734 and was powered by a hand crank. As you might imagine, it was hard to sell sex toys to women in the 18th century, so they were sold to doctors for use in treating “hysteria,” then thought to be a buildup of female semen. The only cure was—you guessed it—“paroxysm” (also known as orgasm).

2. People got real about vibrators in 1973, thanks to the Hitachi Magic Wand…

Through an article in Ms. Magazine, the NOW conference, and her Bodysex workshops, New York-based artist Betty Dodson brought national attention to the Hitachi Magic Wand as more than just a back massager. During her workshops, women were invited to explore their vulvas and learn about their bodies, and then they were given a Hitachi (which Dodson purchased by the case) so they could masturbate together.

3. …But Hitachi wasn’t quite as excited about it

After nearly 45 years on the market, the folks at Hitachi finally realized what people were using their “back massager” for (took them long enough) and decided they no longer wanted their brand to stand for that kind of behavior. Luckily, the distributor Vibratex swooped in to save the day—and your sex life—by offering to continue manufacturing the toy without the Hitachi branding. That’s why it’s now called, simply, Magic Wand.

4. They’re technically illegal in Alabama

Thanks to the Anti-Obscenity Enforcement Act, distribution of any device “designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs” is punishable by a fine up to $10,000, or one year in prison. In Texas, it’s not only illegal to sell them, but it’s also illegal to simply possess six or more, since that would indicate you may have the intent to sell them. A woman was even arrested in the state in 2003 for selling sex toys at a “Tupperware-type party.” Though her charges were eventually dropped, if you live in Texas, maybe you should just say they’re back massagers?

5. Despite its massive popularity, the sex toy industry isn’t regulated

After noticing that their first shipment of toys seemed to be leaking an oily substance, Jennifer Pritchett from sex toy store Smitten Kitten started doing some research—including sending some products out to be independently tested. When the results came back,Pritchett was dismayed to find that a number of products contained surprise materials that weren’t made for use with the human body. Since there’s no governing group to tell manufacturers what they can put in your vibrator—and, for that matter, no rules about what they can put on the package—it’s important to do some research when you’re shopping for sex toys.

6. Vibrators aren’t just for alone time

One of the most popular questions I heard when I worked on the floor of an NYC sex shop was, “What can I use with my partner?” In fact, according to a survey by Adam & Eve, 55 percent of people who use sex toys use them with someone else (though, interestingly, only 24 percent are brave enough to bring it up first). The popular We-Vibe Sync is specifically designed with couples in mind and even has an app.

7. Animals occasionally also use sex toys

Female porcupines in captivity have been known to place a stick between their legs and drag it across the ground to feel the vibration against their body. Get it, Ms. Porcupine!

8. Speaking of animals, there’s a surprising legal reason your Rabbit is shaped like a rabbit

And it’s not just about the ears. Back in the day, many sex toys were produced in Japan, where obscenity laws didn’t allow them to create products shaped like actual penises. In order to skirt these laws, companies like Vibratex decided that cute animals were the next best option, and a tradition was born.

9. Not all vibrators are for vaginas

Given that many vibrators lead double lives as “back massagers,” it’s not surprising that vibration makes feels great for lots of folks on lots of different parts. The Cobra Libre and the Hand Solo are two toys designed specifically for penises, and even the Magic Wand can work wonders. Studies show that 45-50 percent of men have used a vibrator in their life.

10. Using a vibrator can make you a better singer

The Vibrant Voice Technique, developed by voice coach David Ley, claims that using a vibrator against the vocal cords can “quickly and effectively enhance vocal resonance.” They recommend the popular Lelo Siri which is, incidentally, also great for orgasms.

11. No matter what you’ve heard, vibrators don’t decrease sensitivity

Don’t worry, frequent vibe enjoyer! There’s no evidence of long-term numbness associated with sex toy use. In fact, I often had people come into my store on doctor’s orders, looking for vibrators to bring sensitivity back to their bits, post-surgery. Vibrators have also helped women orgasm again after their antidepressants made it hard to climax.

12. Not all vibrators merely vibrate…

While there are countless vibrating toys on the market, there are plenty of other sensations to explore, too. Just this year, we’ve seen toys that oscillate, toys that thrust, and some extremely popular toys that suck.

13. …And not all vibrations feel the same

Maximum enjoyment doesn’t always come down to just how strong a toy’s vibration is, but which type of vibration it uses. Buzzy vibrations are going to sit on the surface of your skin, and while they may feel intense, they may also feel itchy or temporarily numbing. Rumbly vibration has a lower pitch, more like an earthquake than a bumblebee, and will penetrate through more layers of skin, hitting deeper buried nerves.

14. Like most things, vibrators are even better with lube

Yep, even if you’re just using it externally. Many vibrators are made of silicone, which had considerably more friction than skin against skin. Plus, it’s moving considerably faster than your average finger can. A good lube will cut down on that friction and allow the vibrator to glide against your skin more easily.

15. But there’s nothing wrong with you if you’re not into them at all

Just like how there are people who don’t like pizza, there are people who don’t like vibrators. And that’s totally cool! Not all bodies find vibration appealing— some find it too intense, irritating, or just downright boring.

More:

Glamour’s First-Ever Sex Toy Awards

My Anti-Depressants Made It Hard for Me to Orgasm, Until I Tried THese Sex Toys

Why the Nipple Clamp Is the Most Underrated Sex Toy in the World



Source link