Categories
Health

Climate Change Parenting – How to Raise a Child at the End of the World


My two-year-old is funny and joyful and extremely cute, but she requires a lot of patience, and I am often desperate to disengage from her. I am not alone in this feeling; at any playground, as soon as parents are behind their kids, pushing them on the swings, we’re on our phones, distracting ourselves with a little Instagram-induced adrenaline rush. Anything will do the trick: friends’ selfies, Twitter jokes, even silly videos of other people’s kids. But the images of the burning Amazon and Australian wildfires that keep popping up on my newsfeed are not the sort of adrenaline rush I hope for.

Raising a kid in this precarious moment requires both reckless denial and meticulous planning. Before our child was born, I put an emergency survival kit on the baby registry because I figured we might need to prep for the apocalypse as a family of three. My partner—not a doomsday prepper herself—was skeptical at first. But the kit I picked out was inexpensive. (At under $40, it’s a steal compared to the giant camo backpacks with their own pre-printed “HELP” signs that retail for hundreds of dollars.) It was also one of the first items to go; a younger friend picked it off the registry right away.

If it were just my partner and me, we’d head for the open road when the time came or swallow cyanide together romantically. But babies need car seats and five square meals, including two to throw on the ground, and as we prepared for our kid’s arrival, I figured we should think about what we’d need to ensure her basic survival at the end of the world in advance.

In a disaster-prep presentation at work right before the baby was born (because we have those now), we were told to keep four gallons of water on us at all times. I pictured myself holding my toddler in one arm, her folded-up crib in the other, the backpack we use as a diaper bag crammed with water jugs on my back, the cat obviously forgotten at home. It was not a comforting vision.

That’s how we ended up with our end-times kit. You register for gifts so that the kind people in your life can help you get ready for life with your child—the right car seat, the best crib, flares in case of disaster. The kit I chose is packed into a black-and-silver tin a little bigger than a deck of cards, with a Dia de los Muertos skull design for our Instagrammable escape. You can do a lot with a tampon in the wilderness, they say, like filter water or have your period for three hours, so we’ll be fine with the single one in the kit. There are iodine tablets and doll-sized fire starters that I don’t know how to use, plus bandaids, which will probably come in handy for wildfire burns. Okay, so our emergency kit is a box of bandaids. We’re all set!

It is a profound leap of faith to bring another person into the world, and it is extra profound now. Some argue that it’s irresponsible to produce another consumer as we battle climate change, a person who will probably eat beef and fly on airplanes and drive a car for 80 years.

“It’s easy to give up meat and ride my bike everywhere, but to sacrifice having a family is a big change,” my friend Carlie says. She’s a paleontologist who studies dinosaur extinction and wears an inflatable T-Rex costume at Halloween, and she’s not sure whether she and her new husband will have kids. “There’s no way I can look at what we’re doing now and say a mass extinction isn’t coming,” she says, and I groan.

Those of us who plunged ahead despite the warnings are raising end-of-the-world babies. Before she was born, I promised myself that once I had a child I’d keep the gas tank full instead of zipping around with the warning light on like I used to, daring it to hit zero before I pulled into the cheap gas station. If we needed to evacuate, I intended to be able to leave. (I know several people who have fled climate emergencies, so the scenario is not as hypothetical as I want it to be.)



Source link

Categories
Health

Jennifer Siebel Newsom: It’s Time to Stop Treating Parenting as a Mom’s Burden and a Dad’s Adorable Hobby


On the morning of January 7, 2019, my husband was about to become the 40th governor of California, I was going to become the first “first partner” of California, and our four young children were going to take the stage and be thrust into the spotlight with a new level of national attention.

I had a plan for how I wanted to introduce our family to our state. The fight to put on tights and button-down shirts was won, though the fight to take off one coat was lost, and their hair was combed just so. And then, just a couple of minutes into my husband’s inaugural speech, our little Dutch wandered onto the stage holding his binky and his “passie”—much to the audience’s delight and my chagrin.

The media hailed Gavin as “Governor Dad,” and our son Dutch became an internet sensation. I, on the other hand, was asked by too many people to count—in that half-joking but in fact quite serious tone—how could I have possibly let him get up on that stage, and also, why did he still use a pacifier?!

California Governor Gavin Newsom at his 2019 inauguration, alongside his wife Jennifer Siebel Newsom and their four children

Eduardo Ezequiel

I tried to pretend it didn’t bother me, but the truth is it did. It was a reminder that despite our partnership and despite the support I feel in our relationship, I will always bear the responsibility of our children in a way Gavin never will.

And therein lies a deep truth about the struggle for equality, a truth that can often be hard to acknowledge: Policies and structural changes are essential, but on their own those can’t change our cultural attitudes and behaviors toward women. Until we stop treating parenting as a woman’s burden and a man’s adorable hobby, the gender gap we see at work and at home won’t disappear.

The research shows that when women become mothers they face a motherhood penalty at work. Employers are less likely to hire moms than they are to hire women without children, and when they do hire a mother, they offer her a lower salary than they offer women without children. Studies also show that mothers are considered less committed with their jobs in comparison to their childless coworkers, while men are considered more committed once they have children. In fact, men actually receive a fatherhood bonus, seeing a 6% increase in their salaries once they become parents! It’s not surprising then that my husband’s popularity seemed to soar after his big onstage dad moment!



Source link

Categories
Health

Scott Disick Says Khloé Kardashian Doesn't Need His Parenting Advice


The Kardashian-Jenner clan broke the Internet for the billionth time last month when several outlets reported Khloé Kardashian and Kylie Jenner are pregnant. Granted, this news still hasn’t been confirmed by Khloé or Kylie themselves; Kylie hasn’t said anything about it, and the only thing Khloé’s done is shut down social media chatter about a certain “baby bump” photo. In fact, most of the family has remained tight-lipped about these reports; sure, Kim Kardashian dismissed a few stories adjacent to these pregnancies, but no one has directly addressed the idea of Khloé or Kylie becoming mothers.

Well, until now. E! News caught up with Kourtney Kardashian’s ex, Scott Disick, over the weekend and asked him if he has any advice for Khloé about raising a baby. Here’s what he said:

“Well, if she ever asks I’m sure I would try. But I feel like all of
us are so close that all of our children are kind of brought up in the
same vicinity, or one block over, that everybody’s kind of there for
each other, I don’t really need to give advice per se because, we are
right there. It’s not like long-distance, ‘Hey, maybe you should try
this?’ Everybody so hands-on that I feel like it will happen within
time. So no real advice in that sense.”

It’s a vague answer, but notice how he doesn’t deny that Khloé is expecting. Of course, it’s possible he’s speaking in a completely hypothetical scenario. E! News could’ve just been asking, innocuously, if Scott has any advice for Khloé if and when she decides to become a mom.

But that would be…strange. Asking Scott a question about Khloé raising children is very random if that’s not in her immediate future. If Khloé isn’t planning to raise a child any time soon, why wouldn’t Scott just say that as opposed to this ambiguous nonsense? It’s essentially a non-confirmation confirmation.

Obviously, let’s wait until Khloé or Kylie comments to get truly excited. However, Scott’s quote is certainly a good indication that the Kardashian-Jenner family is expanding.

Related Stories:

Kendall Jenner’s Reaction to the Rumor She Had an Affair With Scott Disick Is Perfect

Bella Thorne Opens Up About Those Scott Disick Relationship Rumors



Source link