Categories
Health

*Crazy Rich Asians* Is a Hit With Critics—and Why That's So Important


Crazy Rich Asians isn’t even out yet, and Hollywood is already raving about it. The highly-anticipated adaptation of Kevin Kwan’s hit novel has an impressive 100 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 19 reviews. Granted, there’s a chance this rating could drop as more come in, but the fact it’s currently at 100 percent all but confirms Crazy Rich Asians is headed for a Certified Fresh Rating—and, hopefully, box office success.

“Seeing this kind of onscreen representation is incredibly satisfying, especially via Kwan’s rich page-turner,” reads the review from Time Out. “A loving take on Kwan’s books, bundled up in a wildly entertaining package,” says Kate Erbland from IndieWire.

And these are just two of many stellar reviews from top critics. In addition to their actual reviews, many of them took to Twitter to express their enthusiasm for the movie. “After seeing #CrazyRichAsiansMovie I wanted to reread the book and rewatch the movie, AT ONCE. It made me that happy, and not just because of the outfits (though they are stellar),” Moira MacDonald from The Seattle Times tweets.

“Crazy Rich Asians picked an auspicious date to lift its review embargo, but by delivering a satisfying, highly entertaining romantic comedy, the filmmakers have made their own luck,” writes Brian Lowry from CNN.

And here are some more tweets from critics:

“I wanted to rewatch CRAZY RICH ASIANS as soon as the credits started rolling. It’s a wonderful romantic comedy with culturally distinct (but universally relatable) stakes. It’s also a moving-as-hell affirmation of Asian American identity,” tweets Inkoo Kang from Slate.

“#CrazyRichAsians takes the fairy tale trope that has defined our cultural understand of romance, and gives it new life by showing that it doesn’t belong to blue-eyed, blonde haired Cinderella,” writes Anne Cohen for Refinery 29.

This bout of critical acclaim is coming on the heels of #GoldOpen, a social media campaign started by digital media entrepreneur Bing Chen to make sure Crazy Rich Asians has a banner opening weekend. “EVERY MOVEMENT NEEDS ITS MAFIA,” he tweeted earlier. “That’s why 100+ of us have bought out theaters to give #CrazyRichAsians a #GoldOpen. Join us and buy your tickets NOW for opening week on @Fandango.com.”

This early praise should certainly help drive viewers to movie theaters next weekend. After all, the 24/7 nature of our news cycle makes positive reviews impossible to ignore—and with people’s time and funds limited, they want to make sure they’re seeing something good.

The early Twitter response to Crazy Rich Asians seems to mirror this Rotten Tomatoes slam drunk. Check out some responses, below:

Crazy Rich Asians hits theaters August 15.

Related Stories:

Crazy Rich Asians Supporters Are Using This Hashtag to Make Sure It Slays at the Box Office

Hollywood Wanted a White Actress to Lead Crazy Rich Asians—So Author Kevin Kwan Fought Back

21 Movies You’ll Kick Yourself for Missing This Summer





Source link

Categories
Health

A Few Dozen Migrant Children Were Reunited With Their Families—but That's Not Enough


Although a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration had until Tuesday to reunite about 100 young migrant children with their parents, the government acknowledged Monday evening that it would fall short of the court-ordered deadline.

Roughly 3,000 kids were removed from their families at the border under the Trump administration’s “zero-tolerance” immigration policy this spring, and about 102 of those children were under the age of five. Last month U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw ordered the Trump administration to return all kids under five to their parents or guardians by July 10. However, the Justice Department revealed at a court hearing in San Diego that only 54 families would be reunited by today and that they would be released in the U.S. together.

Five more cases are still undergoing final background checks.

This leaves a few dozen kids in limbo. According to Time, Justice Department lawyer Sarah Fabian said that the government was unable to reunite the remaining children with their families for several reasons, including the fact that some of their parents had already been deported, some needed to be located and others are behind bars on criminal charges.

Judge Sabraw has signaled that he will work with the government and allow more time to place the final children back with their parents. He asked the administration to propose a timeline and said that he recognized some cases would “necessitate additional time.”

However, this situation still raises several concerns about the children beyond the 102 in question. About 2,000 are still being held away from their parents, and Judge Sabraw had given the government until July 26 to reunite all of them. At the rate the government is going, it’s likely they will need an extension again. If Judge Sabraw decides not to offer more time, the government could be found in contempt of court.

Additionally, the Trump administration missing their first deadline calls their reunification process into question and reveals it may not be enough to unite families effectively.



Source link

Categories
Health

Netflix Is Making a Rom Com That's Basically 'A Christmas Prince' Meets the Royal Wedding


With the royal wedding over and done with, we’ll have to get our fairytale romance fix somewhere else. Luckily Netflix is here to fill the gap, announcing on Monday a new royal wedding–y movie, starring Vanessa Hudgens and Sam Palladio. The movie is called The Princess Switch, according to @seewhatsnext, Netflix’s news-bearing Twitter account, and it’s “a rom com about a duchess & a commoner who swap places after discovering they look exactly alike! But things get complicated when they each fall in love with a man who doesn’t know their true identity.” (The duchess obsession lives on.)

Although Netflix didn’t give out any more information, Hudgens did post a still from the film to her Instagram account. In it she’s wearing a wedding gown and a tiara, and Palladio is rocking a European-looking uniform à la Princes William and Harry at their respective weddings. So…does this mean Hudgens is playing the dual role of duchess and commoner? And is Palladio the royal she marries? It sure seems that way.

“Did someone say a royal wedding??????? that’s a wrap on THE CHRISTMAS SWITCH ? coming to you this holiday season on @netflix ❤️❤️ so excited for you guys to see this one ??,” Hudgens captioned her Instagram post. So either she got the film’s name wrong, or the working title was The Christmas Switch at one point. Either way, it appears to be Christmas-themed (like Netflix’s surprising breakout hit A Christmas Prince). Palladio re-‘grammed the photo as well, appearing to reveal that filming took only a month.

In other Christmas-themed royal rom com news, BuzzFeed reported that A Christmas Prince is getting a sequel called A Christmas Prince: The Royal Wedding, in which the main characters prepare for their nuptials by watching Meghan Markle and Prince Harry tie the knot. So meta.

Related:

Watch Prince Harry Save Meghan Markle From a Fall Like, Well, a Prince

Leaving Netflix in June 2018: 40 TV Shows and Movies Leaving Next Month





Source link

Categories
Health

Tennis Fashion Is the Athleisure-Adjacent Trend That's About to Take Over Summer


At the beginning of every season, you might run through a list of things you might want to buy—for summer, that may include a swimsuit, sandals, and… a tennis skirt?

As of early June, one of the frontrunners for the trend of the summer appears to be tennis-inspired: prim polo shirts, A-line skirts, monochromatic halter mini dresses, and other pieces you might normally spot on the courts at Wimbledon or the U.S. Open—except, now, they’re on Instagram.

It’s not completely out of left field: Athleisure has been dominating the industry for years, though it’s moved beyond the leggings-and-sports bra mentality. Now, brands are moving into the next phase of this trend, tailoring their collections to specific activities and sports, infusing performance fabrics and silhouettes with a design sensibility. And tennis is proving to be the early favorite from this wave.

Outdoor Voices just debuted its first-ever tennis collection—a project that founder and CEO Tyler Haney says has been in the works for about 14 months; Tory Burch has incorporated tennis-specific pieces into her sportswear label, Tory Sport, since it launched in 2015; brands like Lilly Pulitzer and Lacoste are bringing back archival tennis silhouettes for a 2018 shopper. The sport’s relationship to fashion isn’t exactly new: The Williams sisters have both been involved with the industry for years (and Serena just launched her first-ever solo clothing label, which has sporty undertones, but isn’t overtly tennis-related). But it seems to be particularly omnipresent for the summer shopper.

PHOTO: Courtesy of Outdoor Voices

The Players Polo Dress from Outdor Voices’ tennis collection.

Haney says the brand’s tennis collection originated from customer insight: It has a team dedicated to scouring all platforms to figure out what the shopper wants (the requests “run the gamut of ‘I want a specific sports bra style’ or ‘I want things for stretching,’” per Haney), which then takes its findings to the creative and design specialists—and “tennis was definitely an activity that popped for us.”

“When we first started thinking about Sport ten years ago, I knew that tennis would be an integral part of the collection,” Burch tells Glamour. In the summer, she’ll hit the courts several times a week—and “for people who love tennis,” she says, “it is really part of their lives. They want designs that work on and off the court, delivering on the things that matter—comfort, fit and durability—with great style.”

PHOTO: Courtesy of Tory Sport

A look from Tory Sport’s Spring 2018 collection.

According to Haney, seasonality definitely came into play when thinking about the collection, since it “drives why people want to wear the product”—the piqué material used throughout the pieces, for instance, isn’t only reminiscent of the fabrics we see on the court during tournaments, but it’s also developed to be extra-breathable in the face of heat, which makes it ideal for summer wear.

Outdoor Voices’ foray into tennis apparel comes hot off the heels another tennis-adjacent milestone for the brand: the introduction of the Exercise dress. At the core of both this garment and its tennis collection is a fascination with the A-line silhouette—which Haney believes is at the root of sport’s recent come-up in summer fashion trends: There’s “an ease” to that style that translates “on all different body types,” she says, which makes it an appealing canvas for a designer.

“That A-line silhouette you traditionally find in tennis has definitely been an inspiration for us across all of Outdoor Voices,” Haney continues. “As we started thinking about dresses, a lot of [the references] came from older on the court [imagery] from the ‘70s and ‘80s… In a very cool, not-super-sexy way, it emphasizes curves—it makes you look powerful and strong… We’re really focused on leaning into feminine design while also making you feel strong, and the dress totally does that for us.”

In recent months, too, we’ve seen how brands that have been in this space for some time have capitalized on the resurgence of these silhouettes by digging through their archives and bringing back old collections and pieces, updated for a modern consumer. Lilly Pulitzer is one, reviving its fan-favorite capsule after a 10-year hiatus; Lacoste, meanwhile, announced its 85th Anniversary collection, which reimagines some of its most well-known pieces from its vault.

“Tennis is a life-long, social sport and such a natural fit into our year-round resort lifestyle,” Mira Fain, the brand’s EVP of Design, explains to Glamour. Plus, summer’s the season to go outside and either play or spectate, so it felt like a good time to re-introduce this line. (From this capsule, Fain says the “Perfect Match” tennis toile has proven to be an early favorite.)

PHOTO: Courtesy of Lilly Pulitzer.

A shot from Lilly Pulitzer’s “Summer Tennis” lookbook.

With designers like Christophe Lemaire and Felipe Oliveira Baptista, Lacoste has long been building on tennis legacy with a distinctly more “lifestyle” approach. Still, the resurgence of these more traditional pieces suggests there’s an interest from the customer.

“Our designs for tennis are resonating with customers who love the performance aspect as well as the quality and fit,” says Burch. “I love a modern take on classic tennis whites, and, with Sport, the idea of marrying fashion and function is always an interesting challenge. We have crisp whites, of course, but we also incorporate color, feminine details and technically innovative materials.”

“There’s such power behind women feeling powerful and empowered—if you think of sports and [what you wear to play], tennis is where you wear the dress,” Haney adds of this trend. “The fact that it’s a dress that you’re strong and active in—for me, that’s probably it.”

Related Stories:

30 Wrap Dresses That Make Summer Dressing That Much Easier

25 Excellent Resort 2019 Looks, and the Fictional Vacations We’d Wear Them On

How to Wear Your Swimsuit As Part of Your Outfit



Source link

Categories
Health

Toe Ring Sandals Are the Unexpected Summer Shoe That's About to Be Everywhere


When it comes to certain fashion trends, it can feel like a slow burn: For a while, they’ll exist on the periphery of what’s considered “realistic” or “wearable”—their existence is acknowledged, but it’s rarely implemented into one’s wardrobe. That’s how I felt about Matrix-esque patent; ditto for Birkenstock-esque sandals, when Phoebe Philo first made the case for them at Céline back in spring 2013. If I wait long enough, though, the aspects of the item that feel unpalatable to me—that, though runway-approved, would be hard to explain to my relatives—start to fade away. And before I know it, I’ll spend hours searching for the right one to buy myself, a good two seasons late. (Though, usually, by this point, there are plenty of affordable distillations of it everywhere.)

This is a very long-winded explanation for why I may spend my summer in toe-loop sandals. Yes, I mean those shoes that have some sort of ring detail around the big toe. And yes, I’m serious.

I mentioned this in a pitch meeting, and was met with a not-unexpected dose of skepticism—a mix of furrowed brows and, ‘… really?’’s from colleagues. I explained how I kept seeing them on Instagram, which led me to believe they would soon become A Thing. Sure, they already have a runway precedent—Philo’s Céline, Alexander Wang, and Tibi had already endorsed the trend in past collections. But having the endorsement of well-dressed bloggers and editors , as well as a proliferation of options courtesy of indie labels, meant it was gaining popular support. Plus, not too long ago, we were unsure about whether things like corset tops and PVC clothing would catch on… and, well, look at how far we’ve come.

Humor me, reader, as I embark on this quest to convince my co-workers (and, okay, maybe even myself) that I’m not totally off on this prediction. See the 20 toe-loop sandals ahead for further proof that these shoes will be all over your feed in a few week’s time.

We bring you the trends. You make them your own. Sign up for our daily newsletter to find the best fashion for YOU.





Source link

Categories
Health

Hillary Clinton's New Book *What Happened* Proves She's Not Going Away. That's a Good Thing


On the morning of the 2016 election, I slipped on some of the only pants that accommodated my pregnant belly and a “Hillary” T-shirt. Climbing up the steps after I checked off a box for my namesake, I stopped for a moment and put my hand on my stomach, right near the kicking foot of my unborn daughter. I had just voted for a highly qualified, highly intelligent, highly suitable woman for President of the United States of America, and she was going to win. Her inauguration would come just days before my daughter was due to arrive in the world.

Instead, I cried for most of the next week. And my story is no different than that of millions of other women across America who felt like they too had personally had a rug ripped out from under them on November 9.

On that post-election morning, as Hillary delivered her concession, I sputtered out loud, “How the hell is she doing this?” Imagine losing the presidency to an admitted sexual predator with the personality of a petulant Big Mouth Billy Bass.

What the hell happened?

In Hillary Clinton’s new book, aptly titled What Happened, she digs into the question, even if she doesn’t offer any comforting explanations. She discusses how she spent the day after her concession (“I don’t remember much about the the rest of that day. I put on yoga pants and a fleece almost immediately”), throws barbs at some of her critics (claiming that Bernie Sanders “impugned” her character), and puzzles over why exactly so much scorn has been fired at her over the decades (“What makes me such a lightning rod for fury? I’m really asking. I’m at a loss.”)

The book itself has already become a lightning rod (it just came out Tuesday), especially for Democrats who want to tuck Clinton into a special lined and scented drawer for failed candidates and never let her out again. Who think that her book distracts us from the future of the Democratic party because it’s wrapped up in the past. Who offered up such opinions as the former Clinton surrogate who proclaimed, “I wish she’d just shut the fuck up and go away.”

Apparently everyone in this country gets to dissect the 2016 election—except the woman who lost.

We don’t typically ask losing candidates to imprison themselves in their homes for all eternity—Al Gore recently completed the talk show circuit for his new film, John McCain is still mavericking through the Senate, and Mitt Romney is sitting on a beautifully appointed sofa somewhere. But Hillary? She should gracefully bow out of public life, her critics proclaim. Apparently everyone in this country gets to dissect the 2016 election—except the woman who lost.

A woman’s role in the world is exactly what a large portion of What Happened delves into. In three chapters—the least discussed bits of the book so far, of course—Clinton outlines her own history as a woman in politics and the contours of the still raging fight for gender equality. It’s clear Clinton is relieved to get this off her chest, to rant about the young man at the law school admissions test who told her “If you take my spot at law school, I’ll get drafted, and I’ll go to Vietnam, and I’ll die.” About the bizarre spectacle that surrounded the “tearful moment” (she says, “I didn’t even cry, not really”) she had on stage at the 2008 New Hampshire primary. About the impossibility of pleasing people as a woman in politics: “If we’re too tough,we’re unlikable. If we’re too soft, we’re not cut out for the big leagues. If we work too hard we’re neglecting our families. If we put family first, we’re not serious about the work.”

There is nothing new or exciting in what Hillary Clinton offers from her own biography—but that’s precisely the problem. These issues aren’t new, but they aren’t going away. One of the most accomplished women in the world still doubts whether she did the right thing when she was literally stalked onstage by her opponent during a nationally televised debate! The exchange has been widely reported (“Donald Trump was looming behind me … My skin crawled”) but the followup hasn’t. Clinton did not, as she considered, turn to him and say, “Back up, you creep, get away from me.” But she wonders to herself now, “Maybe I have overlearned the lesson on staying calm—biting my tongue, digging my fingernails into a clenched fist, smiling all the while, determined to present a composed face to the world.”

He stalked her and she’s still left doubting if her reaction cost her crucial votes. That’s the state of gender relations in our country today.

And Clinton doesn’t just hash out the details of her own issues. “Something I wish every man across America understood,” she explains, “is how much fear accompanies women throughout our lives. So many of us have been threatened or harmed.” And interrupted, and castigated, and told our voices are too shrill and our opinions too forceful. Clinton traces all that. “It’s maddening,” she writes, “that the basic fact that sexism is alive and well should be up for debate.” And yet it is—and it is specifically up for debate when you question the role sexism played in the 2016 election. It seems the country doesn’t want to re-litigate that question—just try telling a man that you think misogyny was a large factor in Trump’s rise and Clinton’s defeat.

It’s nearly impossible to discuss the election without being offered an explanation of Hillary’s failures as a candidate (Those pantsuits! That cold demeanor! Those celeb endorsements!) as if her opponent were Franklin Delano Roosevelt and not a real estate tycoon who was caught on camera boasting about committing sexual assault. We’re still free to hate on Trump—but not to love on Hillary.

We’re still free to hate on Trump—but not to love on Hillary.

I can feel myself rehashing the election right now. You’ve done it, too. How could this happen? How could democracy fail us on such a fundamental level? Clinton deserves her chance to work through that question, too—publicly if she chooses. She campaigned publicly. She battled publicly. She can certainly now wonder publicly about the day she lost the presidential election. Think about it: If it happened to you, wouldn’t you want your say?

The book, then, is an act of women’s liberation. A woman who failed in public wants to work towards course correction. And yet here comes the parade of people prepared to tell her that her voice—the one for whom all this has mattered the most—should go for a literal hike in the woods of Chappaqua and keep her feelings to herself. She should keep to the Netflix binges she writes so fondly about in this book, apparently, and ignore that the failed election was only one smaller portion of a decades-long career in public service.

But that makes Clinton just another woman in a long string of suppressed voices. Yes, she lost. But that doesn’t mean she’s less equipped to tell the country where we all went wrong. In fact, it may make her better informed.

It’s not going too far to say that a lot of women have been traumatized over the past year. If a former Secretary of State, Senator, First Lady, accomplished attorney and Yale Law graduate is repeatedly dismissed as a “flawed candidate” because she boasts policy over reality TV theatrics, then what does that say about our country’s attitudes towards women? That’s not the kind of wound that heals in 10 months–for the populace or Clinton herself. Why shouldn’t she tell her side in gritty detail? And why shouldn’t we take that particular narrative as a welcome reminder of how important the fight for women’s equality has become?

Related Stories:

Let’s Keep “I’m With Her” and Make It a Rallying Cry for All Women



Source link