Categories
Health

I Put Off Having a Baby to Cover Hillary Clinton's Campaign—and I Don't Regret It


I’d been waiting a year—or my entire life, depending on how you look at it—for this envelope to arrive. It was a self-seal bubble mailer in standard-issue manila sent via messenger from a major publishing house, containing a single copy of the finished version of my first book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.

What I hadn’t anticipated during all those years I’d dreamed of becoming a real published author was that when this package finally arrived, I’d be sitting on the sofa soaked in a frothy mix of milk after a full bottle burst open and spilled all over me and my screaming infant son.

It felt like some cosmic life realignment that the finished edition of my memoir about covering Hillary Clinton for The New York Times, arrived during this mini-fiasco called new motherhood. I held my baby in my arms, the envelope taunting me from the floor, where it would remain unopened for the next several hours.

There was a time in my life when the pull of that envelope would’ve been impossible to resist. Instead, my son and I both wailed.


I’d hardly learned how to write when I began to imagine myself writing a book. I could see the pencil scrawls in my Big Chief notebook published and bound, perched on a shelf at the B. Dalton in North Star Mall in San Antonio, where I grew up. I thought if I worked hard enough and wrote every day, it would happen for me.

I’m a fifth generation Texan, a product of a public high school with metal detectors and an A.P. English teacher whose primary reading material was the J. Crew catalogue. In 1996, when I was 17, one of the teachers at the middle-school school where my mom worked took me to hear Hillary promote her first book, It Takes a Village. I was entranced by what she had to say.

Two weeks after college graduation, I moved to New York with no connections in media or politics and quickly realized how naive I’d been about becoming a writer. I ran around midtown clutching clips from The Daily Texan in a leather Trapper Keeper. I lived on a stash of savings from working in a snow cone stand in Austin. When that ran out, I took temp jobs all over town, at insurance offices and nonprofits, mostly. My writing submissions were either rejected or ignored; things got so bad that I actually contemplated law school. Little by little, I came to understand that winning the Young Author’s Conference of South Texas wasn’t going to open any doors.

After months with no job offers, my sister met a New York Times political reporter through a mutual friend and this reporter generously agreed to have coffee with me. I’ll never forget standing in the crusty lobby of the old Times building in a suit I’d bought at an outlet mall. The reporter never showed.

Three years later, a friend I’d met while temping at Conde Nast Traveler put me up to replace her as the foreign news assistant at The Wall Street Journal. That was my foot-in-the-door. I never imagined that a decade later, I’d be a political reporter at the Times covering the leading candidate for president. (The reporter who never showed is now my colleague.) I wasn’t about to let go of that for anything.

In 2013, when I was 34, then Times executive editor Jill Abramson plucked me out of relative obscurity covering media companies and put me on the Hillary beat ahead of the coming presidential election. I knew this wouldn’t just be a job, but an all-consuming, cross-country marathon that would stretch on for years and require countless nights in a Holiday Inn Express in [insert swing-state city here]. I’d covered Hillary and Barack Obama’s 2008 campaigns, an endeavor that brought me to 48 states, got me enough Marriott points to cover honeymoon lodging in Mexico and left me with an 20 extra pounds from eating whatever sandwich was thrown to us on the campaign bus.

At that point, I hadn’t given much thought to having a baby. I thought I wanted one, but the timing was terrible. I asked my doctor how much it would cost to freeze my eggs until after the election. She told me to get pregnant immediately and take an au pair on the campaign trail. I left the appointment convinced that the baby could wait a couple more years—and resolved to find a new doctor.

Whenever the subject of babies came up with my husband, Bobby, or with nosy but well-meaning friends, the conversation always found its way back to the same question: “What about Hillary?” Ever since she’d spoken about the cracked ceiling in her 2008 concession speech, I’d dreamed of doing it all over again. Thankfully, Bobby and I were in agreement on one thing: the chance to cover the election of the first woman President for the paper of record was too important to pass up—a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. We decided to put off the baby for a few more years. I might not have been so willing to put my personal life on hold had the path to covering a presidential campaign for the Times been even a tiny bit easier.

Two years later, after Hillary had become the first woman to capture the Democratic nomination for president and the Times’s Upshot data model projected that her lead against Trump was insurmountable, Bobby and I started to think ahead. We had the baby talk, again punctuated by the same question—What about Hillary?

After all those years of covering her, I didn’t want to stop when Hillary finally reached the White House. I wanted to see what happened when the candidate morphed into Madam President.

I suppose the good people of Wisconsin made our decision for us.

It was late on Election Night. I stood on the floor of the Javits Center surrounded by Hillary’s crestfallen supporters. I’d just emailed my editors a tip I’d heard from a campaign source. “Wisconsin,” I told them at exactly 11:51 p.m., “Not gonna happen for them. Gone.”

All around me, Hillary’s supporters sobbed. They held cupped hands over open mouths. Grown men collapsed on the floor. A Muslim woman in a hijab dove into the press area and grabbed my arm. “Tell me she can still win!” she said. I didn’t say a word. I was still in deadline mode, thinking only of the next story, reporting out my “how she lost” piece for the next day’s paper. Old habits die hard.

I didn’t realize it at the time, but after three years, visits to all 99 counties in Iowa (twice) and countless renditions of “Fight Song” and—in that instant, under the glass dome that had been set to spill two hundred pounds of confetti shaped like glass shards down on a victorious Hillary—I finally faced a future in which the “What about Hillary?” question no longer loomed.

Not long after Election Day, still in a sleep-deprived fog, I told my very understanding husband, who had visited me on the campaign trail, put up with my constant travel and only occasionally yelled at me to stop looking at Twitter, that I was ready to have a baby.

By then we’d been married for eight years and liked our life—tramping around Southeast Asia, fishing in Montauk, tubing down the Guadalupe River in Texas. He’d left the baby decision entirely up to me. “I could take it or leave it,” he’d say whenever I brought it up. But now that I’d made up my mind, he was all in.

In the weeks after Donald Trump’s inauguration, when I began my (coincidentally) nine-month book leave, I struggled to pull myself away from the adrenaline that comes with a byline, the warm bath of breaking news and re-Tweets. There was a lot about the campaign that I didn’t miss, the exhaustion, the ugliness, the campaign trying to control every word I wrote, but I loved the other “girls on the bus” who covered Hillary and the way that every day had the feel of a traveling circus. This was a far cry from sitting at my dining room table, staring at a blank screen.

But by June 2017, two remarkable, life-transforming things had happened– I’d written 80,000 words about Hillary’s pursuit of the presidency —and, at 38 years old, I was pregnant with our first child. A book and a baby—the two most terrifying, all-consuming things a procrastinator like me would ever do—now forever intrinsically linked.

Ten days after our son Cormac was born, I read a final version of Chasing Hillary. This was my last chance to (gulp!) make factual changes. He lay in my lap, my perfect little peanut, as I reviewed 384 printed pages. I posted a picture of us on Instagram. A friend called me Wonder Woman, another told me I made it look easy. What I left out of the caption: the fact that I had dried baby vomit in my hair. That the vomit had been there for 24 hours, probably longer. Who could be sure?

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on *Chasing Hillary.*

The author and her infant son, putting the finishing touches on Chasing Hillary.

For years, when parents warned me how emotionally and physically grueling new motherhood would be, I nodded but thought: If I can function on no sleep for Hillary, I can do it for my own child.

This turned out to be only partly true. I could indeed endure three hours of sleep, down a cold brew with a shot of espresso and crank out a reasonably coherent front-page story. And, unlike Hillary’s campaign, my baby took a long afternoon nap. But the new baby knocked me back in ways that I hadn’t anticipated. For example, no one told me, that I’d be in so much pain that for the first five weeks just walking from couch to crib would be a challenge. Or that I would irrationally yell at my saint-of-a-husband over dirty bottles and diaper changes, unable to scream about my real frustration—that men, even the best ones, don’t have to go through any of this.

And even if someone had warned me, I wouldn’t have believed them that I would be so hopelessly, inexplicably in absolute, all-consuming love that I would start to see the book, my first “baby,” as an unwanted distraction. I couldn’t have imagined a scenario in which the arrival of my first book would essentially amount to an afterthought. And then it coincided with the arrival of a delightful little baby who filled a piece of me that, it turned out, newsprint never could.

However, I will admit that in recent weeks I’ve spent several sleepless nights agonizing over questions like: will my vagina still hurt while I’m on a multi-city, weeks-long book tour with my baby and my mom in tow? Is there any under-eye cover on that planet that could brighten the dark circles under my eyes? Will my raging hormones cause me to burst into tears on “Morning Joe”?

I had cabbage on my breasts (an old trick to reduce the pain) and an ice pack in my underwear when the publisher needed me to sign off on the jacket design. I wished I were staring into my baby’s eyes (even if they were closed). Or napping beside him. Or doing just about anything (changing a heaping diaper!) other than arguing with the fact checker about whether the bomb sniffing dogs used by the secret service were German Shepherds or Belgian Malinois. (They are the latter, in case you’re wondering.)

People always told me that you are supposed to read to your baby in utero, I’d considered talking to my bulging stomach a bridge too far. Then I realized that in recording the audio version of my book while nine months pregnant, I’d already read 80 hours of my own words to Cormac.

He’d been with me the whole time, kicking as I wrote. I couldn’t have done it without him, without the promise of him. We would open that envelope together. Just as soon as I found a pacifier.

Amy Chozick is a writer-at-large for The New York Times and the author of Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling.



Source link

Categories
Health

Tiffany Haddish on Her Best Groupon Purchase: 'I Don't Need a Man When I Got This'


During last year’s Super Bowl, Girls Trip breakout star Tiffany Haddish was at a friend’s house getting, as she says, “wasted.” It’s safe to say this year will be a bit of an upgrade considering she’s starring as Groupon’s new spokesperson in their Super Bowl commercial. Even better: She’s actually attending the big game in Minneapolis. “I want to cry just thinking about how good [it’s all been],” Haddish tells us. “If you believe in yourself enough and put in the work, good things will happen.”

And good things are indeed happening for Haddish. When she’s not taking selfies with Beyoncé or getting jewelry from Ellen DeGeneres (yep, read about that below), she’s turning her biggest passion—saving money—into a side career. As one of Groupon’s top customers (she’s in the 1% of users), the worldwide e-commerce marketplace took note of her obsession after her Jimmy Kimmel Live! segment talking about the brand went viral. So before the big day, Haddish called us up to talk about all that and (way) more.

First, we have to talk about Groupon and the Super Bowl commercial. Do you remember your first Groupon purchase?

Tiffany: I want to say my very first Groupon purchase was to a pole dancing class. We were going to a Bachelorette party and wanted to take a pole dancing class, so everybody had to get this Groupon for like $15. I believe that was the first…no, wait, wait, wait, hold up. It might have been a necklace. [Laughs]

We just went from pole dancing to a necklace. [Laughs] That’s great.

Tiffany: Girl, the best thing I ever bought on Groupon was a bidet! [Laughs] Yeah, girl! They sell bidets on there, and that has been the best thing I’ve ever bought off of there. I don’t need no man when I got a bidet, you know what I’m saying? You’re always so fresh and so clean! I got mine for like $298, and it was the best one on there at the time. They probably have some even better ones now, and they have some really cheap ones too, but it’s really the best.

What was your your reaction when you found out Groupon wanted you to represent them in such a big way?

Tiffany: They called my agent, and when my agent told me, I was like, “Yeah!” I was doing the Nay Nay for five minutes, I was so happy. When they said I was going to do the Super Bowl commercial, I was like, “What?! OK!” And then I started thinking about all these ideas, and they were like, “Well, we already have some stuff planned out, so save that for later.” I was like, “OK, cool.” Their ideas were way better than mine. I only thought of mine in like four minutes. They obviously spent time on theirs.

[embedded content]

You’ve joked in the past that people think you’re making huge amounts of money now, but you’re like, “I’m glad you know my name now, but I’m still not making the big bucks.” Do you feel like you’re financially comfortable now, at least?

Tiffany: I’m definitely comfortable. I’ve been comfortable for a long time, because I spend money like I don’t have any money. That’s how I got into Groupon, and that’s how I’m going to be a multi-billionaire. I’m always living like I still have the Geo Metro, you know? I drive a Honda now. I’m not going bananas. I’m waiting until Tesla is ready to sponsor me and give me a car. [Laughs] If I talk about it enough, it will come!

I saw on Ellen that she gave you a Tesla rental for a week and a cardboard cutout of Oprah was in the back.

Tiffany: But they wouldn’t let me drive it off the [Warner Bros. lot]. They’re like, “Whenever you’re here for a whole week, you just give us a call and you can drive it,” and I was like, ‘Oh, man!’ But then the next day, Ellen sent a diamond necklace to my house, and it’s so beautiful. I was like, “Well, that makes up for everything.” She said she thought it would be inappropriate to give it to me on the air, so she gave me a necklace off air. I’m waiting for a fancy event to go to where I have to drive myself and then I’ll be like, “I’m ready for the Tesla because I have this fancy event and this fancy event and that fancy event, and I want to pull up in the Tesla.”

Can you even sum up what this last year has been like for you? Can you even put it into words what it has all meant?

Tiffany: To me, it’s like, you know something is going to happen, you just don’t know how it’s going to happen. I’ve kind of known this, and I’ve talked about it so much, but for it all to be manifesting now is the perfect timing. If this had happened in my 20s, I would have been a freaking mess. [Laughs] Now it’s just so perfect. I’m just so grateful. I’m not a perfect person, I’m going to make a lot of mistakes, but I’m just so happy. I just came back from Africa, and this is the first time in my whole life where I felt like a complete person. I want to cry just thinking about how good it…like, if you believe in yourself enough and put in the work and the main thing you have to do is really love and appreciate yourself.

It’s funny because one of my favorite quotes is from Oprah and she said, “You don’t get what you hope for, you don’t get what you wish for, you get what you believe.” I mean, how often do we wish for something or hope for something? But to believe it is an entirely different concept.

Tiffany: Yes!

And that’s why you and Oprah need to be BFFs.

Tiffany: I know, we need to be BFFs. I want to garden with her a few times. Come on, Oprah! Let’s grow some tomatoes!

Hey, maybe she’ll make you her VP if she runs for President in 2020. You never know.

Tiffany: Oh man, I don’t know if I want that kind of responsibility. That’s one thing I don’t believe. [Laughs]

I hear you on that. Do you ever worry, though, that the more success that comes your way, it’ll be harder to relate to the everyday things?

Tiffany: No, that never crosses my mind. Because I’m a human being. I take poops, too. [Laughs]

So now that you have been in this industry for a while and gotten a taste of fame over the last year, is there anything that surprises you?

Tiffany: You know, things that surprise me are when people want to meet me. That’s the thing that surprises me. Or when they say they want to work with me. It’s mind-blogging. Billy Crystal wants to work with me…I mean, what? Kate Hudson wants to work with me, and she’s invited me to her house. Are you serious? When I met Billy Crystal, it took everything in my power now to fan girl out because I’ve watched every one of his movies and studied him. I said, “Who knows, maybe one day I’ll get to host the Oscars and we can do it together!” Because I think he’s the best Oscar host of all time. He and Whoopi would pass me the torch, like, “Handle it, Tiffany.” [Starts screaming.] I believe that! I believe that.

What were you doing last Super Bowl, and what are you going to be doing this Sunday?

Tiffany: Last Super Bowl I was at my friend’s house getting pretty wasted, laughing at all the commercials. This Super Bowl, I’m actually going to go to the game, and this will be like the third time I’ve ever gone to a professional football game. It will be my very first Super Bowl I’ve ever attended, so I’m really excited.

What are you going to wear?

Tiffany: Well, I’m going to wear a big jacket that I got off of Groupon and some gloves that I got on Groupon because it’s going to be cold, and maybe my snow boots I got off of Groupon, too.

You should. Well, Tiffany, you’ve made my day and I can’t wait till you go gardening with Oprah. I believe it’s going to happen.

Tiffany: Oh yes, and I’m going to be crying like a baby and probably will roll around in her dirt.

Well, I’m going to go on Groupon and look into buying a bidet. If I could only buy a man on Groupon.

Tiffany: You know, Groupon had speed dating six or seven months ago, so hopefully they bring that back. Hey, they even have an adult section with the really good grown-up toys, you know the ones that are normally like $200-$300, and they’re like $99. You’ll get an incredible price!



Source link

Categories
Health

Why I Don't Use Scented Tampons


Honestly, I’d forgotten about the existence of scented tampons until the other day, when I forgot to bring tampons to work, and a coworker generously gave me one of hers. And it was one of them. While I appreciated the favor, I was reminded that I truly don’t understand why or how these things still exist. Why would I need fragrance inside of my vaginal canal? And if someone’s vagina truly does smell badly, that’s usually a sign they need to shower or go to the ob-gyn—the solution is usually not to add some perfume to the mix. Plus, would anyone really prefer that their vag smell like a chemical-y imitation of a dewy meadow rather than…a vagina?

Look, if you’re a scented-tampon user, that’s your choice. (America. Freedom.) But we need to talk about why these exist in the first place.

Scented tampons came on the scene around 1945, which means women had been using tamponlike appliances for a long-ass time before some boardroom of men (yes, I’m just assuming it was men, but…you know I’m right) had the idea that women wanted their menstruating genitalia to smell like a bouquet of roses or whatever. And while that might seem strange (it’s not like anyone as of yet has invented a product that makes dicks smell like manly alpine wood) but relatively innocuous, when you look at these tampons through a more feminist lens, the implication is that periods should be hidden—even from yourself.

Which brings me to my next point of rage against scented tampons: No one is smelling your period. I’ve given this a lot of thought, and my hypothesis is if you’re the kind of person who opts for eau de “fresh laundry,” then you probably aren’t the kind of person who’s comfortable enough with your cycle to have period sex or let someone go down on you while you’re bleeding—meaning most likely, no one’s nose is getting close to your nether regions. And in my experience, it’s not like the scent of period blood is so strong that it’s wafting over to the neighboring stall when you use the restroom (for that matter, probably neither is the scent of the tampon). So really, the fragrance is only there for the users, to help them rest assured that no one—including themselves!—can smell what’s going on in there.

Ultimately, after digging into the history of these things, I walked away thinking that more than anything, they perpetuate the offensive cultural message that periods are shameful, dirty, or bad. And despite the boom of organic cotton tampons, scented tampons are still a thing, so people clearly are still buying into that message (literally). Not to mention that the additives in scented tampons are more than likely not great, health-wise.

If someone really wanted to invent a tampon that women actually needed, how about one laced with a drug that helps with cramps? Or one that can remind me when I have my period so I won’t keep forgetting to bring tampons to work? But I’m still not in the market for one that smells like a knock-off Dolce & Gabbanna Blue. How vaginas smell—every week of the month—is just fine.



Source link

Categories
Health

These Are the Actors Who Now Regret Working With Woody Allen—and the Ones Who Don't


On January 1 more than 300 powerful women in Hollywood launched a movement called Time’s Up, which is aimed toward ending gender imbalance and sexual harassment in the workplace across all industries. Time’s Up is undoubtedly a product of the sexual harassment reckoning that happened in Hollywood late last year; following the explosive exposés about Harvey Weinstein in The New York Times and The New Yorker, dozens of famous women—and men—came forward with their own stories of sexual harassment, both at the hands of Weinstein and others. For the first time ever, it feels like sexual assault survivors are actually being heard and their perpetrators are receiving consequences for their actions.

But there’s one exception here: Woody Allen. In 2014 Allen’s daughter Dylan Farrow wrote an open letter to The New York Times, alleging he had molested her at seven years old. Allen was never convicted of anything, but it’s telling that his son Ronan Farrow has publicly stood by Dylan’s side. “I believe my sister,” he wrote in an article for The Hollywood Reporter. (Ronan is also one of the journalists who broke the Weinstein story.) Dylan’s accusation was first made in 1992, but little was done then—and nothing’s really happened now. In fact, Allen’s still very much a working director: His next movie stars Selena Gomez, Elle Fanning, and current awards-season favorite Timothée Chalamet. So where is the disconnect? Why is Allen still able to receive steady work—and acclaim, no less—despite this shift happening in Hollywood?

For some reason, actors, many of whom have voiced their support for Time’s Up, agree to make movies with him…and publicly ignore Dylan Farrow’s accusations. Kate Winslet, Blake Lively, Justin Timberlake—all of these stars (and more) have made movies with Allen in the past few years. Some have even sung his praises. It’s this cone of silence that keeps Allen in power.

Maybe this is going to end, though. Lady Bird director Greta Gerwig, who acted in Allen’s 2012 film To Rome With Love, said in a New York Times op-ed this week that she wouldn’t have worked with Allen had she known the allegations against him—and she won’t work with him again.

“If I had known then what I know now, I would not have acted in the film,” Gerwig said. “I have not worked for him again, and I will not work for him again. Dylan Farrow’s two different pieces made me realize that I increased another woman’s pain, and I was heartbroken by that realization. I grew up on his movies, and they have informed me as an artist, and I cannot change that fact now, but I can make different decisions moving forward.”

This statement comes just days after Gerwig side-stepped a question about Allen at the Golden Globes:

While Gerwig’s NYT piece is a start, other artists who’ve worked with Allen have not followed suit. Hollywood is ignoring his behavior because the actors in his movies are. The only way to effect change is for people to stop working with him. And the people who have worked with him need to speak out—loudly.

Here’s a nonexhaustive list of what actors who starred in Allen’s most recent films have said. Note how many of these quotes are wishy-washy, vague, or even congratulatory:

Kate Winslet (Wonder Wheel, 2017): “He understands the female characters he creates exceptionally well. His female characters are always so rich and large and honest in terms of how they’re feeling, and he just knows how to write dialogue for them to communicate all that.” —Sydney Morning Herald

Selena Gomez (A Rainy Day in New York, 2018): “To be honest, I’m not sure how to answer—not because I’m trying to back away from it. [The Harvey Weinstein allegations] actually happened right after I had started [on the movie]. They popped up in the midst of it. And that’s something, yes, I had to face and discuss. I stepped back and thought, Wow, the universe works in interesting ways.” — Billboard

Blake Lively (Café Society, 2016): “It’s very dangerous to factor in things you don’t know anything about. I could [only] know my experience. And my experience with Woody is he’s empowering to women.” —Los Angeles Times

Kristen Stewart (Café Society, 2016): “At the end of the day, Jesse and I talked about this. If we were persecuted for the amount of shit that’s been said about us that’s not true, our lives would be over. The experience of making the movie was so outside of that, it was fruitful for the two of us to go on with it.” —Variety

Cate Blanchett (Blue Jasmine, 2014): “I mean, it’s obviously been a long and painful situation for the family, and I hope they find some sort of resolution and peace.” — *Hollywood Elsewhere* via Reuters

Diane Keaton (Annie Hall, 1977): “I have nothing to say about that. Except: I believe my friend.” —The Guardian

Rebecca Hall (A Rainy Day in New York, 2018): In a statement posted to her Instagram, Hall revealed that she’ll be donating her wages from A Rainy Day in New York to the Time’s Up fund. “The day after the Weinstein accusation broke in full force I was shooting a day of work on Woody Allen’s latest movie in New York. I couldn’t have imagined somewhere stranger to be that day,” she wrote. “When asked to do so, some seven months ago, I quickly said yes. He gave me one of my first significant roles in film for which I have always been grateful, it was one day in my hometown—easy. I have, however subsequently realized there is nothing easy about any of this. In the weeks following I have thought very deeply about this decision, and remain conflicted and saddened. After reading and re-reading Dylan Farrow’s statements of a few days ago and going back and reading the older ones—I see, not only how complicated this matter is, but that my actions have made another woman feel silenced and dismissed. That is not something that sits easily with me in the current or indeed any moment, and I am profoundly sorry. I regret this decision and wouldn’t make the same one today. It’s a small gesture and not one intended as close to compensation but I’ve donated my wage to Time’s Up. I’ve also signed up, will continue to donate, and look forward to working with and being part of this positive movement towards change not just in Hollywood but hopefully everywhere.”

Timothée Chalamet (A Rainy Day in New York, 2018): The actor revealed in an Instagram post that he cannot answer questions directly about working with Woody Allen because of “contractual obligations,” but he doesn’t want to “profit” from his work on the film. Because of this, he’s donating his entire salary to three charities: Time’s Up, the LGBT Center in New York, and RAINN. Here’s his full statement:

“This year has changed the way I see and feel about so many things; it
has been a thrilling and, at times, enlightening education. I have, to
this point, chosen projects from the perspective of a young actor
trying to walk in the footsteps of more seasoned actors I admire. But
I am learning that a good role isn’t the only criteria for accepting a
job–that has become much clearer to me in the past few months,
having witnessed the birth of a powerful movement intent on ending
injustice, inequality and above all, silence.

I have been asked in a few recent interviews about my decision to work
on a film with Woody Allen last summer. I’m not able to answer the
question directly because of contractual obligations. But what I can
say is this: I don’t want to profit from my work on the film, and to
that end, I am going to donate my entire salary to three charities:
TIME’S UP, The LGBT Center in New York, and RAINN. I want to be worthy
of standing shoulder to shoulder with brave artists who are fighting
for all people to be treated with the respect and dignity they
deserve.”

Alec Baldwin (Blue Jasmine, 2014, along with the 1990’s Alice and 2012’s To Rome With Love): Baldwin took to Twitter on January 16, 2018 and said that it’s “sad” and “unfair” so many actors are distancing themselves from Allen. “Woody Allen was investigated forensically by two states (NY and CT) and no charges were filed,” he wrote. “The renunciation of him and his work, no doubt, has some purpose. But it’s unfair and sad to me. I worked w WA 3 times and it was one of the privileges of my career.” In a second tweet, he posited that Allen could even be innocent because he’s never been formally charged with anything. “This is a charge that was investigated aggressively and resulted in…nothing,” he said.”What would it take for you to at least consider that he is telling the truth?”

Rachel Brosnahan (Crisis in Six Scenes, 2016): Brosnahan is adding her voice to the chorus of actors who admit they regret working with Allen. “Honestly, it’s the decision that I have made in my life that is the most inconsistent with everything I stand for and believe in, both publicly and privately. And while I can’t take it back, it’s important to me, moving forward, to make decisions that better reflect the things that I value and my worldview,” she told The Hollywood Reporter. “Look, I had a great experience working on that project. But I do have to take this opportunity to say that, for me, I have really struggled with the decision to do that project for a long time.”

Related Stories:

Greta Gerwig and 13 Other Golden Globes 2018 Snubs We Just Can’t Get Over

Selena Gomez “Isn’t Sure How to Answer” Questions About Why She’s Working With Woody Allen

Selena Gomez and Elle Fanning Are Starring in Woody Allen’s Next Movie





Source link

Categories
Health

You Don't Become Lisa Vanderpump by Accident: Inside the World of 'The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills' MVP


Lisa Vanderpump is freezing. Sitting on a bench in New York’s West Village, her alopecia-stricken Pomeranian Giggy in one arm and a Pantone purple Chanel in the other, she grits her teeth against the elements. “My nose is about to fall off,” she insists to no one in particular. Then, more quietly, “Too. Cold.” Though it’s nearly 40 degrees Fahrenheit—practically tropical after the maddening chill of the past week’s #BombCyclone—London-born Vanderpump, 57, isn’t used to begrudging the annual slog of winter.

Once she and her crew are ushered inside brunch-all-day bistro Café Cluny, shed their jackets, and toss two low energy Pomeranians into a banquette (Giggy is joined by Puffy, a rescue Pomeranian who also suffers from hair loss), the chill thaws considerably. “Let’s have some lunch,” Vanderpump crows to the group, which includes husband Ken Todd, a compact car of a man in cashmere, daughter Pandora, 31, a publicist, and two other well-turned-out Brits. “I’m the eating housewife!” Everyone laughs politely, the way you might if the queen made a joke.

For the past eight years, Lisa Vanderpump has served as something of a pop culture anomaly: In a franchise that rewards immaturity and instability, she peddles neither. While other Real Housewives have found themselves wading through divorce, substance abuse, even jail time—some going as far blaming a “Housewife curse”—Vanderpump, 57, has steadily if not smugly thrived. Like a fine Vanderpump Rosé, she only gets better with age.

In person, Lisa Vanderpump looks like a flattering caricature of Lisa Vanderpump. Her hair, which I can best describe as Kate Middleton-esque, perfectly complements her pert nose, which nicely offsets her heavily-lashed eyes. (“Individuals,” she tells me. “I can sleep in them and you just take your makeup off around them. Kyle Richards taught me that trick.”) Her purse matches her blouse which matches Giggy’s jacket. The whole thing looks exhausting, but Vanderpump insists she can pull herself together in ten minutes flat. “Some of the girls take a glam squad with them when we go on trips. I don’t do that,” she says. “I have to be made up and put together every day for the restaurants, so it wouldn’t make sense for me.”

It’s a velvet-covered dart, sure, but the point is this: Unlike other reality stars, even her co-stars, Vanderpump has more important stuff to do than get ready all day. A fundamental part of the Lisa Vanderpump brand, in fact, is that she never wanted to be a “reality TV star” in the first place. “They asked me twice to audition and I said, ‘Not for me, thanks,” she says. It was only after her friend Jennifer Stallone—”Sly Stallone’s wife,” she notes—made her watch The Real Housewives of New York that she reconsidered. Her friend, news anchor Robert Kovacik, drove her to the audition.

PHOTO: Bravo

Lisa Vanderpump on The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills

“I didn’t realize how life changing it would be. I don’t think anybody did,” she says over an omelet (see: Housewife, Eating). “I never intended to make my career from it, but I was smart, and I used the show to draw attention to my businesses.”

No kidding. The restaurateur’s résumé now boasts a reported 26 eateries (including PUMP and SUR, which stands for “Sexy Unique Restaurant”), a spinoff series, Vanderpump Rules, now in its sixth season, a canine rescue center, a documentary about the Chinese dog meat trade, and a gig as Editor-in-Chief of Beverly Hills magazine. Her net worth is reported at $65 million, which arguably makes her the most powerful Housewife of them all.

“When people say, ‘The Housewives belittle women,’ I disagree,” she says. “Look what Kyle Richards is doing right now. She’s producing her own TV show. Look at what Erika [Jayne]’s doing. She’s 45 or 46 years old and doing what she wants to. Look at me, going to congress and speaking to the United Nations and building a brand. I think that’s empowering for women.”

But with great visibility comes great responsibility, something Vanderpump, a fierce advocate for LBGTQ rights, understands. “I am a heterosexual woman who can be a conduit to people who might not listen otherwise. I take that very seriously,” she says. “Even the word ‘tolerance.’ I’ve always said, ‘I don’t understand this word.’ We’re going to ‘tolerate’ someone because they’re gay? Fuck off. That’s not what life’s about. It’s about embracing. It’s about understanding.”

When I ask about President Trump, whom she’s never publicly condoned or condemned, she grows serious. “I can’t vote, so I’ve never really had to make a statement, but there are aspects of both parties I do totally understand and would vote for,” she says diplomatically. “I think a lot of people know where my allegiance lies, and what I believe in.”

Regarding the #MeToo movement—and the recent sartorial demonstration at the Golden Globes—she is less opaque. “I didn’t really agree with the need for everybody to wear black to show solidarity. For me, there’s got to be a little bit of a divide, an ability to say, ‘OK, this is about entertainment. Let’s drop it and enjoy the moment,'” she says. “I think the one good thing that’s really going to come out of this is that women aren’t going to be as afraid to speak up. Have I been sexually harassed? Of course. I think most women have at some point. It’s just to what degree. I think we’ve got to judge each [accused person] individually.”

Lisa Vanderpump on Watch What Happens Live

It’s one of those admissions that feels personal at the moment, but when you go back to review the tape, you realize almost nothing has been revealed. And that’s another thing about the Lisa Vanderpump brand: It’s careful. Vanderpump is warm, but with boundaries. Endearing, but rarely vulnerable. She is, in so many ways, unimpeachable. And if her on-screen persona is to be believed, few get much closer. There’s Ken, of course, whom she married 35 years ago after a six-week-long courtship, their two children, Max and Pandora, and a fairytale-like coterie of pets, which includes a swan named Panky. And, for now, she and Kyle Richards, with whom she’s had a notoriously rocky relationship, have reached an accord. “There’s a very authentic friendship there,” she says. “I don’t have a sister, but she’s someone who’s so close to me. If she’s hurting, I’m hurting.”

After eight seasons on the show together, the veterans seem to have established a code of conduct. “I’m sensitive to the other women. If there’s something that isn’t for public consumption, I’ll think to myself, ‘This isn’t for now.’ Kyle’s the same as well,” she says. So what constitutes a breach? “The year that Brandi [Glanville] exposed Adrienne [Malouf’s surrogate pregnancy] was devastating to her,” she says. “It’s not something any of us would have done.” It’s firm, but vague. It’s also the end of that topic.

With our plates cleared—and an appointment with the New York Times waiting uptown—Vanderpump and her team begin to mobilize. A driver is alerted. Pandora drains her white wine. Ken helps Giggy and Puffy into their outerwear. I’m not ready to leave. Maybe it’s the hairless dog in the jester costume still nibbling hand-torn bits of chicken, the midday Sancerre, or Vanderpump’s walnut-size diamond directing sunlight into my eyes, but I feel like I’ve entered a more-decadent, colorful, fragrant, downright reasonable realm. I tell her as much, and she doesn’t seem surprised. “It’s my job to do that,” she says. “People feel more comfortable when everything about their ambiance is just right. And no one does it better than I do. I know if the music’s at the right volume. I know if the lighting is right. I know—and maybe other people wouldn’t notice—but when it’s right, people feel better.”

She’s talking about her restaurants of course, but it’s as close to a brand ethos as you’ll get. “Make your environment as beautiful as you can because you’ll feel so much better,” she says. “I want to feel that I’m immersed in things of beauty. Authenticity and beauty combined make for a fabulous combination.” After all, the rest is just unfortunate weather…or bad lighting. “I liken it to this: You know when you’re in a beautiful bar and then you get in the elevator and it’s that bright light and you’re like, ‘Ugh’? It’s a culture shock. I don’t ever want to feel like that.” And so she never will.



Source link

Categories
Health

'Outlander' Still Hasn't Been Renewed for Seasons 5 and 6—but Don't Freak Out Yet


Although we already knew that season four of Outlander was coming in 2018, the new year has finally arrived, and we still don’t an exact date for when we should expect the new episodes. Even worse, we don’t entirely know if this is the end of Jamie and Claire: No official renewals have been announced for the show, leaving us wondering if season four will really be the last we see of them (say it’s not so!). But on Friday, we got some news that’s making us feel a tiny bit better.

At the Television Critics Association Press Tour, the Starz CEO himself, Chris Albrecht, dropped a little hint about the future of the show, and it’s having us feel all sorts of optimistic. (Of course, keep in mind that Starz hasn’t confirmed the future seasons just yet, so nothing’s official until it’s, well, official.)

“I wouldn’t worry too much about that,” he said when asked about why renewals for seasons five and six haven’t been officially announced. “There are 10 books, and we are having very productive conversations about the future of the show.”

Each season so far has loosely lined up with the plot of its matching installment in author Diana Gabaldon’s book series, which means that if we’re on season-four-book-four, and there are 10 books—well, it’s safe to say there could be a lot more of the duo and their adventures ahead.

Albrecht says his main concern is with how much they’re asking of Outlander stars Caitriona Balfe and Sam Heughan.

“We have joined the legions of fans of Outlander around the world. Our biggest concern is making sure that we don’t kill Caitriona and Sam along the way,” he said, referring to how hard both actors work, not the million brushes with death their characters experience each season. “The two of them are fantastic and deserve every bit of the accolades they have received.” (Like, say, Balfe’s Golden Globe nomination for her work on season 3.)

Those who just cannot wait for the fourth season to start will want to clear their calendars Sunday evening (January 14), when Starz airs an exclusive scene from it at 10 P.M. ET. (So…that’ll hold us over for maybe a week or so?) Until the new season’s actual premiere, we’ll be rereading Outlander recaps and possibly definitely revisiting the best sex scenes from the last three seasons.

Related Stories:
Caitriona Balfe From ‘Outlander’ Is Engaged
Caitriona Balfe Says There’s Less Sex on ‘Outlander’ Than You Think—and That’s a Good Thing
New ‘Outlander’ Trailer Teases All the Sex and (Maybe) Deaths Coming This Season



Source link