Categories
Health

Demi Lovato's Mother Says She Still 'Shakes' Thinking About Her Daughter's Overdose


In late July news broke that Demi Lovato was hospitalized for a reported overdose. It wasn’t until August 5 that the singer opened up about the incident herself, writing on Instagram, “I have always been transparent about my journey with addiction. What I’ve learned is that this illness is not something that disappears or fades with time. It is something I must continue to overcome and have not done yet.” Lovato ended her message by telling fans she was going to take some time to “heal and focus on [her] sobriety and road to recovery,” and she hasn’t updated her social media channels since.

Now, the singer’s mother, Dianna de la Garza, is talking about what happened. In a new interview with Newsmax TV, de la Garza confirms Lovato did overdose and that the entire ordeal still makes her “shake.” “It’s still a really difficult thing to talk about,” de la Garza said in the interview. “I literally start to shake a little bit when I start to remember what happened that day.”

According to de la Garza, she first heard about Lovato’s overdose from her friends and loved ones, who bombarded her with text messages expressing their condolences. What they were talking about exactly was still unclear to her, but it became all too real when she received a phone call from Lovato’s assistant, Kelsey. “[Kelsey] said, ‘Demi overdosed,’ de la Garza recalled.

That’s when she and her two other daughters, Dallas and Madison, rushed to the hospital. “We got there as quickly as we could,” de la Garza said. “Dallas and Madison and I jumped out of the car at the emergency room and ran into the emergency room to be by her side. [Lovato] just didn’t look good—at all. She was in bad shape. But I said to her, ‘Demi, I’m here. I love you.’ And at that point she said back to me, ‘I love you, too.'”

[embedded content]

De la Garza believes the positive thoughts she and Lovato’s legion of fans put into the universe are why she’s still here today. “I don’t think she would be here if it hadn’t been for those prayers and the good doctors and Cedars-Sinai,” de la Garza said.”They were the best. I couldn’t have asked for a better team of people to save her life.”

Fans will be pleased to know Lovato is now happy, healthy, and “working on her sobriety,” according to de la Garza. “She’s getting the help she needs,” she added. “That in itself encourages me about her future and about the future of our family.”

Watch de al Garza talk about all this and more in the video, above.

Related Stories:

Demi Lovato’s Sister Wrote a Touching and Emotional Message for Her Birthday

How Demi Lovato Is Changing the Conversation About Addiction in Hollywood

Demi Lovato Breaks Silence About Her Reported Overdose



Source link

Categories
Health

Sharon Horgan Is the Realest Mother on TV


In a world short on joy, humor can be a unifier and a survival tool. In that spirit, we bring you our Comedy Issue, a month-long celebration of funny (and fearless) women and the enduring power of a good laugh.

Before she was one of comedy’s most cult-loved voices, Sharon Horgan was adrift. After moving to London from a turkey farm in rural Ireland, she waited tables, toiled away at an office job, and even sold bongs to stoners. “A lot of trying and failing,” she recalls of her twenties. “I basically did everything I could possibly do to avoid starting my actual, genuine career.”

Then, at 35, she and longtime friend and ­fellow lackey Dennis Kelly wrote a sitcom all about their professional shortcomings. The raunchy Pulling, which aired on the BBC from 2006 to 2009, was a success—and a wake-up call. “With Pulling I found out that writing about something tragic and sad can be fully hilarious if you look at it from a slightly different angle,” she says. “I haven’t wanted to write in a different way since.”

[embedded content]

Sure, she’s the mother dragon behind foul-mouthed tragicomedies like Divorce and Motherland. But it’s Catastrophe, the Amazon show she co-created and stars in, that elevated her to the comedic pantheon. She’s earned a Best Writing Emmy nomination for the show and a BAFTA nod for her turn as Sharon Morris, an Irish woman in London who gets pregnant after a weeklong hookup with American Rob Norris (Rob Delaney) and dives headfirst into an unlikely relationship. (The story is based on Horgan’s own life. Six months after meeting British entrepreneur Jeremy Rainbird, she found out she was expecting. The couple is now married, with two daughters.)

The plot may sound like the setup for a schmaltzy rom com, but Catastrophe approaches everything from alcoholism and infidelity to motherhood with uproarious frankness. In season two, for example, Sharon is desperate to return to work after her second child is born. “To be honest, I didn’t realize how much I love teaching until I had to be around my own kids 24 hours a day,” she tells a stunned job interviewer before admitting that “it’s just hard…to know how to do things” and bursting into tears. “Sharon’s not afraid to admit when she’s lonely or depressed or any of those things you feel when you’re a mother,” Horgan, now 48, says. “She can be sweet and loving and scared and needy. And, equally, she can have balls of steel. I don’t know if that’s more common for Irish women, but I’ve got two personalities inside of me at all times.”

PHOTO: Ed Miller

Comedy of Errors

Horgan, in the season three finale of Catastrophe, says that “writing about something tragic can be hilarious.”

Directness, friends confirm, is a Horgan trademark. “She’s quite straightforward,” Kelly says. “I don’t think she analyzes herself or what she’s doing, and I don’t think she wants to. Partly because Sharon doesn’t want to be a wanker.” Says Delaney: “When we’re writing, we’re like two technicians in lab coats with the exact same goal of producing the best possible scripts. She’s taught me a lot about stories that make ironclad sense.”

“I don’t think she analyzes herself or what she’s doing, and I don’t think she wants to. Partly because Sharon doesn’t want to be a wanker.”

Despite the series’ brisk pace—each season is composed of six 24-minute episodes—the emotional center always holds. At the end of last season, Sharon is grappling with her dad’s recent death. “She’s not grieving properly. She’s not feeling the things she thinks she ‘should’ be feeling,” Horgan says. “One of the mums from my daughter’s school came up to me on the playground and said, ‘I have those same feelings. They made me feel awful, and [after watching], I feel a little less awful.’ That’s been our yardstick: to say things that maybe seem a bit gross or terrible and then be pleasantly surprised that other people feel them too.”

[embedded content]

Horgan’s gift is finding the humanity in the humor. “When I look at Sharon’s work, I don’t think of it as deliberately dark,” Kelly says. “I think she’s just being honest about the world as she sees it.” And, for her, the funniest moments don’t require a clever pun or a zany coincidence. “It has to make us laugh. If we’re not laughing several times per page, we’re not doing it. But it doesn’t have to be a ridiculous sort of gag, either. It can be something so true it’s funny,” she says. “We like there to be two good story lines running solidly through the beginning, middle, and end. We don’t like to just have a series of events. We like shit to happen.”



Source link

Categories
Health

Meghan Markle Reportedly Wants Her Mother to Walk Her Down the Aisle


2018 is officially here, so you know what that means: It’s time to start the countdown to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s wedding. Yes, my friends, Markle and Prince Harry are tying the knot this year—on Saturday, May 19, to be exact—and it’s been a long time coming. News of the Suits actress and Prince Harry dating first popped up in October 2016, and a sea of rumors and reports transpired shortly afterwards. However, everything was confirmed on November 27, 2017, when the couple finally announced their engagement.

Not much is known about their royal wedding at this time, though. Like we said, it’s happening on May 19, and we know the location—St. George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle—but that’s about it. Everything else is just hearsay. Of course, that doesn’t mean we can’t playfully indulge in the rumors surrounding the nuptials, like the one about Prince Harry and Markle wanting a banana cake for the reception. Yummy.

Or how about this new one from E! Online, which claims that Markle doesn’t want her father, Thomas, walking her down the aisle? According to the news outlet, the soon-to-be duchess has another person in mind for the honor: her mother, Doria Ragland.

And this makes total sense, if it’s true. E! reports that Markle is super close to her mother. Interestingly, Markle wasn’t really seen with her father last year, who is often described as reclusive.

That being said, Markle’s parents did release a joint statement following her engagement to Prince Harry, so don’t rule out her father making an appearance at the wedding just yet. “We are incredibly happy for Meghan and Harry. Our daughter has always been a kind and loving person. To see her union with Harry, who shares the same qualities, is a source of great joy for us as parents,” they said. “We wish them a lifetime of happiness.”

Looks like we’ll have to file this one under “wait and see.”

Related Stories:

Meghan Markle Opens Up About Her Passion for Volunteering

Meghan Markle’s New Year’s Resolutions Are Probably Yours, Too

The ‘Meghan Markle Effect’ Is Already Very Real for Fashion Brands



Source link

Categories
Health

This 'Riverdale' Theory Suggests Alice Isn't Betty's Biological Mother


With every new episode of Riverdale, it’s becoming more obvious the mysterious Black Hood is a member of the Cooper family. At this point, though, it could be anyone in that band of blonds: Hal Cooper, Betty’s long-lost brother, or maybe even Betty herself. (“Dark Betty” is scary, guys.) Your guess is as good as ours.

And a new Reddit theory builds on this idea—that the Black Hood is a Cooper—but with a twist. According to a user named -lCrackers, the Black Hood is Betty’s biological mother…but that woman isn’t Alice Cooper. It’s Penny Peabody, the shady lawyer for the Southside Serpents. Yes, you’re reading this correctly. We now have a new theory which posits Penny Peabody as both Betty’s biological mother and the Black Hood. That’s two bombshell reveals at once.

But the evidence is pretty strong. -lCrackers suggests that Alice and Penny are half-sisters, and that Alice took Betty away from Penny when she was born because she didn’t think she could handle a child. Fast-forward to roughly 17 years later: Penny’s now grown up and seeking revenge on Alice for taking Betty and for painting the South Side as this criminal hotbed. She wants to show everyone the North Side is just as gross and corrupt—hence why she became the Black Hood.

If Penny’s been on the South Side this entire time, it’s entirely plausible that she observed Betty from afar, which would explain how she knows so much about her. And because Penny is paid in “favors,” she has the connections to make this Black Hood operation seamless. Perhaps she’s hiring people to do the dirty work—the killing—for her, and she’s just pulling the strings. That would explain why those two Black Hood letters had different handwriting: one came from Penny, and the other from one of her accomplices.

It’s an ironclad theory, to be honest. Penny has both the motive and the means to be the Black Hood. Also, she looks just like Betty. This is, hands down, the most convincing hypothesis we’ve come across thus far—and the one most likely to be true. Of course, we’ll have to keep watching to find out for sure.

Related Stories:

If Riverdale Fans Are Right About This Character Being the Black Hood, I’m Done

This Riverdale Fan Theory About the Core Four Is Very Creepy but Totally Possible

A New Riverdale Fan Theory Claims This Surprising Character Is Black Hood



Source link

Categories
Health

Elizabeth Warren Once Struggled to Find Child Care—and Every Working Mother Can Relate


For millions of American families, securing affordable, high-quality child care is a challenge if not an impossibility—one that Senator Elizabeth Warren is all too familiar with.

On Wednesday evening, the Massachusetts lawmaker delivered the keynote address at the National Women’s Law Center’s 45th anniversary gala and in a heartfelt speech, revealed that if it hadn’t been for the help of her 78-year-old Aunt Bee, she likely wouldn’t be a U.S. Senator today.

Warren started her career as a teacher, but when she ended the school year pregnant with her first child, she wasn’t asked to return. Throwing herself into life as a mother and wife, Warren knew she wanted to do something more. After law school, she got a job teaching law, but her life was quickly thrown into chaos when her babysitter quit. Cycling through different child care options, managing the requirements of her job, and raising two young kids was an endless struggle—one Warren felt she was failing at. During a phone conversation with her 78-year-old Aunt Bee, Warren broke down crying and decided the only option she had was to quit her job.

Without hesitating, Bee told Warren that, though she couldn’t arrive until Thursday, she would be there to help. Sure enough, she arrived with seven suitcases and her Pekingese in tow—and stayed with Warren and her family for 16 years.

“I’m a United States Senator today in part because my Aunt Bee rescued me on that Thursday in 1979,” Warren said. Without child care, I was a goner. And I know how lucky I was because so many working moms don’t have an Aunt Bee who can fly in and help out.”

Though plenty has changed in the decades since Warren began teaching law, affordable, high-quality child care remains one of the most significant challenges for working parents. According to a recent report from the Democratic staff of the Congress Joint Economic Committee, American families spend an average of 15 percent of their income on child care—and in states like California, New York, Arizona, Colorado, and Oregon, it’s not uncommon for that total to hit the 20 percent mark.

For many mothers in two-parent households, leaving the workforce entirely is a more viable financial option than staying at their jobs and paying for child care. But for millions of mothers who serve as the head of household, this is not an option—and they’re spending anywhere from 25 to 50 percent of their earnings on child care. And in order to make ends meet, they may have to sacrifice the best child care options for ones that they can afford.

It goes without saying that the benefits of high-quality, affordable child care are vast—for both women and their children. Women not only have more education and professional opportunities but stand to earn significantly more money during their careers if they’re able to find top-notch child care options for their kids. This is especially true for low-income moms who, according to the JEC report, could earn up to $90,000 more over the course of their professional lives.

And for kids, enrollment in first-rate early learning programs often benefits them beyond their adolescence and well into adulthood. They’re more likely to get higher grades in school, enroll in college, earn more once they’re in the working world, and have overall better health.

Warren, of course, knows just how valuable high-quality child care can be, and she’s taking steps in the Senate to make this a reality. She’s backing legislation that would help cut child care costs for low- and middle-income families. She’s introduced the Schedules That Work Act so that low- and minimum-wage workers so can have some basic fairness in their schedules—and not have to scramble with going back to school, scheduling doctor’s visits, and, of course, handling child care because they work jobs with unpredictable hours. And just like public schools provide a space for kindergarteners to learn how to read, write, do math, and interact with other kids five days a week, she wants to create programs so that two-year-olds, three-year-olds, four-year-olds—and their families—have opportunities to access this type of early childhood education.

“It’s a big goal, but no one builds a future without investment,” Warren said. “Whether you and I have small children or not, we have an interest in the future of this country—and that means we have an interest—and a responsibility—to invest in America’s children. And that means making sure that their teachers and caregivers are adequately paid and trained…and it means making sure that when parents are working, their children are safe and loved and learning and growing.”

As she concluded her remarks, Warren drove home that access to quality child care can’t be a solo endeavor—it’s one that everyone needs to get behind.

“Until we decide, until all of us decide—men and women, married and single, black and white, old and young—that we are willing to invest more in all our children, then we cannot build a country in which women have an equal opportunity to build a future,” Warren said. “The energy to make these changes will come from people like you, people who fight for equality every day. And most importantly, the energy will come from the many people all across the country who have joined this fight and made it a part of their lives.”



Source link

Categories
Health

Margot Robbie on Playing a Mother Who Puts Herself First in 'Goodbye Christopher Robin'


PHOTO: David Appleby/FOX Searchlight

There’s an adorable moment in Goodbye Christopher Robin—the real life story behind Winnie the Pooh that’s in theaters now—where Daphne Milne (played by Margot Robbie) surprises her son, Christopher Robin (Will Tilston) with a teddy bear. She playfully disguises her voice and delights her son by bringing this stuffed animal to life as only a mother can. Everything about the scene—which takes place in the gorgeous countryside outside of England in the 1920s—is as charming as one would expect of the location that inspired the iconic children’s book.

And yet, there’s an underlying sadness to this moment. It’s post World War I England, and Christopher Robin’s father, the successful humorist and playwright known as A.A. Milne, is quite damaged from the war. He’s also suffering from what we now know is post-traumatic stress disorder. He has moved his family to the countryside in hopes of new beginnings, but Daphne—a London socialite to the core—is lost and deeply unhappy in these surroundings. Her solution? Leave her husband and young son for weeks at a time to pursue her interests back in the city.

“Daphne was passionate about clothes, jewelry, gardening, and decorating,” Margot Robbie says of her character. But was she passionate about motherhood? “No, no, not at all,” the film’s writer, Frank Cottrell-Boyce, explains. “She was terrified of it.”

PHOTO: FOX Searchlight

Although it was actually common for mothers of Daphne’s time—and class—to seldom see their children and let a nanny do most of the child-rearing, Daphne was far from typical. In fact, in many ways Mrs. Milne could be described as the original ‘momager.’ “She encouraged her husband to get his work published and do the publicity,” director Simon Curtis explains. “She liked fame. She liked being married to a famous playwright and author and the mother of a famous [child]. She didn’t see the potential downside. And to be fair to her, no one had experienced the downside before. It was a whole new concept.”

To modern eyes, neglecting parental duties to party and socialize are far from “Mother of the Year” attributes, but part of what makes Daphne—and the film—so fascinating is the purposeful decision not to villainize her for it. “They weren’t trying to make her one thing,” Robbie explained to Glamour. “It was very evident in the script that [the writer] didn’t see her as the bad guy, nor did he make her into this perfect, demure lady. I just loved that she was complicated and had a strong point-of-view. I didn’t want to soften her edges. I wanted to embrace her character flaws and also shine a light on some of her choices and decisions. Though the audience might not like them in the beginning, by the end of the film hopefully they can understand why she behaved the way she behaved.”

Domhnall Gleeson—who plays A.A. Milne—couldn’t agree with his on-screen wife more. “I thought Margot made a brilliant decision not to apologize for her character,” he told us at the film’s London premiere. “She said she’s known people like that in her own life—very strong people who come off as very abrasive, who don’t apologize for themselves—and I love that that’s how she went about playing Daphne. And more so, Daphne weirdly gave her husband more [encouragement and support] than it seems, whether it’s time alone with their child, time alone to write, etc. Dumping him in the middle of a situation where he was uncomfortable was what he needed, and I thought that was really interesting.”

PHOTO: FOX Searchlight

Cottrell-Boyce echoes Gleeson’s sentiment, explaining that “the whole point of her is to make you understand people. She was difficult, yes, and I think you might have judged her if you met her in real life, but the whole point of the movie is to show you that every heart has its reasons.”

Speaking of reasons, “I hope viewers realize how traumatic it was for the women at home from wars as much as it was for the men who were away at war,” Robbie says of Daphne’s decision to immerse herself in a different world. “Just realize for a moment how [that devastation] could affect people’s lives.”

And while most people wouldn’t equate love with seeing your child only for an hour or day, Curtis—who directed the film—says there was no doubt that Daphne truly loved her son and husband. “It might seem strange, but they really did love each other. She was incredibly helpful to her husband. She moved to the country for him, encouraged him to write knowing he won’t be happy unless he did. And then once he [finished his work], she helped promote it. But she was enjoying living her own life, too.”



Source link