Categories
Alberta Economic Ft Mac

Court Rules Against Wrongful Termination Suit by Syncrude Employee Accused of Sexual Harassment

sexual harassment, Syncrude employee, wrongful termination
sexual harassment, Syncrude employee, wrongful termination

John A. Clark, a former Syncrude employee who was fired for sexual harassment and who sued for wrongful termination, has lost his case in front of the Alberta Court of Appeal. There is no doubt as to what Clark did during a 2004 formal Syncrude dinner event in Toronto, or to the fact that he was highly intoxicated that day. Clark smacked one woman on the buttocks, groped another, and then pulled a third down onto his lap while the dinner was in progress. Another victim was a female representative of Sun Life Financial, who was groped in the taxi after the dinner. Shortly after the trip Clark was terminated as a Syncrude employee for sexual harassment, and he then filed for wrongful termination.

John Clark engaged in sexual harassment while at an event in his capacity as a Syncrude employee, and the Alberta Court of Appeal dismissed his wrongful termination suit. According to Justice J.D. Bruce McDonald “Given the egregious nature of the behavior, the leadership position held by Clarke, Syncrude’s clear and unequivocal policies prohibiting harassment of any sort which were well known to Clarke, and the adverse impact it had on a key business relationship, as well as the adverse impact it had on key business advisors working for its pension fund administrator.” The court also found that “Contrary to Clarke’s submissions, there were adverse consequences for Syncrude and the pension fund administrator. Syncrude’s reputation with one of its key business partners was adversely affected and the pension fund administrator’s staff suffered humiliation and stress as a result of the harassment.”

Categories
Alberta Canada Politics

Will GSA Bill Pass in Alberta?

GSA bill, sexual orientation, Alberta
GSA bill, sexual orientation, Alberta

In Alberta parents will lose the ability to pull their children out of class when sexual orientation is being discussed if a new GSA bill passes. The new GSA bill is designed to protect the rights of sexual minorities in Alberta. The legislation is called Bill 10: The Act to Amend the Bill of Rights to Protect our Children, and it was introduced in an effort to prohibit discrimination that is based on sexual orientation while also protecting parental rights, and it provides recourse which allows a student to challenge a decision by a school board which rejects any gay straight alliance club by asking for judicial review of the decision.

According to Sandra Jansen, the Calgary-North West MLA “There shouldn’t be any roadblocks to students who want to set up gay-straight alliances in their schools and indeed the progress that we have made in this past year has been remarkable, in my opinion, with more and more GSAs being established all the time. This bill is aimed to ensure that in situations where those students aren’t supported, that the students, the parents and their advocates have a clear mechanism to challenge that position.”

The new GSA bill that protects sexual orientation in Alberta would affect the rights of parents, because the school will no longer notify parents ahead of time when sexual orientation will be discussed. According to Gordon Dirks, the Education Minister, the new GSA bill may cause some tension even in the court system. “No parent should be able to just pull their child out of class willy-nilly for no reason. Underneath this legislation, (parents) have an opportunity to express their opinion and to be heard and if they don’t agree, to appeal.” The issue of sexual orientation and GSA clubs has been very controversial, with people on both sides of the argument. Liberal MLA Laurie Blakeman stated “The incremental argument is insulting. I’m sure that the black people, the Jews and the disabled people appreciated incremental progress just so that they didn’t get too many rights all at once.

Categories
Uncategorized

Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Fights Financial Transparency Law

financial transparency,  Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
financial transparency, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation

The Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation are prepared to fight a federal law that requires financial transparency, and they could be facing sanctions in federal funding as a result. The ACFN has refused to publish their financial records which have been audited, and these records include the expenses and the salaries of the chief and the council for the group. Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Chief Allan Adam explains “We are transparent with our members. We tell them what our finances and salaries are and if they don’t like what they see, they can tell us or vote us out. This is none of Canada’s business.” The chief continued by stating that the new federal law in question puts the competitiveness of the businesses owned by the band at risk and it views aboriginal governments the same way as it views criminals.

The Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation is not against financial transparency, but the federal law in question requires the band to publish consolidated statements from organizations owned by the band that would expose Acden Group Ltd. financial statements. Chief Adam stated “Everything is tied into the band’s corporation because Acden is tied to the band. This opens up our private business to our competitors, like our bidding wars. That’s bad for business and bad for our community. Now how is this fair?” Other bands of First Nation posted expenses in an online format earlier in the year but Chief Adam did not give a reason at that time why the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation would not do the same.

Categories
Breaking News

Is Louis Head Guilty of Inciting a Riot in Ferguson, Missouri?

Louis Head, inciting a riot, Ferguson, Missouri, Michael Brown
Louis Head, inciting a riot, Ferguson, Missouri, Michael Brown

Louis Had, the stepfather of Michael Brown, is being investigated by law enforcement over claims that he was responsible for inciting a riot in Ferguson, Missouri after a grand jury returned a no true bill in the fatal shooting of the 18 year old black teen by white officer Darren Wilson a few months ago. As the parents of the boy who died Heard and Brown’s mother were understandably upset over the lack of charges, but what happened next could lead to criminal charges against Louis Head for inciting a riot. When the grand jury returned their decision a crowd had already formed outside the police station in Ferguson, Missouri. As the prosecutor announced the grand jury decision the crowd outside was very tense, and protests were expected by the public but agreements between community leaders and police called for peaceful protests without any property damage or violence.

When the decision by the grand jury in the Michael Brown case was announced news cameras were everywhere, and one filmed Louis Head making some very inflammatory comments that are viewed by many as inciting a riot. After the announcement Michael Brown’s mother, who was on a car outside of the Ferguson, Missouri police station, broke down in tears. Louis Head climbed up onto the car beside Brown’s mother and started telling the crowd to “Burn this bitch down.” This phrase was repeated by Heard more than once, and within the next 24 hours more than a dozen businesses and buildings in the community were burned to the ground. Many others were looted and damaged during the riots.

Is Louis Head guilty of inciting a riot? What do you think?

Categories
Politics U.S.

Will the Racial Divide in the USA Ever End?

racial divide, racism in America
racial divide, racism in America

Racism in America is a big subject, especially right now after the Michael Brown case, but why is there still such a big racial divide in 2014? The USA has an African American President, a sign that every race can achieve any position if they stay in school, work hard, and become productive citizens. Many of the top leaders in the black communities are accused of keeping the racial divide open in order to profit from the unrest, and some say that these are the ones who still foster racism in America today. Statistics show that 93% of African Americans are killed by others of their own race, and in the USA today every child regardless of race or religion has access to a free education.

Some African Americans are speaking out about the Michael Brown case, the racial divide, and what some feel are high levels of racism in America today, including celebrities like Charles Barkley and Chris Rock. Even black celebrities are divided, with some advocating that the leaders of black communities start in their own neighborhoods and mentor young kids so that they stay off the streets and out of jail. In Ferguson, Missouri there were violent riots and the burning down and looting of many businesses in the suburb, and the stepfather of Michael Brown was caught on camera after the grand jury returned a true bill, telling the crowd to burn these —– down. The National Guard had to be called in to protect the public and the remaining businesses in town, and more than 100 people were arrested for criminal acts during the rioting.

Categories
Breaking News U.S.

The Grand Jury Found No Charges for Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson

Ferguson police officer, Darren Wilson, Michael Brown
Ferguson police officer, Darren Wilson, Michael Brown

Recently the grand jury found no charges for Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson in the shooting death of 18 year old Michael Brown, and this has fueled violence, protests, and a debate about whether the Ferguson police officer feared for his life. An 18 year old man is dead an that is tragic, but the grand jury went over all of the evidence in the case and determined that officer Darren Wilson was justified in using deadly force. Witnesses who saw what happened were conflicted, and 3 different autopsies did not clarify things as much as the jurors would have liked. There is no evidence that Brown had his hands raised in surrender when he was shot, in fact some of the witnesses corroborated the testimony of Darren Wilson that the teenager was charging him.

The forensic evidence in the Michael Brown case shows that Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson shot Brown while still seated in the police vehicle after Brown came into the side window and assaulted Wilson. There were witnesses to this altercation who have stated that Michael Brown was the initial aggressor in the confrontation. There is also evidence that the teen had stolen cigars from a nearby convenience store, and surveillance footage from the store shows the teen pushing the clerk around. Many are trying to portray the troubled teen as a boy scout who was an angel and the facts show that this is not true. Any person, regardless of color or age, should expect to be shot when assaulting a police officer.