Categories
Health

This Swimsuit Line Wants to Change the Way We Think About Disfigurement


Maria Luisa Mendiola has always had an affinity for bold, striking swimsuits—in part because for years, she’d buy them in the hope that they’d take attention away from her feet. She was born with brachymetatarsia, a condition in which one of her toes is visibly shorter than the others. Growing up in Costa Rica, going to the beach was a constant source of anxiety, because it meant going barefoot.

“I was always so uncomfortable, because everything in my body looked ‘normal,’ but I think people were a lot quicker to ask me why my feet looked different,” she says. “Having that conversation was so difficult for me because there was always this taboo about being different.”

Brachymetatarsia is a hereditary condition, and Mendiola reasoned that, while she doesn’t have kids yet, she wants her hypothetical future offspring to feel accepted, no matter what they look like: “I think that, pardon my French, but lit a fire under my ass… I need to make sure that the society that my children live in is going to be much more embracing of differences and empathetic.”

Mendiola recognized that while her condition may be specific, the psychological and social burden of disfigurement—a catchall term that can describe everything from congenital conditions (like cleft lips and palates) to scarring caused by an accident or surgery to paralysis from a stroke or Bell’s Palsy—is something that many more people are familiar with. People with visible disfigurements, for instance, often face conscious and unconscious bias, staring, hostility, and discrimination in the workplace and in school, something that can be debilitating itself, hindering self-esteem and quality of life.

Mendiola decided to confront this issue head-on, quitting her job in finance to enroll in a master’s program at Central Saint Martins, the famed London design school. For her graduate project, she designed a line of swimsuits inspired by disfigurement. That turned into MIGA Swimwear.

PHOTO: Bruna Lacerda/Courtesy of MIGA

When she first started the project, Mendiola connected with several women through a U.K. organization called Changing Faces, which supports and advocates for the estimated 1.35 million people in the country with significant face or body disfigurement, to help develop what would become MIGA. (In the U.S., there is no single organization dedicated to disfigurement—rather, they tend to focus on a specific condition or group of conditions, such as craniofacial anomalies or eczema—so no such overall statistics exist.) Later on, she reached out to potential partners based in the U.S., and eventually found a collaborator in New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center’s burn support group.

Mendiola sat down with women in this group and interviewed about their experiences with swimwear and design preferences (Katuiscia DeJean, one of its members, says she would make her own protective swim layer from the sleeve of a surfing rash guard; another, Mio Acosta, recalls wearing board shorts or leggings and long sleeves to the beach—none of which were particularly comfortable on hot summer days.) They also participated in fittings, modeled, and ultimately walked away with a swimsuit tailored to their individual needs.

PHOTO: Bruna Lacerda/Courtesy of MIGA

Each MIGA suit comes in two versions: one specifically designed with a survivor’s needs in mind (with a detachable skirt, a matching glove, or an asymmetrical sleeve), and one more traditional one-piece or bikini style for or anyone who may not want as much coverage (whether you have a disfigurement or otherwise.) When you purchase one or pledge to the brand’s Kickstarter, you’ll receive a short narrative of someone’s experience living with disfigurement. Through this process and MIGA’s just-launched blog, Mendiola hopes to break the silence around this topic, as well as create a space to talk about what it means to look different—something most women can no doubt relate to.

Isabel Heine, one of Mendiola’s collaborators, who suffered burns on 35 percent of her body during an apartment fire in 2003, says she was particularly drawn to the project because of its focus on women. “Something that I’ve seen in working with different burn patients is that men and women handle scarring very differently,” she says, noting how, in her experience, female survivors tend to need more time adapting to the changes in their appearance. “That was certainly something that I remember dealing with a lot and finding to be the most difficult, because with women, society and ourselves, put so much value in our physical appearance. When that’s completely altered overnight, it’s shocking to your sense of identity.”

PHOTO: Bruna Lacerda/Courtesy of MIGA

Identity was something Mendiola also had to reckon with when choosing the language to use surrounding the line. Some of the consumers she hopes to reach might not necessarily identify with the term “disfigured,” preferring instead to use “visible difference” or the precise name of their condition. She settled on “disfigurement” because experts consider it to be the most neutral and precise term, and it can carry over to any group she works with in future collections.

Acosta says she’s okay with the word “disfigurement,” but there’s another she no longer identifies with: victim. “I feel like we’re more so survivors than we are victims,” she explains. “I know we were victims at one point, but you do survive it and you continue to live.” DeJean adds: “At the end of the day, my scars don’t define who I am. But they helped craft who I’ve become.”

PHOTO: Bruna Lacerda/Courtesy of MIGA Swimwear

The functional elements of a swimsuit designed for burn survivors, such as placing a seam in such a way that it doesn’t irritate a skin graft or adjusting the length of a sleeve so it covers a scar, are important, especially since it’s a group of people that historically hasn’t been catered to. But what might be as vital is the message that MIGA’s existence and mission conveys—one of equality, shattering of prejudices, and self-acceptance.



Source link

Categories
Health

Geena Davis Knows Women Are Good for Hollywood's Bottom Line. So What Gives?


Perhaps the set of Stuart Little isn’t where feminists expected to battle gender norms, but Geena Davis is the happiest warrior. Trust that she will open a frontline when she sees one.

In the movie, Davis is Mrs. Eleanor Little, mother to George Little and Stuart Little, the mouse-son the family decides to take in. Once, between takes, Davis watched one of the second-unit directors line up extras for a scene in Central Park. George Little is meant to enter a boat race, and he needs some competition. So “[the director] found a little boy and gave him a remote control and had him sit on the edge of the water,” Davis recalls. “Then he found a little girl to come and stand behind him as his cheerleader.” Over and over, the pattern repeated: boy, contender; girl, admirer.

It took Davis a second, and then it struck her: “Oh, wait a minute—we could do something different here.” She approached the director to make her case. She wanted an equal split, with both genders in both roles.

“He got this sickened look on his face of utter mortification,” she remembers. “Yes!” he told her. “Of course!”

For Davis, 62, it’s this simple. “It’s all so, so unconscious,” she insists. Not the harassment or the discrimination that has come to the fore since the #MeToo movement exploded almost 12 months ago, but the bias, which has been the site of her activism for over a decade. Davis believes that men don’t mean to undercut women, but she saw it on Stuart Little, and she’s seen it in countless executive suites and on dozens of sets since. Even in 2018, men still make most of the choices. And when those men write a remote control into a script, it tends to be placed in the hands of a character who looks like them.

Since her landmark back-to-back roles in Thelma and Louise in 1991 (which she was so desperate to be part of that her hastily drawn contract didn’t even stipulate which of the two title roles was hers) and A League of Their Own in 1992, the icon has strived to offer decision makers a new vision.

PHOTO: PictureLux / The Hollywood Archive / Alamy Stock Photo

At first, she planned to do it onscreen. In the wake of her one-two punch for which writer Thelma & Louise writer Callie Khouri won an Oscar and Davis was nominated for a Golden Globe for A League of Their Own, the media all but coronated her: Because of Davis (and Khouri and Susan Sarandon and Madonna) it would all be different now! The rules of the game had been rewritten! For women in film, Davis heralded the dawn of a new era.

As far as Davis was concerned, she’d had it made. When Davis was new to the business, awards season came like a divine promise. “Meryl Streep, Glenn Close, Sally Field, Jessica Lange—these women were getting nominated or winning Oscars for incredible parts. I thought, They’re older than me, so they’re going to fix everything. There’s no way these people are not going to be working into their sixties.” Streep and Close and the rest had blazed “a ferocious trail.” She would just follow it.

Except she couldn’t.

Insiders had predicted a wave of movies with female athletes after A League of Their Own, but audiences didn’t get one until Bend It Like Beckham premiered a decade later. Interviewers wanted her to corroborate that women’s opportunities in film had expanded thanks to her work, but she wasn’t so sure. She’d go on to shoot just three live-action films in her forties. (“I didn’t want to just react—to be the girlfriend or the wife of the person doing all of the cool stuff.”)

Davis noticed that it wasn’t just her. A lot of movies were “supposed” to upend the status quo. Thanks to The First Wives Club, women over 50 would be cast in lead roles. Then came The Hunger Games, with its promise of women-helmed action franchises. Fifty Shades of Grey generated over $500 million in ticket sales, but Sam Taylor-Johnson told Indiewire in a recent interview that she was offered “nothing” after the movie came out. Wasn’t Frozen meant to scuttle the damsel-in-distress trope? Didn’t Hidden Figures and Black Panther demonstrate that black casts could command millions at the box office? Each movie vowed to correct a flawed calculus, but none have quite done it.

Davis realized she needed new tactics. If she couldn’t fix the disparities between women and men onscreen alone, then she wanted research. She founded the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media in 2004 to convince the entertainment business to make a commitment to better representation, commissioning Stacy Smith, Ph.D., at the University of Southern California Annenberg School of Communication and Journalism, to calculate the percentage of female characters who appear and speak onscreen. Perhaps with the Stuart Little moment in mind, she resolved to fix a particular gaze on movies and television shows made for children, whose sense of their own possibilities media helps shape.

“When I was coming up, there was an explicit assumption that girls will relate to male protagonists, but boys won’t relate to a female protagonist,” Nina Jacobson, who produced The Hunger Games and Crazy Rich Asians, remembers. “In essence, a white male protagonist was like the type-O blood for representation.” The first time Jacobson met Davis, she was the president of Buena Vista Motion Pictures and Davis had come in to make a presentation. Davis was the first person to show Jacobson what that meant—how few characters little girls could see themselves in were onscreen. Jacobson now refers to that as the “paradigm shift” in her career and also as a “true holy-shit moment.”

PHOTO: Getty Images

PHOTO: Alamy Stock Photo

PHOTO: Getty Images

“The ratio of male-to-female characters in film has been exactly the same since 1946,” Davis tells me. Later, she adds, “It’s preposterous that’s still the case, but we never get momentum because it goes back to people’s idea, this Hollywood fixation, that men won’t watch women but women will watch men.” The excuse came up so much that she directed her institute to crunch the numbers. (See? Data.) Researchers found that movies with a female lead made 16 percent more at the box office than movies with male leads in 2015. More studies confirmed her conclusion: Inclusion isn’t just some moral imperative. Women are good for a bottom line. So what gives?

“I think men were raised from minute one in worlds nearly bereft of a female presence,” Davis explains. “So when adult men look at a workplace or a cast list and see one woman, that looks normal. One is what’s expected.” She mimics the protest she’s sometimes encountered when she puts the problem to men: “We have a woman!” Then she shows them the data.

Davis has sat down with hundreds of men and can’t think of one who has said, “Well, that’s not important” or “That’s not true.” But once, when she went to address the Animation Guild, which was at the time around 17 percent female, a man in the audience raised his hand and said, “We hear what you’re saying, but we really can’t add more female characters because they’re too dull.” Davis reminded him he was one of the people responsible for shaping those unimaginative characters.

“Well, we don’t dare give them flaws,” the man responded. “They can’t be unattractive, heavy, clumsy, stupid. They can’t have any flaws, whatsoever, because we don’t know what you want.” It was an accusation. That usual male howl: Women! Impossible to please. Davis (who has this response to at least 70 percent of the insane anecdotes she recounts to me over the phone) laughed.

“What if you made, I don’t know, half of the characters female,” she proposed at the time. “And then they can be whatever you want.”

“She’s a shining bright light,” director and producer Paul Feig says of Davis. “She’s holding lots of really aggravating, embarrassing, enervating facts. And yet I’ve only seen her present them in just the loveliest manner. You’re even more shamed because she never yells.”

“You just want to be around her,” he continues. “She motivates people to want to change things.”

Even in our current era and despite her involvement in Time’s Up, which is committed as much to genuine progress as it is to loud collective awareness, Davis maintains there’s a place for her quieter war. “I haven’t kept it a secret from the public,” she says of her crusade. “I give speeches and interviews, and we release data to the public. But the main goal is not to educate the populace.” It’s to launch a complaint with the people in the room where it happens. If that means she needs to whisper when she’d like a bullhorn, she’ll do it.

Her methods are not lost on Emma Watson, the heir apparent to her brand of activism. “Geena’s work has been a huge inspiration to me,” she writes in an email. “I’m a massive geek when it comes to data and am constantly citing research from her institute.” Watson proves it, adding in the note that women make up less than one third of all speaking characters in film and under a quarter of fictional onscreen leads.

This month Davis traveled to the Toronto Film Festival to promote her latest work. She’s a producer on a new documentary, which includes the likes of Jessica Chastain, Shonda Rhimes, Meryl Streep, and Davis in conversation about sexism in entertainment. In an interview with the Associated Press, Davis said that despite profound inequalities across all industries, “the one area that can be fixed overnight is onscreen.” It doesn’t need to be a slow process or incremental. Davis feels in her bones that one film can do what A League of Their Own or even Bridesmaids was supposed to. Our beacon of optimism! She knows it’s possible. So she decided not to wait for the media or the experts to write their op-eds. The film is titled This Changes Everything.

Geena Davis is an executive producer on the upcoming documentary This Changes Everything. This profile is part of a full week honoring iconic women. For more, head here.

Photos: Getty Images; Art by Aimee Sy



Source link

Categories
Health

Serena Williams Is Launching Her Own Fashion Line


If you follow Serena Williams on social media, you know she’s been preparing for the launch of her namesake clothing line for some time now. If you’ve been keeping up with the greatest athlete of all time for longer, though, you know that she was once enrolled at the Art Institute of Fort Lauderdale for fashion design—and that she’s created collections for companies like Nike and HSN, as well as been responsible for many of her most memorable on-court outfits. (Remember that Puma catsuit? Yup—all Serena.) Now, for the first time, she’s going out on her own. And it’s crucial that her first independent fashion venture bears her name.

“I needed to call it Serena,” Williams tells Glamour. “I always said I [was] going to call it something else—I even toyed with my name spelled backwards… I need people to know that this is me and this is what you’re getting, and to not shy away from it and to be proud and have that confidence that sometimes even someone like me [doesn’t] have… I’ve designed for Nike, I’ve designed for Puma, I did that stint with HSN for a few years and we had runway shows—but I was never full creative director. So here I am, complete creative director, down to the grommets that we use on the jeans, the tags, our packaging… You can see how it plays out different than anything else I’ve done.”

Serena debuts as a 12-piece collection on its own e-commerce site—and with its own crest, which features a few of Williams’ favorite things, like tennis and her dog, Chip. It’ll follow a “drop” system, with new styles released in waves throughout the summer and into the fall. Even within this limited release, you’ll see a range of different aesthetics covered, all of which are a reflection of Williams’ own style: “I was thinking, ‘This is my boardroom look when I go to my meetings, this is what I wear in Florida or in L.A. just hanging out with my friends’… I feel like this really speaks to all different aspects of my life, and since I do so much, it covers a lot of women.”

At launch, everything in Serena is under $250. Affordability was something Williams was hyper-aware of throughout this process. “I’m Serena Williams, and I don’t want to pay $1,000 or $3,000 for an outfit—I can, and I’m not going to,” she says. Instead, she wants to offer that high quality and attention to detail that all shoppers want, at a price point that feels realistic and attainable: “There are so few people who have access to buy whatever they want, however they want. I want them to be able to buy these clothes.”

“The Serena collection is for the woman that believes in herself, that wants to be gorgeous, that already looks good and loves herself on the inside and now is showcasing that on the outside,” Williams tells us. “When I went with this, I thought, ‘I’m not going for age—I’m just going for that girl or that woman that wants to look fabulous.’ I’m 36 and I’m playing professional tennis, so for me, there’s no age. On paper, I should have been done 8 years ago, and I’ve had my best times [since], but it was like: Who says that? Why does age even come into play here?” Williams applies that same line of thinking to her clothing line, and the types of words associated it: She sprinkled empowering slogans and “S-words” throughout this and upcoming drops, that are meant to reflect and celebrate the wearer.

Throughout her career, Williams has held and balanced many titles: tennis champion, board member, design collaborator… Of all these experiences, there’s one lesson that’s stood out to her as the most valuable as she goes out on her own with this fashion line: “Investing in yourself,” she says, “and that’s what I did in this collection: I invested in myself because I believed in it and I believed in myself. I said, ‘You know what? I put it off for so many years—I’ve always done so much for other people and other companies and I want to do this for myself.’ And I think that’s the best news that I could get.”

See the first pieces from Serena below.





Source link

Categories
Health

Lady Gaga Might Have a Makeup Line Called 'Haus Beauty' Coming


Going from making music to making makeup isn’t an obvious jump, but the beauty industry is up for anything, especially when it comes in the form of a rumored Lady Gaga makeup line on the horizon. Not much is confirmed at this point, but according to Harper’s Bazaar, Lady Gaga’s company, Ate My Heart Inc., filed for the trademark to “Haus Beauty” this February, so a beauty line could be on the way from the singer.

Going by the filing, Haus Beauty could potentially bring us products in 38 different categories. This might sound familiar, because it feels like every celebrity is getting into the beauty world these days. Celebrity perfumes are nothing new (even Shawn Mendes has one at this point), but the recent trademarks go beyond that and cover so much more. Alone, Haus Beauty reserved the right to explore everything from foundation and eyebrow colors to face masks, massage oils, and self-tanner. Gwen Stefani’s recent filing to trademark P8NT also reserved 52 beauty products, while Serena Williams’ Aneres filing covers 18 beauty categories. There’s no guarantee anything will happen, but if it does, it might be coming avalanche-style.

Gaga hasn’t commented on the line so far, but comments have already started piling up inquiring about just what it could look like. “Please let your new makeup line be cruelty free with vegan options,” wrote one Instagram user, followed by a comment asking for more than 30 foundation shades. With Gaga’s dedication to inclusion, it’s just a waiting game to see what she comes up with—that is, if she runs with it at all (TBT Blue Ivy’s rumored hair care line).

Because the internet is what it is, people have already started wondering how it could stack up to the other female musician-led beauty brands out there.

But for the most part, people are psyched by the thought.

However: Some Gaga fans say they’ll believe it when they see it, especially knowing Gaga’s past.

Still, Gaga’s love for a beauty moment is well-documented. If she comes out with a lipstick you can apply while flying, we’ll talk.

Related Stories:
Lady Gaga on Pop, Politics, and the Power of Women
Gwen Stefani’s New Makeup and Beauty Line Sounds Like an Empire
It Looks Like Serena Williams Is Launching a Beauty Line





Source link

Categories
Health

H&M is Introducing a Modest Fashion Line for Spring


H&M is joining brands like Nike, American Eagle, and Macy’s and introducing its own collection catering to the modest shopper.

Launching exclusively online on May 3 (with a second drop slated for May 24), LTD Collection is H&M’s first designed expressly with modest fashion in mind. The line is heavy on embroidered, flowy pieces such as coordinating tunic-and-trouser sets and kaftan dresses with shimmery details, all with long sleeves and hems.

Pernilla Wohlfahrt, Head of Design at H&M, tells Glamour that customer interest in modest dressing had increased in recent years, leading the brand to formally launch a collection dedicated to this consumer: “Today, H&M is present in 69 markets and we want to be diverse and inclusive to all the markets where we operate. We want to be able to offer something for everyone.”

PHOTO: H&M

A look from H&M’s LTD Collection.

LTD Collection is an exclusive collection for spring—hence, the name “limited.” Women’s apparel prices range from $59.99 to $129; accessories will run from $34.99 to $49.99.

Modest dressing isn’t entirely new territory for the company. Back in 2015, H&M introduced a campaign starring Mariah Idrissi, a Muslim woman wearing a hijab—a first for the brand, and a move that drew a lot of attention. Plus, “we have had modest options in the range in the past and decided for spring to bring together these items under one cohesive collection, for customers interested in modest fashion to easily find and shop these items,” Wohlfahrt adds.

PHOTO: H&M

A look from H&M’s LTD Collection.

LTD Collection “[isn’t] necessarily about building on a previous campaign, but more about offering a wide range of styles and choices to a global fashion community,” she says. “We have seen a growing interest in modest fashion in general for a long time, and wanted to create this collection as an option to our customers that are interested in modest dressing.”

While the line is certain to attract customers who dress modestly for all occasions, Wohlfahrt says that LTD Collection is a viable option for any shopper looking for pieces that fuse conservative silhouettes with H&M’s trend-driven aesthetic. “The intention with this collection is to offer fashion for everyone,” Wohlfahrt asserts, “no matter what their personal style.”

Check out looks from H&M’s spring LTD Collection, below.

PHOTO: H&M

A look from H&M’s LTD Collection.

PHOTO: H&M

A look from H&M’s LTD Collection.

PHOTO: H&M

A look from H&M’s LTD Collection.

Related Stories:

The Modist Is Launching Its First In-House Modest Fashion Brand, Layeur

Macy’s Will Start Carrying Verona Collection, Its First Modest Fashion Line

And Comfort Is a New Affordable Plus-Size Clothing Brand for Minimalists



Source link

Categories
Health

Makeup Artist Gucci Westman's New Line Is Paradise for Finicky Skin


Makeup artist Gucci Westman’s glowy, is-she-or-isn’t-she-wearing-foundation signature look has made Jennifer Aniston and Kate Hudson longtime devotees. Now the vegetarian and mother of three is using her clean-living approach to inform her new makeup and skin care hybrid line, Westman Atelier. Bare-bones, the plot may sound familiar. Pat McGrath famously used her years of experience to craft her own line, as has a slew of models, makeup artists, and influencers—launching a makeup line is the hot new thing. But with our collective attention shifting to products free of chemicals, there’s room for a line that’s fresh, luxe, and kind to your skin. Ahead of the launch of her brand, which drops in May, we caught up with Westman to learn more about the products she uses to define her own distinct aesthetic, in the day to day and longterm.

Glamour: There are hundreds of new product lines out there. What makes yours different?

Gucci Westman: Bright, beautiful colors and incredible textures. My products have no silicones and are hyperconsciously crafted. I wanted them to melt into your skin. I have rosacea, so I wanted to do a foundation stick—I love the control of a stick—that was going to calm my skin down and work against redness.

PHOTO: Courtesy of brand

Westman Atelier Foundation Stick, $68, westman-atelier.com

Glamour: Have you always lived by a pared-back approach?

Gucci Westman: I spent my youth in the Swedish countryside, and my parents were super-duper hippies. Everything we ate, they made. Nothing was processed. My mother taught me to never wash my face with soap and to use olive oil and aloe to soothe it.

Glamour: How much time do you spend on your routine now?

Gucci Westman: Between makeup and skin care, 10 minutes. I like multitasking, so I exfoliate, then do a mask in the shower. I’m super into the SK-II Overnight Miracle Mask; it’s ridic. For makeup, Nars Bahama lip pencil or my blush in Petale are my signatures. And I wear my hair up with Odile Gilbert’s hair pin a lot.

Glamour: Any drugstore buys?

Gucci Westman: Avène thermal water spray, pointy cotton swabs, and black makeup wipes from Japan.

PHOTO: Courtesy of brand

Westman Atelier Baby Cheeks Blush Stick, $50, westman-atelier.com

Glamour: What’s your favorite feature?

Gucci Westman: The mole under my left eye. I tried to pick it off when I was little, but I couldn’t. Now I tell my kids it’s like an angel’s kiss, and it makes me feel nostalgic.

Glamour: What’s most beautiful to you in other women?

Gucci Westman: I like women with a distinct style. Like French women—so many of them look amazing and don’t overdo it. There’s a confidence that’s unspoken, a level of knowing when to stop. It’s just cool at any age.

Related Stories:
Isabella Rossellini on Unrealistic Beauty Ideals: ‘Antiaging Is Against Nature’
I Spend $2,279 on My Skin Care Routine, and I Wouldn’t Change a Thing
The Best Place to Find All-Natural Black-Owned Beauty Products



Source link