Categories
Health

Kylie Jenner Is Officially the Youngest 'Self-Made' Billionaire, According to Forbes Magazine


At a mere 21 years old, Kylie Jenner is officially the world’s youngest self-made billionaire, according to Forbes magazine. And she got there faster than the previous title-holder, Mark Zuckerberg, who reached the milestone at age 23. It also means she’s worth more than her family, including sisters Kim, Khloé, Kourtney, Kendall…and, yes, even momager Kris.

The bulk of Jenner’s worth comes, of course, from her mega-successful Kylie Cosmetics brand, which expanded via an exclusive deal with Ulta last year. Forbes notes that over the first six weeks at Ulta, Kylie Cosmetics sold $54.5 million worth of products. Based on (conservative) projections, they estimate that Kylie Cosmetics is worth $900 million—and Jenner owns the entire company. Adding in the cash that she’s already made, Jenner is a billionaire. “I didn’t expect anything. I did not foresee the future,” she told Forbes. “But [the recognition] feels really good. That’s a nice pat on the back.”

No matter your opinions on the Kardashian-Jenners, that’s incredibly impressive. But what many are taking issue with online is the designation of Jenner as “self-made,” given the rich and famous family that she comes from. (You may remember a similar conversation last July when she was almost to the billion-dollar mark.)

“She founded the company. She started the company with money that she made—$250,000 from modeling,” Kerry Dolan, the assistant managing editor of Forbes explained on Today. “She owns 100% of it. We know she comes from a wealthy family, but she started the business and she owns it so, in our books, she’s self-made.”

Some people on the Internet felt differently, of course. “‘Self-made’ is so delusional too,” wrote one Twitter user. “She certainly had a head start with money in this world, every resource already at her fingertips, and a mighty nice cushion of money to fall back on had she failed. Someone like Mark Z actually innovated and created his place in the world.”

But Jenner has defenders, too. “Kylie Jenner made most of her money on her own,” said one on Twitter. “She has a business mind and honestly, has worked her ass off. Just because you come from spotlight doesn’t mean the spotlight made you. Lot of entrepreneurs out there that came from multimillionaire /billionaire parents who weren’t.”

Whether you want to categorize Jenner’s success as “self-made” or not, there’s really no denying the magnitude of it.





Source link

Categories
Health

Forbes Addressed the Lack of Diversity on Its Highest-Paid Actresses List


2017 has been a good year for diversity in film across the board. Moonlight won the Academy Award for Best Picture; Jordan Peele’s directorial debut Get Out is the most profitable film of the year; and Girls Trip, a film starring four women of color, was the surprise hit of the summer. That being said, we still have a long way to go. Yes, we’ve made progress, but the majority of speaking roles in major motion pictures still go to white performers—specifically, white men.

And this explains why there are no women of color in the top 10 of Forbes magazine’s highest-paid actresses list this year. The publication released its annual list earlier this week, and people were quick to notice the lack of diversity. Check it out for yourself, below:

  1. Emma Stone—$26 million

  2. Jennifer Aniston—$25.5 million

  3. Jennifer Lawrence—$24 million

  4. Melissa McCarthy—$18 million

  5. Mila Kunis—$15.5 million

  6. Emma Watson—$14 million

  7. Charlize Theron—$14 million

  8. Cate Blanchett—$12 million

  9. Julia Roberts—$12 million

  10. Amy Adams—$11.5 million

Stone getting the top spot this year is a no-brainer; her performance in La La Land earned her the Academy Award for Best Actress. Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Lawrence, and Melissa McCarthy prove time and time again to be bankable stars, so their appearance isn’t a surprise. And Emma Watson did Beauty and the Beast this year, so, again, duh. But no actresses of color? How is that possible?

Like we said earlier, it’s the lack of roles. Forbes associate editor Natalie Robehmed confirmed this in a statement released yesterday.

“The lack of diversity on the list comes down to roles: Only 28.3% of all speaking roles across formats go to characters from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, according to a 2016 study,” she said, Cosmo reports. “That means there are simply fewer characters—and fewer high-paying roles—written for women of color. When studios, directors and screenwriters begin creating more main characters for women of color in the types of big budget movies that pay huge upfront fees and backend profits, we’ll see more actors of color on the list.”

Hollywood doesn’t have any more excuses for ignoring this issue. Many studio executives, I believe, used to think films about women and people of color were niche—but Get Out and Girls Trip dispel that completely. These films make money—and people want to see them. It’s time for the industry to wake up.



Source link