Categories
Health

Planning My Wedding—And a Marriage—Without Gender Roles


Last summer, my fiancé and I asked a couple celebrating their 40th anniversary what their secret to a long, happy marriage is. They thought for a moment and said, “Do your own laundry.” They were dead serious. Taking responsibility for their own laundry, a chore neither of them wanted to do, meant that the task always got done but never solely rested on one partner or the other.

It was a smart idea, my fiancé and I agreed. Then we continued to mix our laundry and get in squabbles about who was doing more loads of it.

I have shared a home with my fiancé, a cisgender heterosexual male, for several years. Finding a division of household tasks that feels fair and equal has definitely been a topic of (sometimes heated) discussion in our home. But overall, I feel lucky to have an equal and progressive partner and am happy with the balance we’ve found: We switch off on meal prep, team up for apartment deep-cleans, and now alternate laundry loads.

But as we began wedding planning last fall, I couldn’t help but notice how the gender-focused traditions around marriage made me more sensitive to the dynamics in our relationship. Almost immediately, I was struck by how much of our planning to-do list naturally fell to me, simply because I’m a woman and likely know more about wedding prep than my partner does.

In some ways, that made sense: The fact that I grew up on a steady diet of “fairytale wedding” movies and have several close friends who’ve gotten married meant that I at least have some sense of how wedding planning works. Plus, let’s be honest, the vast majority of the gorgeous wedding guides and websites out there—with their soft colors and pretty florals—are presumably geared toward women. It wasn’t that my fiancé didn’t want to help; he simply had no idea where to start.

So I stepped into the role of primary planner, with only the tiniest chip on my shoulder. As I scoured wedding websites, launched spreadsheets, and reached out to vendors, I started thinking of other areas in which women are often presumed to be the experts and therefore tasked with planning, assigning, and executing. At the top of that list: parenting.

I’m not a mother yet, but hope to have children in the near future. Over the years, I’ve watched mothers I know navigate the terrain of maintaining domestic parity with their male partners—something that can be even more difficult to achieve with the added demands of having kids.

A complaint I hear all the time: Male partners don’t always understand the amount of behind-the-scenes, unpaid work that women put into raising children. Seemingly small tasks like scheduling doctors’ appointments and play dates, meal prep, and cleaning really add up—and it’s sometimes hard to get male partners to share those tasks or make them a priority, even if they’re more than happy to take kids to school or spend time playing with them.

Moms often end up taking on the less fun (but unavoidable) tasks just so they get done, and I could feel myself doing the same—and fretting about it—with wedding planning. As my fiancé and I talk more about having kids, I couldn’t help but think about how that could supercharge tiffs over laundry or who’s in charge of calling the caterer (or, down the line, the babysitter).

Recently, I found myself stewing over all of this as I listened to author and clinical psychologist Dr. Darcy Lockman give a keynote speech at the In Good Company conference in San Francisco. The title of her talk? “The Patriarchy at Home.” She had my attention.

Darcy Lockman delivers the keynote speech at In Good Company, a San Francisco conference geared toward entrepreneurial women and mothers. Kara Brodgesell



Source link

Categories
Health

Watch Jessica Chastain Perfectly Illustrate Why Hollywood Needs Better Roles for Women


Jessica Chastain knows there’s a problem for women in Hollywood. Well, besides the sexual harassment. And the pay disparities. And the inane red carpet questions. OK—Jessica Chastain knows there are a lot of problems for women in Hollywood.

But this week on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, she wanted to talk about one in particular: underwritten female roles. Like the distraught wife of the hero who saves the day. Or the distraught girlfriend of the man who would and does risk everything. To illustrate just what actresses are dealing with in terms of a lack of depth of the characters they’re asked to play, Chastain asked Fallon to help her read some scenes, with the late-night host taking the female parts while Chastain read for the men. The result was obviously hilarious—and very telling.

Fallon didn’t have to stretch himself much to read for the leading lady in a rom-com, when a meet-cute had the guy waxing poetic about the unpredictable nature of the universe and the possibility of fate, while his female companion…just giggled mostly. He was completely silent during Chastain’s action hero monologue (though, on set he’d probably need to do at least some pained expressions when the hero said, “You wait here”). He did get an actual chunk of very technical dialogue for an imaginary sci-fi script, with his heroine outlining her perfectly calculated plan to save the ship, but it’s still not exactly a shining beacon of feminism at work—her plan was quickly and simply dismissed by her male counterpart.

At the end of the sketch, Chastain and Fallon made sure to plug Time’s Up, the initiative to fight gender inequality that’s been rampant in the world of Hollywood and beyond, making it clear that just poking fun at problems in the industry isn’t going to cut it; there need to be clear indicators that positive changes are truly coming.

Watch the sketch for yourself, below:

[embedded content]



Source link

Categories
Health

A 'Pretty Little Liars' Spinoff Is Coming—and Two Leads Will Reprise Their Roles


PHOTO: Pictorial Press Ltd / Alamy Stock Photo

Pretty Little Liars fans, we’re about to make your day. A spinoff of the popular Freeform series is coming, and get this: Two of the original liars are reprising their roles. Nope, this isn’t a drill. Your tweets to I. Marlene King and company have finally been answered.

The new show is called Pretty Little Liars: The Perfectionists, and it’s based on the book series The Perfectionists by Sara Shepard (who also wrote the original PLL novels). The premise of The Perfectionists is eerily similar to PLL : It takes place in a picturesque town, Beacon Heights, and it’s filled with beautiful people—but all of this, well, perfection starts crumbling when somebody turns up dead. Sounds just like the saga of Rosewood, right? The only thing missing is a menacing hooded figure sending cleverly-worded threats via text. (Spoiler alert: That menacing hooded figure turned out to be Spencer Hastings’ evil twin Alex Drake. It’s been three months, and I’m still not over that reveal.)

Unfortunately, you won’t see Spencer in this spinoff—not to our knowledge, at least—but you will get a little more time with Alison DiLaurentis and Mona Vanderwaal. Both Sasha Pieterse and Janel Parrish are expected to reprise their roles for Pretty Little Liars: The Perfectionists. Whether this means the teenage or adult versions of Alison and Mona is still to be determined.

If you remember from the series finale, Alison is now married to Emily and has children, and Mona’s off in Europe torturing Alex and Mary Drake in a life-size dollhouse. So does this mean Alison and Mona are just going to…drop their lives and move to Beacon Heights?

The PLL gals have said multiple times they’d love to work with each other again, and this new series seems like a great opportunity to do that with little commitment. I’m predicting it now: Aria, Hanna, Spencer, and Emily will—fingers crossed!—return for at least an episode or two of PLL: The Perfectionists. I.M.K. can be very persuasive.

Related Stories:

The Pretty Little Liars Creator Finally Revealed How the Moms Escaped That Basement



Source link