Categories
Health

What Happened on Day Two of Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings


You like drama? Stories with strong female voices? Shade in spades? Then Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings are the show for you—oh, also because they’ll directly, and significantly, affect your life. Unfortunately, this bit of must-see TV airs when most everyone’s working or watching their kids—so we’ll be here all to recap each day of these monumentally important proceedings.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh spent nearly all of Day One of his Capitol Hill confirmation hearings in rapt attention. Listening, listening, listening. Sitting, bearing fidgety witness to the drama as it unfolded on the dais. But here we are on Day Two, though, like a ubiquitous Real Housewives “friend” turned full cast-member, he twirled into the spotlight. And if he had a Housewives tagline, it’d be this: “Nothing but respect for my precedent.”

Yes, “precedent” was the word of the hour, all the hours—Kavanaugh’s career, mantra, and brand all in one. (At one point, he even said “precedent on precedent”—which is, trust me, the closest Brett Kavanaugh has ever gotten to a rap). Every decision he’s ever rendered? Based on precedent, he told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every decision he intends to make in the future? Same. “Do you agree with Justice [Sandra Day] O’Connor that a woman has a right to control her reproductive life?” asked Senator Dianne Feinstein (D—Calif.), the ranking Democratic member on the committee.

Kavanaugh paused. “Well, as a general proposition, I understand the importance of the precedent set forth by Roe v. Wade,” he answered.

“What would you say your position is today on a woman’s right to choose?” Sen. Feinstein followed up.

“As a judge, it is an important precedent of the Supreme Court,” Kavanaugh said, leaving little doubt that he is, in fact, a scholar of Housewives in addition to constitutional law. These answers are nothing if not designed to be easily denied later—at the end-of-season reunion, or whilst striking down Roe v. Wade.

Later in the afternoon, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D—Conn.) arrived. He turned Kavanaugh’s love of a precedent reference against him! (Very Vicki Gunvalson!) Sen. Blumenthal proceeded to pull out an opinion of Kavanaugh’s in which he referred to Roe as “existing precedent.” Sen. Blumenthal insisted that he’d never seen precedent qualified like that before: “It’s a little bit,” he said to Kavanaugh, “like someone introducing you to his wife as ‘my current wife.’” Blumenthal tried to extract a guarantee from Kavanaugh that he’d never overturn Roe. That, as the pros put is, was a non-starter.

If he had a Housewives tagline, it’d be this: “Nothing but respect for my precedent.”

Kavanaugh’s marathon evasiveness was enough to make a gal wish for a guest spot from Andy Cohen, whose blithly exasperated, yet effective interview techniques were desperately needed here. I just get the impression that Andy would be able to get decisive yes-no responses on all the important issues—whether Kavanaugh would gut abortion rights, whether he believes Trump can be prosecuted, whether Ramona did attempt to go to Tom’s New Year’s Eve bash. (And then I’d like Sen. Blumenthal to take a crack at dissecting the Bethenny-Carole breakdown.)

Here are some more takeaways from a long, long-winded day:

Fastest turnaround: Zina Bash. We now know the name of the aide sitting over Kavanaugh’s shoulder like a Club Monaco-clad guardian angel. She’s Zina Bash, and she was much more subdued than we saw her on Tuesday. Having to debunk Twitter theories that you were throwing white-power hand signals will do that to a person. Today, Bash barely had hands. Mostly, they manifested as quick blurs whenever she had to scratch an itch or answer an urgent email. If someone handed her a beverage, I feel sure she would have accepted it with her teeth.

Biggest distraction: Silicon Valley celebs.

PHOTO: Drew Angerer

Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey, and Jack Dorsey’s community-Shakespeare-theatre beard were all on Capitol Hill this afternoon, too, talking about their platforms’ roles in 2016 election meddling. Somehow, Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) even got into a fight in the hallway with a radio person. Can you imagine what it would have been like to attempt to concentrate on Kavanaugh while all that’s happening next door? It would be like that time you were in the class stuck making up a pop quiz while the rest of the school is at a pep rally—a pep rally where Marco Rubio, who was awarded “Crispest Khaki Creases” at graduation, is about to throw a punch!

Best successor to “moist,” the worst word on the planet: “Undergirds.” I’m not sure how many times Kavanaugh said the word “undergirds” today, but I know it was all the times too many.

Dad move of the day: Kavanaugh on Leahy’s emails. When Senator Patrick Leahy (D—Conn.), in an attempt to catch Kavanaugh in an alleged lie, showed him a printed-out email chain, Kavanaugh went into full-on naïve mode, blinking into the middle distance and repeating the name of a one-time Republican Senate staffer—“Mir-an-da?”—in the befuddled tone of a medium-developed toddler. Clearly, he’d practiced this response—but not in debate prep. Rather, it’s a move ripped from the official two-point fatherhood playbook.

When one of your daughters gets invited to a sleepover at the home of a friend you’ve deemed “fast,” here’s what you’ve got to do: Step one: “Lose” the invitation. Step two: When confronted, feign innocence: “An invitation from… who? Mir… an… da? The one who has her own vape pen and the boyfriend who drag races? Nope, I didn’t see it, sweetie! Let’s go hoop it up instead!”

Burn of the day: Senator Amy Klobuchar (D—Minn.).

Senate Rules And Administration Committee Holds Hearing On Election Security

PHOTO: Bloomberg

Sen. Klobuchar is on a two-day winning streak for the best daily zing. Today, she grilled Kavanaugh on his established reluctance to investigate or prosecute sitting presidents. The exception to his opinion, Kavanaugh once said, would be if the president did something “dastardly.” But as Sen. Klobuchar pointed out coolly, “How do we know something is dastardly or not if we can’t even investigate it?” Klobes! Rip that teeny little mic right out of the podium, then go ahead and drop it.

Most hilarious tactic: The Tremendous, Stupendous Brett Kavanaugh Loves Women Parade! Senator Orrin Hatch (R—Utah) may have been shaken by women on Tuesday. But a new dawn broke, and on Wednesday, he was like, “You know what? Women are good!”

Sen. Hatch’s allotted time was spent hyping Kavanaugh’s deep commitment to gender equality. “They say that you are one of the strongest advocates… for women lawyers,” Sen. Hatch said, adding, “The majority of your clerks in your office have been—women!” You should know he said “women” there with such a pure sense of awe, it seemed like he might have been less shocked if the clerks had turned out to be goats.

Giver of fewest f—s: Senator Mazie Hirono (D—Hawaii).

Senate Lawmakers Speak To The Media After Their Weekly Policy Luncheons

PHOTO: Zach Gibson

Whether she was expressing frank skepticism at Kavanaugh’s inability to remember a raunchy office email chain at one of his former jobs (eyebrows at 30,000 feet), slicing through his verbosity (“I think that’s a complete answer, thank you”), or eviscerating his support of a parental consent requirement for a minor’s abortion in a specific case (“Her parents were beating her up! How could you expect parental consent?”), Sen. Hirono was not having the bullshit this eve. Her turn didn’t come until dinnertime, and while everyone else in the room looked beat, and Kavanaugh was probably desperate for his linguine alla Heinz at that point, Hirono must have had a well-timed protein snack, because she looked like she could have gone until the midterms.

Kavanaugh will see her and her brooch in his nightmares. You’re welcome, Brett. Good night.


Megan Angelo writes about TV and is the author of the novel Followers, which will be published in 2019. You catch her Kavanaugh recaps on Glamour.com all week.

MORE: This Is Must-See TV: All the Drama You Missed on Day One of Brett Kavanaugh’s Confirmation Hearings



Source link

Categories
Health

Piper Perabo: 'It Was a Privilege' to Get Arrested for Protesting Brett Kavanaugh's SCOTUS Hearing


Piper Perabo spent years portraying a CIA operative on Covert Affairs—but says this week was the first time she got busted in real life.

The actress, also known for her roles in Coyote Ugly and The Prestige, was among protesters who got hauled out of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s volatile Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday. And she’s damn proud of it, she tells Glamour.

“I felt like this was an opportunity for me to do something and stand up for all the women who have to be at work [or] take their kid to school [or] look after their elderly parents,” she says by phone, after she paid a fine to be released. “It was a privilege to get arrested [to] speak out against this and to stand up for women’s equal rights.”

President Donald Trump’s pick to replace retired swing Justice Anthony Kennedy has galvanized protesters who say Kavanaugh’s appointment would mean a titanic lurch to the right for the Supreme Court. The conservative jurist could not only roll back the abortion protections of Roe v. Wade, they say, but turn back the clock on health care, labor, and voting rights.

Kavanaugh, in his Tuesday opening statement, told lawmakers, “I don’t decide cases based on personal or policy preferences.” He has also called Roe a matter of “settled law.” That’s scant reassurance to his critics, especially because Trump has vowed to choose pro-life judges.

So, how’d it all go down for Perabo and the other women protesters who took a day off from their responsibilities to protest?

While many watched a livestream of the hearing on televisions and electronic devices, Perabo says she showed up early to get a seat in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing room. At times, she says, the protest scene got a little surreal: “I could see women who were dressed as the handmaids [with] the red cloaks and the white caps,” she recalls, referencing the dystopian Hulu series The Handmaid’s Tale, whose first season was based on the Margaret Atwood novel about women living in subjugation under a patriarchal society.

At the hearing, “We took turns standing up and saying why we were protesting, and then we were arrested,” she says. Perabo’s line: “I said [the president is an] unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal investigation, and I don’t think a president should be able to appoint judges until that’s been resolved.”

Perabo hadn’t even finished her second line before the Capitol Police had her out the door. Officers took her belongings, cuffed her, and put her in a van with other demonstrators. “I wasn’t going to resist arrest. I’d never been arrested before. I was a little nervous,” she confesses.

“They kept bringing down elevators full of women into the basement where the white vans were [to take people] to the police station,” Perabo says. “One of the cops said, ‘Aren’t there any men coming down?’ And one woman said, ‘No! It’s all women, all day.'”

Perabo says she was charged with disorderly conduct and released after paying a $35 fine: “My mom texted me, and she was like, ‘I think people are getting arrested at the hearings. Could you call me and let me know you’re OK?’ and I was like, ‘This is a weird day,” she adds. “I called her right back and [told her], ‘I did get arrested, but everything’s fine.’”

Perabo says she had the chance to fly to D.C. for the protests because she’s between acting jobs and her husband is filming in Utah. For Jennifer Epps-Addison, demonstrating also meant time apart from her spouse—on their anniversary, no less—but much more than that.

“This is really personal for me. Three years ago, my husband was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Thank G-d for the Affordable Care Act [and] President Obama’s work,” says Epps-Addison, who’s president of the social justice group Center for Popular Democracy.

The couple had planned to take a trip together to mark their eighth anniversary. Instead, Epps-Addison ended up flying to D.C., disrupting the Kavanaugh hearing and getting “tackled pretty hard by four officers” as she was dragged out along with protesters, including Women’s March leader Linda Sarsour.

“It is life or death,” Epps-Addison, who is convinced if Kavanaugh makes it to the bench, her 40-year-old husband “will not have [the] same rights to the same quality of life that he deserves and that we have,” tells Glamour.

Heidi Sieck, founder of the civic platform #VoteProChoice, also agrees it was “absolutely” worth getting arrested to challenge Kavanaugh in defense of “reproductive freedom,” which she calls “a foundational issue” that affects “women and men and families and transgender folk” and is tied to racial and economic justice.

“There is so much to lose. And listen: I have no illusions that those men in power have every intention of winning,” Sieck told Glamour after the Senate demonstration. “They will not be deviated from their their path. [They] have the majority on their side. They have process on their side. And who are we if we don’t stand up?”

When it comes to Kavanaugh, she says, “it’s so clearly obvious that this man will roll back all of our reproductive rights” based on his past rulings.

“We did what we could to stand up and have our voices heard. I don’t know if they’re listening, but it’s one of those things that has to be done. We cannot just let this go by.”

Protesting and pressuring lawmakers can help, Perabo says, but here’s her advice: If you want real change, vote — and help others get to the polls.

“Even some simple reminder can cause more people to vote,” Perabo says. “Make sure you ask your co-worker if they’re voting, [and ask] your partner. Does an elderly neighbor need a ride? Can you watch your elderly neighbor while their kids go to vote? Let’s make it more of a conversation with our civic participation.”

The Kavanaugh hearings—and possibly the protests—continue Wednesday. Keep up with the latest on the confirmation hearings, here.


Celeste Katz is senior politics reporter for Glamour. Send news tips, questions, and comments to celeste_katz@condenast.com.

MORE: Must-See Protest Photos from Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings





Source link

Categories
Health

Everything You Need to Know About Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings


We hope you had a relaxing Labor Day weekend, because the nation’s capital is kicking directly into high gear this morning with the confirmation hearings for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the conservative D.C. circuit judge and the President’s choice to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Kavanaugh is Donald Trump’s second nominee to the highest Court in the land (Trump secured the first with Neil Gorsuch) and if confirmed, he will give conservatives a majority on the bench. Democrats, and women in particular, will be watching closely as fears about the overturn of Roe v. Wade have become all too real in an administration that vowed to tap all pro-life justices for the Court.

Here’s everything you need to know about the confirmation path, how Kavanaugh will handle abortion rights questions, where to watch and more.

What is a confirmation hearing?

The process to becoming a justice on the United States Supreme Court is basically threefold. First, the President makes a nomination. Then the nominee and other witnesses testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who can then vote to send the nomination to the full Senate for the final confirmation vote. This sends the nominee to the bench officially.

Kavanaugh can be confirmed by a simple 51-vote majority.

How does it work and who exactly is involved?

The hearings take place in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is currently made up of 21 senators from both parties. (The committee chair is always held by the majority, in this case the Republicans.) Some notable names to look out for are Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-LA), ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Ben Sasse (R-NE), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Kamala Harris (D-CA). You can check out the full committee list here.

The proceedings will open with introductions from former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Republican Ohio Senator Rob Portman, and Lisa Blatt, a partner at a D.C. law firm who has argued cases before the Supreme Court and supports Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh will then make his own opening statement. The committee members will be the only ones allowed to question Kavanaugh and any of the witnesses presented by the majority and the minority over the course of the hearings. The Senators will take turns asking their own questions (there are time limits in place). However, the chairman acts as the moderator, so don’t be surprised if he objects to Democratic lines of questioning that might get problematic for Kavanaugh.

How is Kavanaugh expected to handle questions on abortion rights—and specifically Roe v. Wade?

Opponents of Kavanaugh have been particularly concerned about his stance on the Supreme Court case that made abortion legal in the United States: Roe v. Wade. And there will surely be questions, especially from the Democrats on this issue. They will try to get him to state definitively whether or not he would overturn the decision. But, if we look to the most recent hearings for Justice Neil Gorsuch, the chances of that happening on the record are not incredibly likely.

Gorsuch danced around the issue to some degree when asked about his personal views. “A good judge will consider it as precedent of the Supreme Court, worthy of treatment of precedent as any other,” Gorsuch said. “If I were to tell you which are my favorite precedents or which are my least favorite precedents…I would be tipping my hand and suggesting to litigants that I have already made up my mind about their cases.”

However, Kavanaugh is likely to be questioned more heavily on the issue of women’s reproductive rights since he will be the conservative tipping point in the balance of the court. It’s a good time to remember that while Kavanaugh called Roe v. Wadesettled law,” many Democrats and abortion rights advocates aren’t convinced, citing his dissent in a case involving an undocumented teen who sought an abortion while in a federal detention center.

In an interview with Glamour shortly after his nomination, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D–N.Y.) called Kavanaugh’s record disqualifying. “I think he is more dangerous than any previous justice nominee because of his education and his experience and because of the track record he’s laid out about what he intends to do,” she said. “I think he is going to be very destructive to basic civil rights and civil liberties for millions of Americans.”

What else should I keep an eye on?

There are exactly zero women on the Judiciary Committee on the Republican side of the aisle, but there are four Democrats—Harris, Klobuchar, Hirono, and Feinstein. Both Harris and Klobuchar’s names are routinely coming up on lists of possible 2020 presidential candidates, along with Gillibrand and Elizabeth Warren (who will not be questioners at the hearings). Gillibrand and Warren may use the hearings as a chance to stand out from their colleagues, in addition to trying to get relevant information from Kavanaugh and the witnesses.

Male committee members may be looking to do the same. We see you Cory Booker. And from the majority men, be on the lookout for the kind of right-leaning views that they may see as rallying their conservative base.

Where can I watch?

You can watch a livestream here starting at 9:15 AM Eastern on September 4.

Related Stories:

What Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court Nomination Could Mean for Your Abortion Rights

Black Women Stand to Lose the Most if Brett Kavanaugh Is Confirmed to the Supreme Court



Source link

Categories
Health

What Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Nomination Could Mean for Your Abortion Rights


President Donald Trump on Monday night nominated conservative Brett Kavanaugh to serve on the Supreme Court, tilting the top tier of the American judiciary to the right without changing its gender balance.

Kavanaugh, a 53-year-old federal judge on the D.C. circuit, is the president’s choice to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy.

“There is no one in America more qualified for this position, and no one more deserving,” Trump said before introducing Kavanaugh.

Kennedy’s departure raises new questions about the future of American abortion law. While he had a conservative record coming into the job, Kennedy went on to side with liberals in key cases that reaffirmed the legal right to abortion enshrined by the court’s watershed 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade.

“Mr. President, I am grateful to you and I’m humbled by your confidence in me,” Kavanaugh said. Trump’s new pick spoke at length about his warm relationship with his mother and his two daughters, as well as his wife, whom he met when they both worked at the White House.

Trump campaigned on a vow to tap pro-life judges for the Supreme Court. Shortly after taking office, he successfully nominated conservative Neil Gorsuch to fill the vacancy created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

The president’s second SCOTUS pick is even more politically charged, coming amid a midterm election widely seen as a national referendum on how Trump is doing as president.

Trump chose Kavanaugh, of Maryland, from a roster of conservative judges that included Amy Coney Barrett, 46, who would have been the fourth woman seated on the current court and the only female conservative. He also considered, among others, Raymond Kethledge, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for the past decade who was viewed as a potential “consensus choice,” and Thomas Hardiman, a strong proponent of gun rights and a finalist for the SCOTUS berth that ultimately went to Gorsuch.

After earning undergraduate and law degrees from Yale, Kavanaugh clerked for Justice Kennedy. He later worked for Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel who famously investigated President Bill Clinton, and as a top aide to President George W. Bush.

Sally Kenney, a Tulane political science professor and an expert on the judiciary, told Glamour in an email immediately following the announcement that Trump had nominated a judge “chosen” by the conservative Federalist Society “to replace the swing justice on the Court a few months before an election while many in his administration are under investigation.”

Kenney added, “Judge Kavanaugh is no consensus candidate, but rather a Republican partisan associated with the most divisive conflicts of our times. It is hard to see how this appointment advances the rule of law, protects constitutional rights, or guarantees equal justice under law.”

Cardozo Law School Professor Kate Shaw said Kavanaugh might refuse to say in Senate hearings if he favors overturning Roe v. Wade.

Other nominees have avoided giving a position on Roe, but Shaw, a former associate White House counsel, said lawmakers would be “justified” in pressing Kavanaugh on “what confirming him could mean for reproductive rights” given the 2017 case of an undocumented teen who sought an abortion while in federal custody.

Kavanaugh’s dissent in that case sounded an alarm about giving detainees a new right to abortion “on demand”—a phrase abortion-rights advocates call “coded” language that indicates support for overturning Roe.

Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, condemned the president’s choice: “We oppose the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, and call on the Senate to do the same,” she said in a statement. “There’s no way to sugarcoat it: with this nomination, the constitutional right to access safe, legal abortion in this country is on the line.”

But some hardline abortion opponents have reportedly used the very same case to question whether Kavanaugh would truly be the kind of “solidly pro-life” justice they want on the bench.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life group Susan B. Anthony List, praised the decision. “President Trump has made another outstanding choice in nominating Judge Brett Kavanaugh to replace Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, keeping his promise to nominate only originalist judges to the Court,” Dannenfelser said in a statement. “Judge Kavanaugh is an experienced, principled jurist with a strong record of protecting life and constitutional rights.”

Additionally, as NPR reported, Kavanaugh “also dissented in a case involving a challenge brought by religious groups to the contraception provision of the Affordable Care Act.” The rule, which “required religious groups to certify that they were exempting themselves from providing contraceptive services,” was eventually withdrawn by the Trump administration.

If confirmed, Kavanaugh promised to “keep an open mind in every case” and “always strive to preserve the Constitution of the United States and the American rule of law.”

Now that he’s made his pick, Trump’s nominee goes on to confirmation hearings held by the Senate Judiciary Committee. After that review, committee members make a recommendation on the candidate and send it to the full Senate.

Related Stories:

Trump’s Supreme Court Pick May Come From This List—Here’s Where They Stand on Women’s Issues.

Pro-Choice Organizations Launch the #OneInFour Campaign Ahead of President Trump’s Supreme Court Nomination





Source link