Categories
Health

First Lady Melania Trump Wears Chanel Haute Couture Gown to First State Dinner


President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump hosted their first official State Dinner at the White House Tuesday evening, in honor of French President Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron. In keeping with an unofficial custom, FLOTUS paid homage to the guests’ country of origin through her fashion, opting to wear a custom silver gown by Chanel Haute Couture.

PHOTO: Mark Wilson

The style was adapted from a jumpsuit that appeared on the house’s Spring 2018 couture runway, according to Vogue; FLOTUS appears to have requested the pants be changed to a floor-grazing sequin skirt, but that it maintain the same mesh neckline, crystal embellishments, and contrasting sheer hem.

Chanel : Runway - Paris Fashion Week - Haute Couture Spring Summer 2018

PHOTO: Victor VIRGILE

Mrs. Macron, meanwhile, decided on a long-sleeved white dress by Louis Vuitton, also custom.

US-FRANCE-DIPLOMACY-ARRIVALS-GUESTS

PHOTO: SAUL LOEB

This isn’t the first time Mrs. Trump wore Karl Lagerfeld for Chanel while in office, choosing a red Chanel coat for the National Christmas Tree Lighting in Washington, D.C., in December 2017.

President And Mrs Trump Attend National Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony

PHOTO: Astrid Riecken

Historically, FLOTUS’ gowns for State Dinners have been informed by whoever they’re hosting. Michelle Obama famously picked designers and brands who had some sort of connection to the country her guests were from—like how she wore Jason Wu to greet Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Sophie Trudeau from Canada, and Atelier Versace for Prime Minister Matteo Renzi and Agnese Landini of Italy.

Since becoming First Lady, Mrs. Trump has received criticism for the high cost of the clothing she wears to official events, like the time she chose a $2,950 Delpozo dress to deliver a speech that referenced child hunger at the United Nations. An haute couture gown would certainly fall into that bucket, as these incredibly detailed, often meticulously hand-made garments come with exorbitant, only-upon-request price tags—especially if they’ve been customized.

Neither Chanel or Karl Lagerfeld have released a statement about dressing Mrs. Trump for the State Dinner, and requests to Chanel for comment weren’t immediately returned.

Related Stories:

Donald and Melania Are Back With a New Episode of ‘Awkward Hand Holding’

4 Presidents and 4 First Ladies Honored Barbara Bush in This Incredible Photo

Melania Trump Gave a Rare Speech Encouraging ‘Positive Habits on Social Media’



Source link

Categories
Health

Why I Think Trump’s State of The Union Let DownLatino and Immigrant Communities


Even before Donald Trump started talking, it was clear to me that his State of the Union address on Tuesday night was shaping up to be a hostile environment for Latino immigrants. Several Democrats invited “dreamers,” undocumented individuals brought to the U.S. as children, to attend the event and represent the experiences of young people hoping for immigration reform.

But Rep. Paul A. Gosar (R-Ariz.) tweeted just hours before the speech that he’d contacted U.S. Capitol police, urging them to check IDs and arrest any “illegal aliens in attendance.” I could see the lines were drawn: Dreamers, who come from Latin America and other parts of the world, were not welcome here.

From there, things got worse. I can’t say I was optimistic about Trump’s address—after all, he’s continually derided Latino and immigrant communities, like the one I grew up in, by painting us as criminals and leading “build the wall” chants at his rallies. But I wondered, hopefully, whether his recent non-partisan bluster could at least initiate a productive conversation about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which he ended last year.

Instead, Trump took the podium and launched into rhetoric that referenced criminals and members of the violent Central American gang MS-13, fixated on the dangers of chain migration, and refused to fully commit to DACA recipients, who have been waiting anxiously for permission to stay in the only country they know. It wasn’t just bad, which I’d prepared for; it was a flaming dumpster fire of mistruths, and a massive letdown for immigrants and Latinos listening. And, while it was par for the course for Trump, it still upset me to watch such a divisive reality unfold.

As hard-working members of society, we Latinos were largely invisible last night. The only time Trump mentioned us by name was when he patted himself on the back and boasted about the Hispanic unemployment rate reaching an all-time low—something that’s has been happening incrementally since before he was elected. He spent more time evoking images of gang violence to justify his anti-immigrant agenda, describing how “open borders have allowed drugs and gangs to pour into our most vulnerable communities.”

“Tonight, I am calling on the Congress to finally close the deadly loopholes that have allowed MS-13, and other criminals, to break into our country. We have proposed new legislation that will fix our immigration laws, and support our ICE and Border Patrol Agents, so that this cannot ever happen again,” he said.

By continuing to discuss MS-13 in this context, Trump conflates immigrants and undocumented individuals with criminals and gang members. As a fact-check from the Guardian shows, several studies, including this one from the 2015 National Academy of Sciences, prove that immigrants are actually far less likely to commit crimes than native-born people. Plus, his claim that his administration has put “thousands and thousands and thousands” of MS-13 members behind bars is unverifiable—and likely an overstatement. His narrative leaves out the millions of families who contribute to the economy and only want to provide a better life for their kids—much like my parents, who emigrated from Nicaragua in the middle of a fierce civil war.

Trump had a chance to frame Latinos in a new light after characterizing them as “rapists” and “criminals” in the past, but he didn’t

Trump also turned the attention on “chain migration,” saying that his immigration plan would “protect the nuclear family” and stop immigrants from bringing in “virtually unlimited numbers of distant relatives.” This, as Politico points out, is just not true, because a massive backlog for family visas keeps immigrants for bringing “unlimited” relatives to the U.S. Plus, the hypocrisy of complaining about chain migration has already come back to bite a few Trump officials, given how inextricably tied to U.S. history immigration is. Journalist Jennifer Mendelsohn recently found that relatives of Dan Scavino, an assistant to the president, came to New York from Italy and eventually brought more of their family to America. “Do you think that would count as chain migration?” Mendelsohn asked him on Twitter.

And when it came to DACA, Trump was ambiguous. This was his chance to offer a real pledge. He said he had framework that “generously offers a path to citizenship” to immigrants brought to the U.S. as kids, but didn’t elaborate on what that would look like. The dreamers who showed up crossing their fingers for a solution got a mere 65 words of a 5,000-word speech.

Trump had a chance to frame Latinos in a new light after characterizing them as “rapists” and “criminals” in the past, but he didn’t. He said he had plans that would help struggling immigrant communities, but all he talked about was limitations. As a Latina watching last night, it was obvious that Trump wasn’t really talking to me at all—he was addressing an audience that doesn’t want to see us as a multitudinous, patriotic community of entrepreneurs, politicians, and, of course, college-bound dreamers. For me, this was an address about division and discord, not union.

Julyssa Lopez is a Berlin-based freelance writer and reporter.



Source link

Categories
Health

At the 2018 State of the Union Address, Fashion Was a Vehicle for Quiet Protest


Donald Trump delivered his first State of the Union Address last night to a divided audience—one that was split not only by the choice to stand up to applaud, but also by what they wore.

Leading up to the president’s address to the nation, certain groups, like the Democratic Working Women’s Group and the Congressional Black Caucus, announced they would stage quiet acts of resistance against the current administration at the State of the Union through their clothing. Following the lead of the Time’s Up protest at the 2018 Golden Globes, a group of lawmakers (led by female Democrats) coordinated to wear black, both to the Address and to various boycotts hosted in tandem with it, in a show of solidarity with the #MeToo movement. (Representative Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.), who participated in the protest, told Glamour:”Black has become the color of solidarity for women in the country right now to show this movement is real.”)

Additionally, members of the CBC donned kente cloths, as a response to the President’s recent disparaging remarks against immigrants from predominantly Black countries, the Washington Post reported. What’s more, Representative Bonnie Coleman (D-NJ) encouraged attendees to wear red pins with the name “Recy” on them, in honor of Recy Taylor.

Not all protests came from the left side of the aisle, though: In response to the defiant all-black dress code proposed by Democrats, some Republican lawmakers opted to wear red, white, and blue to the State of the Union. Representative Mimi Walters (R-CA) explained to CNN that this meant “to show patriotism for our country.”

Across party lines and affiliations, outfits worn to the 2018 State of the Union Address culminated in markedly powerful moments of fashion protest on the U.S. Capitol. See all the Congresswomen (and Congressmen) who participated in the myriad fashion protests during the 2018 State of the Union Address, below.

Additional reporting by Lucia Graves.



Source link

Categories
Health

A Guide to All the Special Guests Invited to Trump's State of the Union Address


Though today a recognizable part of State of the Union procedure, the presidential practice of inviting regular civilians to attend the event as “special guests” is actually a fairly recent one, beginning only with the Reagan administration in 1982. Historically, these invitees of the president and first lady have been Americans who either epitomize national ideals, or prove to benefit from the president’s political platform. Unsurprisingly, these guests seen at Tuesday evening’s SOTU were all personifications of the narrative that the president attempted to deliver during this address to Congress. From U.S.-born blue collar workers who have seemingly benefitted under his economy, to those who reflect his stance on immigration and border security, Trump was strategic in his selection of the evening’s guests. Here: a deeper look into who he invited, and why.

Ashlee Leppert: A member of the U.S. Coast Guard who specializes in aviation electronics, Ashlee rescued dozens of hurricane victims from floodwaters and destruction in Louisiana. Specifically, during one of her rescue missions, Leppert reportedly hoisted to safety a woman who was clutching four small children.

Jon Bridgers: Founder of the nonprofit rescue team called the “Cajun Navy,” Bridgers created the organization to aid flood victims in Louisiana; he continues attempts to collect donations for areas still devastated today.

David Dahlberg: A fire prevention technician, Dahlberg saved a total of 62 people (both children and staff members) from an encroaching fire at a Santa Barbara summer camp during the wildfires in Southern California last year.

Officer Ryan Holets: A member of the Albuquerque Police Department, Holets and his wife adopted a baby from a homeless couple who, due to opioid addiction, were unable to care for the child themselves.

Cpl. Matthew Bradford: A retired veteran, Bradford lost his sight and both legs when he stepped on an improvised explosive device in 2007 during a tour in Iraq. After extensive treatment, he became the first blind double-amputee to re-enlist in the Marine Corps.

[Staff Sgt. Justin Peck:](https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2018/01/29/military-members-among-prominent-white-house-guests-for-state-of-the-union-address/) When an improvised explosive device detonated nearby and injured a fellow soldier, Staff Sergeant Peck rushed to the aid of the wounded military member, despite the potential danger, and provided him with lifesaving medical care.

Preston Sharp: A young 12-year-old boy from Redding, California, Sharp organized the placement of more than 40,000 American flags and red carnations on soldiers’ graves through what he called “the Flag and Flower Challenge.”

Steve Staub and Sandy Keplinger: Steve Staub and his sister Sandy Keplinger are the owners of Staub Manufacturing in Dayton, Ohio. After Trump took office, Staub says his business has prospered significantly—citing the fact that in the last year, the company both acquired a new building and saw a 60 percent increase in its employees, from 23 to 37.

Corey Adams: A welder at Staub Manufacturing, Adams, The White House states, was able to purchase his first home last year with his wife, thanks to the recent tax overhaul under Trump’s economic plan.

Elizabeth Alvarado, Robert Mickens, Evelyn Rodriguez and Freddy Cuevas: Parents Who Lost their Children: After four teenagers were violently murdered in Brentwood, New York in September of last year, authorities believed the killers to likely be members of the MS-13 gang; during Tuesday evening’s address, Trump noted that these gang members came to this country without proper documentation or citizenship.

Celestino “CJ” Martinez: an Air Force veteran and an agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations unit, Martinez is responsible, the White House says, for the arrests of more than 100 MS-13 members.



Source link

Categories
Health

Melania Trump Wore an All-White Suit for State of the Union


All eyes were on First Lady Melania Trump as she entered the chamber to watch her husband deliver his first State of the Union to a joint session of Congress. In a break from tradition, she arrived separately from President Trump—the Obamas and George W. Bush and his wife Laura both rode together from the White House. Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that this was for “no reason other than she can greet the guests and he can go straight in.” Still, eyebrows were raised.

And then there’s Melania’s fashion selection: an all-white Christian Dior pantsuit and Dolce & Gabbana blouse. I don’t know about you but when I think all-white pantsuit, or any pantsuit for that matter, my mind immediately travels to one Ms. Hillary Rodham Clinton. Of course, HRC doesn’t have that market cornered and the First Lady is free to wear anything she chooses, but again…eyebrows were raised.

The look also evokes images of the Democratic women who chose to wear white to the president’s joint session last year to symbolize the suffragette movement and women’s rights. It’s also in stark contrast to many Democrats decision to attend in black this year.

Of course, there’s no way to know if Melania Trump is making a statement or if she just really likes that suit. But clothing has become a significant marker of the #MeToo and Time’s Up moment which brings even more scrutiny to every sartorial choice. And Twitter sure had some fun speculating calling her “Resistance curious” and a “suffragette, Hillary Clinton, and Kesha #MeToo backup singer all in one.”

If only she tweeted as much as her husband, we might someday know the real story.





Source link

Categories
Health

Why Rep. Pramila Jayapal Is Skipping the State of the Union


Dozens of Democratic women will wear black to President Trump’s State of the Union on Tuesday to show support for survivors of sexual harassment and assault. Rep. Pramila Jayapal won’t be one of them — because she’s not attending the speech at all. The freshman Democrat from Washington state announced in a Facebook video on Martin Luther King Jr. Day that she is joining a number of colleagues, includingRep. Maxine Waters,] in boycotting the event. Jayapal spoke to Glamour about her decision and how she’s fighting back against what she sees as a racist presidency.

What message are you trying to send by skipping the State of the Union?“For me it really is about refusing to normalize and dignify a president who is using the highest office of the land to really fan and fuel racism and sexism and hatred. [My decision] was brought about by his comments during the immigration meeting, where he called Haiti and other African nations ‘shitholes. I just think that is outrageous. This is just a speech and I don’t want to be in the chamber and have to listen to words from a president who uses the office really for political reasons to fuel hatred.”

You say he’s “fueling hatred” or using these terms for political reasons, but do you think President Trump is a racist? At his core, is he a racist person?“I think he is, because I don’t think that these comments would come out over and over again if he didn’t have those tendencies. The signs really are there, with multiple comments, with multiple sets of policies that are based on racist ideologies. His reluctance to condemn or his refusal to condemn white supremacists and to morally equate those white supremacists with protesters against white supremacy was probably one of the most stunning examples of that. Many people have, perhaps unintended, said things that come out as racist, but he has seemed to have a proclivity to having people around him who strengthen that part of him.”

“We have to keep remembering that the majority of the United States rejected him. And certainly if the election would be held today, that would be even more true. I’s a very difficult situation because he is occupying the oval office, but [the question is] how do we refuse to normalize behavior when every day feels like we’re sinking to a new low. To me, staying away from the State of the Union is a form of nonviolent resistance and part of the reason I announced it on MLK Day is because Dr. King and Gandhi have been inspirations for me and I do think that silence is complicity.”

Some colleagues are using the event to send a message instead, including women wearing black to stand with survivors of sexual harassment and assault. What do you think about that?“For the women of the caucus who are wearing black and going to the State of the Union, I’m very supportive of those efforts. I will just say for me, this is very personal. I am an immigrant to this country, and I spent years working in the immigration movement and the women’s movement. So when [Trump] says immigration has brought us the worst of the worst or when he realizes a report from the White House talking about immigrants as terrorists, I personally cannot sit in that chamber.”

You and other members who are not attending are planning a counter-event. What will you be doing?“We’ll have our own agenda for that evening because we really want to present a state of our union. Our vision is to present an alternative vision, for how we move forward, one based on unity and people in rural and urban areas and white brown and black and men and women coming together to really move the united states forward and not backward.”

The State of the Union is just one night, one news cycle…maybe even less than one news cycle the way things go these days. What happens next?‘We have seen across the country attitudes toward the president — disappointment, disgust, outrage over the president — being turned into action in districts that Democrats never thought they could win. They are winning, often with women candidates. The state Senate race in Wisconsin was a perfect example of that Even [Republican Gov.] Scott Walker said this is a wake-up call. We have to continue to move our organizing into power that demonstrates ourselves in resistance to bad policies. You saw it last year around healthcare, around the “Trumpcare bill”. And I think you’re going to see it this year not only around policy issues, but in special elections and primaries and, ultimately, in November.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.



Source link