Categories
Health

Ashley Graham Is Pregnant With Her First Child


Congratulations are in order for Ashley Graham and her husband, Justin Ervin. The supermodel announced on Wednesday, August 14, that she is expecting her first child.

“Nine years ago today, I married the love of my life,” Graham posted on Instagram. “It has been the best journey with my favorite person in the world! Today, we are feeling so blessed, grateful and excited to celebrate with our GROWING FAMILY! Happy anniversary, @mrjustinervin ❤️ Life is about to get even better. ?”

Ervin adorably commented, “I love you, babe. (And I love you, baby.)”

Check out the post for yourself, below:

Ervin shared in his own post (along with a sonogram shot), “To my forever love and my daily inspiration. Happy anniversary @ashleygraham These 9 years have played out like a lifetime,” he said. “I guess it’s because my life really started once you came into it. Now that we’ve made a life together, let’s make a life together. I love you and I love us. All of us…”

The love immediately started rolling in for the former Glamour Woman of the Year from celebrity friends. Singer Rita Ora commented, “Congratulations ❤️❤️❤️.” Grownish star Yara Shahidi replied, “?????? ?? ??????,” while designer Brandon Maxwell said, “Oh my god congratulations you guys!!!!! Lucky baby!!!!!! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️.”

We can’t wait to see Graham’s pregnancy style and how she embraces this new chapter in her life. The fashion icon is also a fierce body-positivity activist, which will no-doubt play a role in how she approaches pregnancy. “I’m never going to be big enough, I’m never going to be small enough,” she told Glamour last fall. “I’m always going to be too loud, I’m always going to be too quiet; I’m never going to be good enough for anyone. So I might as well just stay in my own lane and be great enough for me.”

Many congrats to the happy couple!



Source link

Categories
Health

Anne Hathaway Just Revealed She's Pregnant With Her Second Child


Anne Hathaway has a baby on the way. The actress shared the exciting news Wednesday on Instagram, revealing to the world that she and her husband, Adam Shulman, are expecting three years after the birth of their first child, Jonathan Rosebanks Shulman.

“It’s not for a movie,” Hathaway captioned a photo of her growing baby bump. She also hinted that this pregnancy hasn’t been so easy. “All kidding aside, for everyone going through infertility and conception hell, please know it was not a straight line to either of my pregnancies. Sending you extra love,” she wrote.

Hathaway didn’t explain what her difficulties were specifically,, but she has been very willing to have honest discussions about motherhood. In 2017, she even advocated for paid parental leave at the United Nations, sharing how the experience of becoming a mom had been a transformative one that changed her priorities.

“”I remember I experienced a shift in consciousness that gave me the ability to maintain my love of career and also cherish something else, someone else, so much, much more,” she said. “Like so many parents, I wondered how I was going to balance my work with my new role as parent, and, in that moment, I remember that the statistic for the U.S.’s policy for maternity leave flashed through my mind.”

Speaking to Glamour last year, Anne Hathaway also opened up about how motherhood helped her come to terms with difficulties she faced in the past.

“How Johnny is going to feel about himself will have so much to do with how I feel about myself in front of him,” she said. “If I’m feeling insecure, I am very careful that I don’t show that. But I also work really hard to acknowledge that place, give room for that place, and then release myself from that place. I’m more loving now, and that includes toward myself.”



Source link

Categories
Health

Former Claire's Employee Says Store's Child Ear-Piercing Policy Is "Deeply Flawed"


In the four decades Claire’s has been in business, the accessories chain has pierced more than 100 million ears around the world. Given the store’s target demographic, it’s safe to say that a large percentage of these piercings have been on young girls. While ear piercings generally go off without a hitch save for nervous butterflies and an iron-gripped hand squeeze, a new viral Facebook post written by a former employee has sparked a heated discussion around children and consent.

As first reported by Refinery 29, 32-year-old Raylene Marks recently quit her job at an Edmonton, Canada location after taking issue with the company’s piercing policy. In a post titled “An Open Letter To Claire’s Corporate,” which has received an upwards of 6,500 likes and 500 comments, Marks details an uncomfortable situation in which she was asked to piece the ears of a seven-year-old girl, who “made it clear she no longer wanted to get her ears pierced.”

“I had a couple ‘gray area’ piercings where the children resisted heavily [then] were pressured and intimidated by the parents into settling down,” she wrote. “I didn’t feel good about those, and I started to wonder at what point the piercer and the parent are actually violating a child’s personal boundaries. Last week was a breaking point.”

She then goes on to share more about the interaction that made her leave the company. Marks was performing a “double” with another sales associate (a procedure in which two associates pierce both ears at the same time), which is often done on nervous children who might get upset after the first earring is put in. Marks says the girl was crying loudly, begging her mother to take her home, and “expressed that she didn’t want us touching her, that we were standing too close, that she was feeling uncomfortable.”

“That child’s message was loud and clear to me,” Marks continued. “Do not touch my body, do not pierce my ears, I do not want to be here.”

The mother and daughter eventually left without a piercing after Marks took a step away from the situation. “I’m inclined to respect a child’s right to say no to any adult forcing any kind of non-medical contact on them, so I told the other piercer I wouldn’t be part of the ear piercing for this girl,” she wrote.

The next day when discussing the event with her manager, Marks explained how uncomfortable she felt as the child was “begging to be left alone” despite the mother’s pressure to go through with the piercing. According to Marks, she was told, “You would have had no choice but to do it.” She then hypothesized the “worst scenario I could think of,” in order to see how far she was expected to take the policy.

“So if a mother is physically restraining her daughter, holding her down and saying, ‘DO IT,’ while that little girl cries and asks me not to, do I do the piercing?” asked Marks. “Yes, you do the piercing,” Marks says she was told.

She quit the same day.

In her post, Marks goes on to say that her manager continued to assert that “children can be held down and pierced,” and that there was one policy in place regarding the subject of consent, which stated: “We reserve the right to refuse an ear piercing if a successful one cannot be done.” Marks calls this a “deeply flawed policy that helps facilitate situations where children can be traumatized,” as there is “no mention of the use of physical restraint by the parent, or the employee’s right to refuse an ear piercing”—and she challenged the company to consider amending its policies.

Glamour reached to Claire’s representatives for comment and received the following statement:



Source link

Categories
Health

Why I Don't Post Photos of My Child on Social Media


A few months ago, at a family gathering, we took a group photo of all the cousins and our kids. As my cousin’s wife examined the picture on her phone and got ready to post it, my cousin slapped—literally, slapped—the phone out of his wife’s hand. We’re living in an era in which using social media has become an instinct. The assumption whatever happens—to us, near us—is fair game for #content. But that cousin knew that my husband and I don’t post pictures of our daughter on social media and he didn’t think he’d be able to communicate that to his wife in time to stop her from hitting “upload.” (His wife was fine, if rattled.) His reflexes kicked in. Around us, people in the restaurant stared at him until he sheepishly handed his wife her phone back.

When I was pregnant with our daughter, my husband told me he’d like to keep her off our—well, my—social media. The request surprised me. As a writer, I’m always mining my personal life for stories, and my social media accounts (while hardly well-followed) reflect how open I am. I am a sharer. My husband uses Facebook maybe once a fiscal quarter and doesn’t have Instagram, so I wasn’t sure why he cared what I was or wasn’t posting. I’m used to scrolling past newborn after newborn in my feed, and I expected mine to be among them. So I said as much, pushing back. But he made a kind, convincing argument, telling me he was concerned about her privacy and the digital footprint she might have before she could even consent to being photographed. It’s a significant concern—not just for our family, but socially, as our culture reckons with everything from revenge porn to whether countries should allow individuals to erase unwanted digital content. (France seems to think the answer is “yes.”)

Even at the start, there were parts of the idea I liked: She’ll never get mad at us for showing a photo of her in the bathtub to dozens of strangers. But there were parts I didn’t like: Like, what if she does something really, insanely cute and I want everyone to see? “Just text it to people you actually know,” he said. I sighed. I wasn’t sold on the fix—I didn’t want to assume people cared enough to see her unprompted. (Whereas scrolling past her in their feed seemed much more passive.) Still it didn’t strike me as an immediate problem. “Fine. We can reassess when she starts doing really, insanely cute things,” I said. He rarely asks for anything like this, and really he was asking me to not do something. I decided I could handle it.

Sharing baby stories is the currency of the new mom.

Once she entered the world, I began to feel some regret about the decision. I was spending more hours than ever plugged in to social media, filling late nights and endless afternoons on my phone while I was home alone with an infant. I was desperate to connect to people with whom I could relate. Sharing baby stories is the currency of the new mom. I tried to participate while following the rule we came up with: no face photos, don’t share her full name. But obscuring her while trying to post about her started to seem pointless. I felt like I was missing out on opportunities to bond with other moms. I was DMing women posting about their babies just to feel less alone.

I had to make sure not to grow resentful towards my husband, since it hadn’t been my rule. Erin, a mom of one in New York City, a model, and a doula who is building her business on Instagram, told me she could relate—her husband also asked her not to post their son. “I’m super public and my husband is super private,” she explains. “Since the internet is forever, my husband doesn’t want our son to have his image out before he chooses. Which I get, but I’m also like—this is what I do!” She also doesn’t post face photos but has found a lot of work-arounds. I get it. But for me, it became easier just to retreat.

After a few months of feeling left out of social media #mom culture, I decided to post about how I wasn’t going to be showing my daughter’s face.

I felt kind of like I had been lying by omission by not coming right out and saying that we wouldn’t be sharing her, and it was oddly cleansing to make the declaration. Instantly, I saw positive comments populate: “love this!” “yes!” and applause emojis. I started to feel empowered by the decision rather than restricted. In fact, once I went public with it, it became something I felt proud of.

For one, I love that people interested in my kid actually ask me about her. As it turns out, it’s much more gratifying to get texts saying, “I need to see a picture of C!” than it is to watch likes roll in. It also avoids that awkward dance of telling an anecdote when you meet up with someone in real life and trying to suss out if that person already saw it on social media. I know for a fact that no stories about my child are boring repeats for anyone who’s watched the stories I post on Instagram. An unexpected twist? It’s reinforced some friendships—the people getting the “content” that I would have posted are the people I really care about and who really care about me and my daughter.

On a more serious note, it’s also forced me to make social media a reprieve from being “C’s mommy.” With next to no child content on my account, I have to highlight other things going on in my life. I have to take more stock of the non-mom activities I do and share those moments, reminding me that I’m a person outside of this role. I love being a mom, but it doesn’t consume me. And it matters that the world sees it doesn’t appear to be consuming me either, as it does so many new parents who suddenly flip from posting beers to posting bassinets. Some friends have made half-joking comments that they haven’t had to mute me or tune me out, that I’m one less poster of endless kiddie spam. On some level I get that, too: Even though I have a kid and like knowing what other parents are up to, there are a few children I see so often on my feed that I’ve memorized their bath-time routine. Keeping C off social media, as trivial as it might seem, has given me a stronger sense of my identity, post-baby.

Of course in the end this is about her, and it’s a relief to know that posting her is not a habit I’ll have to wean myself off of when I become like, so embarrassing as her mom. And I loved a point made by Lisa, a mom of one in Los Angeles who I spoke to who also doesn’t post her baby. She does it for her child’s privacy, but she had one additional reason: “I feel like when I was struggling to get pregnant it killed me to see images of happy families and bouncing babies. The comparisons felt so awful,” she says. “I try and remember how that felt to see an image of perfection, regardless of what was really going on behind the scenes.” I was comforted to think I wasn’t adding to anyone’s pain like that, too.

There are still moments it’s not easy. I hate having to police others’ behavior—I’ve had to explain at big family gatherings that the group photo can only be posted if you can’t see my daughter’s face, and once had to ask a good friend to take something down after it had gone up. Personally, I haven’t faced any backlash over that, but Lisa told me she has been pressured to share more about her family by moms in her circle. “I have been getting a fair amount of pushback from my friends who take lots of pics of our babies [together] and post them all over,” she says. I’ve seen comments like this directed at celebs like Sarah Michelle Gellar and Kristen Bell who don’t post pics of their kids, too. It surprises me, because who cares? And also: We’re gong to bully people for what they do post and what they don’t? When I want to hit upload, I scratch the itch in the ways I know how: I send it to a group text, or to my dad. Or I’ll stick an emoji on her face and just go ahead and post. But I know we made the right decision for us. At some point, I hope she’s grateful. But even if she never expresses appreciation for her digital blank slate, I know I am. And besides, I’ll find plenty of un-grammable ways to embarrass her in the meantime.

Sara Gaynes Levy is a writer and editor in New York City.





Source link

Categories
Health

Kim Kardashian Just Confirmed She's Having a Fourth Child


Earlier this month news broke that Kim Kardashian and Kanye West are expecting their fourth child via surrogate, and now Kim’s confirmed this herself. In a new interview with Bravo’s Watch What Happens Live With Andy Cohen, Kim revealed baby number four is on the way—and it’s a boy.

“We are [expecting another child],” Kim told host Andy Cohen with her sisters, Kourtney and Khloé, by her side. “Yes.”

Kim said she and Kanye do have a due date, and that it’s “sometime soon.” However, she didn’t offer any more details beyond that.

“It’s out there,” Kim continued, referring to the reports about her fourth child. “I got drunk at our Christmas Eve party, and I told some people, and I can’t remember who I told because I never get drunk.” Talk about a relatable holiday party moment!

Watch Kim reveal all this for yourself, below:

[embedded content]

Kim and Kanye welcomed their third child, Chicago, via surrogate in January 2018. After giving birth to her second child naturally, Kim began suffering from placenta accreta, a condition in which the placenta is bound to the uterine wall. She decided after this to explore surrogacy as an option for expanding her family.

“You know, it is really different,” Kim told Entertainment Tonight about the differences between surrogacy and carrying a child herself. “Anyone that says or thinks it is just the easy way out is just completely wrong. I think it is so much harder to go through it this way, because you are not really in control. And you know, obviously you pick someone that you completely trust and that you have a good bond and relationship with, but it is still…knowing that I was able to carry my first two babies and not, you know, my baby now, it’s hard for me. So it’s definitely a harder experience than I anticipated just in the control area.”

Related Stories:

Kris Jenner Changed Her Hair, and It’s Scary How Much She Looks Like Kim Kardashian

Kim Kardashian Defends Decision to Let Daughter North Wear Red Lipstick

These Celebrities Aren’t Afraid to Get Real About Pregnancy and Childbirth



Source link

Categories
Health

Kim Kardashian and Kanye West Are Reportedly Expecting Their Fourth Child


Kim Kardashian and Kanye West are reportedly expecting their fourth child via surrogate, Us Weekly reports.

The couple hasn’t confirmed the news yet themselves, but rumors of them wanting a fourth child have been swirling around for months. In August, Us Weekly reported Kardashian and West had one embryo left, a male. If true, this means their baby-to-be is a boy. According to Us Weekly, he’s due in “very early May.”

Kardashian and West used a surrogate to welcome their third child, a daughter named Chicago, in January 2018. After her second natural pregnancy, Kardashian began suffering from placenta accreta, a condition in which the placenta and uterine wall bind too tightly. It was after this she decided to explore surrogacy as an option for having more children.

“My doctor had to stick his entire arm in me and detach the placenta with his hand, scraping it away from my uterus with his fingernails,” Kardashian wrote in her blog about the condition. “My mom was crying; she had never seen anything like this before. My delivery was fairly easy, but then going through that—it was the most painful experience of my life! They gave me a second epidural but we were racing against time, so I just had to deal.”

In November 2017, she opened up about the differences between having a child naturally and via surrogate. “You know, it is really different,” Kardashian told Entertainment Tonight. “Anyone that says or thinks it is just the easy way out is just completely wrong. I think it is so much harder to go through it this way, because you are not really in control. And, you know, obviously you pick someone that you completely trust and that you have a good bond and relationship with, but it is still…knowing that I was able to carry my first two babies and not, you know, my baby now, it’s hard for me. So it’s definitely a harder experience than I anticipated just in the control area.”

Congrats, Kimye! We’ll update this post if and win the couple confirms this news.

Related Stories:

Kim Kardashian Says Using a Surrogate Is “So Much Harder” Than Past Pregnancies

Kim Kardashian Didn’t Invite Her Surrogate to Her Baby Shower—Here’s Why

Kim Kardashian Writes Emotional Essay About Her Experience Using a Gestational Carrier



Source link