Categories
Health

What Happened on Day Two of Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings


You like drama? Stories with strong female voices? Shade in spades? Then Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings are the show for you—oh, also because they’ll directly, and significantly, affect your life. Unfortunately, this bit of must-see TV airs when most everyone’s working or watching their kids—so we’ll be here all to recap each day of these monumentally important proceedings.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh spent nearly all of Day One of his Capitol Hill confirmation hearings in rapt attention. Listening, listening, listening. Sitting, bearing fidgety witness to the drama as it unfolded on the dais. But here we are on Day Two, though, like a ubiquitous Real Housewives “friend” turned full cast-member, he twirled into the spotlight. And if he had a Housewives tagline, it’d be this: “Nothing but respect for my precedent.”

Yes, “precedent” was the word of the hour, all the hours—Kavanaugh’s career, mantra, and brand all in one. (At one point, he even said “precedent on precedent”—which is, trust me, the closest Brett Kavanaugh has ever gotten to a rap). Every decision he’s ever rendered? Based on precedent, he told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every decision he intends to make in the future? Same. “Do you agree with Justice [Sandra Day] O’Connor that a woman has a right to control her reproductive life?” asked Senator Dianne Feinstein (D—Calif.), the ranking Democratic member on the committee.

Kavanaugh paused. “Well, as a general proposition, I understand the importance of the precedent set forth by Roe v. Wade,” he answered.

“What would you say your position is today on a woman’s right to choose?” Sen. Feinstein followed up.

“As a judge, it is an important precedent of the Supreme Court,” Kavanaugh said, leaving little doubt that he is, in fact, a scholar of Housewives in addition to constitutional law. These answers are nothing if not designed to be easily denied later—at the end-of-season reunion, or whilst striking down Roe v. Wade.

Later in the afternoon, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D—Conn.) arrived. He turned Kavanaugh’s love of a precedent reference against him! (Very Vicki Gunvalson!) Sen. Blumenthal proceeded to pull out an opinion of Kavanaugh’s in which he referred to Roe as “existing precedent.” Sen. Blumenthal insisted that he’d never seen precedent qualified like that before: “It’s a little bit,” he said to Kavanaugh, “like someone introducing you to his wife as ‘my current wife.’” Blumenthal tried to extract a guarantee from Kavanaugh that he’d never overturn Roe. That, as the pros put is, was a non-starter.

If he had a Housewives tagline, it’d be this: “Nothing but respect for my precedent.”

Kavanaugh’s marathon evasiveness was enough to make a gal wish for a guest spot from Andy Cohen, whose blithly exasperated, yet effective interview techniques were desperately needed here. I just get the impression that Andy would be able to get decisive yes-no responses on all the important issues—whether Kavanaugh would gut abortion rights, whether he believes Trump can be prosecuted, whether Ramona did attempt to go to Tom’s New Year’s Eve bash. (And then I’d like Sen. Blumenthal to take a crack at dissecting the Bethenny-Carole breakdown.)

Here are some more takeaways from a long, long-winded day:

Fastest turnaround: Zina Bash. We now know the name of the aide sitting over Kavanaugh’s shoulder like a Club Monaco-clad guardian angel. She’s Zina Bash, and she was much more subdued than we saw her on Tuesday. Having to debunk Twitter theories that you were throwing white-power hand signals will do that to a person. Today, Bash barely had hands. Mostly, they manifested as quick blurs whenever she had to scratch an itch or answer an urgent email. If someone handed her a beverage, I feel sure she would have accepted it with her teeth.

Biggest distraction: Silicon Valley celebs.

PHOTO: Drew Angerer

Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey, and Jack Dorsey’s community-Shakespeare-theatre beard were all on Capitol Hill this afternoon, too, talking about their platforms’ roles in 2016 election meddling. Somehow, Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) even got into a fight in the hallway with a radio person. Can you imagine what it would have been like to attempt to concentrate on Kavanaugh while all that’s happening next door? It would be like that time you were in the class stuck making up a pop quiz while the rest of the school is at a pep rally—a pep rally where Marco Rubio, who was awarded “Crispest Khaki Creases” at graduation, is about to throw a punch!

Best successor to “moist,” the worst word on the planet: “Undergirds.” I’m not sure how many times Kavanaugh said the word “undergirds” today, but I know it was all the times too many.

Dad move of the day: Kavanaugh on Leahy’s emails. When Senator Patrick Leahy (D—Conn.), in an attempt to catch Kavanaugh in an alleged lie, showed him a printed-out email chain, Kavanaugh went into full-on naïve mode, blinking into the middle distance and repeating the name of a one-time Republican Senate staffer—“Mir-an-da?”—in the befuddled tone of a medium-developed toddler. Clearly, he’d practiced this response—but not in debate prep. Rather, it’s a move ripped from the official two-point fatherhood playbook.

When one of your daughters gets invited to a sleepover at the home of a friend you’ve deemed “fast,” here’s what you’ve got to do: Step one: “Lose” the invitation. Step two: When confronted, feign innocence: “An invitation from… who? Mir… an… da? The one who has her own vape pen and the boyfriend who drag races? Nope, I didn’t see it, sweetie! Let’s go hoop it up instead!”

Burn of the day: Senator Amy Klobuchar (D—Minn.).

Senate Rules And Administration Committee Holds Hearing On Election Security

PHOTO: Bloomberg

Sen. Klobuchar is on a two-day winning streak for the best daily zing. Today, she grilled Kavanaugh on his established reluctance to investigate or prosecute sitting presidents. The exception to his opinion, Kavanaugh once said, would be if the president did something “dastardly.” But as Sen. Klobuchar pointed out coolly, “How do we know something is dastardly or not if we can’t even investigate it?” Klobes! Rip that teeny little mic right out of the podium, then go ahead and drop it.

Most hilarious tactic: The Tremendous, Stupendous Brett Kavanaugh Loves Women Parade! Senator Orrin Hatch (R—Utah) may have been shaken by women on Tuesday. But a new dawn broke, and on Wednesday, he was like, “You know what? Women are good!”

Sen. Hatch’s allotted time was spent hyping Kavanaugh’s deep commitment to gender equality. “They say that you are one of the strongest advocates… for women lawyers,” Sen. Hatch said, adding, “The majority of your clerks in your office have been—women!” You should know he said “women” there with such a pure sense of awe, it seemed like he might have been less shocked if the clerks had turned out to be goats.

Giver of fewest f—s: Senator Mazie Hirono (D—Hawaii).

Senate Lawmakers Speak To The Media After Their Weekly Policy Luncheons

PHOTO: Zach Gibson

Whether she was expressing frank skepticism at Kavanaugh’s inability to remember a raunchy office email chain at one of his former jobs (eyebrows at 30,000 feet), slicing through his verbosity (“I think that’s a complete answer, thank you”), or eviscerating his support of a parental consent requirement for a minor’s abortion in a specific case (“Her parents were beating her up! How could you expect parental consent?”), Sen. Hirono was not having the bullshit this eve. Her turn didn’t come until dinnertime, and while everyone else in the room looked beat, and Kavanaugh was probably desperate for his linguine alla Heinz at that point, Hirono must have had a well-timed protein snack, because she looked like she could have gone until the midterms.

Kavanaugh will see her and her brooch in his nightmares. You’re welcome, Brett. Good night.


Megan Angelo writes about TV and is the author of the novel Followers, which will be published in 2019. You catch her Kavanaugh recaps on Glamour.com all week.

MORE: This Is Must-See TV: All the Drama You Missed on Day One of Brett Kavanaugh’s Confirmation Hearings



Source link

Categories
Health

Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s Confirmation Hearings Have Started. Here's What You Need to Know.


You like drama? Stories with strong female voices? Shade in spades? Then Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings are the show for you—oh, also because they’ll directly, and significantly, affect your life. Unfortunately, this bit of must-see TV airs when most everyone’s working or watching their kids—so we’re here to recap each day of these monumentally important proceedings.

There’s a chance—if you were in your office, or at a doctor’s appointment, or on a treadmill—that you spotted some of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings on mute. If you did, then you saw a lot of white guys. And so perhaps you assumed that it was them who stole the show.

Not so. A chorus of women’s voices—those of the senators on the dais, and those of the protestors in the gallery—became the soundtrack of the day. Women spoke when they were called upon, and frequently when they were not.

That unfamiliar audio—the sound of women interrupting men—gave Day One of Kavanaugh’s grilling on Capitol Hill an unexpected vibe. An event that could have felt (and sometimes did feel, what with a group of Offred-themed protestors in the halls) like one step closer to life inside the Handmaid’s Tale, delivered occasional moments of triumph. Brave women delivered a flat-out, top-of-their-lungs refusal to let one more man bent on legislating their bodies breeze into power without a fight.

The battle began just seconds into the hearing. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the committee chairman, had barely finished clearing his throat when Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) jumped in.

“Mr. Chairman,” she said, “I’d like to be recognized for a question before we proceed.”

Harris went on to ask for a delay based on the late release of 42,000 pages of documentation related to Kavanaugh’s job in the administration of President George W. Bush. A lawyer for Bush released the papers to the judicial committee just last night. Yes, last night—as in the tail end of #ldw, as in 12 hours before the start of the hearings, as in barely enough time for these senators to digest their hot dogs and aloe their sunburns, let alone read the equivalent of the entire Lord of the Rings series 27 times. Harris’s peers on the Judiciary Committee (the Democratic ones, at least)—Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Cory Booker (D-NJ), and Mazie Hirono (D-HI)—picked up her lead, demanding that Sen. Grassley adjourn the session until they could review the material.

Meanwhile, Kavanaugh sat at his table, quiet and alone, playing a game of How much water can I drink without having to excuse myself to pee during this broadcast? I must not pee during this broadcast. The boss hates when people take bathroom breaks during event television!

Sen. Grassley steadfastly denied the Democrats’ motions, but he couldn’t thwart the momentum of the women on the committee. There was the quiet swagger of ranking member, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), slyly rocking Planned Parenthood pink and giving Kavanaugh a taste of how she plans to come for him on his record on reproductive freedom. “The impact of overturning Roe [v. Wade] is much broader than a woman’s right to choose,” she said to him. “It’s about protecting the most personal decisions we all make from government intrusion.”

There was Sen. Klobuchar, who achieved the burn of the day while discussing Kavanaugh’s assertion that sitting presidents can’t be prosecuted. The question the hearings must answer, she said, is “whether this judge, at this time in our history, will administer the law with equal justice as it applies to all citizens, regardless of whether they live… in a small house or the White House.”

There was Sen. Harris, making her opening statement late in the afternoon, and commenting bluntly on the way the Supreme Court—Brown v. Board of Education, to be exact—has affected the arc of her own life. Without it, she said, “I most certainly would not be sitting here as a member of the United States Senate… So, for me, a Supreme Court seat is not only about academic issues of legal precedent or judicial philosophy. It is personal.”

And, every minute or so for much of the morning proceedings, there were the largely female protestors, each of them exacting their own tiny revenge against civilization’s long tradition of men talking over women. You know whom life did not prepare for this gender bender? One Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT). He was visibly rattled as protestor after protestor screwed up his what-a-good-man speech about Kavanaugh.

(Side note: Don’t ask Orrin Hatch to be your best man unless you like such pillow-soft jokes such as: “You also apparently like to eat pasta with ketchup, but nobody’s perfect.” As far as I’m concerned, it’s marinara and bodily autonomy, or bust. That’s just a simple matter of good taste.)

After one too many ladies made themselves known, chin trembling, Sen. Hatch gathered himself and said, “I don’t know that the committee should have to put up with this type of insolence.”

Insolence—yes, that’s the word you were looking for, if you think that women concerned for their own liberty and mortality are just being brats.

Insolence—yes, that’s the word you were looking for, if you think that women concerned for their own liberty and mortality are just being brats. That’s the word you were looking for, if you think women exercising their right to free speech are the same as toddlers who refuse to hold your hand in the parking lot. That’s the word you were looking for if, despite your literal seat of power, you can’t help but feel—as Sen. Hatch so clearly seemed to—like you’ve never been closer to losing control.

So there’s the big takeaway from today’s episode of Who Wants to Revoke Reproductive Freedom? But there are little ones we need to discuss, too. A few distinctions from the day’s events:

Least effective prop: Big quotes.

PHOTO: Bloomberg

Some poor staffer was at the FedEx store all weekend, getting these big quotes just right, and it’s on his or her behalf that I beseech you, senators: For whom are the big quotes? For whom! They’re behind the rest of the people on the committee, and we at home can’t see them at all. Down with big quotes.

Best athletic performance: The aide behind Sen. Chuck Grassley. During the chaotic first hour of the hearing, this poor guy was out of his chair and squatting to whisper into his boss’s ear every 15 seconds. His quads had to be on fire.

Most sympathetic onlookers: Kavanaugh’s family.

Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing

PHOTO: Tom Williams

“My daughters, Margaret and Liza, thank the committee for arranging a day off of school today,” Kavanaugh quipped early into the proceedings. Good thing he made it clear that was a joke; otherwise I’d nail him for perjury. Nothing underscores how poorly this man understands women than the assertion that these two would rather be sitting here listening to politicians drone than be at school during the crucial week in which summer makeovers are revealed and fall alliances are formed. (And they still had to hear about Marbury v. Madison multiple times.) Also, my heart goes out to the aunts, uncles, and cousins Kavanaugh says are sitting behind him. This day was like, six and a half baptisms, except worse, because Ted Cruz talked.

Least sympathetic onlooker: The woman in navy just over Kavanaugh’s shoulder.

US-POLITICS-SUPREME COURT

PHOTO: SAUL LOEB

She smirked. She rolled her eyes. She laughed. She seemed, generally, to think that she was at a talk show taping, and I bet she’s still wondering why there wasn’t a prize beneath her chair.

Best Law & Order antics: Sen. Richard Blumenthal. After lunch, when the Democrats resumed their complaints about the previous night’s document dump, Sen. Grassley snapped, exasperated, that his staff was able to read them all by 11 p.m. Then Blumenthal was all, like, But the documents weren’t even fully uploaded by 11 p.m.! You got a time machine or what, Chuck?

Dumbest theory: Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE). Sen. Sasse took some shots at the protestors, calling them “people trying to get on TV.” Yeah. For sure, in 2018, when we have Instagram, YouTube, and near-constant editions of Bachelor franchise programming, the easiest way to earn fame is to hike to D.C., sit through government proceedings, and yell about fundamental rights, all in hopes of being the roughly one in 25 protestors you can partially see on camera for exactly one second. Nailed it, Sasse.

Most worthy of further exploration: Hold on—ketchup on spaghetti? Is that some sort of sick joke?

Megan Angelo is a TV critic; catch her Kavanaugh recaps here all week.



Source link

Categories
Health

Everything You Need to Know About Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings


We hope you had a relaxing Labor Day weekend, because the nation’s capital is kicking directly into high gear this morning with the confirmation hearings for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the conservative D.C. circuit judge and the President’s choice to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Kavanaugh is Donald Trump’s second nominee to the highest Court in the land (Trump secured the first with Neil Gorsuch) and if confirmed, he will give conservatives a majority on the bench. Democrats, and women in particular, will be watching closely as fears about the overturn of Roe v. Wade have become all too real in an administration that vowed to tap all pro-life justices for the Court.

Here’s everything you need to know about the confirmation path, how Kavanaugh will handle abortion rights questions, where to watch and more.

What is a confirmation hearing?

The process to becoming a justice on the United States Supreme Court is basically threefold. First, the President makes a nomination. Then the nominee and other witnesses testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who can then vote to send the nomination to the full Senate for the final confirmation vote. This sends the nominee to the bench officially.

Kavanaugh can be confirmed by a simple 51-vote majority.

How does it work and who exactly is involved?

The hearings take place in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is currently made up of 21 senators from both parties. (The committee chair is always held by the majority, in this case the Republicans.) Some notable names to look out for are Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-LA), ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Ben Sasse (R-NE), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Kamala Harris (D-CA). You can check out the full committee list here.

The proceedings will open with introductions from former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Republican Ohio Senator Rob Portman, and Lisa Blatt, a partner at a D.C. law firm who has argued cases before the Supreme Court and supports Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh will then make his own opening statement. The committee members will be the only ones allowed to question Kavanaugh and any of the witnesses presented by the majority and the minority over the course of the hearings. The Senators will take turns asking their own questions (there are time limits in place). However, the chairman acts as the moderator, so don’t be surprised if he objects to Democratic lines of questioning that might get problematic for Kavanaugh.

How is Kavanaugh expected to handle questions on abortion rights—and specifically Roe v. Wade?

Opponents of Kavanaugh have been particularly concerned about his stance on the Supreme Court case that made abortion legal in the United States: Roe v. Wade. And there will surely be questions, especially from the Democrats on this issue. They will try to get him to state definitively whether or not he would overturn the decision. But, if we look to the most recent hearings for Justice Neil Gorsuch, the chances of that happening on the record are not incredibly likely.

Gorsuch danced around the issue to some degree when asked about his personal views. “A good judge will consider it as precedent of the Supreme Court, worthy of treatment of precedent as any other,” Gorsuch said. “If I were to tell you which are my favorite precedents or which are my least favorite precedents…I would be tipping my hand and suggesting to litigants that I have already made up my mind about their cases.”

However, Kavanaugh is likely to be questioned more heavily on the issue of women’s reproductive rights since he will be the conservative tipping point in the balance of the court. It’s a good time to remember that while Kavanaugh called Roe v. Wadesettled law,” many Democrats and abortion rights advocates aren’t convinced, citing his dissent in a case involving an undocumented teen who sought an abortion while in a federal detention center.

In an interview with Glamour shortly after his nomination, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D–N.Y.) called Kavanaugh’s record disqualifying. “I think he is more dangerous than any previous justice nominee because of his education and his experience and because of the track record he’s laid out about what he intends to do,” she said. “I think he is going to be very destructive to basic civil rights and civil liberties for millions of Americans.”

What else should I keep an eye on?

There are exactly zero women on the Judiciary Committee on the Republican side of the aisle, but there are four Democrats—Harris, Klobuchar, Hirono, and Feinstein. Both Harris and Klobuchar’s names are routinely coming up on lists of possible 2020 presidential candidates, along with Gillibrand and Elizabeth Warren (who will not be questioners at the hearings). Gillibrand and Warren may use the hearings as a chance to stand out from their colleagues, in addition to trying to get relevant information from Kavanaugh and the witnesses.

Male committee members may be looking to do the same. We see you Cory Booker. And from the majority men, be on the lookout for the kind of right-leaning views that they may see as rallying their conservative base.

Where can I watch?

You can watch a livestream here starting at 9:15 AM Eastern on September 4.

Related Stories:

What Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court Nomination Could Mean for Your Abortion Rights

Black Women Stand to Lose the Most if Brett Kavanaugh Is Confirmed to the Supreme Court



Source link