Categories
Health

How to Cover a Pimple When Your Concealer Won't Stick


PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

Fact: There’s nothing more annoying than waking up with a massive pimple—especially around that time of the month. And for anyone who’s attempted to cover up a breakout during the summer, you already know all too well about the struggle that comes with applying concealer to oily, sweaty skin. A small dab of makeup on top of that zit just slides right off it, awkwardly gathering around the base for a halo-like ring that just draws more attention to the wickedly red spot.

However, before you toss your concealer aside and decide to call off all pending social plans indefinitely, take a minute to read our foolproof concealment plan courtesy of celebrity makeup artist Daniel Martin, whose clients include Meghan Markle and Jessica Alba. How do we know it works? We made our editor, Lindsay—who, lucky her, was having a struggle-is-real moment at the office—try it out. All it takes is a few easy steps to guarantee your makeup won’t budge, even in sweltering 90-degree heat.

The Essentials

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

Purell, Glossier Stretch Concealer in Light ($18, glossier.com), Giorgio Armani Luminous Silk Foundation in Color 3.75 ($64, sephora.com), Sephora Collection Confetti Mini Sponge ($12 for a set of 5, sephora.com), and Urban Decay Anti-Aging Eyeshadow Primer Potion ($24, ulta.com)

Here’s what you’ll need to start: hand sanitizer, concealer, foundation, a mini makeup sponge, and eyeshadow primer (this is major key!).

Step 1: Sanitize the Pimple

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

For some serious pimple-pulverizing action that works long-term, the best thing to start with is a tool like the Positively Clear 3-Step Acne Skincare Solution by Tria ($149), which uses non-UV light therapy to kill acne-causing bacteria within the pimple. However, if you’re at work or don’t have a blue light tool with you, Martin has an easy alternative: “I like to use hand sanitizer,” he says.

Not only will that small dollop of hand sanitizer disinfect the area (no need to spread more bacteria than what’s already there), but it will also dry the surface of the skin so that it won’t be overly oily for the next step. If you want to be extra precise so as to not dry out the skin around the pimple, Martin suggests using a pointed cotton swab to dab the disinfectant on.

Step 2: Apply Eyeshadow Primer

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

You know how eyeshadow primer helps to prevent eye makeup from migrating to other parts of your face? Well, the same can be said for when you apply it to a pimple before concealer. According to Martin, laying a light coating of eyeshadow primer (his favorite is by NYX) onto the surface of the pimple will not only seal off the surface of your skin for protection, it’ll also allow your concealer and foundation to adhere to the area. So dab a bit of primer (not tinted, though) onto the pimple and the area surrounding it. Then blend with your ring finger—it has the lightest touch.

Step 3: Layer on Concealer and Foundation

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

When it comes to the final makeup application for hiding that unwelcome mega-zit, remember that layering is your new best friend. Start by layering concealer (we like Honest Beauty’s Concealing Duo) on top of the eye shadow primer, then apply foundation as usual (try Dior Diorskin Forever Perfect). Once your face is set, you can go back and forth between adding concealer and dabbing on foundation until you get your desired coverage (don’t worry, it won’t take 100 layers). You can also set the look with translucent powder or setting spray if prefer extra coverage.

Step Five: Blend

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

Finally, grab a mini makeup sponge made for smaller areas and blend away until you can’t see anymore redness.

PHOTO: Photo: Katie Friedman; Design: Emily Kemp

After that, you’re free to go about your day without wondering if anyone is staring at your zit. Even though they’re probably not. Really.

Looking for more concealer tricks? Start by checking out our guide to the most common application mistakes.

Watch Beyoncé’s Makeup Artist Show the Difference Between Contouring and Strobing:





Source link

Categories
Health

Like Meghan Markle, My Father Won't be Walking Me Down the Aisle


Walking down the aisle with your dad on your wedding day is one of those traditions that many women start to imagine from the moment they first fully appreciate the meaning of the word bride. Little did we know when we were kids making our dads play pretend wedding that being “given away” means something much different now than it once did.

Back when marriages were still mostly arranged, a father walked his daughter down the aisle as a way to keep the groom from backing out of the deal; a hand-off from one male-dominated home to the next. The wedding itself marked a transfer of responsibility and financial liability. In a sense, once the ceremony was over, the bride (a word which, by the way, is etymologically entangled with the verb cook) was officially no longer her father’s problem.

Of course, now things are different. Weddings can be whatever we want them to be; if we elect to enact traditions with sexist roots, we can rewrite what they mean in a modern context—or we can throw them out the window altogether.

But the truth is that the “father of the bride” element of most ceremonies has largely stuck, and when that doesn’t happen, it’s often a decision that winds up under the magnifying glass. Just look at what’s happening with Meghan Markle: Her father, Thomas Markle, was initially set to be on the arm of the royal bride-to-be at St. George’s Chapel on Saturday. Then a heart condition, followed by a small scandal thanks to a series of staged photographs, kicked in; as of Thursday the official report from the Kensington Palace press team reflects that he will be absent from the ceremony.

There’s a kind of irony to the fact that a bride who is carrying centuries of monastic history on her shoulders—and whose “fairy-tale wedding” will be watched by the world—won’t be participating in this particular element of ceremonial tradition. No doubt the fact that her father won’t be there is a bruise on her heart. To add insult to injury, she’ll bear the scrutiny surrounding his absence as well.

It’s a weight I can relate to. From the time I was very small, I knew my dad would play an integral role in my wedding day. In fact, I was devastated when a girl in my kindergarten class alerted me to the fact that you couldn’t grow up and marry your father. So I set my sights on finding someone who embodied all my dad’s best qualities instead.

When I found that person, four years ago, seated across a conference table in a Manhattan office building, it didn’t take long for me to begin daydreaming about what our wedding would look like someday. He and I are marrying in November. But what has changed in the years since is that it’s only in my dreams that my father will be there.

I was 27 when my dad was diagnosed with cancer; he was only 61. I remember getting the phone call and collapsing to the ground; I remember my dad telling me that it would be all right, before putting my stepmom on the line. Chemotherapy was tough, but so was my father. When my sister got married, a year later, he was in remission. His hair was a soft gray fuzz that day, and he looked so handsome, so proud, in his suit. By the following June, when the flowers he had planted in the backyard were bursting up through the ground, he was gone.

The “father of the bride” element of most ceremonies has largely stuck, and when that doesn’t happen, it’s often a decision that winds up under the magnifying glass.

When my partner and I became engaged this winter, people immediately wanted to know what kind of wedding we planned to have: where, when, how many people. They wanted to know what type of dress I would wear and what song would play when I walked down the aisle. They wanted to know: band or DJ? And the precipice of something so exciting, it is lovely to be asked.

But it’s also been difficult to explain, especially to people who did not already know, why we are not getting married in my hometown, where I most acutely feel my father’s absence; it is hard to watch a face fall when I share why my sister will be the one to give me away. I’m sorry, they say, and I worry I’ve ruined a happy moment—that somehow I’ve spoiled their joy.

Lately I’ve taken to skimming over certain details, saying that yes, we’re having a big wedding, but no, we won’t be doing a lot of the traditional things: a father-daughter dance, staged family portraits. A walk down the aisle. The responses to those decisions span the gamut, from raised eyebrows (my Italian aunts) to elopement encouragement (“Wouldn’t it be better to save the money instead?”).

There’s another that stands out, though. “Congratulations!” for eschewing retro traditions, some have said, a “Good for you guys!” hurrah. “It’s 2018, a woman doesn’t need to be ‘given away’ by her father,” someone who didn’t know better, said. And the thing is: I agree.

Five years ago I might have skipped any ritual that might suggest that I, or any woman, could be passed like a possession from one man to another. It’s the symbolism, I would have said, my feminist ire up, even if the foundational meaning has changed. I would have found some other way to honor my dad during our ceremony, to acknowledge the massively outsize role he has played in my life. I would nodded at tradition without bending to it. I would cite more progressive traditions like how, in Sweden, the newlyweds-to-be walk down the aisle together. Maybe I would have skipped the whole damned thing and insisted we head to City Hall instead.

There are limitless ways to be a bride, and—unless we are destined to get married in St. George’s Chapel—it’s a choice we get to make for ourselves, which is neither better or worse for being filtered through the sieve of feminism. Now, if the only way I could have my dad back is if he “gave” me to my husband…I would be overjoyed to let him. What has become clear to me since is some traditions are more than rituals; they’re about making a memory. And in the end, I personally cannot imagine anything mattering more. I have no doubt that the royal bride-to-be will carry her own pain in her heart, looking back on her photos and not finding her father there.

I don’t know that my father would have called himself a feminist. What I do know is that he was the first person (along with our mom) who told my sister and me that we could be whatever we wanted to be and that the greatest risks I’ve taken in my life were made possible because I believed that, if I looked over my shoulder, my dad would be standing there behind me. He taught me how to change a taillight and how to stand my ground. He showed me what respectful, compassionate masculinity looks like, because that’s how he always behaved.

What I know now is what I knew as a little girl: that he was the best man to have by my side. For the rest of his life and most of mine, that’s where I could always find him. It’s where I still see him now.



Source link

Categories
Health

10 Best Self-Tanners That Won't Look Orange—No Matter How Pale You Are


I left my tanning addiction where it belongs—in 2011, along with sunscreens less than SPF 30 and the phrase GTL. In 2018, we now all know the importance of practicing safe sun and wouldn’t dream of passing around baby oil by the pool like its a bottle of rosé. Still, it’s around this time of year, when the weather finally decides to get its act together, that I realize a long winter of tights and a lack of vitamin D has done my pasty skin no favors. I know I’m not alone in this. And yet, finding enough Glamour staffers willing to test self-tanners was shockingly difficult. Chalk it up to the fact that—even after years of innovation—sunless tanners have maintained a bad rap for looking streaky, splotchy, and orange. The good news is that the latest batch of self-tanning foams, towelettes, and creams are anything but—and these testimonies from some former skeptics are proof. Jersey Shore might be back, but the days of looking fake-baked are long gone.



Source link

Categories
Health

Paul Ryan Just Announced He Won't Seek Reelection in November—Read His Full Statement


After a morning filled with speculation, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R–Wis.) officially announced that he will not be seeking reelection in November and will retire from the U.S. House of Representatives in January at the end of his current term. The 48-year-old has served in Congress for almost 20 years, and in a statement he called his job “one of the greatest two honors of my life.”

According to The New York Times, the decision came as a surprise to many in the Republican party, since as late as last week Ryan hosted a donor retreat in Texas. In Ryan’s official statement, he stressed that his desire to spend more time with his family ultimately drove his decision. In prepared remarks announcing his retirement, he spoke of losing his own father at 16 and added, “I just don’t want to be one of those people looking back at my life thinking I wish I’d spent more time with my kids. If I spend another term, they will only know me as a weekend father.”

He went on to speak about what he believes have been great achievements during his time in office: “Probably the two biggest achievements for me are, first, the major reform of our tax code for the first time in 36 years, which has already been a huge success for this country, and that’s something I’ve been working on in my entire adult life. Something I’ve focused on since becoming speaker is to rebuild our nation’s military, and after addressing our military readiness crisis, that was a top priority we got done last year as well. These I see as lasting victories that will make this country more prosperous and more secure for decades to come.”

President Trump, who hasn’t always been the most vocal supporter of the speaker, took to Twitter to give his thoughts: “Speaker Paul Ryan is a truly good man, and while he will not be seeking re-election [sic], he will leave a legacy of achievement that nobody can question. We are with you Paul!”

While Ryan may fancy the new tax bill as his lasting legacy, others will likely look back on his time in office with a bit of a different lens. Ryan has repeatedly attempted to defund Planned Parenthood, for example; then there were his attempts to overturn the Affordable Care Act—both moves that were widely criticized by professionals in the medical community as well as progressive politicians and voters alike. The new proposed health care plan, for example, would also have reportedly left millions of Americans uninsured.

Many had hoped that Ryan would be a stabilizing force in the Trump administration—someone who could stand up to the volatility of a president with no background in governing. But Ryan often evaded questions about Trump’s tweets, saying in a CNN town hall: “Do I wish there would be a little less tweeting? Of course, I do.” As former presidential candidate Evan McMullin wrote on Twitter, “Paul Ryan was the hope of the GOP, but he wilted when his leadership was needed most. Instead of checking Trump, he helped normalize him.”

Speculation in D.C. will now turn to who might replace Ryan as speaker of the house, but that would presume that Republicans maintain their majority in the November midterm elections—something that’s not a certainty. Others are wondering if this means more Republican retirements lie ahead. As for Ryan’s future, he’s not giving any clues outside of spending time with his family. But before Donald Trump arrived on the scene in 2016, he was considered a front-runner for the Republican nomination in 2020. Perhaps he will entertain thoughts about the highest office in the land once again? Some of his Twitter fans are ready to sign up and campaign right now. We will all just have to wait and see.





Source link

Categories
Health

This Is the Frustrating Reason Best Album Nominee Lorde Won't Be Performing at the Grammys


The Grammys are tonight, and both celebrities and us normals watching from our couches are gearing up for the big event. After all, awards shows are way better when your favorite artists are performing. But one artist, nominated for Album of the Year, won’t be heading up on stage to wow us—and the circumstances are pretty surprising.

Lorde is the only female up for Album of the Year (Melodrama) this year, but Variety reported on Saturday that she wasn’t offered a chance to give a solo performance up on stage. Every other nominee—who are, again, all male—was given the opportunity and will be singing on stage, according to the magazine.

According to Variety‘s source (who’s “close to the situation”), the Grammys reached out to Lorde about performing as part of a group—reportedly a tribute to Tom Petty—which she declined. She wasn’t asked to sing solo, and so she’s decided not to perform at all.

It’s not like her voice is gone or anything, as Variety points out: She did two flawless gigs on Wednesday and Friday—so no issues there. But it’s worth noting that, in a year of #MeToos, for an event that has a chronic history of ignoring women’s contributions to music to conspicuously oust her from performing isn’t a good look. Throughout Grammys past, there have been 457 male nominees and winners for Best Album—but only 90 female nominees (and from there, just 21 winners).

Lorde’s mom, Sonya Yelich, was thinking along the same lines: She posted a photo to Twitter on Friday with an excerpt from a New York Times article circled. “This says it all,” she captioned the tweet.

Lorde didn’t sing during her VMAs performance last August, either—but that was for an entirely different reason called the flu. Unfortunately this time, we won’t get treated to any of her slick dance moves either.

Related Stories:
The Grammys Did Not Give Enough Shine to These Women This Year
These 5 Graphics Show How Few Women Have Been Nominated in Key Categories at the Grammys Since 1959
Why Lorde Didn’t Sing During Her 2017 VMAs Performance





Source link

Categories
Health

Why Meghan Markle (Probably) Won't Be Sharing Prince Harry's Royal Fortune


The upcoming royal wedding between Prince Harry and Meghan Markle is about to make the United Kingdom an insane amount of money. Their marriage is expected to boost the economy by $680 million thanks to related tourism and T-shirt sales. And while the U.K. will have a lot to thank the soon-to-be royal couple for, Markle will be dealing with some much less fun financial conundrums. Specifically, her United States taxes (and you thought doing yours was annoying).

Although Markle plans to become a U.K. citizen, the process will take approximately three years, during which time Markle will remain a U.S. citizen. Why is this important? Royal expert Marlene Koenig told The Sun, that “Even when married to a member of the British royal family, as long as she remains a U.S. citizen she will have to pay income tax.”

Though Markle has wealth of her own (much of which comes from her role on Suits) that she’ll pay taxes on, she’s also about to marry into a family with a very large fortune. Prince Harry received half of his mother’s £21.5 million (about $29.2 million) estate when she died, and he shares a £3.5 million (about $4.7 million) annual allowance with his brother and sister-in-law, William and Kate. And that’s not to mention the rest of royal family’s worth.

If Markle receives any of her new family’s money, she’ll be at risk of paying income tax on it. “If she receives money from her husband or his family, and that’s considered income, she would have to pay income tax on that,” Koenig explained.

This poses an issue for the royal family, since Markle could have to reveal details of foreign trusts and the worth of the royals’ estate which has remained undisclosed.

“With that sort of money, if Meghan’s name is on that account, most likely she would be dinged—that would have to be reported as income in the United States. You can be sure that those at Buckingham Palace and those who run the accounts are looking very carefully at all of this to make sure that the royal family’s money does not get reported to the IRS,” Koenig said.

While planning her wedding much feel like a fairytale, this part is a royal pain in the you-know-what.

Related Stories:
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Have a ‘Profound Sense of Commitment’
How Meghan Markle’s Life Will Change After the Royal Wedding
Why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Wedding Is Happening So Soon



Source link