Categories
Health

Christine Blasey Ford's ACLU ‘Courage Award’ Speech Is A Must Watch


Dr. Christine Blasey Ford made a rare public appearance to accept the ACLU of Southern California’s Rodger Baldwin Courage Award over the weekend, explaining in more depth and detail what motivated her to come forward against now Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in September 2018. (Almost 14 months ago Blasey Ford testified that Kavanaugh assaulted her when both were in high school in 1982. He has denied the accusations and was later confirmed to the bench.)

“When I came forward last September, I did not feel courageous,” Blasey Ford said in her acceptance speech. “I was simply doing my duty as a citizen.” So much so, she added, that she felt certain anyone in her position would “of course do the same thing.” But what seemed to her to be an essential and obvious move had a greater impact—and came at a greater cost—than she could have anticipated.

After her appearance before the Senate committee, Blasey Ford and her family were faced with threats, forcing them to move from their home and enhance their personal security.

“I was prepared for a variety of outcomes, including being dismissed,” she said over the weekend of her decision to speak out. “I was not prepared for the venom, the consistent attacks, the vilification, the loss of personal privacy, and the collateral damages to my friends and my family. I was not prepared to be physically threatened, or forced out of our home for over three months. I have learned a lot over the past year. I have learned there’s a well-financed attack machine out there ready to flood the internet and the media anytime I raise my head. And I know it’s not going to go away.”

In coming forward, Blasey Ford faced greater scrutiny and cruelty than most of her critics can imagine. But, she went on, even in the face of relentless attacks, she found strength. “Though I underestimated the pain, I also underestimated the love and the support that I have received,” she said.

You can watch the entire speech below:

[embedded content]



Source link

Categories
Health

Chrissy Teigen Makes Trump's Birthday Great by Donating $288,000 to ACLU


Thursday, June 14, marks President Donald Trump’s 72nd birthday, and in honor of the occasion, Chrissy Teigen released a statement about the administration’s policy of separating immigrant children from their parents at the border, asking followers to donate to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“John and I are outraged to see and hear the horror stories of immigrant families seeking asylum and refuge in America being ripped apart due to the inhumane policies of the Trump administration,” Chrissy wrote in a statement posted to Instagram and Twitter. “These actions are cruel, anti-family and go against everything we believe this country should represent. The ACLU is committed to defending the rights and humanity of these vulnerable families. In addition to fighting for immigrants’ rights, they’re advocating for reproductive rights, voting rights, criminal justice reform, LGBT rights, 1st amendment rights and holding the Trump administration accountable whenever possible.”

“The President celebrates his 72nd birthday today,” the statement continued. “On this auspicious occasion, in order to Make Trump’s Birthday Great Again, each member of our family has donated $72,000 to the ACLU. If you would like to donate $7.20, $72, or whatever you like to the ACLU in honor of this blessed day, please go to www.aclu.org/72.” Chrissy signed the statement “with love” from herself, John Legend, and their children Luna and Miles.

In April, the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the administration’s aforementioned family separation practice, arguing that it violates the families’ constitutional rights to due process. Last Thursday, Bloomberg reported that a federal judge has allowed the lawsuit to advance on those grounds, but rejected the ACLU’s argument that the family separation policy violates asylum laws.

“The government actors responsible for the ‘care and custody’ of migrant children have, in fact, become their persecutors,” the judge said, according to Bloomberg. Bloomberg reported that the ACLU also requested for this practice to halt while the case proceeds, adding that the request is currently pending.

Chrissy was memorably blocked by Trump on Twitter last July, though it’s a safe bet the well-wishes came through loud and clear.





Source link

Categories
Health

Taylor Swift Is in Hot Water With the ACLU After Allegedly Attempting to Silence a Critic


Taylor Swift has a history of pushing back against her critics—see: the lyrics to “Shake It Off”—but her latest dispute has the singer in hot water with the ACLU.

On Monday the ACLU sent Swift a strongly worded letter telling her to back off a critic she reportedly tried to silence. According to the ACLU, the website PopFront published a story in September entitled, “Swiftly to the alt-right: Taylor subtly gets the lower case kkk in formation.” In the post, editor Meghan Herning, in a mix of “political speech and critical commentary,” argues that some white supremacists have embraced Swift’s work. Because of this, Herning asks the singer to denounce white supremacy. Then, in October, Herning received a cease-and-desist letter from Swift and her lawyer threatening a defamation lawsuit and demanding a retraction for the story.

“Among other things, the story propagates such hideous falsehoods as: 1) ‘Taylor’s lyrics play to [a] subtle, quiet white support of a racial hierarchy;’ 2) that there are similarities between Ms. Swift and Adolf Hitler; 3) that the ‘lyrics [of ‘Look What You Made Me Do’] are the most
explicit in speaking to white anger and affirming white supremacy;’ and 4) that Ms. Swift’s purported silence regarding white supremacy means she supports Donald Trump and identifies with the white supremacist/al-right movement,” the letter from Swift’s lawyer read.

After receiving it, Herning contacted the ACLU, who sent Swift a letter stating that the editor and PopFront would not “in any way accede to your attempt to suppress their constitutionally protected speech.” As for the aforementioned “hideous falsehoods,” the ACLU responded, “Not even in your wildest dreams can they constitute defamation.” The references to Swift’s work continued later in the letter with, “Criticism is never pleasant, but a celebrity has to shake it off, even if the critique may damage her reputation.”

Related: How Taylor Swift is Counting on Fashion to Change Her ‘Reputation’



Source link