Categories
Health

'What Happened to Monday?' Is a Terrifying Mix of 'The Hunger Games' and 'Divergent'


PHOTO: ©Netflix/Courtesy Everett Collection / Everett Collection

Warning: Major film spoilers ahead.

Noomi Rapace plays seven characters in Netflix’s new film, What Happened to Monday, but that’s not even the wildest part about this project. Nope, that honor goes to the Child Allocation Bureau, a government branch responsible for making sure families have onlyone child in their households. The goal of this entity is to “fix” the world’s overpopulation issue, which has reached critical mass in 2073, the year this film takes place. And what happens to the excess siblings, you ask? They’re killed—but the families don’t know that.

This is a dystopian movie, if you couldn’t tell, and it’s a good one. It’s also a movie about survival and determination and sisterhood—seven sisters, specifically. All played by Rapace.

If you’re scratching your head, here’s some background info: A genetic mutation causes a woman to give birth to seven children, which is bad because of the Child Allocation Bureau I mentioned earlier. If the government finds out about her children, six of them will be taken away. So after she dies in the hospital, her father (Willem Dafoe) takes the kids into hiding. He names each child after a day of the week—and when they get older he lets them go out once a week. Monday can leave the house Monday, Tuesday on Tuesday—you get the idea.

But here’s the catch: When the sisters are outside, they have to fool the world into thinking they’re one person named Karen Settman. They have to wear a wig and walk the same and talk the same. If they don’t, the government might realize more than one person is living in their house—and I already told you what happens in that case.

MCDWHHA EC064

PHOTO: ©Netflix/Courtesy Everett Collection / Everett Collection

At the head of this totalitarian regime is Nicolette Cayman, played brilliantly (and terrifyingly) by Glenn Close. When she gets wind of the seven siblings, a manhunt ensues for all of them but one. Those are the rules, after all.

You can probably guess what happens next: lots of fighting, blood, and yes, death. (Sorry, but not all the sisters make it to the end of the film.) These scenes are exciting and adrenaline-pumping, sure, but they’re something even more important: empowering—especially for women. The seven sisters outsmart their techno-savvy government by working together—using their strengths to stay one step ahead of the violent dudes hot on their tails.

In one particularly chilling scene, three men with scary guns lure five of the sisters out of hiding. The dudes laugh at the sisters and make some disparaging comments about them. Right as you think it’s all over, though, one of the physically astute sisters takes a shot at the head lunkhead, and a full-out brawl begins, ending in the death of all the men hired to kill them. Granted, this isn’t a fully victorious moment—one of the sisters, unfortunately, also dies—but it establishes the tone of the film. On some level, this movie shows what good can happen when women join forces.

It also shows what happens when they’re adversaries. This entire blood bath began in the first place because one of the sisters—I won’t tell you which—made a seedy deal with the government. She quite literally betrayed her sisters, and the result was carnage. Lots of it. The message isn’t exactly subtle—but it’s powerful.

And the film’s references to The Hunger Games, Divergent, and Orphan Black aren’t subtle either. Nicolette Cayman is eerily similar to Jeanine Matthews, the dictator who had a bone to pick with Tris in Divergent; the sisters’ fighting style has distinct Katniss Everdeen shades; and, as I mentioned earlier, Rapace takes on seven. different. roles. That’s Tatiana Maslany AF.

What Happened to Monday still has its own identity, though. For one, it’s scary. Like, genuinely scary. (The Hunger Games and Divergent are great, but they won’t keep you up at night.) But it’s that theme of sisterhood that really sets Monday apart from its peers. Katniss and Tris are great female protagonists, but they’re the only ones in their respective stories. Their narratives are inextricably linked to the male characters. In What Happened to Monday, the males take a backseat to the badassery of Karen Settman. Times seven. Whoever said there’s power in numbers was absolutely right.

What Happened to Monday is streaming on Netflix right now. Go watch!



Source link

Categories
Health

Emilia Clarke Just Called This 'Game of Thrones' Character 'The One' For Daenerys


One of the biggest questions Game of Thrones fans have on their minds this season is whether or not Jon and Daenerys will get together—like, sexxxually. Yes, Dany is Jon’s aunt, but incest is just as common as dragons on this show. (Heck, the first episode of GoT ever featured Cersei and and Jaime getting it on.) The sexual tension between these two characters is off the charts. Re-watch the cave scene from episode four if you’re skeptical—it’ll seriously make you sweat.

But Emilia Clarke might’ve just shut down this theory. In a post-show interview published on HBO’s YouTube page, Clarke dropped a subtle hint about who Daenerys ends up with—and it wasn’t Jon.

“The thing about Ser Jorah is that he has been the one from the very beginning,” Dany said. “I think he has an ability to see right through [Dany].”

Wait…so Ser Jorah is the man Dany rides off into the sunset with? That would be…strange. It’s pretty obvious that Ser Jorah is ride-or-die for Dany, but they never seemed like The Couple. According to Clarke’s quote, though, Ser Jorah is The One—so what the hell is happening?

And to add fuel to this fire, Clarke also said not to “read into” the scene between Jon and Dany on the cliff—ya know, the one where Dany is clearly turned on by the way Jon interacts with her dragons. It seems like this ship is officially shipwrecked, people.

Watch Clarke’s interview for yourself, below:

[embedded content]

Of course, it’s totally possible Clarke’s quote doesn’t mean anything and this is just another example of the GoT cast gas-lighting America. Looks like we’ll just have to keep watching to find out for sure.

Related Stories:

All the Signs Jon and Daenerys Are Definitely Getting Together on ‘Game of Thrones’

Did Kit Harington Just Confirm This Popular ‘Game of Thrones’ Jon and Daenerys Theory?



Source link

Categories
Health

Mufasa and Scar Aren't Actually Brothers in 'The Lion King'


PHOTO: Everett Collection / Everett Collection

If you’re a ’90s kid, you’ve seen The Lion King at least 300 times. You can probably recite the entire script from start to finish, but for the three people who haven’t seen it, here’s a quick summary: A diabolical lion named Scar kills his royal brother, Mufasa, in order gain control of the Pride Lands, which causes Mufasa’s son (Simba) to run away. While stranded in the middle of nowhere, Simba meets a friendly meerkat (Timone) and warthog (Pumbaa), who help him get his stride back. After years of confidence-building, Simba returns to the Pride Lands to battle Scar and reclaim his father’s title. It’s standard, Disney tearjerker stuff—and we love it.

But we’ve all been getting a fundamental component of The Lion King wrong for two decades. As it turns out, Mufasa and Scar aren’t brothers—not by blood, at least. The sleuths over at HelloGiggles found this out after interviewing the 1994 film’s director (Rob Minkoff) and producer (Don Hahn).

“[While making the movie] we talked about the fact that it was very likely [Scar and Mufasa] would not have both the same parents,” Hahn said. “The way lions operate in the wild…when the male lion gets old, another rogue lion comes and kills the head of the pride. What that does is it causes the female lions to go into heat [to reproduce], and then the new younger lion kills the king and then he kills all the babies. Now he’s the new lion that’s running the pride.”

So, in other words, Scar was just a strange lion who sensed Mufasa was getting old, so he swooped in and killed him. Harsh, right? (Actually, maybe this isn’t as harsh as your own brother murdering you.)

“There was always this thing about well, how do you have these two [male] lions?” Hahn continued. “Occasionally there are prides that do have two male lions, in an interesting dynamic because they’re not equals [since they don’t have the same parents]. One lion will always kind of be off in the shadows. We were trying to use those animal truths to underpin the story so we sort of figured Scar and Mufasa couldn’t really be from the same gene pool.”

If you pay close attention to the movie, Scar actually confirms he and Mufasa aren’t birth brothers—but it’s subtle. “I’m from the shallow end of the gene pool,” he says at one point.

Mind blown, right? What bombshell are you going to drop next, Disney? That Elsa and Anna aren’t sisters?! I feel bad for even putting that in the universe.

Related Stories:

Disney Gives The Lion King and Frozen 2 Official Release Dates

9 Bonkers Disney Fan Theories That Will Keep You Awake Tonight



Source link