Categories
Health

All the Fashion Brands That Have Banned Fur


In October 2019, Macy’s, Inc.—which includes Macy’s, Bloomingdales, Macy’s Backstage, and Bloomingdale’s The Outlet—announced that it would end the sale of animal fur at its properties by the end of fiscal 2020.

“Over the past two years, we have been closely following consumer and brand trends, listening to our customers and researching alternatives to fur. We’ve listened to our colleagues, including direct feedback from our Go Green Employee Resource Group, and we have met regularly on this topic with the Humane Society of the United States and other NGOs,” Jeff Gennette, chairman and chief executive officer of Macy’s, Inc., said in a statement, noting that Macy’s private-label brands were already fur-free, so this mandate would now extend across the entire company. “We are proud to partner with the Humane Society of the United States in our commitment to ending the sale of fur. We remain committed to providing great fashion and value to our customers, and we will continue to offer high-quality and fashionable faux fur alternatives.”

As part of this move, Macy’s, Inc. will close its Fur Vault and Maximilian locations, also by early 2021.



Source link

Categories
Health

The International Gymnastics Federation Just Banned 'Heavy Makeup' From Competitions


The world of gymnastics is getting a ton of attention these days, but for all the wrong reasons. Following the sentencing of Larry Nassar, the new USA Gymnastics CEO stepped down after just five days on the job (and after gymnastics superstar Simone Biles called out her anti-Kaepernick Tweet). And now, the International Federation of Gymnastics (or FIG), the governing body of the sport, has just placed a ban on “heavy makeup” during competition.

It stems from a gymnastics routine at the 2018 European Championships in August, during which Dutch gymnast Céline van Gerner competed with a floor routine inspired by the musical Cats, complete with the original music and hair and makeup to match.

From her scores, she didn’t appear to be penalized for her costume. “It’s not like we’re used to makeup like this in artistic gymnastics, but for me, it was like… I’m doing this routine based on the musical Cats, I’m wearing a cat-like leotard,” van Gerner said afterwards in an interview with Luba Baladzhaeva of gymnastics news site Gymnovosti. “We checked the rules and there was no restriction on makeup, so we just went for it.”

There weren’t any restrictions then, but FIG has since changed that. This week, van Gerner posted a screenshot of an apparent rule change for the 2018 World Gymnastics Championships in Doha, Qatar. It reads: “Face-painting is not allowed; makeup must be modest and not portray a theatrical character (animal or human).”

Gymnasts and those who follow the sport alike have expressed their disappointment in the policy change, which seems to set a double-standard and undermines the fact that the gymnastics world has more pressing matters it should deal with. Plus, the word “modest” both is gendered and can have insidious implications when applied to how one looks or what one wears. (In fact, Olympian Aly Raisman called out this very thing in a moving Instagram post earlier this year. “Women do not have to be modest to be respected,” she wrote.)

This isn’t the first time that makeup has received unwarranted attention and policing. In fact, it’s far from it: During the 2016 Summer Olympics, two male hosts on Fox News discussed whether female athletes (namely gymnasts) should or should not wear makeup, for reasons still unknown. And the peanut gallery on Twitter took it upon themselves to critique Gabby Douglas’s (perfectly sleek) ponytail during the 2012 Summer Olympics. We’ll take a wild guess that for the 2020 Summer Olympics, someone’s going to whine about the skin looking too luminous.

Last we checked, wearing makeup doesn’t prevent you from being a serious, talented, or seriously-talented gymnast.

Glamour has reached out to FIG for comment and will update this post accordingly.

Related Stories:Simone Biles Called Out USA Gymnastics President for an Anti-Kaepernick TweetMichigan State to Pay $500 Million in Settlements to Larry Nassar Abuse VictimsWhy Judge Aquilina’s Handling of the Larry Nassar Sentencing Is So Important for Abuse Survivors





Source link

Categories
Health

Serena Williams' Nike Catsuit Has Been Banned From the French Open


In May, Serena Williams played in the 2018 French Open, her first tournament since giving birth to daughter Alexis Olympia last summer. She stepped onto the court wearing a black catsuit specially designed for her by Nike—and fans loved it. However, the president of the French Tennis Federation apparently wasn’t a fan, and the Associate Press is reporting that the organization is adopting new measures to regulate players’ outfits, which would effectively ban a catsuit like Williams’.

In an interview with Tennis magazine, Bernard Giudicelli said that French Tennis Federation would “impose certain limits” on clothing that can be worn during the event, beginning with the 2019 French Open. Per ESPN, he cited Williams’ skin-tight black catsuit as an example of a uniform that went “too far.”

“It will no longer be accepted,” Giudicelli said. “One must respect the game and the place.”

PHOTO: Aurelien Meunier

Williams returned to the French Open this year after the life-threatening delivery of her daughter. In an interview with Vogue, the tennis champion shared that she had a pulmonary embolism removed during her C-section, and suffered from blood clots. The custom Nike catsuit she wore to compete in the French Open took that into account: According to the Guardian, her outfit was engineered to prevent further blood clots while she played tennis.

Not only did the Nike catsuit address Williams’ health needs, it was also symbolic of her triumphant return to the court. The one-piece with a single red stripe around the waist was meant to represent “[a]ll the moms out there that had a tough pregnancy and have to come back and try to be fierce, in [the] middle of everything,” Williams told USA Today.

2018 French Open - Day Five

PHOTO: Fred Lee

Across the Internet, people shared outraged reactions to the news of the impending French Tennis Federation dress code, and the fact that it would prohibit Williams’ outfit. Some suggested that the move demonstrates discomfort with women’s bodies and unfairly penalizes the tennis star. “Serena Williams is almost always singled out in tennis,” sports reporter Taylor Rooks tweeted. “It’s not her job to make you feel comfortable.”

Williams’ tennis outfits are widely lauded in the fashion and sports communities. Most recently, she revealed some of her looks for the 2018 US Open, which were designed in collaboration with Nike and Off-White’s Virgil Abloh. Williams has not yet commented on the announcement from the French Tennis Federation.

Related Stories:

It Sure Does Seem Like Meghan Markle Inspired Serena Williams’ Hoodie

Serena Williams Tops Forbes’ Highest-Paid Female Athletes of 2018

Serena Williams Just Teased Her Epic U.S. Open Outfits Designed by Nike and Off-White





Source link

Categories
Health

Trump Reportedly Banned the Words ‘Transgender’ and ‘Diversity’ in CDC Documents


Thee Trump administration has reportedly directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—America’s public health agency—to omit seven words from its 2018 budget documents. According to a report from the Washington Post, the news was announced Thursday and promptly enraged those in the public health sector. The thing is, the seven words happen to be pretty key terms for a public health agency to use.

Two of the phrases gone are “transgender” and “diversity”—and in an Orwellian move, alternative phrasings for some of the terms were offered.

Here are the seven banned words:

  1. Science-based

  2. Evidence-based

  3. Fetus

  4. Transgender

  5. Vulnerable

  6. Entitlement

  7. Diversity

This is pretty problematic, considering the CDC—as a public health agency—must necessarily make science- and evidence-based decisions in order to protect the nation’s diverse population, which often includes vulnerable groups in health care, such as fetuses requiring adequate prenatal care and people who are transgender and seeking safe medical care. (See what we did there?)

The ban is troubling in a way that goes beyond semantics, too: for example, in its erasure of the transgender population and its implicit denial of health issues faced by people of color who disproportionally live in at-risk communities: “You cannot fight against the Zika virus, or improve women’s and fetal health, if you are unable to use the word ‘fetus.’ You must be able to talk about science and evidence if you are to research cures for infectious diseases such as Ebola,” Dana Singiser, vice president of public policy and government affairs for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, told CNN. “You must be able to acknowledge the humanity of transgender people in order to address their health care needs. You cannot erase health inequities faced by people of color simply by forbidding the use of the words ‘vulnerable’ or ‘diversity’.”

The source who informed the Post—apparently a longtime CDC analyst—told the paper that instead of using “science-based” or “evidence-based” in wording, the following was offered: “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes.”

The Health and Human Services department is pushing back and calling the Post‘s report fake news.

“The assertion that HHS has ‘banned words’ is a complete mischaracterization of discussions regarding the budget formulation process,” a HHS spokesman told The Hill on Saturday. “HHS will continue to use the best scientific evidence available to improve the health of all Americans. HHS also strongly encourages the use of outcome and evidence data in program evaluations and budget decisions.”

Meanwhile, we’re suddenly feeling a strong urge to re-read 1984 over the holidays.

Related Stories:
Donald Trump’s New Health and Human Services Pick Is “Public Enemy #1” for Pro-Choice Groups
Donald Trump’s Child Care Plan Fails Working Families, and a New Report Proves It
Donald Trump Just Expanded a Decades-Old Anti-Abortion Policy to Apply to All Global Health Initiatives



Source link