TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

St. Albert mayor found guilty of breaking pecuniary interest laws


The outgoing mayor of St. Albert has been found guilty of breaking municipal laws which prevent politicians from voting on matters where they personally stand to gain or suffer financially.

According to a Court of Queen’s Bench ruling released on Thursday, Nolan Crouse was found guilty of violating the Municipal Government Act.

In two instances he was found to have voted on council matters in which he had a pecuniary interest.

Court of Queen’s Bench Justice B.R. Burrows cleared Crouse of a third charge.

‘Unreasonably harsh, unjust’

The lawsuit was filed by fellow St. Albert councillor Steve Stone. Stone is scheduled to hold a news conference Friday morning, in which he will demand Crouse’s immediate resignation.

However, the judge determined that calls for Crouse’s resignation were “unreasonably harsh, unjust and entirely inappropriate.

In each case, he ruled that Crouse had “acted in good faith.”

Crouse failed to recuse himself from a debate around an expense claims audit during a meeting in May 2015.

It was a procedural motion, and Crouse’s failure to realize his pecuniary interest in the matter was “understandable,” Burrows determined.

Crouse was also in violation when he took part in a funding limit motion in late 2014.

In that instance, the motion related to defamation funding. Burrows determined that Crouse was careful to research the regulations on recusals, but misunderstood the technicalities of the law.

The mayor was cleared in a third charge, which related to a vote on the potential environmental contamination of a property at Salisbury Ave. Crouse is principal of a company which owns property in the neighbourhood. 

‘Case closed’ 

Crouse, who has indicated that he will not seek re-election, reacted to the 16-page ruling in a post to his public Facebook page.

“You may or may not be aware that a resident brought forward an application to the courts and a judge has heard arguments by the applicant to have me removed from office for pecuniary interest on 3 matters and the judge ruled today in my favour,” wrote Crouse.

“I am thrilled that this matter is behind me. CASE Closed.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *