Categories
Health

Linda Hamilton: Why Can't 60 Be the New 60?


When the first Terminator movie debuted in 1984, Linda Hamilton became a big screen icon almost overnight: As Sarah Connor, she transformed from helpless to heroine, a buff badass who would stop at nothing to save her son even if it meant becoming an outlaw. Thirty-five years later, Hamilton returns to the character for Terminator: Dark Fate, a film that challenged her mentally and physically. Glamour spoke with the actress about getting into fighting shape at 62, her relationship with her body, and battling to give Sarah Connor the story she deserves.

I have never been about what’s on the outside, ever. I’m uncomfortable with makeup on—I only put it on when I work. I don’t really even use moisturizer. I just don’t care. I’m proud to be my age. I keep saying: Why does 40 have to be the new 60? Why can’t 60 be the new 60? Why do we have to color everything with this idea of eternal youth?

Still, prepping for Terminator now versus 30 years ago were very different experiences. One assumes that you put in the same amount of time and work, and you’ll get the same result. But that doesn’t happen with a 62-year-old body. I first thought: I’m going to go right back and be the same person. But you need hormones to build muscles, and I can’t do it in the same way anymore. I realized I just had to work a different way. Thankfully, I had a fantastic trainer and team who helped me prepare. We worked for a year to get ready. We really focused on moving the body, like pilates, and not just static pumping weights. I didn’t touch carbohydrates for a year. But eventually, I just said: This is who I am, and this is who Sarah Connor is.

Then, when I showed up for my first wardrobe fitting, they literally had to add ass. Isn’t that funny? You work your butt off, and then they’re like, you need more butt. I never saw that coming. In my regular life, I like to have more butt. I work out. But I also enjoy sitting on the couch and eating pie sometimes, so I try not to live in a rigid world that I can’t have treats. I just like to keep it all in balance.



Source link

Categories
Health

A Note on Linda Fairstein's 1993 Woman of the Year Award


Hi all,

We’ve heard from some you in recent days as we, and the world, have been remembering the injustice of the prosecution of Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, and Korey Wise. Glamour has covered the new limited series centered on their story, When They See Us, through interviews with some of its actors and with director Ava DuVernay.

Many of you have contacted us on social media to ask about the Glamour Woman of the Year award that the prosecutor in the case, Linda Fairstein, received a quarter century ago.

Unequivocally, Glamour would not bestow this honor on her today. She received the award in 1993, before the full injustices in this case were brought to light. Though the convictions were later vacated and the men received a settlement from the City of New York, the damage caused is immeasurable.

Glamour’s Women of the Year awards should reflect our culture, the values of our brand, and our audience. We remain committed to being thoughtful and purposeful about whom we choose to celebrate, and in this case, the lens of history has shown us that we got it wrong.

It’s important to hold institutions accountable, and we appreciate the commitment so many of you showed to this issue when you reached out. Glamour is, and will always be, a platform that celebrates outspoken women. So to those of you who raised this issue, thank you. We want you to know that we hear you, and we assure you that while we can’t erase the past, we will continue to learn from it.

Samantha Barry
Editor in Chief



Source link