Tag: Won039t

Categories
Health

You Won't Recognize Kylie Jenner With Blue Eyes


Kylie Jenner, whose maybe-pregnancy is driving the world insane, is known for her always-changing hair colors. She’s tried essentially every shade in the rainbow: blond, brown, green, blue, purple, even bright pink. One aspect of her appearance that mostly stays constant, though, is her eye color. Jenner’s almond-brown eyes perfectly compliment whatever hair color she chooses for the day, which explains why she doesn’t really mess with them.

But she decided to have a little fun last night. (It was Halloween, after all; if there’s any night to rock a different eye shade, that’s the one.) The lip kit maverick popped in some icy blue contact lenses to go with her angel costume, and she looks unrecognizable. It’s seriously mind-boggling how such a subtle change can make someone look like a completely different person. Check out the videos she uploaded to Instagram last night of the new look:

Jenner also styled the costume with bright blond hair, which made her blue contacts stand out even more. Her best friend, Jordyn Woods, dressed up as a devil, and she looked amazing with her dramatic red eye makeup and fiery hair.

While Jenner’s new look is a nice distraction, it’s not making us forget those pregnancy rumors that’ve been swirling around for months. Both she and her sister, Khloé Kardashian, are reportedly expecting, but they haven’t confirmed anything yet. Instead, they’re just doing ambiguous things, like calling their lip kits “babies” and having their sisters appear on Ellen and mock the stories. When will this teasing end?

Now, let’s wait patiently for fan theories to pop up suggesting Jenner wore blue eye contacts to hint she’s having a boy.

Related Stories:

Kylie Jenner and Khloé Kardashian Joke About Having ‘So Many Babies’ in New Video

Why Kylie Jenner Is Missing in This Keeping Up With the Kardashians Christmas Special Photo

Did Kim Kardashian Confirm Khloé and Kylie’s Pregnancies on Instagram Weeks Ago?



Source link

Categories
Health

Adam Sandler Won't Stop Touching the Leg of 'The Crown' Actress Claire Foy


You would think that as powerful and creepy men have fallen over the course of the past year—experiencing retribution, if not legally, at least in reputation and career—that dudes would kind of sit up and realize that groping women and/or otherwise not waiting for an invitation to insert themselves into a woman’s personal space isn’t a good idea. In recent weeks in particular, there’s been a lot of fallout around former producer Harvey Weinstein as dozens of women have accused him of sexual assault and harassment. There’s also been hundreds of women coming out against director James Toback with similar allegations.

Let’s revisit the general gist of it all, in case it wasn’t clear: Don’t touch us without our consent.

Apparently Adam Sandler hasn’t gotten the message. On a Friday appearance on the U.K.’s Graham Norton Show, he kept nonchalantly—even obliviously—putting his hand on the thigh of The Crown star Claire Foy. She looks incredibly uncomfortable as the audience laughed (we’d like to think in sympathy with her plight) and removes his hand not once, but twice, putting it firmly back on his own leg.

Watch the cringe-y video below:

The two other actresses on the show sitting near Sandler, Emma Thompson and Cara Delevingne—who both came for Weinstein hard as allegations broke out—look at him with something close to disdain. Sandler later went on to touch Thompson’s leg, too.

We all know Sandler’s sense of humor isn’t exactly high-brow: he’s known for physical comedy and early ’90s “bro” humor that veers towards immaturity. But the 51-year-old treating a talented, 33-year-old actress as a casual landing pad for his hand is, at the very least, in incredibly poor taste, especially given the near-constant headlines surrounding sexual harassment and assault in the past weeks. Would Sandler, who is married to a woman, have done the same with male colleagues?

Many women are feeling especially sensitive and vulnerable about matters like this—for some, each new headline is a reminder of their own experiences—and tone-deaf actions like this are incredibly inappropriate.

A spokesperson for the actor said on Sunday that the resulting backlash was “blown out of proportion”—but that’s a response that polices the reaction of women are affected by what they saw. And it’s not OK for the male actor (literally, in this case) to dictate what their response should be.

Twitter wasn’t happy, either, remarking that Foy looked distressed:

On her end, Foy apparently brushed off the brush: a spokeswoman for her repeatedly told the Daily Mail, “We don’t believe anything was intended by Adam’s gesture and it has caused no offense to Claire.”

We’re glad she’s OK, but still, it’s an out-of-touch (no pun intended) gesture from Sandler—and the backlash is an indication that more and more people are less willing to put up with moves like that. Invading a woman’s personal space might have been the punchline of jokes 50, even 30 and 10 years ago, but now, in 2017, times have changed—and it’s time that men, even those who have made a career out of juvenile humor, grow up.

Related Stories:
–More Than 200 Women Have Accused This Hollywood Director of Sexual Harassment
–Selma Blair Says James Toback Once Made Her Read a Monologue While Naked
–Amber Tamblyn Writes Powerful Open Letter to Actor James Woods





Source link

Categories
Health

Kristin Davis Says It's 'Deeply Frustrating' That There Won't be a 'Sex and the City 3'


PHOTO: ©New Line Cinema/Courtesy Everett Collection

This week we heard some disappointing news: Sex and the City 3 isn’t happening. That’s right, Sarah Jessica Parker herself confirmed the news on Thursday, saying she’s disappointed the movie franchise based on the iconic HBO series is done. And SPJ wasn’t the only core cast member to express sour feelings: Kristin Davis is also unhappy that there won’t be another film.

The actress posted an Instagram Friday with two side-by-side photos of her character Charlotte—one at her most vulnerable and one where she’s predictably polished.

“I love to look back at the pics from our LONG history of Sex and the City. I am incredibly lucky to have gotten to play Charlotte through all of her ups and downs ( epitomized in one of my favorite episodes here). It is true that we are not going to be able to make a 3rd film. I wish that we could have made the final chapter, on our own terms, to complete the stories of our characters. It is deeply frustrating not to able to share that chapter (beautifully written by MPK) with all of you. So we will just have our memories, but please know that all of the love and support for us through the years is felt by us and we are so grateful for all of you!SATC forever in our hearts ❤️?❤️?❤️?❤️?”

Both Davis and Parker mentioned that there is a script kicking around for the third movie, it’s just not being made. Of course, there could be dozens of reasons it’s not happening. One theory is that Kim Catrall, who played Samantha, made too many demands about the movie which halted production, but she’s come forward on Twitter saying she just didn’t want to make a third film, plain and simple.

Fans have been asking for another SATC movie since the second one premiered, either because they can’t get enough of Carrie, Charlotte, Samantha, and Miranda or they can’t stand that Carrie and Big ended up together and they want to see if it really lasts. Sadly, we won’t get to know what happens next, but we can seek solace in the fact that there are 94 original TV episodes and over six hours of film to relive.

Related stories:



Source link

Categories
Health

This Drugstore Mascara Is So Good, You Won't Believe It's Only $5


I’m a sucker for a good before and after. Instant gratification, dramatic results, the feeling like you’re in the most entertaining part of a romantic comedy, it’s all there. Fortunately, the best beauty products deliver—but the challenge is going through Sephora one swipe at a time, finding the lipsticks and mascaras with results that make all other products pale in comparison. Unfortunately, those mega-noticeable results sometimes come with an equally heart-attack-worthy price tag—and annoyingly, oftentimes it’s worth it. But other times, the Internet spotlights an underdog so cheap, so available, and so unassuming that its insane effects feel entirely out of nowhere. And that’s where Essence’s Lash Princess False Lash Effect Mascara comes in.

Now, let the record show that I love a good deal as much as anyone, but I also love gorgeous, glossy packaging. So a mascara with the word “princess” in the name that’s emblazoned with a turquoise bodice takes some persuasion for me to all-out worship. Yet ask and you shall receive, because one Reddit user just served potentially the most convincing photo of a drugstore mascara’s results ever. Take a look.

According to user EllieDaisyLouise, who posted the photo, all she did was curl her lashes and layer the mascara onto her “short, straight eyelashes.” Comment after comment raves about getting similar results from the Lash Princess and Essence’s other mascaras, so I had to try for myself.

A look at it on both my lashes

The findings? Holy wow, Reddit. I cannot emphasize enough how much the wand looks like every other mascara wand on the market, with nary a bell or whistle in sight—and pulling it out, I was ready to chalk this one up to some Internet, David Blaine magic. One coat seems normal, with some length and darkening, but no more than any other mascara. But if you keep going, it builds, and builds, and then you have seriously stunning, eyebrow-grazing, Reddit-thread level results.

It’s incredible. And just in case, I passed the tube around Glamour’s beauty editors to confirm.

On Amber you can really tell the difference in the before and after

Amber, our beauty editor, called it magical and offered this tip: “Make sure to wiggle the brush as you apply it, otherwise it can and will clump.” While Lindsay, our senior editor, applied four swipes, then wiped the brush clean on a napkin to go back through. “It started clumping by the third swipe, but after I went through with a clean brush I was able to wiggle the wand in between and really build up the length. Enough so that someone stopped me to say, ‘Whoa, your lashes!'”

That said, it won’t quite give you the same fanned-out look if you don’t have naturally long lashes or ones that don’t hold curl, as some others on the floor reported back. (Sorry, guys.) Otherwise, it’s no fluke: this $4.99 mascara might just be the drugstore’s best-kept secret.

Related Stories:
–Revlon Created a Hair-Dryer Like You’ve Never Seen Before
–A New Maybelline Mascara Is Coming, and It Smells Like Coconuts
–I Fell for a Lancôme Mascara Named After Mr. Big and Now I’m a Cliché With Great Lashes



Source link