Categories
Health

Shonda Rhimes Wants to Ban the Phrase 'Strong Female Leads'—and She's Not Wrong


How often do you hear the phrase “strong male characters?” Probably not very much, but the entertainment industry is quick to point out whenever a “strong female woman” makes it on screen. And Shonda Rhimes is sick of it.

Yesterday afternoon, the producer and creator of some of the most beloved female-driven shows, such as “Grey’s Anatomy,” “Scandal,” and “How To Get Away With Murder,” made the case that although using phrases like “strong female character” or “smart female lead” might be well-intentioned, these qualifiers are not just redundant and condescending.

“Okay,” she tweeted on Thursday. “Entertainment industry, time to stop using the phrases ‘Smart Strong Women’ and ‘Strong Female Leads’. There are no Dumb Weak Women. A smart strong woman is just a WOMAN. Also? ‘Women’ are not a TV trend — we’re half the planet.”

Her remarks started a conversation about how these descriptors are a disservice to women, because they imply that brainy, independent women are a rare sight that needs to be applauded or pointed out. As she explains, the industry should assume that women are already strong and smart, the way they generally do with male characters. Twitter users noted that these terms can also be limiting, since being constantly painted as strong doesn’t always leave much room for complexity or nuance, which is often celebrated in brooding, tortured male characters like the Don Drapers and Walter Whites of the TV world.

A few hours after Rhimes initiated the discussion, Oscar-winning actress Jessica Chastain chimed in to say, “Yes to this. I’m always told I play ‘strong women.’ Lets pleasw use the phrase ‘well written women’ in its place ALL WOMEN ARE STRONG WOMEN.”

It’s not the first time Rhimes has spoken up about how the industry characterizes female characters. As part of an interview series for Time back in 2017, Rhimes said, “Every time someone says, ‘How do you write such smart, strong women?’ I find it appalling because it suggests that there are stupid, weak women and that’s who is generally out there.”





Source link

Categories
Health

In 2017, Size Diversity Became a Phrase That Mattered


This time last year, we reported that fashion seemed to be on its way to genuine size inclusion. Looking back on 2017, the industry has shown that it’s still committed to progress. (Praise hands emoji!) In fact, it felt like media outlets, fashion brands, and models made even greater efforts this year than they did the last. Just when we thought Ashley Graham’s 2016 Sports Illustrated spread couldn’t be topped, she was on the cover of Vogue. Sure, Christian Siriano launched plus-sizes with Lane Bryant in 2016, but he now makes them as part of his main line, too. We were excited about the handful of plus-size model appearances during New York Fashion Week last year; in 2017, we couldn’t stop cheering for the hundreds we counted in 2017. The point: This year was a damn good one for size inclusivity in fashion. And if things keep going the way they’re going, the result will be complete integration. Here’s to hoping that in next year’s “year in size diversity” post, we can say exactly that.



Source link