Categories
Health

These Celebrities Are Fighting to Make Sure Women's History Is Recognized


Given that it’s 2018, it’s a little surprising to realize that the United States still has no national women’s history museum, nor is there any such building currently under construction. But the nonpartisan National Women’s History Museum organization, founded in 1996, is trying to change that: Members and potential donors gathered on Saturday for a fundraiser for the construction of just such a museum, along with the seventh annual Women’s Making History Awards. The event, held at the Beverly Hills Hotel, honored Kristen Bell, Kathy Bates, Gabrielle Union, and Black Lives Matter Global Network cofounder Patrisse Cullors for their social responsibility accomplishments. Glamour‘s editor-in-chief, Samantha Barry, was on hand to moderate a Q&A with each woman following her recognition.

Women’s history is hugely overlooked: For centuries, it’s generally been white men who have held the power to write themselves into Western history textbooks. What results is a narrative of history that often leaves out the contributions of women and people of color. (If you want some weekend reading, New York Times‘s “Overlooked” obituary series is also doing its part to change that.) The first paid baseball team in America was made up not of men, for example, but women. And then there’s Claudette Colvin, who was arrested at 15 when she refused to give up her bus seat—nine months before Rosa Parks made her famous protest.

That’s exactly why the Women’s Making History Awards exists today: to recognize women who are already making history. Idina Menzel presented an award to Bell to recognize the actress’s work with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, as well as the social justice-oriented granola bar company Bell co-founded, This Bar Saves Lives.

Actor Michael Ealy then honored Union, who works with the National Advisory Committee for Violence Against Women, for her advocacy for women’s issues and sexual assault victims.

“She was fearless, and she led from the front,” said Union about Marsha P. Johnson, a gay liberation activist who was prominent at the 1969 Stonewall uprising. “A lot of us call ourselves leaders but we stay quiet and we’re in the back. We talk about inclusion but when we go to work, it’s everybody that looks like us.”

“Anytime whole groups of people have been erased, their contributions have been erased, we tend to see them as less valuable,” Union added. “We don’t tend to see their worth.”

Sarah Paulson also gave an amazing tribute to why her American Horror Story costar Bates inspires her more than anyone else: “The work she does on behalf of the Lymphatic Education & Research Network is a striking example of her desire to move towards the greater good,” she said, noting Bates’ role as an international ambassador for those who have lymphatic diseases. Finally, Dawn Lyen-Gardner honored Cullors for founding the Los Angeles-based Dignity and Power Now organization, which advocates for incarcerated people and their families, and for co-founding the Black Lives Matter Global Network.

It’s not certain yet when the museum will finally break ground. In March 2017, a nonpartisan bill was introduced in Congress that would establish it and designate two potential spots on the National Mall—however, it’s yet to be voted on.

Instagram Stories/[@sophiabush](https://www.instagram.com/sophiabush/?hl=en)

For more info or to find out how you can help, check out the organization’s website.





Source link

Categories
Health

Cynthia Nixon Promises to Keep Fighting After Losing Her Bid for Governor


Activist and actress-turned-gubernatorial candidateCynthia Nixon lost her highly publicized bid for New York governor on Thursday night, with her opponent and incumbent governor Andrew Cuomo cinching about 65 percent of votes.

Despite the defeat, Nixon left her supporters with a rousing concession speech, in which she urged progressives to continue fighting for change and pushing for equality in New York and across the rest of the country.

“This is not a time to settle for the way things are, or sit back and hope for things to change,” she said. “This is a time to fight. As long as New York remains the single most unequal state in the country, we will keep fighting.”

Nixon had positioned herself as a progressive alternative to Cuomo and promised to change the status quo. Had she won, the former Sex and The City star would have been the state’s first female and openly gay governor, and her platform included championing LGBTQ causes, as well as solutions for racial and economic injustice.

In a statement to Glamour after announcing her candidacy, she explained how the election of Donald Trump was a “wake-up” call to women who have launched political campaigns this year in unprecedented numbers.

“I’ve been humbled and inspired by the thousands of women who are running for office for the first time. And today, I am honored to join their ranks,” she said.

Nixon, like recent progressive candidates such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, had pledged not to take any corporate campaign money and eventually secured a record number of small donors that helped her pull 30 percent of votes. She ended up raising about $2.5 million—just a fraction of the $25 million Cuomo reportedly spent on television ads and mailers, according to the New York Times. Buzzfeed reported that Cuomo’s spending per day was almost the same amount of Nixon’s total.

In her speech on Thursday, Nixon praised the gains her campaign had made despite being up against Cuomo’s hefty budget, and said she was inspired rather than discouraged.

“Before a single vote was cast, we have already won. We have fundamentally changed the political landscape in this state,” she said. “This campaign changed expectations about what is possible in New York state.”

She also evoked the achievements of recent progressive candidates, such as Ocasio-Cortez and Ayanna Pressley, who have toppled long-standing incumbents and represent a new era of progressive politics. She urged Democrats to “stand for something” and take back the party while encouraging a new generation to keep pushing forward.

“This is an incredible moment for progressives, but it is not just a moment. it is a movement, and this movement is only growing stronger… To all the young people. To all the young women. To all the young queer people who reject the gender binary. Soon you’ll be standing here, and when it’s your turn, you’ll win,” she said.

MORE: With Letitia James’ Primary Win, New York Could See Its First Black Female Attorney General





Source link

Categories
Health

The Kardashian Sisters Are Fighting on Twitter, and People Think Kris Staged It


Grab an oversize salad and one of those Sprites from Khloé’s refrigerator that she’ll never drink, because there is some maybe real, maybe staged Kardashian drama happening on Twitter right now—and it’s all I can think about.

Like most Kardashian fights, the root of this one is something very serious and life-changing: the family’s Christmas card photo. Last week E! shared two clips of Kim and Kourtney arguing because they couldn’t coordinate their schedules for the card’s photo shoot. Kourtney wanted to stop at 4:00 P.M., but Kim had a business meeting then, ergo conflict. It was A Whole Thing that ended with Kim saying Kourtney is the “least interesting” sister to look at. Yikes.

Please note that both Kourtney and mama Kris Jenner laugh during this argument, so…how real is it? I mean, Kim does raise her voice a few octaves, so there must be a smidgen of truth to it.

Regardless, it’s operatic. Watch the video for yourself, below.

[embedded content]

Shortly after, E! shared part two of the fight, in which Kourtney calls Kim an “evil human being,” and Kim rebuffs by saying Kourtney is acting like a “lunatic.” At one point, Khloé and Kim are basically running around a backyard. It’s very important.

[embedded content]

This all led to a stream of social media posts from Kourtney, Kim, and Khloé. First, Kim replied to a fan who took Kourtney’s side, saying the eldest sister is “sick and tired of being forced to stay relevant” by participating in a bunch of photo shoots. “Oh word, did Kourt tell you this? She sure wanna live that Kardashian life though, and BTW this photo shoot was our Christmas card,” Kim wrote.

When another fan chimed in, saying this fight was just your standard sibling drama that’ll be resolved in a day, Kim took the affirmative.

The tension escalated, though, when Kourtney offered a little insight to E! News about why she’s at such odds with her sisters. “I think it started at the end of season 14, a lot of tension building between us,” Kourtney said. “I felt like every day almost I was being picked on and criticized, and I just couldn’t take it anymore.”

She said the tension among herself, Kim, and Khloé is still “ongoing.” “I’ve been really working on myself a lot, and I think through my growth, I’m better at expressing myself,” Kourtney added. “I think in the past I’ve always been great at like not being emotional. I think that I’m better now at expressing my feelings. So I think this is ongoing. It’s a lot of communication instead of letting things go back into the way that they were. It’s definitely a process, and you’ll see it throughout the season.”

Then Kourtney posted this cryptic Snapchat about anger management, which fans took to be a diss at Kim.

Everything came to a head last night (August 5) on Twitter, conveniently during the Keeping Up With the Kardashians season-15 premiere. “You hear that??? If I don’t take my meeting as scheduled then I couldn’t launch my ULB KKW BEAUTY collection! AND I had this ONLY time slot to plan my baby shower, but Kourt wouldn’t budge to help a sis out,” Kim said, in reference to the aforementioned Christmas card schedule showdown.

Kourtney soon responded with a comment about how her main priority is being a mother.

Which Kim found insulting. “And mine is not? The shoot was with our kids!!!!! My #1 priority is being a mother as well and I can work too, so can you,” she wrote to Kourtney.

That’s when Kourtney conceded—slightly—saying Kim is an “amazing” mother, but they just have two separate outlooks on parenthood. She noted the sisters are always “ride or die,” in case any fans are worried #ChristmasCardGate is going to dissolve the Kardashian empire.

Kim echoed the love. “dont ever get it twisted, me, Kourtney and Khloe are GOOD! ALWAYS!!!! Never question that,” she wrote. Kourtney agreed, simply replying back, “Unconditional love.”

But wait! There’s more! Khloé chimed in on Kourtney and Kim’s tussle, claiming she just wanted “peace” between the sisters. Kourtney called bullshit on that, writing, “Khloé let’s be honest here.”

And that…didn’t sit well with Khloé. “What the fuck does that mean?? I didn’t want peace??” she wrote, to which Kourtney replied she did “eventually.”

Khloé then started chewing Kourtney out in a series of tweets. “Stop looping me into your drama with Kim! Don’t ever tweet me that shit again,” she wrote. She was sure to hashtag #KUWTK in all her tweets too, which is perfectly normal behavior in a spontaneous family fight.

The sisters were apparently supposed to have a conference call to settle their differences (LOL). That didn’t happen.

Oh, and Kourtney’s apparently pissed at Kris, as well.

Who, keep in mind, fans think staged this entire brawl for ratings. The devil works hard, but Kris Jenner works harder, etc., etc.

This really is the Shakespearean tragedy of our time.

Related Stories:

Khloé Kardashian Just Issued a Preemptive “PSA” About Her “Pregnancy Lips”

End of an Era: The Kardashians Are Closing Dash Stores for Good

Kim Kardashian on Making Time for Beauty Rituals: “Even My Sisters Think I’m Crazy”





Source link

Categories
Health

Tessa Thompson's 'Sorry to Bother You' Costumes Are a Wardrobe Roadmap to Fighting the Patriarchy


There’s a lot going on in Sorry to Bother You, Boots Riley’s wildly creative, sci-fi comedy about a black telemarketer who discovers the key to success is using a “white voice”—and there’s not much one can discuss without spoiling the movie. (Trust, the less you know, the better on this one.) One spoiler-free way to unpack the film is how it weaves searing political commentary with pure pop entertainment, most notably through its costumes.

By far, the most memorable outfits come courtesy of Detroit (played by Tessa Thompson), the artist girlfriend of Cassius (Lakeith Stanfield). While the latter makes questionable moral choices in the name of success, the former remains clear-eyed and consistent in her view of the world—and both of these character progressions are reflected in their individual fashion choices: Cassius’ thrifted sweaters shift to slicker suits, while Detroit’s statement earrings (“Tell Homeland Security We Are the Bomb,” one pair reads), slogan T-shirts, and hand-painted jackets remain a constant.

“For me, Detroit is a true activist of her own making,” Deirdra Govan, Sorry to Bother You‘s costume designer, explains. “Her art speaks to her both in form as well as her clothing.”

PHOTO: Annapurna Pictures

“What I really wanted was for her clothing to be her whole business card,” she continues. “[Detroit] is definitely a strong female, very self-aware, not willing to sell out by any means necessary to obtain the level of success that Cassius was seeking. She’s her version of a made woman.”

Govan drew from a range of sources—political movements of the past and present, ’80s and ’90s New York City, afro-futurism and afro-punk—to create the wardrobe for Sorry to Bother You, scouring vintage shops and working with artists in Oakland, California (where the movie takes place) to source the pieces featured on screen. “It’s not a store-bought movie. It’s not a shopped movie. It’s not something that you simplistically just stumble upon. This is true artistic creativity at the core,” she says. “It’s going in vintage shops and finding the beauty in the refuse and starting a language from there.”

STBY_20170629-_H7A9500_R

PHOTO: Peter Prato / Annapurna Pictures

Detroit’s style, in particular, has a personal connection to Govan: The designer says that the character reminded her of her classmates at Pratt Institute and Parsons School of Design, where she studied. “I had girls like this in my class—I was one of these girls at one point, at any given time that I wanted to change my hair or shave my head or do something creative with my clothing,” she remembers.

Thompson also had a hand in crafting Detroit’s wardrobe, contributing her “The Future Is Female Ejaculation” T-shirt to the production, after she picked it up during a press trip in New York City. Govan was thrilled with Thompson’s find: “I was very keen on using [the shirt] because it was a statement. It was just like, wow, OK, this woman has something to say. She’s using every layer, every piece of clothing, to articulate her statement loud and clear.”

Sorry to Bother You

PHOTO: Annapurna Pictures

While a “female ejaculation” T-shirt is, yes, a clear statement, it’s not even Detroit’s most political moment in the movie—that comes during her big art show: She gamely puts on sunglasses, slicks back her hair, and wears a bikini made of rubber gloves, standing defiantly on stage as she asks the audience to throw objects at her.

It’s a bizarre and powerful moment, but it took lots of collaboration to get to the final product. “In the script, [Detroit is] written as being nude, and Tessa and I both felt very strongly [about] not about having nudity for just nudity’s sake, for the gratification of the male gaze,” Govan explains. “Things need to be equally weighted.” Riley, who both directed the film and wrote the screenplay, was open to the change, even suggesting rubber gloves as an alternative. This idea reminded Govan of pants and shirts with hand imprints over a woman’s breasts or backside she’d seen growing up, and she knew she wanted the same statement for Detroit.

“A woman having a glove bikini is like, ‘This is my body. I own it. It’s mine. You don’t.’,” Govan says. “And if you notice the middle finger, it’s very clear, like, ‘Fuck you. This is MINE.'”

PHOTO: Annapurna Pictures

And while a middle-finger-up glove bikini is not an everyday look for most—though, how amazing if it were—there is something to Detroit’s style that can be co-opted by anyone fighting the patriarchy. Govan incorporated plenty of real-life references into her wardrobe (and collaborated with artists and stores one could actually shop to create it); plus, slogan T-shirts have had a bigger presence on the runway in recent seasons, from Dior’s wildly popular “We Should All Be Feminists” to Prabal Gurung’s “Our Minds. Our Bodies. Our Power.” Interested parties can cop Detroit’s “female ejaculation” T-shirt from Otherwild for a cool $36. More importantly, we’re in a cultural climate where activism can mean many things—organizing a Women’s March, chanting #BlackLivesMatter, and, sometimes, putting on a “Feminist AF” T-shirt.

Clothing has become a platform in and of itself, as loud as any social media post, to make your opinion known—or, in some cases, for others to assign meaning to. Look at the fervor around Melania Trump’s “I Really Don’t Care, Do U?” jacket, from her visit to the U.S.-Mexico border: While Trump’s team claimed the jacket didn’t have any larger significance or hidden message, it’s taken on a new life with clap-back “I care” shirts that have raised money for Democrat-backed causes. Nowadays, a top isn’t always “just” a top—and Detroit’s fashion sensibility exemplifies the power your sartorial choices wield.

It’s easy to imagine Detroit making her own riff on the “I Really Don’t Care, Do U?” jacket, maybe even finding a way to take it a step further. As Govan puts it: “I don’t want to sound so cliche, but [this is a woman who] sets her own rules. She is her own design. That sense of individualism is what I really wanted to bring across, because that’s the most exciting thing about her. She is her own tastemaker.”



Source link

Categories
Health

The Problem With Privilege and Fighting for Equal Pay


Conversations around equal pay are blaring, largely thanks to the dozens of famous women calling out their male counterparts for getting bigger paychecks. This is, obviously, a very good thing. But for all the merit these declarations warrant — and all the echoing cries of “hell yes! Empowering!” — the dialogue is also tinged with certain shades of privilege that average women fighting to be paid fairly generally lack.

In a lot of ways, a celebrity is defined by their ability to get heard when talking about issues women routinely deal with, whether it’s sexual assault or revenge porn. When the disturbing story of how Michelle Williams made less than $1,000 compared to Mark Wahlberg’s $1.5 million for the reshoot of the aptly (ironically?) titled All the Money In the World came to realization, celebrities rallied. Thanks to the explosive responses Wahlberg donated his entire re-shoot paycheck to Time’s Up.

The average woman also lacks the privilege of being able to fearlessly slam a corporation on a massive scale like Deborah Messing — and later, others — did when they criticized E! (on E!) for the pay discrepancy between Catt Saddler and her former colleague Jason Kennedy at the Golden Globes. It was a moment that deserved the excitement and virality it got—it probably wasn’t easy for Catt or Debra or Natalie or Eva or any other celebrity to vocalize their anger, but it probably was a hell of a lot easier to do when the public has your back. And your bank account is full.

Asking for more money just isn’t something most working women are conditioned to do, for reasons that range from company policy to gender stereotypes

Wage inequity is technically illegal thanks to the Equal Pay Act of 1963, but speaking out or asking for more money just isn’t something most working women are conditioned to do, for reasons that range from company policy to gender stereotypes. “Employers historically have discouraged and sometimes prohibited employees from discussing pay, says Debra Steiner Friedman, a partner in the labor department of national law firm Cozen O’Connor. Culturally, many still view it as a taboo subject.” Women may also be fearful of negotiating, even if they have the power to do it , she says — concerned that there may be repercussions, like losing their jobs or being viewed as ‘difficult.’

There’s also a risk associated with speaking out. (In fact, the majority of women I spoke to about this wanted to be anonymous and unable to identify in any capacity, a stark contrast to the freedom that public figures have in voicing their opinions on systemic problems.)

One Austin-based woman in the tech industry told me it took her 15 years of work to feel comfortable asking for a raise. She described to me an instance at a happy hour when she learned male colleagues made more than she did. “I didn’t say anything to my boss — because I was afraid. I just [got hired], I didn’t want to ruffle feathers. [I thought], ‘I don’t want to lose this job; I’ve been laid off before, and I [don’t] ever want to be laid off again.’ I try not to ask my family for money, I try not to ask anybody for money. I had a house at the time.” She described the working atmosphere as an “all-boys club”—a sentiment clearly reflected in the way the company paid its employees.

Another woman in her early 30s who also works in tech told me she did advocate for herself, only to yield negligible results. “I approached my boss, and [told him] I don’t think I’m getting paid what I’m worth,” she says. “He immediately said, ‘I’ll agree with that. Your annual review is coming in a month. We’ll figure it out then and give you an increase.’ I did get an increase, but it was just the normal, annual positive-review-increase [versus an actual salary raise]. So then, I got upset …. And I think that’s where it kind of put me in a hard situation. I was perceived as emotionally needy at that point … I didn’t push beyond that. I didn’t feel comfortable.”

It’s hard to know how much to ask for — [these matters] are non-transparent, and male coworkers are not allies.

A woman in her 20s who worked at a media startup in New York City told me she “brought up wage disparity with [her] supervisor and he dismissed [her] concern.” She left — because she realized she realized she could make more money freelancing — but during her exit interview, “the HR person laughed at me and told me [my department] is always paid less.” She’s interviewing for a new job and says she “will be asking for more,” but “will walk away if I don’t get more. It’s just hard to know how much to ask for — since [these matters] are non-transparent, and male coworkers are not allies.”

It’s easy to say, “leave a job that treats you like garbage and doesn’t pay you fairly!” It’s not so simple when your financial situation isn’t in a great place, which the case for most women: According to a 2017 survey from LendingTree, the average millennial woman is saddled with $68,834 in debt, with the majority — 42.1% — making over $50,000 a year. (57.3% of men make over $50,000.) According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median weekly income for a woman in the fourth quarter of 2017 was $769 — with women in service positions earning a median of $499 a week. And though the wage gap has been slowly narrowing over time, Pew Research Center notes that a woman would have to work 44 extra days in order to make what her male counterparts make in 2015.

The pay gap is significantly worse for women of color, with black women earning 65 cents and Hispanic women making 59 cents to a white man’s dollar, according to the Economic Policy Institute. Not only does this mean that these women find it harder to save money or develop a “Fuck Off Fund”, it means walking away — like Catt Sadler did from her job at E! or even turning down some work — isn’t an option. What Sadler did was a bold, symbolic move worth applauding, but most of us can’t follow her lead, even if we wanted to.

A Texas-based woman in her 30s who works in the lighting industry told me she makes $16.50 an hour — and that’s after she asked for a raise from her previous wage of $16 an hour — to her male coworker’s $18. As much as she’d love to leave her job; she can’t — her salary doesn’t permit for savings. “I’ve been looking for jobs. I can’t support this anymore. I’m over it — I’m making $16.50, and that’s more than any other job I can hop over to. I can’t just let this [job] go,” she says, even though “in these people’s eyes I’m not worth what a man is worth for no particular reason.”

My negotiating skills have to be twice as good as a man’s in order to get up to what their starting salary is.

Making less money than her male counterparts who do the same job “feels like being bullied” — and she likens telling men about the unfairness of the wage gap to telling someone who believes the earth is flat that it’s round. “One time, I was arguing with this guy — we were talking about the glass ceiling, and he was telling me how the glass ceiling doesn’t exist; women just aren’t as good at negotiating,” she says. “My negotiating skills have to be twice as good as a man’s in order to get up to what their starting [salary] is.

None of this to say is the conversation celebrities are starting is bad. It draws attention to issues all women face, and sometimes, we really can relate. Like when Ellen Pompeo told The Hollywood Reporter she was scared of being perceived as “greedy” and she wasn’t going to walk away from Grey’s Anatomy because she didn’t receive $5,000 more than Patrick Dempsey after asking for it; that it took her until she was 48 years old to even feel comfortable asking for more money. Though most of us probably won’t pull in Pompeo’s $20 million this year, her words struck a chord with women online who felt understood and inspired, not left out.

And, fortunately, other celebrities have explicitly acknowledged the visibility famous people have or used their own platform to advocate for the less public — Emma Watson told Esquire UK in 2016 that “Hollywood is just a small piece of a gigantic puzzle but it’s in the spotlight. Whether you are a woman on a tea plantation in Kenya, or a stockbroker on Wall Street, or a Hollywood actress, no one is being paid equally.” Beyoncé has also spoken broadly about how women deserve equal pay to Elle in 2016, and how she works with organizations to promote equality, including Chime for Change.

Women who don’t have the opportunity to be interviewed by large publications need the advocacy of other women, because we don’t know what will happen when they go to their manager’s office declaring it’s time they paid what they’re worth.

“What’s good about the conversation is that people are coming out publicly and getting media attention, and then women are getting paid differently,” says Melissa Josephs, Director of Equal Opportunity Policy at Women Employed. She concedes it’s “women making a lot of money who are doing this, but that does get media attention” — a good thing. And when celebrities do draw attention to women beyond their scope, it resonates even more and can be impactful, such as when actresses brought activists to the Golden Globes as their dates. Notably, actress Amy Poehler brought Restaurant Opportunities Center’s co-founder, Saru Jarayaman. Movements like that turn the attention to women we don’t normally see on the red carpet, sending a pointed message to the millions of people watching at home and, crucially, their industries and employers.

“I think the challenge is on the employer to have to say why they’re paying [women] differently,” Josephs says. This is particularly important because employers aren’t always proactive about auditing their pay practices to make sure women are paid fairly, adds Friedman. Transparency is a good way to begin addressing the pay gap, she says, and there should be “pressure from employees, shareholders, and the public [to] fuel the trend.” Laws and policies that prohibit companies from asking about a woman’s salary history are also important — since that’s one way employers may justify keeping women’s wages low.

Which means that the women who lack the visibility and who don’t have the opportunity to be interviewed by large publications need the advocacy of other women, because we don’t know what will happen when they go to their manager’s office declaring it’s time they paid what they’re worth. Their stories matter just as much as those in Hollywood, and chances are, they have more to lose — and so much more to gain from the advocacy of those in the public eye.



Source link

Categories
Health

You Have to Watch This Video of 11-Year-Old Meghan Markle on 'Nick News' Fighting Sexism


Long before she starred in Suits or got engaged to Prince Harry, Meghan Markle was just an average kid—one who just so happened to appear on Nick News as part of her fight for gender equality.

If you didn’t catch Markle’s appearance at the 2015 UN Women conference detailing this very experience, allow us to get you up to date. When 11-year-old Markle was watching TV advertisements in class as part of a social studies assignment, she was alarmed when a commercial for dishwashing soap proudly asserted that “women all over America are fighting greasy pots and pans.” She was especially horrified when two boys in her class loudly proclaimed that women “belong” in the kitchen.

Not wanting kids to grow up thinking that “just mom does everything” Markle took up a letter-writing campaign to protest the ad. She wrote to Hillary Clinton, who was First Lady at the time. She wrote to Gloria Allred, the noted civil rights attorney Gloria Allred. She wrote to Procter & Gamble, the manufacturer of the soap. And she wrote to Linda Ellerbee, the host of Nick News.

“If you see something that you don’t like or offended by on television or any other place, write letters and send them to the right people and you can really make a difference, not just for yourself but for lots of other people,” Markle said at the time. And her advocacy work paid off—P&G ultimately changed the slogan for their soap to say “people over America are fighting greasy pots and pans.”

Inside Edition recently obtained footage of Markle’s appearance on the Nickelodeon news show from none other than Linda Ellerbee herself—and even in the ’90s, Ellerbee could tell that Markle would go on to do great things.

“It was absolutely clear that this young woman was strong in her beliefs,” she told the nightly news program. “It didn’t matter that she was 11 years old. She believed in women and she believed in her own power and wasn’t afraid to reach out and say, ‘I want my power. I want my rights.'”

Watch Meghan’s Nick News appearance below.



Source link