Categories
Health

Melania Trump's Spokesperson Has Addressed Those Infidelity Rumors


Melania Trump hasn’t had a huge public presence since she became First Lady just over a year ago. And rumors surrounding the state of her marriage to Donald Trump have also taken up significant space in the national press, from her delay moving into the White House to viral videos showed her appearing to swat Donald’s hand away when he tried to take it.

Most recently, the publication of Michael Wolff’s book Fire and Fury earlier this month brought these rumors back to the spotlight, as it included the detail that Donald and Melania have separate bedrooms. Then, the Wall Street Journal reported that Donald Trump’s lawyer had arranged to pay adult-film actress Stormy Daniels $130,000 just one month before the 2016 election so she’d remain quiet about an affair between her and Trump. And then InTouch released a 2011 interview with Daniels detailing the affair. Wolff’s book also triggered some speculation that Trump was having an affair with U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley, which she outright denied on Friday.

Now, Melania’s official director of communications, Stephanie Grisham, has spoken out—presumably on Melania’s behalf—about the rumors that Donald’s been unfaithful.

“BREAKING:The laundry list of salacious & flat-out false reporting about Mrs. Trump by tabloid publications & TV shows has seeped into “main stream media” reporting. She is focused on her family & role as FLOTUS – not the unrealistic scenarios being peddled daily by the fake news.”

Given Melania’s history of laying low publicly, this may be the closest we come to a statement from FLOTUS herself on the matter.

Related Stories:
–Donald Trump Hogs Umbrella, Chivalrously Lets Wife and Child Get Rained On
–Please Enjoy This Bizarre Video of Melania Trump Watching Ballerinas
–Melania Trump Isn’t Too Thrilled About Being First Lady, According to a New Report





Source link

Categories
Health

Here's How 'SNL' Finally Addressed the Harvey Weinstein Allegations


Saturday Night Live is known for its sharp takes on news and culture—and its willingness to skewer people, particularly disgraced people, in power. So many were surprised when, last week, the long-running series opted not to cover the unfolding Harvey Weinstein scandal in its October 7 episode, which took place two days after the New York Times published its explosive report detailing allegations of sexual harassment, assault, and inappropriate conduct committed by Weinstein. After a week of more revelations, eyes were once again on SNL last night.

Granted, it’s hard for a comedic, satirical show to find the appropriate way to cover sexual assault. SNL wound up addressing the allegations against Weinstein in two skits. The first was via a faux actors panel about sexual harassment in Hollywood with Cecily Strong playing Marion Cotillard, Leslie Jones as Viola Davis, Kate McKinnon returning as Debette Goldry, and Aidy Bryant as the panel’s moderator (playing an editor from Glamour.com, no less). Together the four women walked a fine line between serious and funny with Bryant, Jones, and Strong playing the straight types to McKinnon’s fiery shot thrower.

“I actually did have one meeting with Harvey, OK?” McKinnon’s character says when the conversation turns to Weinstein. “I was invited to his hotel room, and when I arrived, he was naked, hanging upside down from a monkey bar. He tried to trick me into thinking his genitals were actually his face. It almost worked—the resemblance is uncanny.”

The characters then go on to discuss why sexual assault keeps happening and the role that other men play in these crimes by failing to speak up. When Bryant’s character mentions the “whisper system” that women use to warn one another about threatening men, McKinnon-as-Goldry says “Back then we had a secret code among us actresses to warn each other about the creeps. The code was, ‘He raped me.’ That way if men were listening they would tune us right out, easy peasy.”

The “whisper system” is a very real thing: in the original Times report, actress Ashley Judd confirmed that “women have been talking about Harvey amongst ourselves for a long time, and it’s simply beyond time to have the conversation publicly.”

The sketch also touches on the “father of daughters” line that often gets thrown around by men when they speak out about sexual harassment and discrimination against women. As Strong-as-Cotillard said (with just the right amount of outrage): “You should be upset because you’re a human being.”

That’s when McKinnon comes in with a cutting line of her own: “Having a lady in the family doesn’t make you some kind of hero. I mean, even Hitler had a sister.”

Watch the full skit below:

[embedded content]

The “Weekend Update” guys also kicked off their segment with the Weinstein allegations, with Colin Jost announcing that Weinstein was going to sex addiction rehab. “Somehow I don’t think that’s going to help anybody,” says Jost. “He doesn’t need sex rehab. He needs a specialized facility where there are no women, no contact with the outside world, metal bars, and it’s a prison.”

Co-host Michael Che then ripped into the mogul’s plea for the movie industry to give him a second chance because “we all make mistakes.”

“No, man, a mistake is me walking into the wrong bathroom and using it anyway because I was crowning,” says Che. “You assaulted dozens of women. That’s not a mistake—that’s a full season of Law & Order. Your name’s a verb now. As in, ‘If this guy tries to Weinstein me, I’m going to cut off his little Harvey.'”

[embedded content]

For the record, Weinstein’s legal team has denied the claims, issuing a statement via a spokesperson stating, “Any allegations of non-consensual sex are unequivocally denied by Mr. Weinstein.”

Related Stories:
–These Are All the Women Who Have Accused Harvey Weinstein of Sexual Harassment and Assault
–After Harvey Weinstein Allegations, Women Share Stories of Sexual Harassment on Twitter
–’30 Rock’ Called Out Harvey Weinstein Five Years Ago



Source link

Categories
Health

Why Princess Diana's Death Wasn't Immediately Addressed


Tomorrow marks 20 years since Princess Diana‘s untimely death at 36 years old. During the days following the fatal car crash, Queen Elizabeth II was criticized for appearing detached when she took Prince William, who was 15 at the time, and Prince Harry, who was 12, to a church in Scotland just hours after their father, Prince Charles, told them about their mother’s passing. The nation was also shocked she didn’t rush back to London or appear at any Diana tributes near Buckingham Palace.

Twenty years later, it’s still key to remember that, first, everyone copes with loss differently, and sometimes parents and grandparents need to appear strong to make it easier for the children affected. The queen’s first cousin and close friend Margaret Rhodes confirmed this was the case in an interview with CNN back in 2012, as per Popsugar.

“She was castigated . . . for staying up at Balmoral with the two little boys. She was being a proper granny. What was the point of bringing the boys down to sit in London with nothing to do but sit there feeling sad about mum. Personally, I think I would have behaved in exactly the same way.” So, her choice to come to her grandson’s sides rather than immediately turning to console the nation was rather an easy decision for any grandmother, Queen or not. She was concerned for the children who had just lost their mother.

When it did come time to address the nation about Princess Diana’s death five days later, she did so with, we imagine, the same poise and compassion she shared with her grandchildren. Watch her entire speech below:

[embedded content]



Source link

Categories
Health

Forbes Addressed the Lack of Diversity on Its Highest-Paid Actresses List


2017 has been a good year for diversity in film across the board. Moonlight won the Academy Award for Best Picture; Jordan Peele’s directorial debut Get Out is the most profitable film of the year; and Girls Trip, a film starring four women of color, was the surprise hit of the summer. That being said, we still have a long way to go. Yes, we’ve made progress, but the majority of speaking roles in major motion pictures still go to white performers—specifically, white men.

And this explains why there are no women of color in the top 10 of Forbes magazine’s highest-paid actresses list this year. The publication released its annual list earlier this week, and people were quick to notice the lack of diversity. Check it out for yourself, below:

  1. Emma Stone—$26 million

  2. Jennifer Aniston—$25.5 million

  3. Jennifer Lawrence—$24 million

  4. Melissa McCarthy—$18 million

  5. Mila Kunis—$15.5 million

  6. Emma Watson—$14 million

  7. Charlize Theron—$14 million

  8. Cate Blanchett—$12 million

  9. Julia Roberts—$12 million

  10. Amy Adams—$11.5 million

Stone getting the top spot this year is a no-brainer; her performance in La La Land earned her the Academy Award for Best Actress. Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Lawrence, and Melissa McCarthy prove time and time again to be bankable stars, so their appearance isn’t a surprise. And Emma Watson did Beauty and the Beast this year, so, again, duh. But no actresses of color? How is that possible?

Like we said earlier, it’s the lack of roles. Forbes associate editor Natalie Robehmed confirmed this in a statement released yesterday.

“The lack of diversity on the list comes down to roles: Only 28.3% of all speaking roles across formats go to characters from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, according to a 2016 study,” she said, Cosmo reports. “That means there are simply fewer characters—and fewer high-paying roles—written for women of color. When studios, directors and screenwriters begin creating more main characters for women of color in the types of big budget movies that pay huge upfront fees and backend profits, we’ll see more actors of color on the list.”

Hollywood doesn’t have any more excuses for ignoring this issue. Many studio executives, I believe, used to think films about women and people of color were niche—but Get Out and Girls Trip dispel that completely. These films make money—and people want to see them. It’s time for the industry to wake up.



Source link